[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 22, Issue 3 (7-2024) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2024, 22(3): 551-557 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of radiological risk due to radioactive contamination in the air for different types of laboratories in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
T.H. Ngan Thy , N.L. Thich , N.T. Cung , T.T. Phuong Dung , H.T. Yen Hong , T.H. Lang
Nuclear Technique Laboratory, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam , thnthy@hcmus.edu.vn
Abstract:   (803 Views)
Background: The utilisation of radiation sources can increase radioactivity levels within radiation-applied laboratories, thereby affecting the health of individuals regularly working in such environments. This study aimed to assess the activity concentrations of radionuclides and dose rates across various research laboratories, including nuclear technique laboratories and others, in order to determine the effect of radiation sources on air quality. Materials and Methods: Dust particles in the air were collected and analysed using a low - background gamma spectrometer. The study was conducted in five distinct laboratories with varying frequencies of radioactive material usage. The differences in the activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th, 238U, 226Ra/222Rn, 228Th/220Rn, and 210Po were compared between laboratories and with different periods of the month. To assess potential risks, the annual effective dose rate resulting from dust inhalation was estimated for two adult groups (male and female). Results: High activity levels were observed in lab 1 because of the presence of radioactive sources, standard samples, and diverse environmental samples. The radioactivity levels for various radioisotopes exhibited minimal changes between the weeks of the month. Lab 1 also recorded the highest estimated radiation dose with effective doses of 2300 μSv y-1 and 1886 μSv y-1 for men and women, respectively, surpassing the recommended ICRP value of 1 mSv y-1. Conclusion: Assessment of the activity concentrations in airborne dust for different laboratory types showed that the health impacts of pollution are not significant. However, laboratories dealing with radioactive sources exhibited high radioactivity levels and should undergo frequent monitoring.
Keywords: Radioactive contamination in the air, HPGe spectrometer, Annual effective dose.
Full-Text [PDF 619 kb]   (211 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. NIEHS (2023) Air Pollution and Radiation, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) website: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/air-pollution/index.cfm (Accessed 23 Mar 2023).
2. Mohamed AMO, Maraqa MA, Howari FM, Paleologos EK (2020) Chapter: Outdoor air pollutants in book Pollution Assessment for Sustainable Practices in Applied Sciences and Engineering 1st edition. Elsevier publisher. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809582-9.00009-8]
3. IARC (2001) Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 78, Lyon, France.
4. Michael P, Leo ML (2006) Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment 1st edition, CRC Press, Florida.
5. WHO (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th edition. World Health Organization, Geneva.
6. Mason LR, Bohner JD, Williams DL (1998) Airborne anthropogenic radioactivity measurements from an international radionuclide monitoring system. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 325:71-75 [DOI:10.1007/BF02385940]
7. Kim KP, Wu C, Birky B, Nol W, Bolch W (2006) Characterization of radioactive aerosols in Florida phosphate processing facilities. Aerosol Sci Technol 6: 410-421. [DOI:10.1080/02786820600643313]
8. OSHA Laws & Regulations (2016) Toxic and Hazardous Substances. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Washington, USA.
9. CNSC (2017) Regulatory Oversight Report for Nuclear Processing, Small Research Reactor and Class IB Accelerator Facilities. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC), Canada.
10. Bogard JS, Downing DJ, Coleman RL, Eckerman KF, Turner JE (2022) Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection. Wiley Publisher, New Jersey, USA. [DOI:10.1002/9783527805600]
11. Shengli N (2011) Radiation protection of workers. International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Le CH, Nguyen VT, Huynh NPT, Huynh TP (2017) Gross alpha and beta activity and annual committed effective dose due to natural radionuclides in some water spinach (ipomoea aquatica Forssk) samples in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. J Environ Radioact 173:44-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.10.007]
13. Henryk B (2002) Determination of radioactivity in air filters by alpha and gamma spectrometry. Nukleonika 47(2):87-91.
14. IAEA (1989) Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and the Environment - A guidebook, technical reports series No. 295. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna.
15. Lazovich D, Murray DM, Brosseau LM, Parkerv DL, Milton FT, Dugan SK (2002) Sample size considerations for studies of intervention efficacy in the occupational setting. Ann Occup Hyg 46(2):219-227.
16. Mokarami H, Gharibi V, Kalteh HO, Faraji KM, Kazemi R (2020) Multiple environmental and psychosocial work risk factors and sleep disturbances. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 93(5):623-633 [DOI:10.1007/s00420-020-01515-8]
17. NIOSH (1998) Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), 4th edition. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, D.C.
18. Truong THL, Vu NB, Dang TTD, Vuong MT, Huynh TYH, Truong HNT, Nguyen TTL, Le CH, Huynh TP (2021) Impacts of TENORM from fertilizers on soil and vegetables and the effective dose rate due to ingestion of vegetables at the agricultural zone in Vietnam. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327:609-616 [DOI:10.1007/s10967-020-07547-1]
19. Canberra Industries (2004) Genie 2000 version 3.0-Customization Tools Manual. Canberra Industries Inc., USA.
20. Medhat ME, Abdel-Hafiez A, Awaad Z, Ali MA (2005) A package for gamma-ray spectrum analysis and routine neutron activation analysis. Pramana 65(2):245-258 [DOI:10.1007/BF02898613]
21. Han CH, Park JW (2018) Analysis of the natural radioactivity concentrations of the fine dust samples in Jeju Island, Korea and the annual effective radiation dose by inhalation. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 316:1173-1179 [DOI:10.1007/s10967-018-5873-6]
22. UNSCEAR (2000) Dose assessment methodologies, sources, and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York, USA.
23. QCVN (2019) National Technical Regulation on Dust - Permissible Exposure Limit Value of Dust at the Workplace. QCVN 02:2019/BYT website: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/The-thao-Y-te/Circular-02-2019-TT-BYT-dust-Permissible-exposure-limit-values-of-05-dusts-at-the-workplace-428955.aspx. (Accessed 23 Mar 2023)
24. Geng G, Zhang Q, Martin RV, van Donkelaar A, Huo H, Che H, Lin J, He K (2015) Estimating long-term PM2.5 concentrations in China using satellite-based aerosol optical depth and a chemical transport model. Remote Sens Environ 166: 262-270 [DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2015.05.016]
25. Toledano C, Wiegner M, Garhammer M, Seefeldner M, Gasteiger J, Müller D, Koepke P (2009) Spectral aerosol optical depth characterization of desert dust during SAMUM 2006. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 61:216-228. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00382.x]
26. WHO (2006) Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. World Health Organization, Geneva.
27. HSE (2023) Reducing risks associated with using coating powders - employers. Health and Safety Executive Merseyside, England. Website: https://www.hse.gov.uk/surfaceengineering/reducing-risks-using-coating-powders-employers.htm (Accessed 23 Mar 2023)
28. HSE (2018) EH40/2005 Workplace exposure limits, 3rd edition. Health and Safety Executive Merseyside, England
29. Oladele BB, Arogunjo AM, Aladeniyi K (2018) Indoor and outdoor gamma radiation exposure levels in selected residential buildings across Ondo state, Nigeria Int J Radiat Res 16(2): 363-370
30. Rahman MM, Rahman MS, Khan HR, Yeasmin S (2023) Assessment of radiation level and potential risk to public living around major hospitals in central and western Bangladesh. Heliyon 9:9. [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19774]
31. UNSCEAR (2000) Report to General Assembly. Annex B: Exposure from natural radiation sources and report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. Vol 1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York, pp. 1220.
32. Vu NB, Nguyen VT, Bui NT, Huynh NPT, Truong THL (2021) Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 222Rn in the indoor air and surface soil in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Methods for estimating indoor 222Rn and health risks to the population. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327: 897-904 [DOI:10.1007/s10967-020-07530-w]
33. Salih I, Ali S, Eisa S, Idriss H (2014) Radiation exposure of workers in storage areas for building materials. J Taibah Univ Sci 8(4): 394-400. [DOI:10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.06.004]
34. IAEA (2007) Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM V). Proceedings of an international symposium Seville, Spain, 19-22 March 2007.
35. Belete GD, Shiferaw AM (2022) A Review of Studies on the Seasonal Variation of Indoor Radon-222 Concentration. Oncol Rev. 16:10570. [DOI:10.3389/or.2022.10570]
36. Singh M, Singh K, Singh S, Papp Z (2008) Variation of indoor radon progeny concentration and its role in dose assessment. J Environ Radioact 99: 539-545. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.08.023]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ngan Thy T, Thich N, Cung N, Phuong Dung T, Yen Hong H, Lang T. Assessment of radiological risk due to radioactive contamination in the air for different types of laboratories in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Int J Radiat Res 2024; 22 (3) :551-557
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-5550-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 3 (7-2024) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 49 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660