<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<XML>
<JOURNAL>
<YEAR>2018</YEAR>
<VOL>16</VOL>
<NO>4</NO>
<MOSALSAL>63</MOSALSAL>
<PAGE_NO>507</PAGE_NO>


<ARTICLES>

	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Dose distributions of high-precision radiotherapy treatment: A comparison between the CyberKnife and TrueBeam systems
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Several high-precision stereotactic radiation therapy modalities are currently used in clinical settings. We aimed to evaluate whether the CyberKnife (CK) or TrueBeam (TB) radiation treatment systems were more appropriate for treating targets of various morphologies according to the physical properties of each device.&#160; Materials and Methods: Spheres (diameter&#160;=&#160;5&#8211;50&#160;mm), as well as triangular prisms and cubes (length of a side&#160;=&#160;10&#8211;50&#160;mm), were used as virtual targets for each treatment delivery system. A phantom with dosimetry film was irradiated to evaluate the flatness and gradient of the radiation treatment from each modality. Results: The homogeneity index (HI) for the spherical targets was significantly higher (dose distribution was more homogeneous) using the TB than when using the CK (1.9 vs. 1.4; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences between treatment modalities in the HI for more complex shapes. The HI increased monotonically as the virtual target diameter increased for the CK (p = 0.048). The flatness parameter was lower for the TB than for the CK (1.4 vs. 1.1; p &#60; 0.001). Conclusion: The CK is particularly robust for delivering therapeutic radiation to small targets, while the TB is more suitable for targets with a simple shape or when the HI is a critical treatment factor.
&#160;

&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>395</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>402</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ito</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ito</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>itou.makoto.292@mail.aichi-med-u.ac.jp</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kawamura</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kawamura</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mori</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mori</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mori</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mori</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Takeuchi</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Takeuchi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Oshima</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Oshima</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nakamura</Family>
				<NameE>K.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nakamura</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Aoyama</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Aoyama</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kaneda</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kaneda</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ishiguchi</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ishiguchi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mizumatsu</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mizumatsu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Cyberknife</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>TrueBeam</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>homogeneity index</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>conformity index.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Regular structural survey by JASTRO. [Internet]. 2011 [Cited 2016 May 21]. Available from: http://www.jastro.or.jp/aboutus/datacenter.php. ##Gallo JJ, Kaufman I, Powell R Pandya S, Somnay A, Bossenberger T, Ramirez E, Reynolds R, Solberg T, Burmeister J (2015) Single-fraction spine SBRT end-to-end testing on TomoTherapy, Vero, TrueBeam, and CyberKnife treatment platforms using a novel anthropomorphic phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 16: 170-182.##Adler JR, Chang SD, Murphy MJ Doty J, Geis P, Hancock SL (1997) The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 69: 124-128.##Scorsetti M, Alongi F, Castiglioni S, Clivio A, Fogliata A, Lobefalo F, Mancosu P, Navarria P, Palumbo V, Pellegrini C, Pentimalli S, Reggiori G, Ascolese AM, Roggio A, Arcangeli S, Tozzi A, Vanetti E, Cozzi L (2011) Feasibility and early clinical assessment of flattening filter free (FFF) based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments. Radiat Oncol, 6: 113.##Blamek S, Grzadziel A, Miszczyk L (2013) Robotic radiosurgery versus micro-multileaf collimator: a dosimetric comparison for large or critically located arteriovenous malformations. Radiat Oncol, 8: 205.##Paik EK, Kim MS, Choi CW, Jang WI, Lee SH, Choi SH, Kim KB, Lee DH (2015) Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with robotic stereotactic radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol, 33: 233-241.##Treuer H, Hoevels M, Luyken K, Visser-Vandewalle V, Wirths J, Kocher M, Ruge M (2015) Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with an adapted linear accelerator vs. robotic radiosurgery: Comparison of dosimetric treatment plan quality. Strahlenther Onkol, 191: 470-476. ##Kaul D, Badakhshi H, Gevaert T, Pasemann D, Budach V, Tuleasca C, Gruen A, Prasad V, Levivier M, Kufeld M (2015) Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiosurgery of meningioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 157: 559-563.##Gevaert T, Levivier M, Lacornerie T, Verellen D, Engels B, Reynaert N, Tournel K, Duchateau M, Reynders T, Depuydt T, Collen C, Lartigau E, De Ridder M (2013) Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations and acoustic neuromas. Radiother Oncol, 106: 192-197.##Dutta D, Balaji Subramanian S, Murli V, Sudahar H, Gopalakrishna Kurup PG, Potharaju M (2012) Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB(R)) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife (R)) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma. J Neurooncol, 106: 637-642.##Paddick I, Lippitz B (2006) A simple dose gradient measurement tool to complement the conformity index. J Neurosurg, 105: 194-201. ##Oliver M, Chen J, Wong E, Van Dyk J, Perera F (2007) A treatment planning study comparing whole breast radiation therapy against conformal, IMRT and tomotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol, 82: 317-323.##Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant, 48: 452-458.##14. Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P (2006) Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 64: 333-42.##Balagamwala EH, Suh JH, Barnett GH, Khan MK, Neyman G, Cai RS, Vogelbaum MA, Novak E, Chao ST (2012) The importance of the conformality, heterogeneity, and gradient indices in evaluating Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment plans for intracranial meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 83: 1406-1413.##Perks JR, St George EJ, Hamri KE, Blackburn P, Plowman PN (2003) Stereotactic radiosurgery XVI: Isodosimetric comparison of photon stereotactic radiosurgery techniques (gamma knife vs. micromultileaf collimator linear accelerator) for acoustic neuroma—and potential clinical importance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57: 1450-1459. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Lateral ventricule invasion and radiation dose to subventricular zone: Their impact to the treatment outcomes of glioblastoma
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the recurrence patterns of GBM in regard to its contact with LVs, the relation between radiation doses to subventrivular zone (SVZ). Materials and Methods: Between 2012 and 2014, 80 adult patients with GBM were included this trial. Median follow-up period was 15 months. Median tumor size was 4.5 cm (1.3-8 cm), where 58% of the patients had a tumor larger than 4 cm. All of the lesions were located supratentorial part of brain. Tumors were classified based on whether the mass involved the SVZ and/or LVs. Reccurrence patterns and treatment outcomes were compared. Results: Tumor progression occurred in 60 (75%) of the patients. Of those 31 (51.6%) were&#160;&#160;&#160; in-field. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) times were 11 and 15 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the negative prognostic factors were maximal surgical resection (p=0.027), LV-invading tumor (p=0.001) and p53 positivity (p=0.034) for PFS. It was found that the patients receiving &#62;50 Gy to iSVZ dose (p=0.024) or &#62;40 Gy to cSVZ dose (p=0.002) or &#62;40 Gy to bSVZ dose (p=0.028) or &#62;50 Gy to bSVZ dose (p=0.008) tended to have more recurrences. Both in-field and out-field recurrences were not affected by higher radiation doses. Conclusion: LVs invading and/or location close to the SVZs can be considered as an important prognostic factor in terms of decreased PFS and OS rates. Additionally both SVZs sparing and dose escalation to SVZs approaches are required to be evaluated in further researches.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>403</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>410</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sert</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sert</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School &#38; Hospital, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>gracilis81@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hoca</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hoca</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School &#38; Hospital, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kamer</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kamer</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School &#38; Hospital, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Anacak</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Anacak</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School &#38; Hospital, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Glioblastoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>subventricular zone</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>lateral ventricule invasion</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>progression-free survival.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, et al. (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 370: 699–708.##Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishikawa R, et al. (2014) Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med, 370: 709–722.##Wallner KE, Galicich JH, Krol G, Arbit E, Malkin MG (1989). Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 16: 1405–1409.##Adeberg S, Konig L, Bostel T, Harrabi S, Welzel T, Debus J, et al. (2014) Glioblastoma recurrence patterns after radiation therapy with regard to the subventricular zone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 90: 886–893.##Adeberg S, Bostel T, Konig L, Welzel T, Debus J, Combs SE (2014) A comparison of long-term survivors and short-term survivors with glioblastoma, subventricular zone involvement: a predictive factor for survival? Radiat Oncol,  9: 95.##Lim DA, Cha S, Mayo MC, Chen MH, Keles E, VandenBerg S, et al.  (2007) Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to neural stem cell regions predicts invasive and multifocal tumor phenotype. Neuro Oncol, 9: 424–429.##Jafri NF, Clarke JL, Weinberg V, Barani IJ, Cha S (2013) Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to the subventricular zone is associated with survival. Neuro Oncol, 15: 91–96.##Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Soriano-Navarro M, Gonzalez-Perez O, Mirzadeh Z, Gil-Perotin S, et al. (2006) Cellular composition and cytoarchitecture of the adult human subventricular zone: a niche of neural stem cells. J Comp Neurol, 494(3): 415-34.##Gibbs IC, Haas-Kogan D, Terezakis S, Kavanagh BD (2013) The subventricular zone neural progenitor cell hypothesis in glioblastoma: epiphany, Trojan Horse, or Cheshire fact? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 86: 606–608.##Lee P, Eppinga W, Lagerwaard F, Cloughesy T, Slotman B, Nghiemphu PL, et al. (2013) Evaluation of high ipsilateral subventricular zone radiation therapy dose in glioblastoma: a pooled analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 86: 609–615.##Kusumawidjaja G, Gan PZ, Ong WS, Teyateeti A, Dankulchai P, Tan DY, et al. (2016) Dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy and irradiation of subventricular zones in relation to tumor control outcomes of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Onco Targets Ther, 9: 1115–1122.##Gupta T, Nair V, Paul SN, Kannan S, Moiyadi A, Epari S, et al. (2012) Can irradiation of potential cancer stem-cell niche in the subventricular zone influence survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? J Neurooncol, 109: 195–203.##Chen L, Guerrero-Cazares H, Ye X, Ford E, McNutt T, Kleinberg L, et al. (2013) Increased subventricular zone radiation dose correlates with survival in glioblastoma patients after gross total resection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 86: 616–622.##Iuchi T, Hatano K, Kodama T, Sakaida T, Yokoi S, Kawasaki K, et al. (2014) Phase 2 trial of hypofractionated high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 88: 793–800.##Elicin O, Inac E, Uzel EK, Karacam S, Uzel OE (2014) Relationship between survival and increased radiation dose to subventricular zone in glioblastoma is controversial. J Neurooncol, 118: 413 – 419.##Gondi V, et al. (2011) Hippocampal Contouring: A Contouring Atlas for RTOG 0933.##Redmond KJ, Achanta P, Grossman SA, Armour M, Reyes J, Kleinberg L, et al. (2011) A radiotherapy technique to limit dose to neural progenitor cell niches without compromising tumor coverage. J Neurooncol, 104(2): 579-87.##Chen L, Chaichana KL, Kleinberg L, Ye X, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Redmond K (2015) Glioblastoma recurrence patterns near neural stem cell regions. Radiother Oncol, 116(2): 294-300.##Liang TH, Kuo SH, Wang CW, Chen WY, Hsu CY, Lai SF, et al.  (2016) Adverse prognosis and distinct progression patterns after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma with synchronous subventricular zone and corpus callosum invasion. Radiother Oncol, 118: 16–23.##Mistry AM, Hale AT, Chambless LB, Weaver KD, Thompson RC, Ihrie RA  (2017) Influence of glioblastoma contact with the lateral ventricle on survival: a meta-analysis. J Neurooncol, 131(1): 125-133.##Fomchenko EI and Holland EC (2007) Platelet-derived growth factor-mediated gliomagenesis and brain tumor recruitment. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 18(1): 39-58. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>A feasibility study of dynamic verification for tumor target delineation and dose delivery using a six degrees of freedom motion phantom 
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: The dynamic phantom is one of the best tools to study the impact of motion on tumor target delineation and absorbed dose verification during dose delivery. Materials and Methods: this study, a 6-DOF (degrees of freedom) phantom was designed following the stacked serial kinematics and assembled by six commercial motion stages to generate 6-DOF motion, which were RotX (pitch, around X), RotY (roll, around Y), TransZ (anterior&#8211;posterior), RotZ (yaw, around Z), TransY (superior&#8211;inferior) and TransX (left&#8211;right). Tumor targets were designed by six plastic spheres for the delineation test. Also, an ionization chamber array detector and RW3 solid water were combined to measure the absorbed dose for dose verification tests.&#160; Results: The maximum translation speeds for LineX and LineY were 50mm/s and 35mm/s for LineZ, while the maximum rotation speeds for RotX, RotY, RotZ were 5.33&#176; per second, 6&#176; per second and 15&#176; per second respectively. Spiral-CT and 4D-CT images acquired in the static and dynamic states successfully showed the influences of tumor motion on target delineation. In the absorbed dose verification, all cases did not pass the gamma test; the pass rate for the 6-DOF motion case was only 34.2% and the pass rates of all other cases were less than 90%. Conclusion: The phantom designed in this study is able to simulate complex tumor motion and can be used to study the influence of tumor motion in radiotherapy.
&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>411</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>420</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xu</Family>
				<NameE>G.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xiong</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xiong</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Cancer Hospital, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jiang</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jiang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Center of Medical Physics and Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Email: hjiang@aiofm.ac.cn</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Cancer Hospital, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Cancer Hospital, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>6DOF dynamic phantom</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>respiratory motion</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>image artifacts</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>dose verification</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>external marker tracking.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Kissick, Michael, and T. Mccaw (2014) Motion Phantoms for Radiotherapy. In: The Phantoms of Medical and Health Physics. Springer New York, USA.##Keall PJ, Kini VR, Vedam SS, Mohan R (2001) Motion adaptive x-ray therapy: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol, 46: 1-10.##Seppenwoolde Y, Shirato H, Kitamura K, Shimizu S, van Herk M, Lebesque JV, Miyasaka K (2002) Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol, 53: 822-834.##Plathow C, Schoebinger M, Fink C, Hof H, Debus J, Meinzer H-P, Kauczor, H-U (2006) Quantification of lung tumor volume and rotation at 3D dynamic parallel MR imaging with view sharing: preliminary results. Radiology, 240: 537-545.##Huang CY, Tehrani JN, Ng JA, Booth J, Keall P (2015) Six degrees-of-freedom prostate and lung tumor motion measurements using kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 91: 368-375.##Malinowski K, Lu W, Lechleiter K, Low D, Parikh P (2007) Development of the 4D Phantom for patient-specific end-to-end radiation therapy QA. SPIE, 6510: 65100E-65100E-9.##Nakayama H, Mizowaki T, Narita Y, Kawada N, Takahashi K, Mihara K, Hiraoka M (2008) Development of a three-dimensionally movable phantom system for dosimetric verifications. Med Phys, 35: 1643-1650.##Bandala M and Joyce MJ (2013) A Computer-Controlled Dynamic Phantom for Respiratory-Gated Medical Radiotherapy Research. IEICE T Fund Electr, E96.A: 1609-1616.##Grohmann C, Frenzel T, Werner R, Cremers F (2014) Design, performance characteristics and application examples of a new 4d motion platform. Z Med Phys, 25: 156-167.##Haas OC, Mills JA, Land I, Mulholl P, Menary P, Crichton R, Depuydt T (2014) IGRT/ART phantom with programmable independent rib cage and tumor motion. Med Phys, 41: 022106-1-022106-6.##Steidl P, Richter D, Schuy C, Schubert E, Haberer T, Durante M, Bert C (2012) A breathing thorax phantom with independently programmable 6D tumour motion for dosimetric measurements in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol, 57: 2235-2250.##Belcher AH, Liu X, Grelewicz Z, Pearson E, Wiersma RD (2014) Development of a 6dof robotic motion phantom for radiation therapy. Med Phys, 41: 121704-1-121704-7.##Menten MJ, Guckenberger M, Herrmann C, Krauss A, Nill S, Oelfke U, Wilbert J (2012) Comparison of a multileaf collimator tracking system and a robotic treatment couch tracking system for organ motion compensation during radiotherapy. Med Phys, 39: 7032-7041.##Sweeney RA, Arnold W, Steixner E, Nevinny-Stickel M, Lukas P (2009) Compensating for tumor motion by a 6-degree-of-freedom treatment couch: is patient tolerance an issue? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 74: 168-171.##Chan MK, Kwong DL, Ng SC, Tong AS, Tam EK (2012) Accuracy and sensitivity of four-dimensional dose calculation to systematic motion variability in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 13: 303-317.##Vinogradskiy YY, Balter P, Followill DS, Alvarez PE, White RA, Starkschall G (2009) Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms. Med Phys, 36: 5000-5006.##Tlusty J, Ziegert J, Ridgeway S (1999) Fundamental Comparison of the Use of Serial and Parallel Kinematics for Machines Tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 48: 351-356.##Kurekova E, Halaj M, Omachelová M, Martišovitš I (2014) Theoretical Positioning Accuracy for Serial and Parallel Kinematic Structure. Meas Sci Rev, 14: 243-251.##Ford EC, Mageras GS, Yorke E, Ling CC (2003) Respiration-correlated spiral CT: A method of measuring respiratory-induced anatomic motion for radiation treatment planning. Med Phys, 30: 88-97.##Keall PJ, Starkschall G, Shukla H, Forster KM, Ortiz V, Stevens CW, Mohan R (2004) Acquiring 4D thoracic CT scans using a multislice helical method. Phys Med Biol, 49: 2053-2067.##D’Souza WD, Kwok Y, Deyoung C, Zacharapoulos N, Pepelea M, Klahr P, Yu, CX (2005) Gated CT imaging using a free-breathing respiration signal from flow-volume spirometry. Med Phys, 32: 3641-3649.##Fitzpatrick MJ, Starkschall G, Balter P, Antolak JA, Guerrero T, Nelson C, Mohan R (2005) A novel platform simulating irregular motion to enhance assessment of respiration-correlated radiation therapy procedures. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 6: 13-21.##Suh Y, Yi B, Ahn S, Kim J, Lee S, Shin S, Choi E (2004) Aperture maneuver with compelled breath (AMC) for moving tumors: A feasibility study with a moving phantom. Med Phys, 31: 760-766.##Richter A, Wilbert J, Flentje M (2011) Dosimetric evaluation of intrafractional tumor motion by means of a robot driven phantom. Med Phys, 38: 5280-5289.##Menon G, Pudney D, Smith WS (2011) Dosimetric evaluation of breast radiotherapy in a dynamic phantom. Phys Med Biol, 56: 7405-7518.##Court LE, Seco J, Lu X-Q, Ebe K, Mayo C, Ionascu D, Lingos T (2010) Use of a realistic breathing lung phantom to evaluate dose delivery errors. Med Phys, 37: 5850-5857. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Protective role of ferulic acid against the damaging effect induced by electromagnetic waves on rat liver and intestine tissues
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: the increasing use of mobile phones in daily life causes many concerns about their effects on human health. Therefore, this work was designed to study the effects of exposure to 1800 MHz electromagnetic waves (EMW) on the liver and intestine of male albino rats and the protective role of ferulic acid (FA) against these harmful effects. Materials and Methods: twenty-four male albino rats were randomly divided into four groups as follows: 1) control group, 2) treated group given FA, 3) irradiated group exposed to 1800 MHz EMW and 4) treated-irradiated group given FA then exposed to EMW. Biochemical analysis and histopathological examination were performed. Results: a significant increase in serum activities of alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase, and serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-&#945; was shown in the irradiated group, while IL-10 was significantly decreased. There was a significant decrease in lactate dehydrogenase and total antioxidant capacity in the tissues of liver and intestine of this group as well as some histopathological changes. All these serum and tissues parameters and histopathological changes were improved in the group treated with FA before exposure to EMW. Conclusion: prolonged exposure to EMW emitted from mobile phones might produce harmful effects in the liver and intestinal tissues of albino rats. These effects can be prevented by FA administration which may be protective against tissue damage induced by EMW through the suppression of oxidative stress.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>421</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>430</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Tawfik</Family>
				<NameE>M.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tawfik</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Health radiation research department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Saif-Elnasr</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Saif-Elnasr</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Health radiation research department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mostafa_saif_elnasr@yahoo.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Elkady</Family>
				<NameE>A.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Elkady</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Health radiation research department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Alkady</Family>
				<NameE>M.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Alkady</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Health radiation research department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hawas</Family>
				<NameE>A.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hawas</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Drug radiation research department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Mobile phones</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>electromagnetic waves</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>liver</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>intestine</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ferulic acid.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Koca O, Gökçe AM, Öztürk MI, Ercan F, Yurdakul N,  Karaman MI (2013)  Effects of intensive cell phone (Philips Genic 900) use on the rat kidney tissue. Urol J, 10(2): 886-891.  ##Aberumand M, Mansouri E, Pourmotahari F, Mirlohi M, Abdoli Z (2016) Biochemical and histological effects of mobile phone radiation on enzymes and tissues of mice.  RJPBCS, 7(5): 1962-1971.##Knave B (2001) Electromagnetic fields and health outcomes. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 30(5): 489-493.##Bortkiewicz A (2001) A study on the biological effects of exposure mobile-phone frequency EMF. Med Pr, 52(2): 101-106.##Parsanezhad ME, Mortazavi SMJ, Doohandeh T, Namavar Jahromi B, Mozdarani H, Zarei A, Davari M, Amjadi S, Soleimani A, Haghani M (2017) Exposure to radiofrequency radiation emitted from mobile phone jammers adversely affects the quality of human sperm. Int J Radiat Res, 15(1): 63-70.##Balmori A (2005) Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn Biol Med, 24: 109-119.##Vanderstraeten J  (2009) GSM fields and health: an updated literature review.  Rev Med Brux, 30(4): 416-424. ##Balci M, Devrim E, Durak I (2007) Effects of mobile phones on oxidant/antioxidant balance in cornea and lens of rats. Curr Eye Res, 32(1): 21-25. ##Kim HK, Jeong TS, Lee MK, Park YB, Choi MS (2003) Lipid lowering efficacy of hesperidin metabolites in high-cholesterol fed rats. Clin Chim Acta, 327(1-2): 129-137.##Soobrattee MA, Neergheen VS, Luximon-Ramma A, Aruoma OI, Bahorun T (2005) Phenolics as potential antioxidant therapeutic agents: mechanism and actions. Mutat Res, 579(1-2): 200-213. ##Gohil KJ, Kshirsagar SB, Sahane RS (2012) Ferulic acid – a comprehensive pharmacology of an important bioflavonoid. IJPSR, 3(1): 700-710.##Kikuzaki H, Hisamoto M, Hirose K, Akiyama K, Taniguchi H (2003) Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its related compounds. J Agric Food Chem, 50: 2161–2168.##Mishra K, Ojha H, Kallepalli S, Alok A, Kumar Chaudhury N (2014) Protective effect of ferulic acid on ionizing radiation induced damage in bovine serum albumin. Int J Radiat Res, 12(2): 113-121.##Rukkumani R, Aruna K, Suresh Varma P, Padmanabhan Menon V (2004) Hepatoprotective role of ferulic acid: a dose-dependent study. J Med Food, 7(4): 456-461.##Bancroft JD and Stevens AE (1996) Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 4th ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, pp: 766.##Oftedal G, Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Mild KH (2000) Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond), 50: 237-245.##Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, Schiff Y, Seger R (2007) Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem J, 405: 559–568. ##McNamee JP, Bellier PV, Gajda GB, Lavallee BF, Marro L, Lemay E, Thansandote A (2003) No evidence for genotoxic effects from 24 h exposure of human leukocytes to 1.9 GHz radiofrequency fields. Radiat Res, 159: 693–697.##World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) WHO research agenda for radio frequency fields. ##Desai NR, Kesari KK, Agarwal A (2009) Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 7: 114.##El-Bediwi A, El-kott AF, Saad M, Eid E (2011)  Effects of electromagnetic radiation produced by mobile phone on some visceral organs of rat.  J Med Sci, 11(6): 256-260.##Ragy MM (2015) Effect of exposure and withdrawal of 900-MHz-electromagnetic waves on brain, kidney and liver oxidative stress and some biochemical parameters in male rats.  Electromagn Biol Med, 34(4): 279-284.##Lahijani MS, Tehrani DM, Sabouri E (2009) Histopathological and ultrastructural studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields on the liver of preincubated white leghorn chicken embryo. Electromagn Biol Med, 28(4): 391-413.##Friedel R, Diederichs F, Lindena J (1979) Release and extracellular turn-over of cellular enzyme. In: Advances in Clinical Enzymology, (Schmidt EF, Schimidt W, Transchold I and Friedel R, eds.), Karge, Basel, pp: 70-105.##Mayer FL, Verteeg DJ, McKee MJ, Folmar LC, Gramey RL, McCume DC, Rattner BA (1991) Physiological and non-specific biomarkers. In: Biomarkers (Huggett RJ, Kimerle RA, Mehrle Jr PM and Bergman HL, eds.), Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp: 5-85.##Shivashankara AR (2015) Effect of cell phone use on salivary total protein, enzymes and oxidative stress markers in young adults: a pilot study. J Clin Diagnostic Res, 9(2): 19–22. ##Ibrahim NK and Gharib OA (2010) The protective effect of antioxidants on oxidative stress in rats exposed to the 950 MHz electromagnetic field. J Rad Res Appl Sci, 3(4A): 1143-1155.##El Nabarawy NA and El Desouky MA (2011) Protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on liver and kidney of rats after exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic field.  J Am Sci, 7(12): 937-944. ##Lee BC, Johng HM, Lim JK, Jeong JH, Baik KY, Nam TJ, Lee JH, Kim J, Sohn UD, Yoon G, Shin S, Soh KS (2004) Effects of  extremely low frequency  magnetic field on  the antioxidant  defense  system  in  mouse  brain:  a  chemiluminescence  study.  J Photochem Photobiol B, 73: 43–48.##Koyu A, Ozguner F, Yilmaz H, Uz E, Cesur G, Ozcelik N (2009) The protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on oxidative stress in rat liver exposed to the 900 MHz electromagnetic field. Toxicol Ind Health, 25(6): 429-434.##Wang YH, Jiang LZ, Li Q, Sun YM, Lü SJ,  Zhong XH (2014) Effect of high power microwave radiation on liver injury and serum cytokine in rats. Acad J Sec Milit Med Univ, 35(6): 672-675·##Megha K, Deshmukh PS, Banerjee BD, Tripathi AK, Abegaonkar MP (2012) Microwave radiation induced oxidative stress, cognitive impairment and inflammation in brain of Fischer rats. Indian J Exp Biol, 50(12): 889-896.##Nair CK, Parida DK, Nomura T (2001) Radioprotectors in radiotherapy. J Radiat Res, 42(1): 21–37.##Prasad NR, Srinivasan M, Pugalendi KV, Menon VP (2006) Protective effect of ferulic acid on γ-radiation-induced micronuclei, dicentric aberration and lipid peroxidation in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res, 603(2): 129–134.##Srinivasan M, Sudheer AR, Pillai KR, Kumar PR, Sudhakaran PR, Menon VP (2006) Influence of ferulic acid on γ-radiation induced DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in primary culture of isolated rat hepatocytes. Toxicology, 228(2-3): 249-258.##Salem AM, Mohammaden TF, Ali MAM, Mohamed EA, Hassan HF (2016) Ellagic and ferulic acids alleviate gamma radiation and aluminium chloride-induced oxidative damage. Life Sci, 160: 2-11. ##Brach MA, Hass R, Sherman ML (1991) Ionizing radiation induces expression and binding activity of nuclear factor kappa B. J Clin Invest, 88: 691–695.##Schreck R, Rieber P, Baeuerle PA (1991) Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-κB transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J, 10: 2247–2258.##Crofford LJ, Tan B, McCarthy CJ, Hla T (1997) Involvement of nuclear factor κB in the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by interleukin-1 in rheumatoid synoviocytes. Arthritis Rheum, 40(2): 226–236.##Libermann TA and Baltimore D (1990) Activation of interleukin-6 gene expression through the NF-kappa B transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol, 10: 2327–2334.##Collart MA, Baeuerle P, Vassalli P (1990) Regulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha transcription in macrophages: involvement of four kappa B-like motifs and of constitutive and inducible forms of NF-kappa B. Mol Cell Biol, 10: 1498–1506.##Chen CY, Peng WH, Tsai KD, Hsu SL (2007) Luteolin suppresses inflammation-associated gene expression by blocking NF-κB and AP-1 activation pathway in mouse alveolar macrophages. Life Sci, 81: 1602–1614.##Das U, Manna K, Sinha M, Datta S, Das DK, Chakraborty A, Ghosh M, Saha KD, Dey S (2014) Role of ferulic acid in the amelioration of ionizing radiation induced inflammation: a murine model. PLoS One, 9(5): e97599.##Sadar SS, Vyawahare NS, Bodhankar SL (2016) Ferulic acid ameliorates TNBS-induced ulcerative colitis through modulation of cytokines, oxidative stress, iNOs, COX-2, and apoptosis in laboratory rats. EXCLI J, 15: 482–499.##Eid F and Al-Dossary AA (2007) Ultrastructural , histological and histochemical study on the effect of electromagnetic field on the liver of pregnant rats and their fetuses. Egypt J Hosp Med, 28: 273-294.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Effects of 2100 MHz radio frequency radiation on the viscosity of blood and oxidative stress parameters in hypertensive and normal rats
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: With the development of technology, human beings are increasingly under the exposure of Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) (due to wireless technologies, mobile phones, base stations etc). The aim was to investigate the possible effects of Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) on blood, aorta and heart tissue in hypertensive and non-hypertensive rats with various parameters. Materials and Methods: Male Wistar Albino rats were divided into 4 groups: 1.Control (C), 2.Hypertension (H), 3.RFR, 4.RFR+Hypertension (RFR+H). 60 mg/kg L-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) was administered for 1 month by oral gavage to induce hypertension. The rats were exposed to 2100 MHz RFR for 60 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 8 weeks. Blood hematocrit, blood and plasma viscosity, malondialdehyde (MDA), total nitric oxide (NOX), and Total sulphydril groups (RSH) / glutathione (GSH) levels in plasma and heart tissue were determined. Histological examination of the aortic wall and left ventricular muscle was performed. Results: RFR exposure resulted in a marked increase in cardiac and plasma MDA and NOX levels and a decrease in RSH/GSH levels (p&#60;0.05). Blood viscosity increased in the hypertensive group with RFR exposure (p&#60;0.05). There was an increase in left ventricular weight and number of muscle cells in hypertensive groups (p&#60;0.05). Conclusion: According Our study suggests that exposure to RFR causes more negative effects on hypertension in terms of oxidative stress and antioxidants in the heart and plasma. Also, RFR exposure showed more prominent left ventricular fibrosis and aortic degenerative effects in hypertensive groups.
&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>431</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>442</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>D.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kuzay</Family>
				<NameE>D.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kuzay</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Ahi Evran University, Medical Faculty, Department of Physiology, Kirsehir, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>dilekkuzay@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ozer</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ozer</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Physiology, Ankara, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Goktas</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Goktas</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Near East University Medical Faculty, Department of Physiology, Lefkosa, Cyprus</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sirav</Family>
				<NameE>B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sirav</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Biophysics, Ankara, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Senturk</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Senturk</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Biophysics, Ankara, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kaplanoglu</Family>
				<NameE>G.T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kaplanoglu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Histology, Ankara, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Seymen</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Seymen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Histology, Ankara, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Natural Hypertension</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>oxidative stress</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>viscosity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>rats.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>WHO (2013) A global brief on hypertension: Silent killer, global public health crisis. Geneva: World Health Organization.##Agafonova IG, Bogdanovich RN, Kolosova NG (2015) Assessment of Nephroprotective Potential of Histochrome during Induced Arterial Hypertension. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 160: 187-191.##Russo C, Olivieri O, Girelli D, Guarini P, Carletto A, Corrocher R (1998) Anti-oxidant status and lipid peroxidation in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens, 16(9): 1267-1271.##Kobayashi A, Ishikawa K, Mastsumoto H, Kimura S, Kamiyama Y, Maruyama Y (2007) Synergetic antioxidant and vasodilatory action of carbon monoxide in angiotensin II- induced cardiac hypertrophy. Hypertension, 50(6): 1040-1048.##Abuja PM and Albertini R (2001) Methods for monitoring oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and oxidation resistance of lipoproteins. Clin Chim Acta, 306(1-2): 1-17.##Squadrito GL and Pryor WA (1998) Oxidative chemistry of nitric oxide: the roles of superoxide, peroxynitrite, and carbon dioxide. Free Radic Biol Med, 25: 392–403.##Mukundan H, Bahadur AK, Kumar A, Sardana S, Naik SL, Ray A, Sharma BK (1999) Glutathine level and its relation to radiation therapy in patients with cancer of uterine cervix. Ind J Exp Biol, 37: 859–864.##Kawada A, Hiruma M, Moguchi H, Ishibashi A, Motoyoshi K, Kawada I (1997) Granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factors stimulate proliferation of human keratinocytes. Arch Dermatol Res, 289: 600–602.##Jadhav GK, Bhanumathi P, Uma DP, Seetharamaiah T, Vidyasagar MS, Koteshwerk K, Hospet CS, Solomon JGR (1998) Possible role of glutathione in predicting radiotherapy response of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 41: 3–5.##1Lowe GDO (1988). Clinical Blood Rheology Volume I. Florida: CRC Press. ##Kensey KR (2003) The mechanistic relationships between hemorheological characteristics and cardiovascular disease. Curr Med Res Opin, 19: 587-596.##Lee AJ, Mowbray PI, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Fowkes FG, Allan PL (1998) Blood viscosity and elevated carotid intima-media thickness in men and women: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation, 97: 1467-1473.##El-Bediwi AB, Saad M, El-kott AF, Eid E (2013) Influence of Electromagnetic Radiation Produced by Mobile Phone on Some Biophysical Blood Properties in Rats. Cell Biochem Biophys, 65: 297–300.##Dillenburg DR, Mostarda C, Moraes-Silva IC, Ferreira D, Bós Dda S, Duarte AA, Irigoyen MC, Rigatto K (2013) Resveratrol and grape juice differentially ameliorate cardiovascular autonomic modulation in L-NAME-treated rats. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 179: 9–13. ##Esmekaya MA, Ozer C, Seyhan N (2011) 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative stress on heart, lung, testis and liver tissues. Gen Physiol Biophys, 30:84–89. ##ICNIRP (1998) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fi elds (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 74: 494–522.##Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA (2001) A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide: Biology and Chemistry, 5: 62–71.##Gilbert DL (2000) Fifty years of radical ideas. In: reactive oxygen species, Ed Chiueh C.C., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci, 899: 1–14.##Kurtel H, Granger DM, Tso P, Grisham MB (1992) Vulnerability of intestinal interstitial fluid to oxidant stress. Am J Physiol, 263: 573–578.##Nakamura YK and Omaye ST (2004) Age-related changes of serum lipoprotein oxidation in rats. Life Sci, 74: 1265–1275.##Aykaç G, Uysal M, Yalçin AS, Koçak-Toker N, Sivas A, Oz H (1985) The effects of chronic ethanol ingestion on hepatic lipid peroxide, glutathione, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione transferase in rats. Toxicology, 36: 71–76.##Khan SA, Choudhary R, Singh A, Bodakhe SH (2016) Hypertension potentiates cataractogenesis in rat eye through modulation of oxidative stress and electrolyte homeostasis. Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 28: 123-130.##Sadek SA, Rashed LA, Bassam AM, Said ES (2015) Said a effect of aliskiren, telmisartan and torsemide on cardiac dysfunction in L-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) induced hypertension in rats. J Adv Res, 6(6): 967-74.##Nasiri Z, Sameni HR, Vakili A, Jarrahi M, Khorasani MZ (2015) Dietary saffron reduced the blood pressure and prevented remodeling of the aorta in L‐NAME‐induced hypertensive rats. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 18: 1143‐1146.##Jaarin K, Foong WD, Yeoh MH, Kamarul ZY, Qodriyah HM, Azman A, Zuhair JS, Juliana AH, Kamisah Y (2015) Mechanisms of the antihypertensive effects of Nigella sativa oil in L-NAME-induced hypertensive rats. Clınıcs, 70(11): 751-757.##Silambarasan T, Manivannan J, Krishna Priya M, Suganya N, Chatterjee S, Raja B (2014) Sinapic Acid Prevents Hypertension and Cardiovascular Remodeling in Pharmacological Model of Nitric Oxide Inhibited Rats. PLoS One, 9(12): e115682. ##Bilgici B, Akar A, Avci B, Tuncel OK (2013) Effect of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress in rat brain and serum. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 32(1): 20–9.##Ozguner F, Altinbas A, Ozaydin M, Dogan A, Vural H, Kisioglu AN, Cesur G, Yildirim NG (2005) Mobile phone-induced myocardial oxidative stress: protection by a novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester. Toxicol Ind Health, 21(9): 223-30.##Levin GIa, Dankova TN, Mokhov MM (1990) Effect of ultra-high frequency electromagnetic energy on the rheologic properties of the blood. Gig Tr Prof Zabol, (1): 28-31.##Fomenko BS and Agafonova TA (1987) Effect of ionizing radiation and Fe2+-induced peroxidation on the lipid phase of erythrocyte membrane preparations. Journal name?, 27(1): 41-5. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Study of natural radioactivity to Assess of radiation 
hazards from soil samples collected  from Mounana in south-east of Gabon 
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: The present work aims to determine the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 233Th and 40K in soil samples collected in Mounana in the Southeastern region of Gabon, to evaluate the contribution of the natural. Materials and Methods: An HPGe p-type detector coupled with a multichannel analyzer DSA-1000 was used to perform measurements and process data. Data acquisition and analysis were made possible&#160; using Genie 2000 software version 2.1 and detector was calibrated using the IAEA certified soil reference standard material multi-gamma (No71863/3). Results: The activity concentrations of 226Ra,232Th and 40K varied respectively from 12 &#177; 03 Bq kg-1 to 23022 &#177; 2572 Bq kg-1, 12 &#177; 04 Bq kg-1 to 265 &#177; Bq kg-1 and64 &#177; 13 Bq kg-1 to 811 &#177; 74 Bq kg-1with means values of 2811 &#177; 198Bq kg-1, 63 &#177; 14 Bq kg-1 and of 355 &#177; 93 Bq kg-1wet weight. In order to assess the radiological risks due to primordial radionuclides in Mounana, the absorbed dose rate, effective dose, radium equivalent and external hazard index were estimated. Conclusion: Absorbed dose rates which have been calculated for each site varied from 26.12 nGy h-1 to 10817.99nGy h-1 with a mean value of 1352.76 nGy h-1. The mean value of annual effective dose was estimated to be 10.96 mSv y-1 from the studied area. The areas investigated in this study showed a strong radioactive contamination of sites inhabited by populations.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>443</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>453</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.Y.L</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mouandza</Family>
				<NameE>S.Y.L</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mouandza</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Departement de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>yannicksky43@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Moubissi</Family>
				<NameE>A.B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Moubissi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Departement de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.E.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Abiama</Family>
				<NameE>P.E.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Abiama</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Laboratory of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I P.O. Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ekogo</Family>
				<NameE>T.B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ekogo</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Departement de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ben-Bolie</Family>
				<NameE>G.H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ben-Bolie</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Laboratory of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I P.O. Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Activity concentration</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>226Ra</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>232Th</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>40K</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>HPGe</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>high background radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Mounana</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Gabon.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>NEA/IAEA Nuclear Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency (2002) A Joint Report by the OECD; Environmental Remediation of Uranium Production Facilities, 2: 217-220.##Commission de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur la Radioactivité CRIIRAD (2009) Contamination radiologique relevée sur l’ancien site minier uranifère de COMUF-AREVA à Mounana au GABON. Note N°09-118.www.criirad.org/.##Manjunatha S, Jayasheelan A, Venkataranabauag P (2013) Study of distribution of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in different rock formations and their dose estimation in and around Chickmagalur, India. Int J Radiat Res, 11: 183-187.##UNSCEAR-United Nations Scientific Commitee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of Ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations Publications.##Ravisankar R, Vanasundari K, Chandrasekaran A, Rajalakshmi A, Suganya M, Vijayagopal P, Meenakshisundaram V (2012) Measurement of natural radioactivity in building materials of Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India using gamma-ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot, 70: 699-704.##Usikalu MR, Rabiu AB, Oyeyemi KD, Achuka JA, Maaza M (2017) Radiation hazard in soil from Ajaokuta North-central Nigeria. Int J Radiat Res, 15(2): 219-224. ##Njinga RL and Tshivhase VM (2017) Radio-epidemiological evaluation and remediation in water sources from two mines in South Africa. Int J Radiat Res, 15(3): 307-315.##Mvondo S, Ben-Bolie GH, Ema’aEma’a, Owono Ateba P,  Ele Abiama P (2017) study of soil-fern transfert of naturally occurring alpha emitting radionuclides in the southern region of Cameroon. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 180: 114-119.##Daoud S, Getti JP, Bourdon W (2007) Rapport d’enquête sur la situation des travailleurs de la COMUF, filiale gabonaise du groupe AREVA-COGEMA. www.asso-sherpa.org/uranium-afriq.##Yin N, Lu X, Li Y (2017) Radioactive analysis and radiological hazards of sand in Weifang, China. Int Radiat Res, 15(2): 225-228.##Bourrel J and Pfiffelmann JP (1972) La province uranifère du bassin de Franceville (République Gabonaise). Mineral Deposita Bert, 7: 323-336.##Peel MC, Finlayson BL, Mac TA, McMahon TA (2007) World of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1633.##EleAbiama P, OwonoAteba P, Ben-Bolie GH, Ekobena FHP, El Khoukhi T (2010) High background radiation investigated by gamma spectrometry of the soil in the Southwestern region of Cameroon. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 101: 739-743.##International Atomic Energy Agency (1989) Measurement of radionuclides in food and the environment. IAEA technical report series no. 295, Vienna.##UNSCEAR (2008) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation report to the general assembly. Annex B: exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation.##Lidman, Fredrik, Henrik Ramebäck, ÅsaBengtsson, and HjalmarLaudon (2013) Distribution and Transport of Radionuclides in a Boreal Mire – Assessing Past, Present and Future Accumulation of Uranium, Thorium and Radium. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 12: 87–97. ##Beretka J and Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials Industrial wastes and by-product. Health Phys, 48:87–95.##ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection (1977) Recommendations of ICRP. Pergamon Press, Publication 26, Oxford.##Krieger VR (1981) Radioactivity of construction materials. Betonwerk Fertigteil Tech, 47:468–473.##Hewamanna R, Sumithrachchi CS, Mahawatte P, Nanayakkara HLC, Ratnayake HC (2001) Natural radioactivity and gamma dose from Sri Lankan clay bricks used in building construction. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 54: 365-369.##Al-Trabulsy HA, Khater AEM, Habbani FI (2010) Radioactivity levels and radiological hazard indices at the Saudi coastline of the Gulf of Aqaba. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 80: 343–348.##Bodu R (1972) Sur l’existence d’anomalies isotopiques rencontrees dans l’uranium du Gabon. CR Academie des Sciences Paris, 275p.1731.##Neuilly M (1972) Sur l’existence dans un passe recule d’une reaction en chaine naturelle de fissions dans le gisement d’uranium d’Oklo (Gabon) ibid. p.1847.##Naudet R (1991) OKLO : Des reacteursnucleaires fossiles. Etude physique. Eyrolles, Paris.##Lozano JC, Blanco Rodríguez P, Vera Tomé F,(2002)Distribution of Long-LivedRadionuclides of the 238 U Series in the Sediments of a Small River in a Uranium Mineralized Region of Spain. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 63 (2): 153–71.## Landström O,  Sundblad B (1986) Migration of thorium, uranium, radium and Cs-137 in till soils and their uptake in organic matter and peat. SKB.##Blanco P, Vera Tomé F, Lozano JC (2005) Fractionation of natural radionuclides in soils from a uranium mineralized area in the South-West of Spain. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 79 (3): 315–30. ##Alicia Cuvier (2015) Accumulations et sources de l'uranium, de ses descendants et des éléments traces métalliques dans les zones humides autour des anciens sites miniers uranifères. thèse de doctorat de l’université de toulouse. Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (INPT), P 58-63.##Kipp GG, Stone JJ, Stetler LD (2009) Arsenic and uranium transport in sediments near abandoned uranium mines in Harding County, South Dakota. Applied Geochemistry, 24(12): 2246–55.##O’Dea J and Mark D (1999) Spatial analysis of natural radionuclides in peat overlying a lithological contact in Co. Donegal, Ireland. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 44 (1): 107–17.##Dowdall M and O’Dea J (2002) Ra-226/U-238 Disequilibrium in an upland organic soil exhibiting elevated natural radioactivity. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 59: 91–104.##Dowdall M, Gwynn JP, Moran C, Davids c, O’Dea J, Lind B (2005) Organic Soil as a Radionuclide Sink in a High Arctic Environment Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 266 (2): 217–23.##Krachler, Michael, William Shotyk (2004) Natural and Anthropogenic Enrichments of Molybdenum, Thorium, and Uranium in a Complete Peat Bog Profile, Jura Mountains, Switzerland Presented as Part of the Archives of Environmental Contamination at the 6thInternational Symposium on Environmental Geochemistry, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7/11September 2003. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6 (5): 418.##Shiva Prasad NG, Nagaiah N, Ashok GV, Karanukara N (2008) Concentrations of 226Ra.232Th and 40K in the soils of Bangalore Region, India. Health Phys, 94(3):264–271.##Malanca A (1996) Distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soils of Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil). J Environ Radioact, 30: 55–67.##Winkelmann I, Thomas M, Vogl K (2001) Aerial measurements on uranium ore mining milling and processing areas in Germany. J Environ Radioact, 53:301–311.##Carvalho FP, Madruga MJ, Reis MC, Alves JG, Oliveira JM, Gouveia JS (2007) Radioactivity in the environment around past radium and uranium mining sites of Portugal. J Environ Radioact, 96: 39–46.##Baeza A, Del-Rio M, Miro C, Paniagua J (1992) Natural radioactivity in soils of the province of Caceres (Spain). Radiat Protect Dosim, 45(1/4): 261–263.##Uosif M (2011) Specific activity of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K for assessment of radiation hazards from building materials commonly used in Upper Egypt. SDU J Sci, 6(2): 120–126.##Ajayi SO (2009) Measurement of activity concentrations of 40K, 226Ra and 232Th for assessment of radiation hazards from soils of the southwestern region of Nigeria. Radiat Environ Biophys, 48: 323–332. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Natural radioactivity assessment in soil samples from Kirkuk city of Iraq using HPGe detector
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Inspection of the level of radioactivity from radionuclides in soil is important for the assessment of the exposure to natural radiation. Materials and Methods: Ten samples from soil were collected from different sites of Kirkuk-IRAQ and the level of natural radioactivity was measured using gamma-ray spectrometry based on a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Results: It was found that the specific activity ranged from 27.4 to 57.0 Bq kg&#8722;1 for 226Ra, from 11.0 to 25.4 Bq kg&#8722;1 for 232Th, and from 207.4 to 516.0 Bq kg&#8722;1 for 40K. The results have been compared with the average values worldwide. The hazard indices have also been calculated. In general certain average values were found to be lower than the world average values; these included the average value of the radium equivalent activity (Raeq), the absorbed gamma dose rate (D), the external and internal hazard Hex and Hin, the gamma radiation representative level Index (I&#947;) and the outdoor and indoor annual effective dose rate (AEDE) Conclusion: In general there are no harmful radiations effects posed to the population who live in the study area; however there are some spots which have values higher than the internationally allowable values.
&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>455</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>463</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Taqi</Family>
				<NameE>A.H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Taqi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physics Department, College of Science, Kirkuk University, Kirkuk, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>alitaqi@uokirkuk.edu.iq</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shaker</Family>
				<NameE>A.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shaker</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physics Department, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Battawy</Family>
				<NameE>A.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Battawy</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physics Department, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Natural radioactivity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>soil contamination</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>activity concentrations</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>HPGe detector</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiation hazard indices.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Rahman S and Faheem M (2008) Natural radioactivity measurements in Pakistan an overview. J Radiol Prot, 28(4): 443-452.##United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (1993) Sources and effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Annexes. United Nations, New York. ##United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2008) Sources, Effects and risks of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Annexes.##Environmental Science Division (EVS) Advancing informed environmental decision making (2010).##United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, (UNSCEAR) (2000) Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations, New York. ##Quindos LS, Fernandez PL, Soto J, Rodenas C, Comez J (1994) Natural Radioactivity in Spanish Soils. Health Physics, 66: 194-200.##Sroor A, El-Bahi SM, Ahmed F,  Abdel-Haleem AS (2001) Natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate of soil in southern Egypt. Appl Radiat Isot, 55: 873-879.##Shaban Ramadan MH, Khaled SD, Abd Elbaset A, Mohamed Abd EA,  Rolf M (2008) Measurements of natural radionuclides in soil samples from Upper Egypt, Nuclear Science and Techniques, 19: 302-307.##Al-Ghorabie Fayez H H (2005) Measurements of environmental terrestrial gamma radiation dose rate in three mountainous locations in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Environ Res, 98(2): 160-166. ##Veiga R, Sanches N, Anjos R M, Macario K, Bastos J, Iguatemy M, Aguiar J G, Santos A M, Mosquera B, Carvalho C, Filho M B and Umisedo N K (2006) Measurement of Natural Radioactivity in Brazilian Beach Sands. Radiat Meas, 41: 189-196.##Svoukis E, Tsertos H (2007) Indoor and outdoor in situ high-resolution gamma radiation measurements in urban areas of Cyprus. Radiat Prot Dosim, 123(3): 384-390. ##Kurnaza A, Küçükomeroğlu B, Keserb R, Okumusoglub NT, Korkmazb F, Karahanc G, Çevika U (2007) Determination of Radioactivity Levels and Hazards of Soil and Sediment Samples in Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey), Appl Radiat Isot, 65: 1281-1289.##Jibiri N N and Emelue H U (2008) Soil radioactivity concentration and radiological assessment in and around a refining and petrochemical company in Warri, Delta State Nigeria. J Radiol Prot, 28: 361-368.##Jibiri NN and Biere PE (2011) Activity concentrations of 232Th, 226Ra and 40K and gamma radiation absorbed dose rate levels in farm soil for the production of different brands of cigarette tobacco smoked in Nigeria. Iran JRR, 8(4): 201-206.##Al-Kharouf SJ, Al-Hamarneh IF, Munir Dababneh (2008) Natural radioactivity, dose assessment and uranium uptake by agricultural crops at Khan Al-Zabeeb, Jordan. J Environ Radioact, 99(7): 1192–1199. ##Al-Hamarneh Ibrahim F, Awadallah Mohammad I (2009) Soil radioactivity levels and radiation hazard assessment in the highlands of northern Jordan. Radiat Meas, 44(1): 102–110. ##Nabil M Hassan, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Masahiro Hosoda, Atsuyuki Sorimachi, Shinji Tokonami, Masahiro Fukushi, Sarata K Sahoo (2010) Assessment of the natural radioactivity using two techniques for the measurement of radionuclide concentration in building materials used in Japan. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 283: 15-21.##Rohit M, Sandeep K, Rajendra S, Singh N P, Komal B (2010) Analysis of terrestrial naturally occurring radionuclides in soil samples from areas of Sirsa district of Haryana, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Environ Earth Sci, 59: 1159-1164.##Mohapatra S, Sahoo S K, Vinod Kumar A, Patra AC, Lenka P, Dubey JS, Thakur VK, Tripathi RM, Puranik VD (2013) Distribution of norm and 137Cs in soils of the visakhapatnam region, eastern India, and associated radiation dose Radiat Prot Dosim, 157(1): 95–104.##Punniyakotti J and Ponnusamy V (2017) Radionuclides of 238U, 232Th and 40K in beach sand of southern regions in Tamilnadu State, India (Post-Tsunami) Indian Journal of Pure &#38; Applied Physics, 55: 218-230.##Al-Sulaiti H, Regan PH, Bradley DA, Malain D (2010) A preliminary report on the determination of natural radioactivity levels of the State of Qatar using high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl Instrum Methods: Phys. Res. Section A: Accel. Spectrom. Detectors Associated Equipment, 619(1-3): 427–431.##Gholami M, Mirzaei S, Jomehzadeh A (2011) Gamma background radiation measurement in Lorestan province, Iran. Iran JRR, 9(2): 89-93.##Najam Laith A, Younis SA, Kithah FH (2015) Natural Radioactivity in Soil Samples in Nineveh Province and the Associated Radiation Hazards, International Journal of Physics, 3(3): 126-132.##Taqi AH, Al-Ani Laith AA, Ali AM (2016) Assessment of the natural radioactivity levels in Kirkuk oil field. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 9: 337-344.##Taqi AH, Ali AM, Al-Ani Laith AA (2017) Estimating the natural and artificial radioactivity in soil samples from some oil sites in Kirkuk-Iraq using high resolution gamma rays spectrometry. Indian Journal of Pure &#38; Applied Physics, 55: 674-682 (2017).##Rohit M, Sandeep K, Rajendra S, Singh NP, Komal B (2010) Analysis of terrestrial naturally occurring radionuclides in soil samples from areas of Sirsa district of Haryana, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Environ. Earth Sci, 59: 1159-1164.##Harb S, El-Kamel AH, Abd El-Mageed, AI, Abbady A, Negm HH (2008) Natural Radioactivity Measurements in Soil and Phosphate Samples from El-Sabaea, Aswan, Egypt. IX Radiation Physics &#38; Protection Conference.## Farai P and Ademola JA (2005) Radium equivalent activity concentrations in concrete building blocks in eight cities in South-western Nigeria.  J Environ Radioact, 79: 119-125.##Xinwei L (2004) Natural radioactivity in some building materials and by‐products of Shaanxi, China. Journal of Radio analytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 262: 775-777.##Noorddin Ibrahim (1999) Natural activities of 238U, 232Th and 40K in building materials. J Environ Radioact, 43(3): 255-258.## Diab HM, Nouh SA, Hamdy A, El-Fiki SA (2008) Evaluation of natural radioactivity in a cultivated area around a fertilizer factory. J Nucl Radiat Phys, 3(1): 53-62.##Agbalagba EO and Onoja RA (2011) Evaluation of natural radioactivity in soil, sediment and water samples of Niger Delta (Biseni) flood plain lakes, Nigeria. J Environ Radioact, 102: 667-671. ##NEA Group (1979) Nuclear energy Agency, exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials, OECD, Paris.##(OECD) (1979) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Exposure to radiation from the natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by a Group of Experts, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France.##Myrick, TE, Berven BA, Haywood FF (1983) Determination of concentrations of selected radionuclides in surface soil in the U.S. Health Phys, 45: 631-642.##Zhi Zhongji and the Writing Group of the Nationwide Survey of Environmental Radioactivity Level in China (1992) Survey of environmental natural penetrating radiation level in China (1983-1990). Radiat Prot, (Taiyuan) 2: 120-122.##Megumi K, Oka T, Doi M et al. (1988) Relationships between the concentrations of natural radionuclides and the mineral composition of the surface soil. Radiat Prot Dosim, 24(1/4): 69-72.##Nielsen SP (1977) In situ measurements of environmental gamma radiation using a mobile Ge(Li) spectrometer system. Risø National Laboratory of Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark.##McAulay IR and Moran D (1988) Natural radioactivity in soil in the Republic of Ireland. Radiat Prot Dosim, 24(1/4): 47-49.##Jagielak J, Biernacka M, Henschke J et al. (1992) Radiation Atlas of Poland. Warszawa: Centralne Laboratorium Ochrony Radiologicznej: Państwowa Agencja Atomistyki.## (ICRP) (1990) International Commission on Radiological Protection Recommendations of the ICRP, Publication 60. Pergamum Publication, Oxford.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Uncertainties in effective dose estimation for CT transmission scan in total body PET-CT imaging with Auto mA3D tube current modulation
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) is a useful hybrid imaging modality in the diagnosis of various malignancies. This modality imposes almost 20 mSv radiation dose to the patient. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the uncertainties in calculated CT effective dose in TUBE CURRENT MODULATION-activated scans by Impact-Dose software.&#160; Materials and Methods: Sixty total body DICOM (30 male and 30 female) whole body PET-CT images were selected. Volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) was recorded for each of the procedures. The image was divided into 5 regions of head &#38; neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis and lower limbs according to special anatomical markers. Effective doses for total body and separate organs were calculated by means of Impact-Dose software once with global CTDIvol and once with a summation of doses calculated by 5 Regional CTDIvol and related scan ranges. Results: The difference among effective doses for some organs and total body were considerable. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the coefficient of variations (CV%) for total body, breast, gonads, liver, lung, red bone marrow (RBM), thyroid, kidneys, and uterus were 12.56, 11.61, 9.44, 8.1, 11.31, 5.93, 8.61, 6.03 and 12.49, respectively. Uncertainties were higher for smaller patients by 19 noise indexes while these changes were higher for bigger patients and 22 noise indexes. Conclusion: The tube current variation depends on the acquisition and patient parameters. For measuring and reporting the total body and organs&#8217; effective doses in order to estimate the risks of CT&#8217;s radiation for total body PET-CT procedures, the tube current variations must be considered.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>465</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>472</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Salimi</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Salimi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Deevband</Family>
				<NameE>M.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Deevband</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mdeevband@sbmu.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ghafarian</Family>
				<NameE>P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ghafarian</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>hronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ay</Family>
				<NameE>M.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ay</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, and Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Effective dose</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>computed tomography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>individual dosimetry</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>PET-CT</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>regional CTDI.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Söderberg M and Gunnarsson M (2010)Automatic exposure control in computed tomography–an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiologica, 51(6): 625-34.##2.	ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. Journal of the ICRU. 2012 Apr;12(1):1-149. PubMed PMID: 24158924. Epub 2012/04/01. eng.##3.	Hara N, Onoguchi M, Takenaka K, Matsubara K, Ujita H, Kenko Y (2010) Assessment of patient exposure to X-radiation from SPECT/CT scanners. Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 38(3): 138-48.##4.	Brix G, Nekolla EA, Borowski M, Noßke D (2014) Radiation risk and protection of patients in clinical SPECT/CT. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 41(1): 125-36.##5.	Hays MT, Watson EE, Thomas SR, Stabin M (2002) MIRD dose estimate report no. 19: radiation absorbed dose estimates from 18F-FDG. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 43(2): 210-4.##6.	McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF (2011) CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology, 259(2): 311-6.##7.	Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose–length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. American Journal of Roentgenology, 194(4): 881-9.##8.	Rong X and Cody D (2010) TH‐C‐201B‐07: How Accurate Is Estimating CT Skin Dose Based on CTDI? Medical Physics, 37(6): 3463-????.##9.	Kalender WA (2014) Dose in X-ray computed tomography. Physics in medicine and biology, 59(3): R129.##10.	Valeri G, Cegna S, Mari A, La Riccia L, Mazzoni G, Maggi S, et al. (2015) Evaluating the appropriateness of dosimetric indices in body CT. La radiologia medica, 120(5): 466-73.##11.	Frush DP and Applegate K. (2004) Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 1(2): 113-9.##12.	Protection R. ICRP (2007) Publication 103. Ann ICRP, 37(2.4): 2.##13.	Kalender W, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M (1999) A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. European radiology, 9(3): 555-62.##14.	Jackson J, Pan T, Tonkopi E, Swanston N, Macapinlac HA, Rohren EM (2011) Implementation of automated tube current modulation in PET/CT: prospective selection of a noise index and retrospective patient analysis to ensure image quality. Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 39(2): 83-90.##15.	Kamel E, Hany TF, Burger C, Treyer V, Lonn AH, von Schulthess GK, et al. (2002) CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 29(3): 346-50.##16.	Fahey F, Stabin M, editors (2014) Dose optimization in nuclear medicine. Seminars in nuclear medicine; Elsevier.##17.	Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M (2011) Automatic exposure control in CT: applications and limitations. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 8(6): 446-9.##18.	Khatonabadi M, Kim HJ, Lu P, McMillan KL, Cagnon CH, DeMarco JJ, et al. (2013) The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams. Medical physics, 40(5): 051903.##19.	AAPM (2014) Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT. report, 220.##20.	http://www.impactscan.org/ctdosimetry.htm. Impact web site. Accessed February, 2015.##21.	 Tian X, Li X, Segars WP, Frush DP, Samei E. (2015) Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation. Medical physics, 42(4): 1575-85.##22.	Khatonabadi M, Zhang D, Mathieu K, Kim HJ, Lu P, Cody D, et al. (2012) A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function. Medical physics, 39(8): 5212-28.##23. Yamane T. Statistics: An introductory analysis. 1973.##24.	Larson DB, Strauss KJ, Podberesky DJ (2015) Toward large-scale process control to enable consistent CT radiation dose optimization. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(5): 959-66.##25.	Schlattl H, Zankl M, Becker J, Hoeschen C (2012) Dose conversion coefficients for paediatric CT examinations with automatic tube current modulation. Physics in medicine and biology, 57(20): 6309.##26.	Gyssels E, Bohy P, Cornil A, van Muylem A, Howarth N, Gevenois PA, et al. (2016) Chest Computed Tomography Radiation Dose Optimization: Comparison of Automatic Exposure Control Strength Curves. Journal of thoracic imaging, 31(1): 23-8.##27.	Li X, Zhang D, Liu B (2014) Radiation dose calculations for CT scans with tube current modulation using the approach to equilibrium function. Medical physics, 41(11): 111910.##28.	McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM (2010) How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? American Journal of Roentgenology, 194(4): 890-6.##29.	Kalender W. TU‐D‐217A‐01: CTDI and Patient Dose: A European Perspective. Medical Physics. 2012;39(6):3906-3906.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Pharmacokinetic studies and human absorbed dose estimation of 68Ga-(4 {[(bis (phosphonomethyl)) carbamoyl] methyl}-7,10-bis(carboxymethy l) -1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododec-1-yl) acetic acid
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: In this study, human absorbed dose of a newly introduced bone imaging agent, 68Ga-(4-{[(bis(phosphonomethyl))carbamoyl]methyl}-7,10-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododec-1-yl) acetic acid (68Ga-BPAMD), was estimated based on the rats data. Materials and Methods: 68Ga was obtained from the 68Ge/68Ga generator and it&#39;s radionuclidic and radiochemical purities were investigated. 68Ga-BPAMD complex was prepared at optimal conditions and the radiochemical purity was studied using instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC) method. The final preparation was injected to the normal rats and the biodistribution of the complex was followed up to 120 min post injection. The accumulated activity for animal organs was calculated. Finally, the human absorbed dose of the complexes was estimated by RADAR method. Results: 68Ga-BPAMD complex was prepared in high radiochemical purity (&#62;99%, ITLC) at optimal conditions. The biodistribution of the complex demonstrated that the main remained radioactivity would considerably accumulate into the bones. The results showed the highest amounts of absorbed dose on the bone surface (0.253 mGy/MBq) and in the bone marrow (0.250 mGy/MBq), while the other organs would receive an insignificant absorbed dose after injection of the 68Ga-BPAMD complex. Conclusion: The comparison of dosimetric results for 68Ga-BPAMD with other complexes shows this complex is a safer agent for bone scanning. This property as well as other characteristics such as the high resolution images of the positron emission tomography (PET) scanning and the availability of 68Ga in the form of 68Ge/68Ga generator, make this complex as a suitable agent for PET bone imaging.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>473</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>480</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rabiei</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rabiei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Energy Engineering and Physics, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shamsaei</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shamsaei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Energy Engineering and Physics, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yousefnia</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yousefnia</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hyousefnia@aeoi.org.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jalilian</Family>
				<NameE>A.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jalilian</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Absorbed dose</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Bone metastases</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>BPAMD</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Ga-68</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Positron emission tomography.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>David JJ, Deborah AF, Frank JF (2004) Metastatic diseases to bone. Hospital Physician, 39: 21-28.##Evan TK, Jinlu D, June E, Christopher LH, Kathleen I, Russell ST, Jill K (2007) New trends in the Treatment of bone metastasis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 102: 1095–1102.  ##O’Sullivan GJ, Carty FL, Cronin CG (2015) Imaging of bone metastasis: An update. World J Radiol, 7(8): 202–211. ##Pauwels EK and Stokkel MP (2001) Radiopharmaceuticals for bone lesions. Imaging and therapy in clinical practice. Q J Nucl Med, 45(1):18-26.##Ahasan MM (2004) Assessment of radiation dose in nuclear medicine hot lab. Iran JRR, 2 (2): 75-78.## Nilegaonkar S, Sonar S,  Ranade A, Khadilkar M (2010) 99mTC MDP bone scan in evaluation of painful scoliosisIndian. J Nucl Med, 25(2): 67–69. ##Mine A, Gülseren A, Özlem NK (2015) The role of 18F–NaF PET/CT in metastatic bone disease. J Bone Oncol, 4(3): 92–97.##Jalilian AR, Rowshanfarzad P, Rahiminejad A, Rajamand AA, Novinrooz AJ (2003) [66Ga]oxine complex; preparation and stability as a possible PET radiopharmaceutical. Iran JRR, 1(3): 157-161. ##Deppen SA, Liu E, Blume JD, Clanton J, Shi C, Jones-Jackson LB, Lakhani V, Baum RP, Berlin J, Smith GT, Graham M, Sandler MP, Delbeke D, Walker RC (2016) Safety and efficacy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for diagnosis, staging, and treatment management of neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med, 57(5): 708-14.  ##Jalilian AR (2016) An overview on Ga-68 radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography applications. Iran J Nucl Med, 24(1): 1-10. ##Fellner M, Biesalski B, Bausbacher N, Kubícek V, Hermann P, Rösch F, Thews O (2012) 68Ga-BPAMD: PET- imaging of bone metastases with a generator based positron emitter. Nucl Med Biol, 39(7): 993-999.##Fellner M, Baum RP, Kubícek V, Hermann P, Lukeš I, Prasad V, Rösch F (2010) PET/CT imaging of osteoblastic bone metastases with (68)Ga-bisphosphonates:first human study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 37(4): 834.##Yousefnia H, Zolghadri S, Jalilian AR, Naseri Z (2015) Preliminary absorbed dose evaluation of two novel 153Sm bone-seeking agents for radiotherapy of bone metastases: comparison with 153Sm-EDTMP. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 14(3): 252-259.##International Atomic Energy Agency (2007) Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code for practice. Technical Reports Series No. 457.##Sparks RB, Aydogan B (1996) Comparison of the effectiveness of some common animal data scaling techniques in estimating human radiation dose, Proceedings of the Sixth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge TN. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 705–716. ##Biological Council (1987) Guidelines on the use of living animals in scientific investigations. Biological Council, UK, 2nd edn.##Mirzaei A, Jalilian AR, Aghanejad A, Mazidi M, Yousefnia H, Shabani G, Ardaneh K, Geramifar P, Beiki D (2015) Preparation and Evaluation of 68Ga-ECC as a PET Renal Imaging Agent. Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 49(3): 208-216.##International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements, TECDOC-1401. ##Yousefnia H, Zolghadria S, Jalilian AR, Tajik M, Ghannadi-Maragheh M (2014) Preliminary dosimetric evaluation of (166)Ho-TTHMP for human based on biodistribution data in rats. Appl Radiat Isot, 94: 260–265.##Stabin MG and Siegel JA (2003) Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys, 85(3): 294-310. ##Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E (2005) OLINDA/EXM: the Second-generation##personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med, 46(6): 1023–1027. ##Brenner DJ (2008) Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. British J Radiol, 81(967): 521–523.  ##International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103, 37:2-4.##Yousefnia H and Zolghadri S (2015) Estimated human absorbed dose of 111In-BPAMD as a new bone-seeking SPECT-imaging agent. Int J Med Health Biomed Bioeng Pharm Eng, 9(9): 722-726. ##Ove C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro C J (2003) Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics, 23(2): 341–358.##Fellner M, Baum R, Kubicek V, Hermann P, Roesch F (2010)  177Lu-BPAMD - From bone imaging to therapy with a macrocycle-bisphosphonate ligand. J Nucl Med, 51(2): 1164. ##Rabie A, Enayati R, Yousefnia H, Jalilian AR, Shamsaei M, Zolghadri S, Bahrami-Samani A, Hosntalab M (2015) Preparation, quality control and biodistribution assessment of 153Sm-BPAMD as a novel agent for bone pain palliation therapy. Ann Nucl Med, 29(10): 870-876.##Rabie A, Shamsaei M, Yousefnia H, Zolghadri S, Jalilian AR, Enayati R (2016) Development and biological evaluation of 90Y-BPAMD as a novel bone seeking therapeutic agent. Radiochimica Acta, 104(10): 727–734.##Yousefnia H,  Zolghadri S, Jalilian AR (2015) Preparation and biodistribution assessment of 111In-BPAMD as a novel agent for bone SPECT imaging. Radiochimica Acta, 103(9).##Yousefnia H and Zolghadri S (2015) Estimated human absorbed dose of 111In-BPAMD as a new bone-seeking SPECT-imaging Agent. Int Journal of Medical, Health, Biomedical, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Engineering, 2(9): 722-726.##International Commission on Radiological Protection (1993) Radiological Protection in Biomedical Research, ICRP Publication 62.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Peri-operative radiotherapy for the prevention of post-operative fibrosis on rats
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Post-operative fibrosis related pains and functional anomalies&#160; can be serious problems for patients. Radiotherapy (RT) could inhibit fibrosis which may occurs post- operation especially following laminectomy. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the effect of peri-operative RT on the prevention of post-operative fibrosis and scar formation on rats. Materials and Methods: Twenty three male Wistar albino rats,&#160; were divided into three experimental groups. Laminectomy was performed to L3 and L4 lomber vertebral regions of group L and L+R rats. The rats in L+R group&#160; in addition to this procedure also received peri-operative RT on the laminectomy area. A total dose of 700 cGy of RT was applied as a single fraction&#160; using electrons. Control rats received no treatment. A rotarod test was performed at 20, 30 and 40 rpm/min speed rates to determine the physical performances of the rats. Results: The results have indicated statistically significant (P&#60;0.05) differences for the 30 rpm/min rotarod test between the L and L+R groups. Histopatologically, significant differences were observed in epidural fibrosis, fibroblast cell density and arachnoid adhesion between the L and L+R groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that peri-operative RT may provide a significant advantage for prevention post-laminectomic of scar tissue formation.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>481</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>485</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kiziltan</Family>
				<NameE>H.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kiziltan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Eris</Family>
				<NameE>A.H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Eris</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>I.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Meral</Family>
				<NameE>I.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Meral</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Seyithanoglu</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Seyithanoglu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University 34093 Faculty of Medical, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Dundar</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Dundar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University 34093 Faculty of Medical, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Eren</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Eren</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Unver</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Unver</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Aydin</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Aydin</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mayadagli</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mayadagli</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>alpdag@hotmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.G.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Bayir</Family>
				<NameE>A.G.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Bayir</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medical, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Celikten</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Celikten</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Animal Scientific Research Center, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical Faculty 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Laminectomy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>peri-operative radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>fibrosis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>rotarod tests.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Marvel JP, Nardini RJ, Rothman RH (1979) Result of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 61: 1077–1083. ##Meaume S, Le Pillouer-Prost A, Richert B, Roseeuw D, Vadoud J (2014) Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones. Eur J Dermatol, 24(4): 435-43.##Ji J1, Tian Y, Zhu YQ, Zhang LY, Ji SJ, Huan J, Zhou XZ, Cao JP (2015) Ionizing irradiation inhibits keloid fibroblast cell proliferation and induces premature cellular senescence.        J Dermatol, 42(1):56-63.##Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Bahri S, Kalend A, Martínez AJ (1999) Inhibition of peridural fibrosis after laminectomy using low-dose external beam radiation in a rat model. Neurosurgery, 44(3): 597-602.##Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Flickinger JC, Welch WC (2003) Low-dose radiotherapy for the inhibition of peridural fibrosis after reexploratory nerve root decompression for postlaminectomy syndrome. J Neurosurg, 99(3): 271-7.##Borok TL, Bray M, Sinclair I, Plafker J, LaBirth L, Rollins C (1988) Role of ionizing irradiation for 393 keloids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 15: 865-70.##He Y, Revel M, Loty B (1995) A quantitative model of post-laminectomy scar formation. Effects of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Spine, 20: 557-563. ##Gabriel EM and Friedman AH (1996) The failed back surgery syndrome. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary DD, editors. New York: McGraw-Hill, Neurosurgery, 3863–3870.##LaRocca H and Macnab I (1974) The laminectomy membrane. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 56: 545–550.##Berman B and Bieley HC (1996) Adjunct therapies to surgical management of keloids.Dermatol Surg, 22: 126-30.##Kovalic JJ and Perez CA (1989) Radiation therapy following keloidectomy: a 20-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 17: 77-80.##Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH,  Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, Stella M (2002) International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg, 110: 560-71.##De Cicco L, Vischioni B, Vavassori A,  Gherardi F, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lazzari R, Cattani F (2014) Postoperative management of keloids: Low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy, 17: 1538-4721(14)00025-7. ##Kim KD (2004) Low-dose radiotherapy for the inhibition of peridural fibrosis after reexploratory nerve root decompression for postlaminectomy syndrome. J Neurosurg, 100(4): 400-1.##Bora H, Aykol SV, Akyürek N, Akmansu M, Ataoglu O (2001) Inhibition of epidural scar tissue formation after spinal surgery: external irradiation vs. spinal membrane application. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1;51(2): 507-13.##Wang LZ, Ding JP, Yang MY, Chen B (2014) Forty-five cases of chest keloids treated with subcutaneous super-tension-reduction suture combined withpostoperative electron-beam irradiation. Dermatol Surg, 40(12): 1378-84.##Jones BJ and Roberts DJ (1968) The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod. J Pharm Pharmacol, 20(4): 302-4.##Balamuralikrishnan B1, Balachandar V, Kumar SS, Stalin N, Varsha P, Devi SM, Arun M (2012) Evaluation of chromosomal alteration in electrical workers occupationally exposed to low frequency of electro magnetic field (EMFs) in Coimbatore population, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13(6): 2961-6.##Edsmyr F, Larsson LG, Onyango J, Wanguru S, Wood M (1974) Radiation therapy in the treatment of keloids in East Africa. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol, 13: 102-6.##Ogawa R, Yoshitatsu S, Yoshida K, Miyashita T (2009) Is radiation therapy for keloids acceptable? The risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg, 124(4): 1196-201.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Exposure to radiofrequency wave (RFW) generated by a base transceiver stations (BTS) antenna model affects learning and memory in female more than male rats
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Exposure to electromagnetic radiation may impair memory. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of radiofrequency wave (hereafter referred to as RFW) on passive avoidance learning and memory in healthy males and females. Materials and Methods: Ten adult male and ten female Sprague-Dawley rats (230&#177;20 gr) were randomly divided into four groups including two control groups (one for males and one for females), and two experimental groups (exposed to 900 MHz radio frequency wave) each representing one gender. The exposure was performed for 30 consecutive days (4h/day). Evaluation of learning and memory of the rats started on the last day of exposure by shuttle box. Learning and memory of animals was recorded by the period of time they remained within the light area; this time was called the light time. Results: Results of the study showed that exposure to RFW significantly decreased the duration of light time in the rats within the experimental groups as compared to the control groups (P&#60;0.05). Exposure to RFW significantly decreased the light time in females in comparison to males in the experimental group (P&#60;0.05). Histological study of brain section did not show significant changes between groups. Conclusion: With regard to these findings, it was concluded that exposure to RFW causes disorder in memory retention of passive avoidance learning in rats. The extent of damage to the learning and memory in rats exposed to RFW was more for females than males.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>487</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>491</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Azimzadeh</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Azimzadeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jelodar</Family>
				<NameE>G.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jelodar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>jelodar@shirazu.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Namazi</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Namazi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Soleimani</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Soleimani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>RFW (radio frequency wave)</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>learning and memory</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>BTS (base transceiver stations)</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>rats.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Abdel-Rassoul G, El-Fateh OA, Salem MA, Michael A, Farahat F, El-Batanouny M, et al. (2007) Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology, 28(2): 434-40.##2.	Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Bhat PG, Mailankot M (2010) Effect of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiations (RF-EMR) on passive avoidance behaviour and hippocampal morphology in Wistar rats. Ups J Med Sci, 115(2): 91-6.##3.	Akbari A, Jelodar G, Nazifi S (2014) Vitamin C protects rat cerebellum and encephalon from oxidative stress following exposure to radiofrequency wave generated by a BTS antenna model. Toxicology mechanisms and methods, 24(5): 347-52.##4.	Manikonda PK, Rajendra P, Devendranath D, Gunasekaran B, Channakeshava, Aradhya RS, et al. (2007) Influence of extremely low frequency magnetic fields on Ca2+ signaling and NMDA receptor functions in rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett, 413(2): 145-9.##5.	Beck KD and Luine VN (2002) Sex differences in behavioral and neurochemical profiles after chronic stress: role of housing conditions. Physiology &#38; behavior, 75(5): 661-73.##6.	Galea LA, McEwen BS, Tanapat P, Deak T, Spencer RL, Dhabhar FS (1997) Sex differences in dendritic atrophy of CA3 pyramidal neurons in response to chronic restraint stress. Neuroscience, 81(3): 689-97.##7.	Luine V (2002) Sex differences in chronic stress effects on memory in rats. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 5(3):205-16.##8.	Khalil A, Al-Adhammi M, Al-shara B, Gagaa M, Rawshdeh A, Alshamli A (2012) Histological and ultrastructural analyses of male mice exposed to mobile phone radiation. J of Toxicology Review, 1(1): 1-6.##9.	Bures J, Buresova O, Huston J (1983) Techniques and basic experiments for the study of brain and behavior. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier Science, p. 148.##10.	Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J (2011) 900-MHz microwave radiation promotes oxidation in rat brain. Electromagn Biol Med, 30(4):219-34.##11.	Joubert V, Bourthoumieu S, Leveque P, Yardin C (2008) Apoptosis is induced by radiofrequency fields through the caspase-independent mitochondrial pathway in cortical neurons. Radiat Res, 169(1): 38-45.##12.	Bouji M, Lecomte A, Hode Y, de Seze R, Villegier AS (2012) Effects of 900 MHz radiofrequency on corticosterone, emotional memory and neuroinflammation in middle-aged rats. Exp Gerontol, 47(6): 444-51.##13.	Sepehrimanesh M, Saeb M, Nazifi S, Kazemipour N, Jelodar G, Saeb S (2014) Impact of 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure on main male reproductive hormone levels: a Rattus norvegicus model. International journal of biometeorology, 58(7): 1657-63.##14.	Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, et al. (2009) Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in-vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril, 92(4): 1318-25.##15.	Cahill L (2006) Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6): 477-84.##16.	Maren S, De Oca B, Fanselow MS (1994) Sex differences in hippocampal longterm potentiation (LTP) and pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: Positive correlation between LTP and contextual learning. Brain Research, 1–2(661): 25–34.##17.	Warren SG, Humphreys AG, Juraska JM, Greenough WT (1995) LTP varies across the estrous cycle: enhanced synaptic plasticity in proestrus rats. Brain Res, 703(1-2): 26-30.##18.	Foy M, Baudry M, Thompson R (2004) Estrogen and hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuron glia biology, 1(04): 327-38.##19.	Bowman R, Ferguson D, Luine V (2002) Effects of chronic restraint stress and estradiol on open field activity, spatial memory, and monoaminergic neurotransmitters in ovariectomized rats. Neuroscience, 113(2): 401-10.##20.	Andreano JM, Arjomandi H, Cahill L (2008) Menstrual cycle modulation of the relationship between cortisol and long-term memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(6): 874-82.##21.	Denti A and Negroni JA (1975) Activity and learning in neonatally hormone treated rats. Acta physiologica latino americana, 25(2): 99-106.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Dosimetric verification of pre-treatment intensity modulated radiation therapy in the commissioning process
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Commissioning tests are recommended before implementing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. This study evaluated five different plans of IMRT mocks for different modulation indices. Materials and Methods: IMRT tests were done in slab phantom for both 6MV and 15 MV photon energies using a 2D array ion chamber dosimeter. Results: The acceptance criteria were based on 3% /3mm. All tests passed the gamma criteria except for the prostate test with 15 MV photon beams and C shape test for both 6 MV and 15 MV energies. The Ratio passing points for Multi target test in 6 MV and 15 MV plans were 93.1% and 91.5%, respectively. The results of the prostate tests with 3%/3mm was 92.3% for 6MV and 91.2% for 15 MV in 4%/4 mm tolerance limit. For Head and Neck test with the same gamma criteria, the percentages of the points were 93.2 and 94 for 6 MV and 15 MV plans, respectively. For C shape tests, the used gamma criteria were 4%/ 4 mm. The ratio passing points were 94.9% and 94.3% for 6MV and 15MV plans, respectively. However, C shape hard test could not pass the gamma criteria of 4%/ 4mm for 6MV. Conclusion: results showed that by increasing the complexity of the IMRT plan, the verification test must be done in a more strict-manner, because a small change in dose delivery can cause a large discrepancy between planned and real dosimetry and may produce hot spots in organs or a cold spot in the target volume.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>493</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>497</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Esmaili</Family>
				<NameE>G.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Esmaili</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mahdavi</Family>
				<NameE>S.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mahdavi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Radiation Biology Research Center &#38; Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mahdavi.r@iums.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nikoofar</Family>
				<NameE>A.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nikoofar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Radiation Oncology Department, Faulty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fadavi</Family>
				<NameE>P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fadavi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Radiation Oncology Department, Faulty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ameri</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ameri</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Radiation Oncology Department, Faulty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>V.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nazari</Family>
				<NameE>V.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nazari</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Pre- treatment IMRT</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>2D array</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>IMRT mock</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Gamma evaluation.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Palta JR, Liu C, Li JG (2008) Quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 71(1): 108-12.##Bedford JL, Childs PJ, Warrington AP (2004) Verification of inverse planning and treatment delivery for segmental IMRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 5(2): 1-17.##Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, et al. (2003) Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee. Med Phys 2003, 30(8): 2089-115.## Doblado FS, Capote R, Rosello JV, Leal A, Lagares JI, Arrans R, Hartmann GH (2005) Micro ionization-chamber dosimetry in IMRT verification: Clinical implications of dosimetric errors in the PTV. Radiother Oncol, 75(3): 342-8.##Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. (2009) IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys, 36(11): 5359-73.##Childress NL, White RA, Bloch C, et al.(2005) Retrospective analysis of 2D patient-specific IMRT verifications. Med Phys, 32(4): 838-50.##Clark CH, Hansen VN, Chantler H, Edwards C, James HV, Webster G, Miles EA, Guerrero Urbano MT, Bhide SA, Bidmead AM, Nutting CM (2009) Dosimetry audit for a multi-centre IMRT head and neck trial. Radiother Oncol , 93(1): 102-8.##Budgell GJ, Perrin BA, Mott JH, Fairfoul J, Mackay RI(2005) Quantitative analysis of patient-specific dosimetric IMRT verification. Phys Med Biol, 50(1): 103–19.##Varatharaj C, Ravikumar M, Sathiyan S, Supe SS, Vivek TR, Manikandan A (2010) Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix. J Cancer Res Ther, 6(2): 179-84.##Chung JB, Kim JS, Ha SW, Ye SJ (2011) statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local  delivery  guideline. Radiat  Oncol,  6(27): 1-8.##De Martin E, Fiorino C, Broggi S, Longobardi B, Pierelli A, Lucia Perna L, et al. (2007) Agreement criteria between expected and measured field fluences in IMRT of head and neck cancer: the importance and use of the gamma histograms statistical  analysis. Radiother Oncol, 85(3): 399–406.##Jang SY, Liu HH, Mohan R(2008) Underestimation of low-dose radiation in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 71(5): 1537-46. ##Das IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjo A (2008) Small fields: Non-equilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys, 35(1):206-13.##Papatheodorou S, Rosenwald JC, Zefkili S, Murillo MC, Drouard J,Gaboriaud G (2000) Dose calculation and verification of intensity modulation generated by dynamic multileaf collimators. Med Phys, 27(5): 960-71.## Xing L, Curran B, Hill R, Holmes T, Ma L, Forster KM, Boyer AL (1999) Dosimetric verification of a commercial inverse treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol, 44(2): 463-78.##Capote R, Sanchez-Doblado F, Leal A, Lagares JL, Arrans R, Hartman GH (2004) An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization-chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets. Med Phys, 31(9): 2416-22.##Van Zijtveld M, Dirkx M, de Boer H, Heijmen B (2006) Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience. Radiother Oncol, 81(2): 168–75.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Assessment of skyshine photon dose rates from 9 and 18 MV medical linear accelerators
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Skyshine describes the radiation scattered by the atmosphere above a LINAC facility to a point on the ground. The aim of this study was to measure the skyshine photon dose rates from two different (9 MV and 18 MV) medical linear accelerators. Materials and Methods: The photon beam was directed upward (180&#176; gantry position), with a maximum photon field size (40 &#215; 40 cm2) at the isocenter. Measurements were obtained around the external points selected outside the room facilities at a horizontal distance from the target by the calibrated RDS-110 survey meter at four points around the isocenter. Results: The measured values of the skyshine photon exposure rates at four points for 9 MV and 18 MV were 0.6, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.4 &#956;Sv/h, and 0.6, 0.4, 0.4, and 0.5 &#956;Sv/h, respectively. All the measured skyshine photon exposure rates were lower than the values recommended by NCRP 147. Conclusion: There is a poor agreement between the measured and the calculated values; therefore it seems that caution is needed while using the equations available in NCRP 147 or 151.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>499</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>503</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rostampour</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rostampour</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>nima.rostampour@kums.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jafari</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jafari</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Saeb</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Saeb</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Seyed-al-Shohada Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Keshtkar</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Keshtkar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shokrani</Family>
				<NameE>P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shokrani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Almasi</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Almasi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Skyshine</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>shielding</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiation measurement</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiation protection</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>scattering</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>medical accelerator.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Radiation protection design guidelines for 0.1–100 MeV particle accelerator facilities. NCRP Report No. 51. Washington, D.C. 1977, NCRP.##National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Structural shielding design and evaluation for megavoltage x- and gamma-ray radiotherapy facilities. NCRP Report No. 151. Bethesda, MD. 2005, NCRP.##McGinley PH (1993) Radiation skyshine produced by an 18 MeV medical accelerator. Rad Prot Mgmt, 10(5): 59-64.##Gossman MS, McGinley PH, Rising MB, Pahikkala AJ (2010) Radiation skyshine from a 6 MeV medical accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 11(3): 259-64.##Gossman MS, Pahikkala AJ, Rising MB, McGinley PH (2010) Providing solid angle formalism for skyshine calculations. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 11(4): 278-82.##de Paiva E, da Rosa LAR (2012) Skyshine photon doses from 6 and 10 MV medical linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 13(1): 215-19.##RDS-110 Multi-purpose Survey Meter PSMHP, Mirion Technologies Division, featuring Rados. 2011; Document No. 2096 6082, Version 2.1.##Zavgorodni SF (2001) A method for calculating the dose to a multi-storey building due to radiation scattered from the roof of an adjacent radiotherapy facility. Med Phys, 28(9): 1926-30.##Biggs PJ (1998) Determination of the shielding for an unoccupied roof of a radiation therapy facility to account for adjacent buildings--modification of a computer program. Health Phys, 75(4): 431-5.##National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Structural Shielding Design for Medical X-Ray Imaging Facilities. NCRP Report No. 147. Bethesda, MD. 2005, NCRP. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Significance of MIBI scintigraphy in a patient with hydatid cyst and parathyroid adenoma
</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>A 17-year-old boy with hyperparathyroidism exhibited a large cyst in the left hemi-thorax on his chest X-ray. The cyst was identified as a hydatid cyst. He was referred for biphasic methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) parathyroid scan. A discrete ectopic parathyroid was detected in the left upper mediastinum in addition to accumulation of the MIBI tracer in the cyst wall. Using radio-guided occult lesion localization with an injection of 3 mCi 99m Tc - MIBI in the morning of the operation day, an ectopic adenoma was detected with a gamma probe within the thymus, resected with a consequent decline of serum high parathyroid hormone (PTH). This report is remarkable in two different aspects: the importance of radio-guided localization of ectopic adenoma, which in this case was within the thymus, and the accumulation of MIBI in hydatid cyst wall, as a unique report of this condition.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>505</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>507</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/52019/01/5
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1397/10/15
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Sh.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rafieian</Family>
				<NameE>Sh.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rafieian</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vali-Asr Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Farzanefar</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Farzanefar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Abbasi</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Abbasi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>meabbasi@tums.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>MIBI</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>SPECT</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radio-guided surgery</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hydatid cyst</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>parathyroid adenoma.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Rokni MB (2009) Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in Iran. Iran J Parasitol, 4(2): 1-6. ##Mamishi S, Sagheb S, Pourakbari B (2007) Hydatid disease in Iranian children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 40(5): 428-31.##Moretti JL, Hauet N, Caglar M, Rebillard O, Burak Z (2005) To use MIBI or not to use MIBI? That is the question when assessing tumour cells. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 32(7): 836-42.##Prager G, Czerny C, Ofluoglu S, Kurtaran A, Passler C, Kaczirek K, et al. (2003) Impact of localization studies on feasibility of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in an endemic goiter region. J Am Coll Surg, 196(4): 541-8.##Kunstman JW, Kirsch JD, Mahajan A, Udelsman R (2013) Parathyroid localization and implications for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 98(3): 902-12.##Rubello D and Mariani G (2007) Hand-held gamma probe or hand-held miniature gamma camera for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: competition, evolution or synergy? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 34(2): 162-4.##Paredes P, Vidal-Sicart S, Zanón G, Roé N, Rubí S, Lafuente S, et al. (2008) Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: first results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 35(2): 230-5.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>

</ARTICLES>

</JOURNAL>
</XML>
