[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 24, Issue 1 (1-2026) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2026, 24(1): 283-287 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of dosimetric parameters in radiotherapy plans for gastric cancer between two accelerators
Y. Tian , X. Peng , L. Yang , H. Liu
Radiotherapy Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China , yanglan_zn163.com
Abstract:   (39 Views)
Background: This study compares treatment plans for gastric cancer patients generated using the Varian IX linear accelerator (linac) and the uRT-Linac 506C. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on ten gastric cancer patients. Treatment plans were initially created using Varian Eclipse v13.5 treatment planning system (TPS) and uRT-TPS for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), respectively; all plans were developed by an experienced physicist and determined to be clinically acceptable. Dosimetric parameters were compared for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), including the conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and monitor unit (MU) efficiency. The delivery accuracy of both accelerator systems was assessed using gamma index analysis. Results: Results indicated that the uRT-Linac 506C provided superior dose conformity and target volume coverage compared to the Varian IX linac, as evidenced by a higher V45/% parameter for the uRT-Linac 506C. For the left kidney, the Varian IX linac had a significantly lower maximum dose (Dmax); however, its mean dose (Dmean), V10, and V20 were significantly higher than those of the uRT-Linac 506C. Similar trends were observed for the right kidney and liver, where the Varian IX linac exhibited significantly higher doses and volumes for specific parameters. Conclusion: In conclusion, both linacs can achieve clinical requirements for gastric cancer radiotherapy; however, the uRT-Linac 506C demonstrated improved dose conformity and target coverage in this study. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and investigate potential clinical implications.
Keywords: Gastric cancer, intensity modulated radiotherapy, treatment plans, dosimetric parameters.
Full-Text [PDF 636 kb]   (6 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Short Report | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tian Y, Peng X, Yang L, Liu H. Comparison of dosimetric parameters in radiotherapy plans for gastric cancer between two accelerators. Int J Radiat Res 2026; 24 (1) :283-287
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-6920-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 1 (1-2026) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.17 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741