[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 14, Issue 4 (10-2016) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2016, 14(4): 269-278 Back to browse issues page
Dose distribution evaluation of various dose calculation algorithms in inhomogeneous media
Y.L. Kim , T.S. Suh , B.Y. Choe , B.O. Choi , J.B. Chung , J.W. Lee , Y.K. Bae , B.M. Park , J.Y. Jung , Y.J. Shin
Department of Radiology, Choonhae College of Health Science, Ulsan 689-784, South Korea
Abstract:   (7583 Views)

Background: Dose calculation algorithms play a very important role in predicting the explicit dose distribution. We evaluated the percent depth dose (PDD), lateral depth dose profile, and surface dose volume histogram in inhomogeneous media using calculation algorithms and inhomogeneity correction methods. Materials and Methods: The homogeneous and inhomogeneous virtual slab phantoms used in this study were manufactured in the radiation treatment planning system to represent the air, lung, and bone density with planned radiation treatment of 6 MV photons, a field size of 10 × 10 cm2, and a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. Results: The PDD of air density slab for the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm was differed by an average of 20% in comparison with other algorithms. Rebuild up occurred in the region below the air density slab (10–10.6 cm) for the AXB algorithm. The lateral dose profiles for the air density slab showed relatively large differences (over 30%) in the field. There were large differences (20.0%–26.1%) at the second homogeneous–inhomogeneous junction (depth of 10 cm) in the field for all calculation methods. The surface dose volume histogram for the pencil beam algorithm showed a response that was approximately 4% lower than that for the AXB algorithm. Conclusion: The dose calculation uncertainties were shown to change at the interface between different densities and in varied densities using the dose calculation methods. In particular, the AXB algorithm showed large differences in and out of the field in inhomogeneous media.

Keywords: Inhomogeneous media, calculation algorithms, correction methods, PDD, dose profiles.
Full-Text [PDF 860 kb]   (3123 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Short Report | Subject: Radiation Biology
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kim Y, Suh T, Choe B, Choi B, Chung J, Lee J, et al . Dose distribution evaluation of various dose calculation algorithms in inhomogeneous media. Int J Radiat Res 2016; 14 (4) :269-278
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-1811-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 4 (10-2016) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645