:: Volume 20, Issue 3 (7-2022) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2022, 20(3): 587-591 Back to browse issues page
Study on the physical factors related to the exposure dose to organs at risk from radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients
W. Zhang , Y. Cao , X. Ni , Y. Tong
Department of Radiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China , 234866208@qq.com
Abstract:   (878 Views)
Background: This research was performed to analyze the relationship among the physical factors of cervical cancer patients and the V40-x (volume of the x receiving 40 Gy, x is replaced by bladder or rectum below). In addition, the methods to control the factors affecting these related physical parameters are comprehensively discussed so that the side effects of radiotherapy can be reduced. Materials and Methods: Sixty cervical cancer patients treated with volume-modulated-arc therapy (VMAT) were selected. Related physical parameters of the planning target volume (PTV), rectum, and bladder were collected. The Spearman analysis method was used to discuss the relationship between the physical parameters and V40-x. Results: The parameter of Dmax-rectum (max dose of rectum) and Vbladder (volume of the bladder) were significantly negatively correlated with V40-rectum and V40-bladder, respectively. In addition, we found three dosimetric parameters and four parameters were significantly positively correlated with V40-rectum and V40-bladder. A reduction in V40-x of the organs at risk (OARs) was also displayed in the redesigned planning dose images and the dose-volume histograms (DVH). Conclusions: It is recommended that patients maintain a filled bladder during localization and radiotherapy. It is also recommended that patients maintain an empty rectum during localization and radiotherapy to ensure the stability of the target. According to the correlation of the physical parameters obtained from the results, medical physics can reduce the V40-x more easily during planning design by specifically controlling some physical parameters, and this can reduce radiation toxicity more effectively.
Keywords: Cervical cancer, physical factors, organs at risk, related analysis.
Full-Text [PDF 1657 kb]   (407 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. Nishimura Y and Komaki R (2015) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Springer Japan; 2015, Book. [DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55486-8]
2. Zhi L, Zhang S, Xin J, et al. (2020) Non-rigid magnetic resonance image registration for cervical cancer radiation therapy evaluation using hybrid features. Int J Radiat Res, 18(1): 13-22.
3. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (2020) SEER Cancer statistics review, (CSR) 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
4. Zhao D, Qiu H, Zhang H, et al. (2017) Treatment results of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy for low-risk Stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. Jap J Clin Oncol, 47(11): 1024-1030. [DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyx127] [PMID]
5. Colombo N, Carinelli S, Colombo A, et al. (2017) Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 23(7): 27. [DOI:10.1093/annonc/mds268] [PMID]
6. Ebrahimi TF, Gholamhosseinian H, Layegh M, et al. (2008) Determining rectal dose through cervical cancer radiotherapy by 9 MV photon beam using TLD and XR type T GAFCHROMIC® Film. Int J Radiat Res, 6(3): 129-134.
7. Tharavichitkul E, Klunkin P, Lorvidhaya V, Sukthomya V, Chakrabhandu S, Pukanhaphan N, Chitapanarux I, Galalae R (2012) The effect of two HDR intracavitary brachytherapy schedukes in radiotherapy fir cervical cancer. Journal of Thai Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 16 (Suppl):78-85.
8. Yaq P and Qingl R (2015) The side effects of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine cervical neoplasms. Journal of Modern Oncology, 5: 716-719.
9. Mundt AJ, Mell LK, Roeske JC (2003) Preliminary analysis of chronic gastrointestinal toxicity in gynecology patients treated with intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 56: 1354-1360. [DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00325-0] [PMID]
10. Özseven A and Elif Özkan E (2020) Dosimetric evaluation of field-in-field and sliding-window IMRT in endometrium cancer patients with a new approach for the conformity index. Int J Radiat Res,18(4): 853-862. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.18.4.853]
11. Yanl C and Xiaoz W (2017) Analysis of influencing factors of adverse reactants in IMRT for cervical cancer. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 11(38): 106-110.
12. Cao Y, Tang D, Xiang Y, Men L, Hong J (2021) Study on the appropriate timing of postoperative adaptive radiotherapy for high-grade glioma. Cancer Management and Research, 13: 3561-3572. [DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S300094] [PMID] []
13. Han C, Yu W, Zheng X, et al. (2018) Composite QA for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using individual volume-based 3D gamma indices. J Radiat Res, 59(5): 669-676. [DOI:10.1093/jrr/rry061] [PMID] []
14. Xiong Q, Zhang T, Su S (2021) Efficacy of the inducing chemotherapy combined with synchronized chemotherapy and radiotherapy on the local advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Res,19(4): 1001-1007. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.19.4.29]
15. Chen W, Bai P, Li J, et al. (2014) Study on the Changes of Volume and Spatial Location in target and Organ at Risk for Cervical Cancer during image-guided IMRT. China Cancer, 23(012): 1044-1048.
16. Naik A, Gurjar OP, Bagdare P, Gupta KL, Mittal HK (2016) Dosimetric comparison between intensity modulated radiotherapy and three dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Res,14(3): 189-196. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.14.3.189]
17. Tong Y, Luo D, Zhang W, et al. (2017) Dosimetric comparison of fixed field static intensity-modulated radiotherapy with dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Qilu Medical Journal, 32(1): 4.
18. Yan L and Lingl K (2015) Impacts of bladder status on target volume and OAR in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Anhui Medicine, 36(6): 656-659.
19. Wang H, Cheng G, Zhao Z, et al. Dosimetric optimization of postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2(6): 22-25.
20. Buchali A, KoswigS, Dinges S, Rosenthal P, Salk J, Lackner G, et al. (1999). Impact of the filling status of the bladder and rectum on their integral dose distribution and the movement of the uterus in the treatment planning of gynaecological cancer. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 52(1): 29-34. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00068-7] [PMID]
21. Gandhi AK, Sharma DN, Rath GK, Julka PK, Subramani V, Sharma, et al. (2013) Early clinical outcomes and toxicity of intensity modulated versus conventional pelvic radiation therapy for locally advanced cervix carcinoma: a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 87(3): 542-548. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2059] [PMID]
22. Zhang Z, He W, Yang L, et al. (2021) Dosimetric comparison between the use of insertion needles and Fletcher applicator in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Res, 19(4): 819-827. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.19.4.7]
23. Mo Y, Long Y, Fu J, et al. (2013) Effect of adjusted radiotherapy plan on radiation dose of target area and organ at risk during IMRT treatment of cervical cancer. Shandong Medicine, 53(6): 122-126.



XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 3 (7-2022) Back to browse issues page