<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<XML>
<JOURNAL>
<YEAR>2025</YEAR>
<VOL>23</VOL>
<NO>4</NO>
<MOSALSAL>91</MOSALSAL>
<PAGE_NO>1135</PAGE_NO>


<ARTICLES>

	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Correlation between clinical, CT features and EGFR gene in minimally invasive adenocarcinoma</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To analyze the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations and clinical as well as computed tomography (CT) signs in minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA). Materials and Methods: A total of 118 patients with MIA treated at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, from December 2018 to December 2021 were included in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor(EGFR) mutation status: a mutation group and a wild-type group. Differences in clinical and CT features between the two groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 118 patients, 69 were in the mutation group, while 49 were in the wild-type group. No significant differences were observed in gender, smoking history, age, mean nodule diameter, peripheral emphysema, air bronchogram, lobulation sign, pleural indentation sign, morphology, tumor-lung interface, peripheral fibrosis, and density between the two groups (P&#62;0.05). However, significant differences were noted in the spiculation sign, vacuole sign, and vascular convergence sign between the groups (P&#60;0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified the vacuole sign with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.410 (P&#62;0.05) and the spiculation sign and vascular convergence sign with ORs of 1.498 and 2.262, respectively (P&#60;0.05), as independent risk factors for predicting EGFR mutations. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for the spiculation sign and vascular convergence sign were 0.634 and 0.735, respectively, in distinguishing EGFR gene mutations in MIA. Conclusion: CT imaging demonstrated that MIA patients presenting with spiculation, vacuole, and vascular convergence signs had a higher likelihood of EGFR gene mutations. Among these, the spiculation and vascular convergence signs are critical, independent risk factors for predicting EGFR gene mutations in MIA patients.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>833</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>838</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/3
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhou</Family>
				<NameE>L.P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Function, The Fifth Hospital of Tangshan (CT/DR Room), Tangshan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chang</Family>
				<NameE>L.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Imaging, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>240612799@qq.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhao</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Imaging, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yang</Family>
				<NameE>X.Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Imaging, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shi</Family>
				<NameE>L.L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Lung adenocarcinoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>CT signs</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>epidermal growth factor receptor</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>tomography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>X-ray computed.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Sung H, Ferlayy J, Siegel RL, et al. (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3): 209-249. DOI:10.3322/caac.21660##2. Antonicelli A, Cafarotti S, Indini A, et al. (2013) EGFR-targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on EGFR oncogenic mutation. Int J Med Sci, 10 (3): 320-330. DOI:10.7150/ijms.4609##3. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. (2011) International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma: executive summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc, 8(5): 381-385. DOI: 10.1513/pats.201107-042ST##4. Gao JW, Rizzo S, Ma LH, et al. (2017) Pulmonary ground-glass opacity: computed tomography features, histopathology and molecular pathology. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 6(1):68-75. DOI:10.21037/tlcr.2017.01.02##5. Yotsukura M, Asamura H, Motoi N, et al. (2021) Long-term prognosis of patients with resected adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol,16(8): 1312-1320. DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.007##6. Hasegawa M, Sakai F, Ishikawa R, et al. (2016) CT features of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated of the lung: comparison with nonmutated adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol, 11(6): 819-26. DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.02.010##7. Pinilla-Macua I, Grassart A, Duvvuri U, et al. (2017) Sorkin A. EGF receptor signaling, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and endocytosis in tumors in vivo. Elife. 21(6): e31993. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.31993##8. Levantini E, Maroni G, Del Re M, et al. (2022) EGFR signaling pathway as a therapeutic target in human cancers. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 85: 253-275. DOI:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.04.002##9. Fei YC, Zhou LM, Lu DL (2021) Research progress of EGFR extracellular domain mutation in non-small cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 30(17): 1579-1583. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2021.17.008##10. Colombino M, Paliogiannis P, Cossu A, et al. (2019) EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK, and cMET genetic alterations in 1440 Sardinian patients with lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 19(1): 209. DOI:10.1186/s12890-019-0964-x##11. Zhou L and Chen Z (2021) Successful treatment of a patient with an EGFR mutated pulmonary adenocarcinoma and a history of uremia with erlotinib after gefitinib-induced kidney dysfunction: a case report. International Journal of Radiation Research, 19(3): 749-753. DOI: 10.29252/ijrr.19.3.749##12. Shi Z, Song CE, Shi RF, et al. (2017) CT and clinical features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation of exon 19 in lung adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 36(04): 490-494. DOI:10.13437/ j.cnki. jcr.2017.04.012.##13. Zhang Y, Yao Y, Xu Y, et al. (2021) Pan-cancer circulating tumor DNA detection in over 10,000 Chinese patients. Nat Commun, 12(1): 11. [DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-20162-8.]##14. Jiang X, Miao L, Yang L, et al. (2024) Advances in diagnostic imaging of small cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 22(02): 296-300. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003388##15. Han X, Fan J, Li Y, et al. (2021) Value of CT features for predicting EGFR mutations and ALK positivity in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep,11(1): 5679. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-83646-7##Han X, Fan J, Gu J, et al. (2020) CT features associated with EGFR mutations and ALK positivity in patients with multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Imaging, 20(1): 51. DOI:10.1186/s40644-020-00330-1##17. Zhang G, Zhao Z, Cao Y, et al. (2021) Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and CT features in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol,76(6): 473. DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.012.##18. Cheng L, Sun W, Peng DG, et al. (2024) Research progress on the relationship between CT manifestations of ground-glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma and common gene mutations. Clinical Journal of Medical Officers, 52(04): 437-440. DOI:10.16680/j.1671-3826.2024.04.29##19. Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Beasley MB, et al. (2022) The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumors: impact of advances since 2015. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 17(3): 362-387. DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003##20. Rekhtman N, Leigh NB, Somerfield MR (2015) Molecular testing for selection of patients with lung cancer for epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors: American society of clinical oncology endorsement of the college of American pathologists/international association for the study of lung cancer/association for molecular pathology guideline. J Oncol Pract, 11: 135-136. DOI:10.1200/JOP.2014.002303##21. El-Deek SE, Abdel-Ghany SM, Hana RS, et al. (2021) Genetic polymorphism of lysyl oxidase, glutathione S-transferase M1, glutathione-S-transferase T1, and glutathione S-transferase P1 genes as risk factors for lung cancer in Egyptian patients. Molecular Biology Reports, 48(5): 4221-4232. 10.1007/s11033-021-06436-4 ##22. Usuda K, Sagawa M, Motono N, et al. (2014) Relationships between EGFR mutation status of lung cancer and preoperative factors—are they predictive? Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(2): 657-662. DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.657##23. Wang S, Shi J, Ye Z, et al. (2019) Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma on computed tomography image using deep learning. European Respiratory Journal, 53(3): 1800986. DOI:10.1183/13993003.00986-2018##24. Girard N, Sima CS, Jackman DM, et al. (2021) Nomogram to predict the presence of EGFR activating mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. European Respiratory Journal, 39(2): 366e72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2022.04.007##25. Yang Y, Yang Y, Zhou X, et al. (2015) EGFR L858R mutation is associated with lung adenocarcinoma patients with dominant ground-glass opacity. Lung Cancer, 87(3): 272-277. DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.12.016##26. L. Duan, W. Shan, L. Guo, et al. (2022) Correlation in high resolution computed tomography signs with pathological subtype and differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20(3): 679-685. DOI: 10.52547/ijrr.20.3.23##27. Sun F, Xi J, Zhan C, et al. (2018) Ground glass opacities: imaging, pathology, and gene mutations. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 156(2): 808-813. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.110##28. Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Xiong Y, et al. (2022) Analysis of CT features of EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 41(06): 1019-1024. DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2022.06.004##29. Zhang LB, Shen LL, Wang B, et al. (2021) Correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and histologic subtypes or characteristics of computed tomography findings in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School, 42(10): 1035-1039+1057. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2021.10.006##30. Song B, Min XH, Chen W, et al. (2019) Clinical analysis of the association between EGFR and CT scan images in early-stage lung cancer with pulmonary ground glass nodules. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 34(2): 215-218+234. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2019.02.011##31. Cai Y, Chen T, Zhang S (2021) Correlation exploration among CT imaging, pathology, and genotype of pulmonary ground-glass opacity. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 27(14): 2021-2031. DOI:10.1111/jcmm.17797##32. Zhang H, Cai W, Wang Y, et al. (2019) CT and clinical characteristics that predict the risk of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(6): 649-659. DOI:10.1007/s10147-019-01403-3##33. Nie Y, Liu H, Tan X, et al. (2019) Correlation between high-resolution computed tomography lung nodule characteristics and EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinomas. OncoTargets and Therapy, 12: 519-526. DOI:10.2147/OTT.S184217##34. Huo JW, Li Q, Luo T, et al. (2021) The value of clinical and CT features in predicting EGFR mutation of lung adenocarcinoma. Radiologic Practice, 36(11): 1375-1381. DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2021.11.008##35. Zhang G, Zhang J, Cao Y, et al. (2021) Nomogram based on preoperative CT imaging predicts the EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma. Translational Oncology, 14(1): 100954. DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100954##36. Zhu N, Zhang CY, Ma N, et al. (2021) Correlation between CT signs of pulmonary adenocarcinoma appearing as ground-glass nodule and epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging, 29(11): 1095-1099. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2021.11.009##37. Lu Q, Ma Y, An Z, et al. (2018) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation accelerates radiographic progression in lung adenocarcinoma presented as a solitary ground-glass opacity. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(11): 6030-6039. DOI:10.21037/jtd.2018.10.19.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Key targets and mechanistic insights affecting radiotherapy effectiveness in renal carcinoma patients with concurrent renal failure</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To explore the key targets and regulatory mechanisms affecting the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with renal carcinoma (RCC) complicated by renal failure. Materials and Methods:&#160;Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)(|log2FC|&#62;2) in TCGA (n=537) and GEO data set (n=215) were screened by limma package in R software. Intersecting genes were accessed through the online site (InteractiVenn). The STRING and MCODE module of the Metascape website were used for key target screening and enriched pathway analysis. The preprocessCore R package was used for data normalization and batch effect processing. The survival/survminer R package was used to analyze the relationship between gene expression and patient survival. Results:&#160;High expression of ACADM, DLAT, SUCLA2 and SUCLG2 genes were all associated with significantly improved prognosis in renal cancer patients. The mOS time in the ACADM high expression group was 7.10 years [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.466, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.353-0.615). The mOS time in the DLAT high expression group was 7.10 years (HR=0.489, 95% CI: 0.372-0.642). The mOS time in the SUCLA2 high expression group was 7.30 years (HR=0.458, 95% CI: 0.346-0.606). The mOS time in the SUCLG2 group was 7.00 years (HR=0.544, 95% CI: 0.415-0.715). Conclusion:&#160;The suppression of&#160;ACADM,&#160;DLAT,&#160;SUCLA2, and&#160;SUCLG2&#160;can regulate fatty acid metabolism and tricarboxylic acid cycle-related pathways, which provides ideas for the prognosis of patients with RCC complicated by renal failure.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>839</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>845</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/18
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/27
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wei</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nephrology, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Gao</Family>
				<NameE>P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Gao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nephrology, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Chinese Medicine, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fan</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Hemodialysis Center, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhao</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nephrology, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>zhaojin8490@dingtalk.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Prognosis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>renal carcinoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>renal failure.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Zhang S, Xiong X, Xie N, et al. (2024) The efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with systematic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. MedComm, 5: e544.##2. Naik P, Dudipala H, Chen YW, et al. (2024) The incidence, pathogenesis, and management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 16: 17562872241232578.##3. Schafer EJ, Jemal A, Wiese D, et al. (2023) Disparities and trends in genitourinary cancer incidence and mortality in the USA. European Urology, 84: 117-126.##4. Yang J, Wang K, Yang Z (2023) Treatment strategies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Past, present and future. Frontiers in Oncology, 13: 1133832.##5. Tumkur Sitaram R, Landström M, Roos G, et al. (2021) Significance of PI3K signalling pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma in relation to VHL and HIF status. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 74: 216-222.##6. Kim CS, Kim B, Suh SH, et al. (2022) Risk of Kidney failure in patients with cancer: A South Korean population-based cohort study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 79: 507-517.e501.##7. Lai S, Mariotti A, Coppola B, et al. (2014) Uricemia and homocysteinemia: nontraditional risk factors in the early stages of chronic kidney disease--preliminary data. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 18: 1010-1017.##8. Jourde-Chiche N, Dou L, Cerini C, et al. (2011) Vascular incompetence in dialysis patients--protein-bound uremic toxins and endothelial dysfunction. Seminars in Dialysis, 24: 327-337.##9. Kadowaki T, Maegawa H, Watada H, et al. (2022) Interconnection between cardiovascular, renal and metabolic disorders: A narrative review with a focus on Japan. Diabetes, Obesity &#38; Metabolism, 24: 2283-2296.##10. Wang S, Liu Z, Zhang D, et al. (2022) The incidence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 22: 1138.##11. Denic A, Elsherbiny H, Mullan AF, et al. (2020) Larger nephron size and nephrosclerosis predict progressive CKD and mortality after radical nephrectomy for tumor and independent of kidney function. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 31: 2642-2652.##12. Jung M, Choo E, Li J, et al. (2024) Longitudinal trends of comorbidities and survival among kidney cancer patients in Asian population. Cancer Medicine, 13: e70421.##13. Cai CF, He Y, Yue D, et al. (2023) DIRAS2 promotes radiation resistance in renal cell carcinoma via autophagy induction and MKK4-JNK1 pathway activation. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21: 805-813.##14. Buttigliero C, Allis S, Tucci M, et al. (2018) Role of radiotherapy in improving activity of immune-modulating drugs in advanced renal cancer: Biological rationale and clinical evidences. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 69: 215-223.##15. Cerbone L, Rebuzzi SE, Lattanzi E, et al. (2020) Abscopal effect after hypofractionated radiotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma pretreated with pazopanib. Immunotherapy, 12(12): 869-878.##16. Paciotti M, Schmidt AL, Ravi P, et al. (2021) Temporal trends and predictors in the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the U.S. The Oncologist, 26: e905-e906.##17. Hosaka S, Katagiri H, Niwakawa M, et al. (2018) Radiotherapy combined with zoledronate can reduce skeletal-related events in renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastasis. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23: 1127-1133.##18. Pastor S, Rodríguez-Ribera L, Corredor Z, et al. (2018) Levels of DNA damage (Micronuclei) in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease. Role of GST polymorphisms. Mutation Research, 836: 41-46.##19. Syed-Ahmed M and Narayanan M (2019) Immune dysfunction and risk of infection in chronic kidney disease. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 26: 8-15.##20. Zhao S, Ye Z, Stanton R (2020) Misuse of RPKM or TPM normalization when comparing across samples and sequencing protocols. RNA (New York, NY), 26: 903-909.##21. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 43: e47.##22. Diao C, Xi Y, Xiao T (2018) Identification and analysis of key genes in osteosarcoma using bioinformatics. Oncology Letters, 15: 2789-2794.##23. Huang M, Yang Y, Zhu X, et al. (2021) A prospective phase II study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 17: 513-521.##24. Scherer A, Günther OP, Balshaw RF, et al. (2013) Alteration of human blood cell transcriptome in uremia. BMC Medical Genomics, 6: 23.##25. Nouhaud FX, Pfister C, Defortescu G, et al. (2015) Baseline chronic kidney disease is associated with toxicity and survival in patients treated with targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 26: 866-871.##26. Zhang Z, Zhao J, Zabell J, et al. (2016) Proteinuria in patients undergoing renal cancer surgery: impact on overall survival and stability of renal function. European Urology Focus, 2: 616-622.##27. Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, et al. (2011) Impact of tumor size on renal function and prediction of renal insufficiency after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The Journal of Urology, 186: 1242-1246.##28. Ham J, Yun BH, Lim W, et al. (2021) Folpet induces mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS-mediated apoptosis in mouse Sertoli cells. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 177: 104903.##29. Ducasa GM, Mitrofanova A, Fornoni A (2019) Crosstalk between lipids and mitochondria in diabetic kidney disease. Current Diabetes Reports, 19: 144.##30. Woo CY, Baek JY, Kim AR, et al. (2020) Inhibition of ceramide accumulation in podocytes by myriocin prevents diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes &#38; Metabolism Journal, 44: 581-591.##31. Sukonina V, Ma H, Zhang W, et al. (2019) FOXK1 and FOXK2 regulate aerobic glycolysis. Nature, 566: 279-283.##32. Nochi Z, Birkler RID, Fernandez-Guerra P, et al. (2020) Increased antioxidant response in medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: does lipoic acid have a protective role? Pediatric Research, 88: 556-564.##33. Donti TR, Stromberger C, Ge M, et al. (2014) Screen for abnormal mitochondrial phenotypes in mouse embryonic stem cells identifies a model for succinyl-CoA ligase deficiency and mtDNA depletion. Disease Models &#38; Mechanisms, 7: 271-280.##34. Jackson LE, Kulkarni S, Wang H, et al. (2017) Genetic dissociation of glycolysis and the TCA cycle affects neither normal nor neoplastic proliferation. Cancer Research, 77: 5795-5807.##35. Wang H, Lu J, Kulkarni S, et al. (2019) Metabolic and oncogenic adaptations to pyruvate dehydrogenase inactivation in fibroblasts. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 294: 5466-5486.##36. Vanpouille-Box C, Pilones KA, Wennerberg E, et al. (2015) In situ vaccination by radiotherapy to improve responses to anti-CTLA-4 treatment. Vaccine, 33: 7415-7422.##37. Filatenkov A, Baker J, Strober S (2016) Disruption of evasive immune cell microenvironment in tumors reflects immunity induced by radiation therapy. Oncoimmunology, 5: e1072673.##38. Wu Q, Allouch A, Martins I, et al. (2017) Macrophage biology plays a central role during ionizing radiation-elicited tumor response. Biomedical Journal, 40: 200-211.##39. Tang C, Cai J, Yin XM, et al. (2021) Mitochondrial quality control in kidney injury and repair. Nature reviews Nephrology, 17: 299-318.##40. Galvan DL, Green NH, Danesh FR (2017) The hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International, 92: 1051-1057.##41. He WJ, Li C, Huang Z, et al. (2022) Association of mitochondrial DNA copy number with risk of progression of kidney disease. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 17: 966-975.##42. Nguyen NP, Chirila ME, Page BR, et al. (2024) Immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for older patients with non-metastatic renal cancer unfit for surgery or decline nephrectomy: practical proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group. Frontiers in Oncology, 14: 1391464.##43. Ren S, Wang W, Shen H, et al. (2020) Development and validation of a clinical prognostic model based on immune-related genes expressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Frontiers in Oncology, 10: 1496.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Differentiating focal interstitial fibrosis from pulmonary adenocarcinoma in part-solid nodules using computed tomography features</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Distinguishing focal interstitial fibrosis from pulmonary adenocarcinoma based on computed tomography characteristics is challenging. We investigated the computed tomography features of part-solid lung nodules to identify characteristics useful for differentiating focal interstitial fibrosis from pre-invasive lesions or invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Materials and Methods: Our research analyzed 182 part-solid lung nodules from 177 patients, comparing the computed tomography characteristics of focal interstitial fibrosis, pre-invasive lesions, and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Predictive factors for focal interstitial fibrosis were determined via binary logistic regression analysis. Predictive capability of the logistic regression model was assessed utilizing receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma was seen in 124 part-solid lung nodules, while 21 nodules showed focal interstitial fibrosis. Binary logistic regression analysis between focal interstitial fibrosis and pre-invasive lesions revealed that irregular shape and concentrated distribution of the solid portion were significantly associated with focal interstitial fibrosis. Binary logistic regression analysis between focal interstitial fibrosis and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas revealed that smaller lesion size, ill-defined lesion borders, and solid portion&#8217;s well-defined borders were notable independent factors linked to focal interstitial fibrosis. The model using these three predictors to distinguish focal interstitial fibrosis from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas achieved a high receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.845. Conclusion: Focal interstitial fibrosis exhibited distinct computed tomography features compared to pre-invasive lesions or invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas; the solid portion of part-solid lung nodules might serve as a valuable distinguishing feature.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>847</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>853</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/18
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/27
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>D.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>An</Family>
				<NameE>D.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>An</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Imaging Center, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zou</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Interventional Treatment, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>An</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>An</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Interventional Treatment, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Tian</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tian</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Interventional Treatment, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>tianye0917@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Tomography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>X-Ray computed</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>solitary pulmonary nodule</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>pulmonary fibrosis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>adenocarcinoma of lung.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. He X, Li X, Wu Y, et al. (2022) Differential diagnosis of nonabsorbable inflammatory and malignant subsolid nodules with a solid component ≤5 mm. Journal of Inflammation Research, 15: 1785-1796.##2. Lee H, Goo J, Lee C, et al. (2007) Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean Journal of Radiology, 8: 22-31.##3. Henschke C, Yankelevitz D, Mirtcheva R, et al. (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178: 1053-1057.##4. Smyth R and Billatos E (2024) Novel strategies for lung cancer interventional diagnostics. J Clin Med, 13: 7207.##5. Woo JH, Kim JH, Jeong DY, et al. (2024) Differentiation between invasive adenocarcinoma and focal interstitial fibrosis among persistent pulmonary part-solid nodules: with emphasis on the CT morphologic analysis. Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 39: 335-341.##6. Chen X and Xu B (2022) Application of CT postprocessing reconstruction technique in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules and analysis of risk factors. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022: 9739047.##7. Yang W, Sun Y, Fang W, et al. (2018) High-resolution computed tomography features distinguishing benign and malignant lesions manifesting as persistent solitary subsolid nodules. Clinical Lung Cancer, 19: e75-e83.##8. Duan L, Shan W, Guo L, et al. (2022) Correlation in high resolution computed tomography signs with pathological subtype and differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20: 679-685.##9. Qi L, Lu W, Yang L, et al. (2019) Qualitative and quantitative imaging features of pulmonary subsolid nodules: differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and preinvasive lesions. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 11: 4835-4846.##10. Chae H, Park C, Park S, et al. (2014) Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology, 273: 285-293.##11. Takashima S, Sone S, Li F, et al. (2003) Small solitary pulmonary nodules (&#60; or =1 cm) detected at population-based CT screening for lung cancer: Reliable high-resolution CT features of benign lesions. Am J Roentgenol, 180: 955-964.##12. Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al. (2007) Focal interstitial fibrosis manifesting as nodular ground-glass opacity: thin-section CT findings. Eur Radiol, 17: 2325-2331.##13. Li W J, Lv F J, Tan Y W, et al. (2022) Benign and malignant pulmonary part-solid nodules: differentiation via thin-section computed tomography. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 12: 699-710.##14. Lee S M, Park C M, Goo J M, et al. (2013) Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas versus preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules: differentiation by using CT features. Radiology, 268: 265-273.##15. Travis W, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 6: 244-285.##16. Si M, Tao X, Du G, et al. (2016) Thin-section computed tomography-histopathologic comparisons of pulmonary focal interstitial fibrosis, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma with pure ground-glass opacity. European Journal of Radiology, 85: 1708-1715.##17. Ko K-H, Huang T-W, Chang W-C, et al. (2021) Differentiating focal interstitial fibrosis from adenocarcinoma in persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules (&#62; 5 mm and &#60; 20 mm): the role of coronal thin-section CT images. European Radiology, 31: 8326-8334.##18. Geng Y, Sun L, Sun M, et al. (2022) The significance of peritumoral 5mm regions features for radiomics model in distinguishing the lung adenocarcinomas and granulomas. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20: 737-745.##19. MacMahon H, Naidich D, Goo J, et al. (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: From the fleischner society 2017. Radiology, 284: 228-243.##20. Eguchi T, Yoshizawa A, Kawakami S, et al. (2014) Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness. PloS one, 9: e97867.##21. Snoeckx A, Reyntiens P, Desbuquoit D, et al. (2018) Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: size matters, but do not ignore the power of morphology. Insights into Imaging, 9: 73-86.##22. Bo Y H, Ahn H Y, Lee Y H, et al. (2011) Malignancy rate in sonographically suspicious thyroid nodules of less than a centimeter in size does not decrease with decreasing size. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 26: 237-242.##23. Qi L, Xue K, Li C, et al. (2019) Analysis of CT morphologic features and attenuation for differentiating among transient lesions, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as pure ground-glass nodules. Sci Rep, 9: 14586.##24. Wu H, Zhang X, Zhong Z (2025) Exploration of CT-based discrimination and diagnosis of various pathological types of ground glass nodules in the lungs. BMC Med. Imaging, 25: 119.##25. Gao F, Sun Y, Zhang G, et al. (2019) CT characterization of different pathological types of subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodular lesions. The British Journal of Radiology, 92: 20180204.##26. Park C, Goo J, Lee H, et al. (2007) Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics, 27: 391-408.##27. Wang H, Weng Q, Hui J, et al. (2020) Value of TSCT features for differentiating preinvasive and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodules smaller than 3 cm. Academic Radiology, 27: 395-403.##28. Gong X and Huang C (2024) Clinical value of CT imaging features to predict infiltration degree and pathological subtype of ground glass lung adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22: 909-918.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Salivary metabolomic profiling reveals dynamic metabolic adaptations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients during radiotherapy</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is commonly treated with radiotherapy, which can induce systemic and local metabolic changes. Saliva, as a non-invasive biofluid, provides a valuable medium for monitoring such alterations. This study aimed to investigate salivary metabolic changes in NPC patients before and after radiotherapy using an untargeted metabolomics approach. Materials and Methods: Saliva samples were collected from 23 NPC patients both prior to and following radiotherapy. An untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Multivariate statistical analysis was employed to identify differential metabolites, and pathway enrichment analysis was conducted to elucidate the affected biological processes. Key metabolic features were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Results: A total of 110 differential metabolites were identified, comprising 64 in positive ion mode (30 upregulated, 34 downregulated) and 46 in negative ion mode (31 upregulated, 15 downregulated). LASSO analysis highlighted four key metabolites: L-Carnitine and Kanosamine were significantly upregulated post-radiotherapy, whereas Phloroglucinol and Dibutyl phthalate were significantly downregulated. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed five significantly affected pathways: arginine biosynthesis, central carbon metabolism in cancer, arginine and proline metabolism, HIF-1 signaling pathway, and protein digestion and absorption. Conclusion: Salivary metabolomics revealed notable metabolic adaptations in NPC patients following radiotherapy, reflecting tissue repair and compensatory responses. These findings provide new insights into the metabolic impact of radiotherapy and may help identify potential therapeutic targets for optimizing treatment outcomes.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>855</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>864</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/18
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/27
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ji</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ji</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Qin</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Qin</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fan</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>yifan.suda@vip.163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhou</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>zhoujuyingsy@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Nasopharyngeal neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>metabolomics</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>saliva</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>metabolic networks and pathways.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Sonis ST and Anderson CM (2023) Avasopasem for the treatment of radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 32(6): 463-70.##2.	Fang Y, Wang L, Chen X, Cao C (2024) Maxillary sinus anterior wall recurrence after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22(3): 803-5.##3.	Elad S, Yarom N, Zadik Y, Kuten-Shorrer M, Sonis ST (2022) The broadening scope of oral mucositis and oral ulcerative mucosal toxicities of anticancer therapies. CA Cancer J Clin, 72(1): 57-77.##4.	Wu Z, Wang B, Zhou X, Xu B, Zeng Z (2022) Radiation-induced oral mucositis is a critical dilemma for patients and physicians during radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Bulletin, 1(2): 95-9.##5.	Tang J, Xu X, Chen M, Liu L, Zhan Z (2025) Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of early breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. International Journal of Radiation Research, 23(1): 163-8.##6.	Li Y, Yang Z, Cai T, Jiang D, Luo J, Zhou Z (2023) Untargeted metabolomics of saliva in caries-active and caries-free children in the mixed dentition. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 13: 1104295.##7.	Balakittnen J, Ekanayake Weeramange C, Wallace DF, Duijf PHG, Cristino AS, Hartel G, et al. A novel saliva-based miRNA profile to diagnose and predict oral cancer. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16(1):14.##8.	Tzimas K, Pappa E. Saliva Metabolomic Profile in Dental Medicine Research: A Narrative Review. Metabolites. 2023;13(3).##9.	Liang L, Rasmussen MH, Piening B, Shen X, Chen S, Rost H, et al. (2020) Metabolic dynamics and prediction of gestational age and time to delivery in pregnant women. Cell, 181(7): 1680-92 e15.##10.	Gardner A, Carpenter G, So PW (2020) Salivary metabolomics: from diagnostic biomarker discovery to investigating biological function. Metabolites, 10(2): 47.##11.	Mikkonen JJ, Singh SP, Herrala M, Lappalainen R, Myllymaa S, Kullaa AM (2016) Salivary metabolomics in the diagnosis of oral cancer and periodontal diseases. J Periodontal Res, 51(4): 431-7.##12.	Buzalaf MAR, Ortiz AdC, Carvalho TS, Fideles SOM, Araújo TT, Moraes SM, et al. (2020) Saliva as a diagnostic tool for dental caries, periodontal disease and cancer: is there a need for more biomarkers? Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 20(5): 543-55.##13.	Kim S, Kim HJ, Song Y, Lee HA, Kim S, Chung JJJocp (2021) Metabolic phenotyping of saliva to identify possible biomarkers of periodontitis using proton nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(9): 1240-9.##14.	Zheng WB, Zou Y, Elsheikha HM, Liu GH, Hu MH, Wang SL, et al. (2019) Serum metabolomic alterations in Beagle dogs experimentally infected with Toxocara canis. Parasit Vectors, 12(1): 447.##15.	Fritz IB, Yue KT. Long-Chain Carnitine Acyltransferase and the Role of Acylcarnitine Derivatives in the Catalytic Increase of Fatty Acid Oxidation Induced by Carnitine. J Lipid Res. 1963;4:279-88.##16.	Graziano F, Bisonni R, Catalano V, Silva R, Rovidati S, Mencarini E, et al. (2002) Potential role of levocarnitine supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced fatigue in non-anaemic cancer patients. Br J Cancer, 86(12): 1854-7.##17.	Kraft M, Kraft K, Gärtner S, Mayerle J, Simon P, Weber E, et al. (2012) L-Carnitine-supplementation in advanced pancreatic cancer (CARPAN)--a randomized multicentre trial. Nutrition Journal, 11: 52.##18.	Longo N, Frigeni M, Pasquali M (2016) Carnitine transport and fatty acid oxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1863(10): 2422-35.##19.	Mahmud T (2003) The C7N aminocyclitol family of natural products. Nat Prod Rep, 20(1): 137-66.##20.	Kudo F and Eguchi T (2009) Biosynthetic genes for aminoglycoside antibiotics. J Antibiot (Tokyo), 62(9): 471-81.##21.	Vijayalaxmi S, Jayalakshmi SK, Sreeramulu K (2015) Polyphenols from different agricultural residues: extraction, identification and their antioxidant properties. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(5): 2761-9.##22.	Benjamin S, Masai E, Kamimura N, Takahashi K, Anderson RC, Faisal PA (2017) Phthalates impact human health: Epidemiological evidences and plausible mechanism of action. J Hazard Mater, 340: 360-83.##23.	Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Kim SW, Li P, Marc Rhoads J, et al. (2009) Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids, 37(1): 153-68.##24.	Morris SM, Jr. (2016) Arginine metabolism revisited. J Nutr, 146(12): 2579S-86S.##25.	Geiger R, Rieckmann JC, Wolf T, Basso C, Feng Y, Fuhrer T, et al. (2016) L-arginine modulates T cell metabolism and enhances survival and anti-tumor activity. Cell, 167(3): 829-42 e13.##26.	Song CW, Shakil A, Osborn JL, Iwata K (2009) Tumour oxygenation is increased by hyperthermia at mild temperatures. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 25(2): 91-5.##27.	Xiong L, Teng JL, Botelho MG, Lo RC, Lau SK, Woo PC (2016) Arginine metabolism in bacterial pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci, 17(3): 363.##28.	Wu G, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Kim SW, Knabe DA, et al. (2011) Proline and hydroxyproline metabolism: implications for animal and human nutrition. Amino Acids, 40(4): 1053-63.##29.	Phang JM, Donald SP, Pandhare J, Liu Y (2008) The metabolism of proline, a stress substrate, modulates carcinogenic pathways. Amino Acids, 35(4): 681-90.##30.	Phang JM, Liu W, Hancock CN, Fischer JW (2015) Proline metabolism and cancer: emerging links to glutamine and collagen. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 18(1): 71-7.##31.	Horsman MR and Overgaard J (2016) The impact of hypoxia and its modification of the outcome of radiotherapy. J Radiat Res, 57; Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i90-i8.##32.	Semenza GL (2012) Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell, 148(3): 399-408.##33.	Balamurugan K (2016) HIF-1 at the crossroads of hypoxia, inflammation, and cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 138(5): 1058-66.##34.	Gray LH, Conger AD, Ebert M, Hornsey S, Scott OJTBjor (1953) The concentration of oxygen dissolved in tissues at the time of irradiation as a factor in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol, 26(312): 638-48.##35.	Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV (2006) HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab, 3(3): 177-85.##36.	Noman MZ, Desantis G, Janji B, Hasmim M, Karray S, Dessen P, et al. (2014) PD-L1 is a novel direct target of HIF-1α, and its blockade under hypoxia enhanced MDSC-mediated T cell activation. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 211(5): 781-90.##37.	Labiano S, Palazón A, Bolaños E, Azpilikueta A, Sánchez-Paulete AR, Morales-Kastresana A, et al. (2016) Hypoxia-induced soluble CD137 in malignant cells blocks CD137L-costimulation as an immune escape mechanism. Oncoimmunology, 5(1): e1062967.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced spectral mammography in assessment of indeterminate breast lesions in patients who underwent breast conservation surgery</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Breast cancer stands out as a major health issue globally, being the most common type of cancer diagnosed in women around the world. Its impact in Egypt is particularly pronounced, accounting for a substantial proportion of new cancer cases. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool for breast tumors. By visualizing tumor angiogenesis, CESM offers improved accuracy compared to traditional mammography with or without ultrasound. Its ability to depict tumor neovascularity parallels that of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study was done to assess how well CESM can accurately identify the nature of unclear breast lesions in patients who have had breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective study with 30 women who had breast-conserving surgery due to ambiguous breast lesions found by traditional mammography. Their ages varied between 32 and 77, averaging 50.07 years. Each patient received dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. The definitive diagnosis was confirmed by examining tissue samples from surgery or biopsy through histopathology. Results: Examination of the 30 patients showed that 23 had benign lesions (69.7%) while 10 were malignant (30.3%). The diagnostic performance character of CESM was improved with the use of the malignancy potential score (MPS) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. Conclusion: The results indicate that CESM serves as an effective supplement to traditional mammography for evaluating unclear breast lesions after breast-conserving surgery. Its enhanced sensitivity and accuracy could lead to better patient management and improved health outcomes.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>865</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>871</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/18
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/27
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>D.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mohamed Shaban</Family>
				<NameE>D.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mohamed Shaban</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>daliaashaban@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ghaffar Boraei</Family>
				<NameE>A.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ghaffar Boraei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.A.E.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Tawfik Chalabi</Family>
				<NameE>N.A.E.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tawfik Chalabi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.A.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ali Nagi</Family>
				<NameE>M.A.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ali Nagi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Comprehensive Diagnostic accuracy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breast cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>contrast-enhanced spectral mammography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breast lesions</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breast-conserving surgeries.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Lee CH, Phillips J, Sung JS, et al. (2024) Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) (A supplement to ACR BI-RADS® mammography). American College of Radiology.##Azim HA and Ibrahim AS (2014) Breast cancer in Egypt, China and Chinese: statistics and beyond. Journal of Thoracic Dis, 6(7): 864-866. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.06.38.##Nada O, El Fiky S, Chalabi N, et al. (2021) Role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography after conserving brest surgery. Ain Shams Medical Journal, 72(4): 767-779. doi: 10.21608/asmj.2021.222682.##Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(1): 7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551.##Helal M, Abu Samra M, Ibraheem M, et al. (2017) Accuracy of CESM versus conventional mammography and ultrasound in evaluation of BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions with pathological correlation. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 48: 741-750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.004. ##Petit JY, Veronesi U, Luini A, et al. (2005) When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast, 14(6): 527-531. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.08.028. ##Zeeneldin AA, Ramadan M, Gaber AA, et al. (2013) Clinico-pathological features of breast carcinoma in elderly Egyptian patients: a comparison with the non-elderly using population-based data. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 25(1): 5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2012.10.003. ##Yousef AF, Khater HM, Jameel LM (2018) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of breast masses. Benha Medical Journal, 35: 5-12.##Patel BK, Lobbes MBI, Lewin J (2018) Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 39(1): 70-79. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.005.##Kamal RM, Helal MH, Wessam R, et al. (2015) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions. European Journal of Radiology, 84(6): 1049-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.005.##Diekmann F and Bick U (2007) Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. European Radiology, 17(12): 3086-3092. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0715-x.##Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, et al. (2013) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Research, 14(3): R94. doi: 10.1186/bcr3210.##Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, et al. (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol, 24(1): 256-264. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3007-7.##While A, Krupinski E, Mordang JJ, et al. (2019) Detection of breast cancer with mammography: effect of an artificial intelligence support system. Radiology, 290(2): 305-314.##Hua B, Chen J, Li QR, et al. (2025) Breast non-mass enhancement lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography: modified breast image reporting and data system classification. Clin Radiol, 83: 106807. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2025.106807.##Sanders JW, Pavlicek W, Stefan W, et al. (2025) Digital mammography, tomosynthesis, and contrast-enhanced mammography: intraindividual comparison of mean glandular dose for screening examinations. Am J Roentgenol, 224(3): e2432150. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.32150.##Xu W, Chen L, Zeng W, et al. (2025) Addition of contrast-enhanced mammography enhancement patterns and morphology for differentiating benign from malignant papillary breast lesions. Br J Radiol, 98(1167): 383-391. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae241.##Long R, Luo Y, Cao M, et al. (2025) Malignancy risk stratification prediction of BI-RADS 4B calcifications based on contrast-enhanced mammographic features: a multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 210(1): 135-145. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07546-w.##Ferrara F, Santonocito A, Vogel W, et al. (2025) Background parenchymal enhancement in CEM and MRI: Is there always a high agreement? Eur J Radiol, 183: 111903. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111903.##Hu K, Wang Y, Ma Y, et al. Clinical utility of quantitative ultrasonography parameters combined with serum cancer antigen 15-3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and soluble E-cadherin in diagnosing mass‑type breast cancer. Oncol Lett, 29(3): 133. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14879.##Li W, Zhao Y, Fei X, et al. (2025) Image features and diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Preliminary findings. Ultrason Imaging, 47(2): 59-67. doi: 10.1177/01617346241292032.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Generation of computed tomography images with different tube voltages by generative adversarial network</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Single-energy computed tomography (SECT) requires different energies for disease diagnosis and detection. The patient must be scanned again after the CT scan to obtain other tube-voltage images, causing increased radiation exposure. One method for avoiding rescanning is virtual monochromatic images (VMI) by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). However, VMI has not proven superior to SECT. Moreover, DECT is not available at all facilities. This study used generative adversarial networks to generate 120 kVp and Sn140 kVp CT images from 80 kVp CT images. Material and Methods: This study involved 35 patients with pulmonary hypertension who underwent CT scans with DECT. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) were calculated to evaluate the difference between the real and pseudo images. Furthermore, the mean CT values of the pulmonary arteries (PA) were compared. Results: The SSIM was 0.99 &#177; 9.15&#215;10-5 and 0.99 &#177; 3.38&#215;10-3 at 120 kVp and Sn140 kVp, respectively. The PSNR was 69.1 &#177; 1.29 and 66.5 &#177; 5.40 at 120 kVp and Sn140 kVp, respectively. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the mean CT values of PA (p &#62; 0.05) between the real and pseudo images. Conclusion: The proposed model accurately generated 120 kVp and Sn140 kVp CT images from 80 kVp CT images.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>873</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>879</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/19
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Takano</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Takano</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hirokazu.takano.a1@tohoku.ac.jp</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kondo</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kondo</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 746 Asahimachidori 2bancho, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8518, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ishizawa</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ishizawa</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Onodera</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Onodera</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiological Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Saito</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Saito</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 746 Asahimachidori 2bancho, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8518, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ota</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ota</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Deep learning</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>medical image processing</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>dual-energy scanned projection radiography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>pulmonary artery.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Mayer C, Meyer M, Fink C, et al. (2014) Potential for radiation dose savings in abdominal and chest CT using automatic tube voltage selection in combination with automatic tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol, 203(2): 292-299.##2. May MS, Kramer MR, Eller A, et al. (2014) Automated tube voltage adaptation in head and neck computed tomography between 120 and 100 kV: effects on image quality and radiation dose. Neuroradiology, 56(9): 797-803.##3. Seyal AR, Arslanoglu A, Abboud SF, Sahin A, Horowitz JM, Yaghmai V (2015) CT of the abdomen with reduced tube voltage in adults: A practical approach. Radiographics, 35(7): 1922-1939.##4. Zaehringer C, Euler A, Karwacki GM, et al. (2016) Manual adjustment of tube voltage from 120 to 100 kVp during abdominal CT in patients with body weights ≤75 kg: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a prospective, randomised trial. Clin Radiol, 71(6): 615.e1-615.e6.##5. Takahashi Y, Ota H, Omura K, et al. (2018) Image quality and radiation dose of low-tube-voltage CT with reduced contrast media for right adrenal vein imaging. Eur J Radiol, 98: 150-157.##6. Szucs-Farkas Z, Schibler F, Cullmann J, et al. (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary CT angiography at low tube voltage: intraindividual comparison of a normal-dose protocol at 120 kVp and a low-dose protocol at 80 kvp using reduced amount of contrast medium in a simulation study. Am J Roentgenol, 197(5): W852-W859.##7. Wu M, Keil A, Constantin D, Star‐Lack J, Zhu L, Fahrig R (2014) Metal artifact correction for x‐ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging. Méd Phys, 41(12): 121910.##8. Hu Y, Pan S, Zhao X, Guo W, He M, Guo Q (2016) Value and clinical application of orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm in ct scans after orthopedic metal implantation. Korean J Radiol, 18(3): 526-535.##9. Zhang GMY, Shi B, Sun H, et al. (2017) High-pitch low-dose abdominopelvic CT with tin-filtration technique for detecting urinary stones. Abdom Radiol, 42(8): 2127-2134. ##10. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, Fribourg M, Artaud D, Duhamel A (2000) Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol, 175(2): 407-411.##11. Ruiz Y, Caballero P, Caniego J, et al. (2003) Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis. Interobserver agreement. Eur Radiol, 13(4): 823-829.##12. Lam S, Gupta R, Levental M, Yu E, Curtin HD, Forghani R (2015) Optimal virtual monochromatic images for evaluation of normal tissues and head and neck cancer using dual-energy CT. Am J Neuroradiol, 36(8): 1518-1524. ##13. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology, 195(2): 353-357.##14. Noda Y, Goshima S, Nakashima Y, et al. (2020) Iodine dose optimization in portal venous phase virtual monochromatic images of the abdomen: Prospective study on rapid kVp switching dual energy CT. Eur J Radiol, 122: 108746.##15. Sugawara H, Suzuki S, Katada Y, et al. (2019) Comparison of full-iodine conventional CT and half-iodine virtual monochromatic imaging: advantages and disadvantages. Eur Radiol, 29(3): 1400-1407.##16. Hamersvelt RW van, Eijsvoogel NG, Mihl C, et al. (2018) Contrast agent concentration optimization in CTA using low tube voltage and dual-energy CT in multiple vendors: a phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 34(8): 1265-1275.##17. Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Sentaro T, et al. (2020) Prospective comparison of 70-kVp single-energy CT versus dual-energy CT: Which is more suitable for CT angiography with low contrast media dosage? Acad Radiol, 27(5): e116-e122.##18. Dai X, Schlemmer HP, Schmidt B, et al. (2013) Quantitative therapy response assessment by volumetric iodine-uptake measurement: Initial experience in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Eur J Radiol, 82(2): 327-334. ##19. Im DJ, Hur J, Han K, et al. (2020) Prognostic value of dual-energy CT-based iodine quantification versus conventional CT in acute pulmonary embolism: A propensity-match analysis. Korean J Radiol, 21(9): 1095-1103. ##20. Foti G, Silva R, Faccioli N, et al. (2021) Identification of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of venous-phase dual-energy CT in comparison to pulmonary arteries CT angiography. Eur Radiol, 31(4): 1923-1931. ##21. Ko JP, Brandman S, Stember J, Naidich DP (2012) Dual-energy computed tomography concepts, performance, and thoracic applications. J Thorac Imaging, 27(1): 7-22.##22. He J, Fang W, Lv B, et al. (2012) Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography. Nucl Med Commun, 33(5): 459-463.##23. Delcroix M, Torbicki A, Gopalan D, et al. (2021) ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J, 57(6): 2002828.##24. Nakazawa T, Watanabe Y, Hori Y, et al. (2011) Lung perfused blood volume images with dual-energy computed tomography for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Correlation to scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 35(5): 590-595.##25. Takagi H, Ota H, Sugimura K, et al. (2016) Dual-energy CT to estimate clinical severity of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison with invasive right heart catheterization. Eur J Radiol, 85(9): 1574-1580.##26. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. (2014) Generative Adversarial Networks. ArXiv Preprint arXiv: 1406.2661. ##27. Mirza M and Osindero S (2014) Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets. ArXiv Preprint arXiv: 1411.1784.##28. Yi X, Walia E, Babyn P (2019) Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review. Med Image Anal, 58: 101552.##29. Yi X and Babyn P (2018) Sharpness-aware low-dose CT denoising using conditional generative adversarial network. J Digit Imaging, 31(5): 655-669. ##30. Wang Y, Zhou L, Wang L, et al. (2018) Locality adaptive multi-modality GANs for high-quality PET image synthesis. Lect Notes Comput Sc, 11070: 329-337.##31.Gholamiankhah F, Mostafapour S, et al. (2022) Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation from MR images: comparison of generative adversarial and residual neural networks. Int J Radiat Res, 20(1): 121–130.##32. Kawahara D, Ozawa S, Kimura T, Nagata Y (2021) Image synthesis of monoenergetic CT image in dual‐energy CT using kilovoltage CT with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 22(4): 184-192.##33. Zhao W, Lyu T, Chen Y, Xing L (2020) A deep learning approach for virtual monochromatic spectral CT imaging with a standard single energy CT scanner. ArXiv Preprint arXiv: 2005.09859.##34. Funama Y, Oda S, Kidoh M, et al. (2021) Conditional generative adversarial networks to generate pseudo low monoenergetic CT image from a single-tube voltage CT scanner. Phys Medica, 83: 46-51.##35. Zhou H, Liu X, Wang H, et al. (2022) The synthesis of high-energy CT images from low-energy CT images using an improved cycle generative adversarial network. Quantitative Imaging Medicine Surg, 12(1): 28-42.##36. Isola P, Zhu JY, Zhou T, Efros AA (2017) Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks.  2017 Ieee Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Cvpr: 5967-5976.##37. Rajkumar S and Malathi G (2016) A Comparative analysis on image quality assessment for real time satellite images. Indian J Sci Technology, 9(34): 1-11.##38. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. Ieee T Image Process, 13(4): 600-612.##39. Sarah B, Ashrith G, Sandeep S. (2021) Evaluation, diagnosis, and classification of pulmonary hypertension. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J, 17(2): 86-91.##40. Li S, Wang Y, Liao Y, et al. (2017) Pseudo dual energy CT imaging using deep learning-based framework: Initial study. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:1711.07118.##41. Zhao W, Lv T, Gao P, et al. (2019) Dual-energy CT imaging using a single-energy CT data is feasible via deep learning. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:1906.04874.##42. Charyyev S, Wang T, Lei Y, et al. (2021) Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy. Br J Radiol, 95: 20210644.##43. Liu CK, Liu CC, Yang CH, Huang HM (2021) Generation of brain dual-energy CT from single-energy CT using deep learning. J Digit Imaging, 34(1): 149-161.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Impact of body contouring changes on dosimetric accuracy in volumetric modulated arc cherapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer: A method to identify target dose deviations beyond 5%</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This study evaluates the impact of body contouring changes on delivered dose and proposes a method to identify target dose deviations exceeding 5%. Materials and Methods: Five CT datasets were created by simulating body contouring reductions of 3mm, 6mm, 9mm, 12mm, and 15mm from the original planning CT. Using the same iso-center and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan, new plans (P3, P6, P9, P12, P15) were generated for new five CT datasets (body contouring reductions of 3mm, 6mm, 9mm, 12mm, and 15mm) respectively. Dose distributions and changes in dosimetric parameters for the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and Organs at Risk (OARs), including the small intestine, rectum, bone marrow, femoral head, and bladder, were analyzed. Results: Progressive weight loss increased doses to PTVs and OARs. PTV D50 increased by 1.32%, 2.35%, 3.62%, 5.18%, and 6.24% for 3mm, 6mm, 9mm, 12mm, and 15mm reductions, respectively. The small intestine V45 exceeded 195cc and the rectum V50 surpassed 50% at 12mm and 15mm. Bone marrow doses remained below the V40 threshold of 37%. When reductions reached 12mm and 15mm, regions with dose deviations &#62;5% (250cGy) covered 31.81% and 178.08% of the PTV. Conclusion: Weight loss-induced body contouring reductions significantly affect PTV and OAR doses. Re-scanning and re-planning are recommended when contour reductions exceed 12mm or waist circumference decreases by &#62;75mm.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>881</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>887</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/19
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/8/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Cao</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Cao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Hubei, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xu</Family>
				<NameE>W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shen</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Hubei, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Lilinjun00417@126.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hbzkznyy@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chen</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>chenc20022002@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>volumetric modulated arc therapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>weight loss</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>dosimetry</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cervical neoplasms.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Ali AN, Dhabaan AH, Jarrio CS, et al. (2012) Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies. Medical Dosimetry, 37: 271-275.##2. Quan EM, Li X, Li Y, et al. (2012) A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 83: 1169-1178.##3. Ali AN, Dhabaan AH, Jarrio CS, et al. (2012) Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies. Medical Dosimetry, 37: 271-275.##4. Zhang W, Cao Y, Ni X, et al. (2022) Study on the physical factors related to the exposure dose to organs at risk from radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients. Int J Radiat Res, 20: 587-591.##5. Xiong Q, Zhang T, Su S (2021) Efficacy of the inducing chemotherapy combined with synchronized chemotherapy and radiotherapy on the local advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Res, 19: 1001-1007.##6.	Lee J, Park JM, Wu HG, et al. (2015) The effect of body contouring on the dose distribution delivered with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy technique. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 16: 365-375.##7.	Robertson JM, Lockman D, Yan D, et al. (2008) The dose–volume relationship of small bowel irradiation and acute grade 3 diarrhea during chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 70: 413-418.##8.	Robertson JM, Söhn M, Yan D (2010) Predicting grade 3 acute diarrhea during radiation therapy for rectal cancer using a cutoff-dose logistic regression normal tissue complication probability model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 77: 66-72.##9.	Roeske JC, Bonta D, Mell LK, et al. (2003) A dosimetric analysis of acute gastrointestinal toxicity in women receiving intensity-modulated whole-pelvic radiation therapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 69: 201-207.##10.	Li F, Guo H, Qiu H, et al. (2018) Urological complications after radical hysterectomy with postoperative radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone for cervical cancer. Medicine, 97: e0173.##11.	Chong V and Rice M (2016) The effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in radiation-induced haemorrhagic cystitis. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 129: 79.##12.	Mell LK, Tiryaki H, Ahn KH, et al. (2008) Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 71: 1504-1510.##13.	Mell LK, Schomas DA, Salama JK, et al. (2008) Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 70: 1431-1437.##14.	Lujan AE, Mundt AJ, Yamada SD, et al. (2003) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57: 516-521.##15.Shalek RJ (1977) Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. Medical Physics, 4: 461.##16.	Wambersie A, Landberg TG, Chavaudra J, et al. (1992) Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy presentation of the ICRU report# 50. Journal of Medical Physics, 17: 5-7.##17.	Chow JCL, Jiang R (2013) Dosimetry estimation on variations of patient size in prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Medical Dosimetry, 38: 42-47.##18.	Pair ML, Du W, Rojas HD, et al. (2013) Dosimetric effects of weight loss or gain during volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Medical Dosimetry, 38: 251-254.##19.	Sun L, Kirkby C, Smith W (2019) Dosimetric effect of body contour changes for prostate and head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20: 115-124.##20.	Moallim M, Maungwe P, Chamunyonga C (2015) CBCT-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced head and cancer: dosimetric impact of weight loss on VMAT and IMRT plans for selected organs at risk structures (OARs). Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 14: 336-342.##21.	Chen C, Fei Z, Chen L, et al. (2014) Will weight loss cause significant dosimetric changes of target volumes and organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy? Medical Dosimetry, 39: 34-37.##22.	Hodapp N (2012) The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 188: 97-99.##23.	Kavanagh BD, Pan CC, Dawson LA, et al. (2010) Radiation dose–volume effects in the stomach and small bowel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 76: S101-S107.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Preoperative assessment of gastric cancer using multi-slice spiral ct perfusion imaging: A study of its diagnostic value</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Globally, gastric cancer (GC) continues to be a primary driver of cancer deaths, as delayed diagnoses frequently lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. Accurate preoperative assessment is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and enhancing patient outcomes. This research analyzed the preoperative evaluation value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) perfusion imaging in GC. Material and Methods: A cohort of 112 GC patients was recruited between January 2022 and April 2024 for quantification of MSCT perfusion metrics, including blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), permeability surface (PS), and mean transit time (MTT). Results: Advanced-stage GC exhibited significantly higher BF, BV, and PS than early-stage disease (P&#60;0.05). TNM stage progression (Ia+Ib &#8594; III+IIIa &#8594; III+IV) correlated with increasing BF, BV, and PS (P&#60;0.05), while tumor location showed no significant parameter differences. Well-differentiated tumors had higher BF and PS but lower MTT than poorly differentiated cases (P&#60;0.05). Patients without lymph node metastasis (LNM) or distant metastasis demonstrated reduced perfusion parameters, with BF and PS being statistically lower in non-metastatic groups (P&#60;0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggest that MSCT perfusion imaging effectively reflects hemodynamic changes and provides valuable insights into tumor staging, differentiation, and metastasis, supporting its clinical utility in preoperative GC evaluation.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>889</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>894</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Peng</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Peng</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Song</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Song</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Haikou 570311, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Breast Armor Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital Of Hainan Medical University  Hainan Haikou 570311, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Q.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Peng</Family>
				<NameE>Q.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Peng</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Large aperture CT room, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan City, Shandong Province, 250117 China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>jack6558@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Stomach neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>multidetector computed tomography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>perfusion imaging</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>preoperative period</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>neoplasm staging</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hemodynamics.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Xu R, Chen XD, Ding Z (2022) Perioperative nutrition management for gastric cancer. Nutrition, 93: 111492.##2. Jaroenlapnopparat A, Bhatia K, Coban S (2022) Inflammation and gastric cancer. Diseases, 10(3): 35.##3. Zhang Y and Yu J (2020) The role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 26(3): 176-182.##4. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. (2021) Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer, 149(4): 778-789.##5. Ilic M and Ilic I (2022) Epidemiology of stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol, 28(12): 1187-1203.##6. Gao H, Wan Y, Fan X, et al. (2021) The Role of cholinesterase in differential diagnosis between gastric cancer and benign gastric diseases. Clin Lab, 67(2): 200525. ##7. Li Y, Hu X, Lin R, et al. (2022) Single-cell landscape reveals active cell subtypes and their interaction in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer. Theranostics, 12(8): 3818-3833.##8. López Sala P, Leturia Etxeberria M, Inchausti Iguíñiz E, et al. (2023) Gastric adenocarcinoma: A review of the TNM classification system and ways of spreading. Radiologia (Engl Ed), 65(1): 66-80.##9. Huang W, Wang L, Ye H (2024) Study on the application of multislice spiral CT in the diagnosis and evaluation of radiotherapy efficacy for esophageal cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22(4): 823-829.##10. Zhao S, Bi Y, Wang Z, et al. (2022) Accuracy evaluation of combining gastroscopy, multi-slice spiral CT, Her-2, and tumor markers in gastric cancer staging diagnosis. World J Surg Oncol, 20(1): 152.##11. Liu W, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. (2022) Preoperative T and N restaging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: An accuracy comparison between MSCT and MRI. Front Oncol, 11: 806749.##12. Hao R, Sun Y, Hu Y (2024) A comprehensive study on the diagnostic value of multi-slice computed tomography for peripancreatic infection in elderly with severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology Res,17(2): 82-89.##13. Li CF, Wang DP, Xue YW (2018) Evaluation of a multi-slice spiral computed tomography perfusion for the prediction of the recurrence of gastric cancer. Future Oncol, 14(19): 1953-1963. ##14. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. (2022) Gastric cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 20(2): 167-192.##15. Mranda GM, Xue Y, Zhou XG, et al. (2022) Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 75: 103411.##16. Yang WJ, Zhao HP, Yu Y, et al. (2022) Updates on global epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol, 29(16): 2452-2468.##17. Ugai T, Sasamoto N, Lee HY, et al. Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic? Current evidence and future implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 19(10): 656-673.##19. Liu X, Wang X and Mao T, et al. (2023) Characteristic analysis of early gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched study. Ann Med, 55(1): 2231852.##19. Dong D, Tang La, Li ZY, et al. (2019) Development and validation of an individualized nomogram to identify occult peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol, 30(3): 431-438.##20. Gao YL, Zhang YH, Cao M (2022) Preoperative evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore), 101(37): e30582.##21. Li Q, Cui D, Feng Y, et al. (2021) Correlation between microvessel density (MVD) and multi-spiral CT (MSCT) perfusion parameters of esophageal cancer lesions and the diagnostic value of combined CtBP2 and P16. J Gastrointest Oncol, 12(3): 981-990. ##22. Wautier JL and Wautier MP (2022) Vascular permeability in diseases. Int J Mol Sci, 23(7): 3645.##23. Steeg PS (2021) The blood-tumor barrier in cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 18(11): 696-714.##24. Kanugula AK, Adapala RK, Jamaiyar A, et al. (2021) Endothelial TRPV4 channels prevent tumor growth and metastasis via modulation of tumor angiogenesis and vascular integrity. Angiogenesis, 24(3): 647-656.##25. Majidpoor J and Mortezaee K (2021) Steps in metastasis: an updated review. Med Oncol, 38(1): 3.##26. Feng G, Lei Z, Wang D, et al. (2014) The evaluation of anti-angiogenic effects of Endostar on rabbit VX2 portal vein tumor thrombus using perfusion MSCT. Cancer Imaging, 14(1): 17.##27. Xu N, Lei Z, Li XL, et al. (2013) Clinical study of tumor angiogenesis and perfusion imaging using multi-slice spiral computed tomography for breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14(1): 429-33.##28. Cao X and Jiang X (2013) Evaluating the effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy on liver tumors using multislice CT perfusion. Oncol Lett, 5(2): 511-514.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>In vitro radiosensitivity of hepatoblastoma cell line huh-6</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: As the predominant malignant embryonal liver tumor in children, hepatoblastoma (HB) demonstrates rising incidence rates. While surgical resection and chemotherapy remain primary treatments, radiation therapy emerges as a potential adjuvant option for refractory cases. However, clinical evidence supporting its application remains scarce. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the radiobiological response of HB cell line Huh-6 through systematic in vitro analyses. Materials and Methods: The proliferation, morphology change, cell apoptosis and cell cycle of Huh-6 cells received gradient X-ray irradiation were systemically conducted with CCK-8 assay, microscopy, Annexin V/7-ADD and PI single staining, respectively. Results: Irradiation induced dose-dependent suppression of Huh-6 cell proliferation. Morphological assessment demonstrated escalating cytopathic effects with increasing radiation doses, characterized by cytoplasmic vacuolization in the early stage progressing to membrane disintegration and cytosolic debris formation in morphologically aberrant cells during the late stage. Cell apoptosis was enhanced with the increment of irradiation dose. The percentage of cells arrested in G2/M phase increased and meanwhile the proportion of cells in G0/G1 phase decreased with the rising dose gradient. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate marked radiosensitivity in Huh-6 cells characterized by dose-responsive growth inhibition, cell apoptosis and cell morphological changes. These experimental results provide preliminary biological validation for considering radiotherapy in HB management protocols, particularly for treatment-resistant cases.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>895</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>900</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xu</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Cancer Research Center Nantong, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, and Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Q.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ge</Family>
				<NameE>Q.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ge</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>geqin.kelley@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Hepatoblastoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiosensitivity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Huh-6 cell line</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>in vitro.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Cao Y, Wu S, Tang H (2024) An update on diagnosis and treatment of hepatoblastoma. Biosci Trends, 17: 445-457.##2.	Guo C, Liu Z, Zhang X, Zhao S, Fan H, Wang H, et al. (2025) Global, regional, and national epidemiology of hepatoblastoma in children from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis. Hepatol Int, 19(1): 156-165.##3.	Meyers R, Hiyama E, Czauderna P, Tiao GM (2021) Liver tumors in pediatric patients. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 30: 253-274.##4.	Wu Z, Xia F, Wang W, Zhang K, Fan M, Lin R (2024) Worldwide burden of liver cancer across childhood and adolescence, 2000-2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. EClinicalMedicine, 75: 102765.##5.	Yang L, Yu Z-Q, Zhang Y-Z, Deng Y-Q, Chen X, Liu H-Y, et al. (2025) Global, regional, and national burden of hepatoblastoma, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Int J Surg, 111(5): 3629-3633..##6.	Wu PV and Rangaswami A (2022) Current Approaches in hepatoblastoma-new biological insights to inform therapy. Curr Oncol Rep, 24: 1209-1218.##7.	Razvi Y, Chan S, Zhang L, Tsao M, Barnes E, Danjoux C, et al. (2019) A review of the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy over two decades. Support Care Cancer, 27: 2131-2134.##8.	Huang Z, Li N, Tang Y, Jin J, Liu W, Xu H, et al. (2022) Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma in China: a preliminary result. Ann Transl Med, 10: 452.##9.	Sun D-E and Ye S-Y (2020) Emerging roles of long noncoding RNA regulator of reprogramming in cancer treatment. Cancer Manag Res, 12: 6103-6112.##10.	Qi J-S, Wang W-H, Li F-Q (2015) Combination of interventional adenovirus-p53 introduction and ultrasonic irradiation in the treatment of liver cancer. Oncol Lett, 9: 1297-1302.##11.	Ma F, Zhang W, Sun X (2024) m6A methylation pattern of SLC7A11 mediates the effects of cinobufagin on hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and radioresistance. International Journal of Radiation Research, 2(2: 481-486.##12.	Zhang K, Tao C, Siqin T, Wu J, Rong W (2021) Establishment, validation and evaluation of predictive model for early relapse after R0 resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion. J Transl Med, 19: 293.##13.	Leal-Leal CA, Imaz-Olguín V, Robles-Castro J, Shalkow-Klincovstein J, Palacios-Acosta JM (2010) Hepatoblastoma. Clinical experience at a single institution using the Siopel staging system. Ann Hepatol, 9: 75-79.##14.	Wang Z-H, Liu Y, Guo J-Q, Liang H-L, Zhi W-W (2024) Research progress in the application of radiotherapy in the treatment of pediatric tumors. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22: 65-75.##15.	Lu Z, Xu H, Yu X, Wang Y, Huang L, Jin X, et al. (2018) 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol induces apoptosis in human hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells by downregulating the protein kinase B signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med, 15: 1277-1284.##16.	Makimoto A, Matsui M, Chin M, Koh K, Tomotsune M, Kaneko T, et al. (2019) Magnesium supplementation therapy to prevent cisplatin-induced acute nephrotoxicity in pediatric cancer: A protocol for a randomized phase 2 trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 16: 100440.##17.	Pariset E, Bertucci A, Petay M, Malkani S, Lopez Macha A, Paulino Lima IG, et al. (2020) DNA damage baseline predicts resilience to space radiation and radiotherapy. Cell Rep, 33: 108434.##18.	Qin H, Ke J, Dong S, Li H, Zhu K, Fu S, et al. (2022) Effect of thoracic radiotherapy dose on the prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. BMC Cancer, 22: 1012.##19.	Wang J, Liu J, Wang J, Wang S, Li F, Li R, et al. (2022) Identification of proteomic markers for prediction of the response to 5-Fluorouracil based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Cancer Cell Int, 22: 117.##20.	Jiang H, Li Q, Chen B, Xi M, Makelike K, Liu S, et al. (2023) Phase I study of cisplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel combined with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med, 12: 15187-15198.##21.	Hong J-D, Wang X, Peng Y-P, Peng J-H, Wang J, Dong Y-P, et al. (2017) Silencing platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β enhances the radiosensitivity of C6 glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Lett, 14: 329-336.##22.	Zhang A-D, Su X-H, Wang Y-F, Shi G-F, Han C, Zhang N (2021) Predicting the effects of radiotherapy based on diffusion kurtosis imaging in a xenograft mouse model of esophageal carcinoma. Exp Ther Med, 21: 327.##23.	Fei Z, Chen T, Qiu X, Chen C (2020) Effect of relevant factors on radiation-induced nasopharyngeal ulcer in patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 5: 228-234.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Complications in CT-guided biopsy of tiny pulmonary nodules: a case-control study</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This investigation explores the effectiveness and physiological consequences of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies, a common technique for analysing pulmonary nodules. Materials and Methods: The study involved a paired comparison involving 211 patients who received CT-guided lung biopsies and an equal number of matched controls who did not undergo the procedure. Variables such as demographic and baseline health characteristics, changes in cardiorespiratory parameters, and patient outcomes were meticulously recorded and analysed. Results: Both groups exhibited comparable baseline demographics and health statuses. The procedure confirmed the presence of malignancy or other diseases in 90% of cases (190 out of 211 patients). Significant physiological responses post-biopsy included elevated heart rate, increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure, enhanced respiratory rate, and reduced oxygen saturation levels, all statistically significant compared to controls. However, metrics such as hospital stay duration, rate of readmission within 30 days, and survival after one year showed no statistical difference between the groups. The incidence of complications following the biopsies was calculated at 15%. Conclusion: CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy is a reliable diagnostic tool for pulmonary nodules, as evidenced by its high diagnostic yield. The procedure, however, leads to noticeable transient cardiorespiratory changes, underscoring the necessity for vigilant monitoring and supportive care during and after the procedure. Long-term patient outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups, indicating the procedure&#8217;s safety profile in a clinical setting.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>901</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>906</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>G.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Thoracic Surgery, Huoshan County Hospital, Anhui Province, China  237200</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>wangguozhong8268@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Medical imaging department, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan 614000, Sichuan province</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Qubie</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Qubie</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Medical imaging department, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan 614000, Sichuan province</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fan</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Medical imaging department, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan 614000, Sichuan province</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fang</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Medical imaging department, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan 614000, Sichuan province</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>diagnostic yield</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cardiorespiratory changes</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>patient outcomes.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM (2013) Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer 3rd ed. American college of chest physicians’ evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest, 143: e142S-e165S.##Mondoni M, Sotgiu G, Bonifazi M, et al. (2016) Transbronchial needle aspiration in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J, 48: 196-204.##Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB (2011) Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J, 37: 902-910.##Ali MS, Trick W, Mba BL, Mohananey D, Setni J, Musani A (2017) Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology, 22: 443-453.##Zhan P, Zhu QQ, Miu YY, et al. (2017) Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 6: 23-34.##Fielding DI, Chia C, Nguyen P, et al. (2012) Prospective randomized trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guide sheath versus computed tomography-guided percutaneous core biopsies for peripheral lung lesions. Intern Med J, 42: 894-900.##Han Y, Kim HJ, Kong KA, et al. (2018) Diagnosis of small pulmonary lesions by transbronchial lung biopsy with radial endobronchial ultrasound and virtual bronchoscopic navigation versus CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 13: e0191590.##Hur J, Lee HJ, Nam JE, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of CT fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration biopsy of ground-glass opacity pulmonary lesions. Am J Roentgenol, 192: 629-634.##Yamauchi Y, Izumi Y, Nakatsuka S, et al. (2011) Diagnostic performance of percutaneous core needle lung biopsy under multi-CT fluoroscopic guidance for ground-glass opacity pulmonary lesions. Eur J Radiol, 79: e85-e89.##Inoue D, Gobara H, Hiraki T, et al. (2012) CT fluoroscopy-guided cutting needle biopsy of focal pure ground-glass opacity lung lesions: Diagnostic yield in 83 lesions. Eur J Radiol, 81: 354-359.##Yamagami T, Yoshimatsu R, Miura H, et al. (2013) Diagnostic performance of percutaneous lung biopsy using automated biopsy needles under CT-fluoroscopic guidance for ground-glass opacity lesions. Br J Radiol, 86: 20120447.##Nakamura K, Matsumoto K, Inoue C, Matsusue E, Fujii S (2021) Computed tomography-guided lung biopsy: A review of techniques for reducing the incidence of complications. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama), 6(3): 83-92. ##Khan MF, Straub R, Moghaddam SR, et al. (2008) Variables affecting the risk of pneumothorax and intrapulmonal haemorrhage in CT-guided transthoracic biopsy. Eur Radiol, 18: 1356-1363.##Kakizawa H, Toyota N, Hieda M, et al. (2010) Risk factors for severity of pneumothorax after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy using the single-needle method. Hiroshima J Med Sci, 59: 43-50.##Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, et al. (2010) Incidence of and risk factors for pneumothorax and tube placement after CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of the procedures conducted over a 9-year period. Am J Roentgenol, 194: 809-814.##Loh SEK, Wu DDF, Venkatesh SK, et al. (2013) CT-guided thoracic biopsy: evaluating diagnostic yield and complications. Ann Acad Med Singap, 42: 285-290.##Nakatani M, Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, Yagi R, Sawada S (2012) Analysis of factors influencing accuracy and complications in CT-guided lung biopsy. Minim Invasive Ther, 21: 415-422.##Vagn-Hansen C, Pedersen MR, Rafaeisen SR (2016) Diagnostic yield and complications of transthoracic computed tomography-guided biopsies. Dan Med J, 63: A5239.##Modi P and Uppe A (2024) Lung Biopsy Techniques and Clinical Significance. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563153/.##Haas BM, Clayton JD, Elicker BM, Ordovas KG, Naeger DM (2017) CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies in patients with suspicion for infection may yield clinically useful information. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 208(2): 459-463. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16255.##Lee HN, Do KH, Kim EY, Choe J, Sung H, Choi SH, Kim HJ (2024) Comparative analysis of CT findings and clinical outcomes in adult patients with disseminated and localized pulmonary nocardiosis. J Korean Med Sci, 39(11): e107. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e107.##Ming M, Lu N, Qian W (2023) Evaluation of computed tomography images under deep learning in the diagnosis of severe pulmonary infection. Front Comput Neurosci, 17: 1115167. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1115167.##Watane GV, Hammer MM, Barile MF (2019) CT-guided core-needle biopsy of the lung is safe and more effective than fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with hematologic malignancies. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging, 1(5): e180030. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019180030.##Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, et al. (2017) Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 27: 138-148. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8.##Tamrazi A, Sundaresan S, Parvizi A, Eller A, Fujii J, Shaheen Z, Campbell A (2022) Clinical value of CT-guided biopsy of small (≤1.5 cm) suspicious lung nodules: Diagnostic accuracy, molecular characterization and long-term clinical outcomes. Cancer Treat Res Commun, 33: 100626. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100626.##Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA (2011) Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 196(6): W678-82. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4659.##Huang MD, Weng HH, Hsu SL, Hsu LS, Lin WM, Chen CW, Tsai YH (2019) Accuracy and complications of CT-guided pulmonary core biopsy in small nodules: a single-center experience. Cancer Imaging, 19(1): 51. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0240-6.##Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Matsui Y, Tomita K, Uka M, Tanaka T, Munetomo K, Gobara H, Kanazawa S (2021) CT-guided biopsy of lung nodules with pleural contact: Comparison of two puncture routes. Diagn Interv Imaging, 102(9): 539-544. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2021.05.005.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Application of dual-parameter MRI-based radiomics in the differentiation of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: Diagnostic efficacy and predictive modeling</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) present with similar clinical symptoms, particularly in patients with borderline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (4&#8211;10 ng/mL), making accurate diagnosis challenging. MRI-based radiomics enables non-invasive extraction of quantitative imaging features that may aid in differentiating these conditions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 150 patients (56 PCa, 94 BPH) underwent prostate MRI including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Radiomics features were extracted from manually segmented lesions using PyRadiomics. Logistic regression was used for feature selection and model construction. Three predictive models were developed based on T2WI, DWI, and combined T2WI+DWI features. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, evaluating area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity on training and validation sets. Results: The combined T2WI+DWI model showed the best diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.942 in the validation set, sensitivity of 0.821, and specificity of 1.000. This outperformed model based on T2WI or DWI alone, as well as the clinical model using PSA and prostate volume. Conclusion: Dual-parameter MRI-based radiomics enhances the non-invasive differentiation of PCa from BPH. The combined T2WI and DWI model offers superior diagnostic accuracy and may reduce unnecessary biopsies in patients with indeterminate PSA levels.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>907</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>912</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hu</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hou</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wen</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mingwen_dc@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Prostatic neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiomics</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>diffusion magnetic resonance imaging</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>computer-assisted</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>machine learning.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Berenguer CV, Pereira F, Câmara JS, Pereira JAM (2023) Underlying features of prostate cancer-statistics, risk factors, and emerging methods for its diagnosis. Curr Oncol, 30(2): 2300-21.##2.	Miernik A and Gratzke C (2020) Current treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 117(49): 843-54.##3.	Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol, 71(4): 618-29.##4.	Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2021) Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(1): 7-33.##5.	Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. (2009) Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med, 360(13): 1320-8.##6.	Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, et al. (2014) Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 65(6): 1046-55.##7.	Barry MJ and Simmons LH (2017) Prevention of prostate cancer morbidity and mortality: Primary prevention and early detection. Med Clin North Am, 101(4): 787-806.##8.	Fernandes MC, Yildirim O, Woo S, Vargas HA, Hricak H (2022) The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions. Magma, 35(4): 503-21.##9.	Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S, Thoeny HC, Tempany CM, Shtern F, et al. (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use. Eur Urol, 69(1): 41-9.##10.	Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet, 389(10071): 815-22.##11.	Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology, 278(2): 563-77.##12.	Li C, Deng M, Zhong X, Ren J, Chen X, Chen J, et al. (2023) Multi-view radiomics and deep learning modeling for prostate cancer detection based on multi-parametric MRI. Front Oncol, 13: 1198899.##13.	Cuocolo R, Cipullo MB, Stanzione A, Ugga L, Romeo V, Radice L, et al. (2019) Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol Exp, 3(1): 35.##14.	van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B, Hendriks R, Padhani AR, Hoogenboom M, et al. (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: A large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol, 75(4): 570-8.##15.	Lee HW, Kim E, Na I, Kim CK, Seo SI, Park H (2023) Novel multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning and clinical parameter integration for the prediction of long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel), 15(13): 3416##16.	Felker ER, Margolis DJ, Nassiri N, Marks LS (2016) Prostate cancer risk stratification with magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Oncol, 34(7): 311-9.##17.	Algohary A, Viswanath S, Shiradkar R, Ghose S, Pahwa S, Moses D, et al. (2018) Radiomic features on MRI enable risk categorization of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: Preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging, 48(3): 818-828.##18.	Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer, 48(4): 441-6.##19.	Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, et al. (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol, 68(6): 1045-53.##20.	Haider MA, Brown J, Yao X, Chin J, Perlis N, Schieda N, et al. (2021) Multiparametric Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: an updated systematic review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 33(12): e599-e612.##21.	Sun Y, Reynolds HM, Parameswaran B, Wraith D, Finnegan ME, Williams S, et al. (2019) Multiparametric MRI and radiomics in prostate cancer: a review. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 42(1): 3-25.##22.	Yoo S, Kim JK, Jeong IG (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A review and update for urologists. Korean J Urol, 56(7): 487-97.##23.	Chaddad A, Kucharczyk MJ, Cheddad A, Clarke SE, Hassan L, Ding S, et al. (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging based radiomic models of prostate cancer: A narrative review. Cancers (Basel), 13(3): 552.##24.	Ferro M, de Cobelli O, Vartolomei MD, Lucarelli G, Crocetto F, Barone B, et al. (2021) Prostate cancer radiogenomics-from imaging to molecular characterization. Int J Mol Sci, 22(18): 9971.##25.	He X, Xiong H, Zhang H, Liu X, Zhou J, Guo D (2021) Value of MRI texture analysis for predicting new Gleason grade group. Br J Radiol, 94(1121): 20210005.##26.	Stanzione A, Gambardella M, Cuocolo R, Ponsiglione A, Romeo V, Imbriaco M (2020) Prostate MRI radiomics: A systematic review and radiomic quality score assessment. European Journal of Radiology, 129: 109095.##27.	Bonekamp D, Kohl S, Wiesenfarth M, Schelb P, Radtke JP, Götz M, et al. (2018) Radiomic machine learning for characterization of prostate lesions with mri: comparison to ADC values. Radiology, 289(1): 128-37.##28.	Fan X, Xie N, Chen J, Li T, Cao R, Yu H, et al. (2022) Multiparametric MRI and machine learning based radiomic models for preoperative prediction of multiple biological characteristics in prostate cancer. Front Oncol, 12: 839621.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Survival advantage of radiotherapy in triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer: A national cohort study</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast carcinoma for which radiotherapy (RT) is a recommended treatment. This retrospective analysis aimed to clarify the impact of RT on survival outcomes among patients with IBC, stratified by molecular subtype. Materials and Methods: Data concerning IBC patients diagnosed from 2010 through 2015 was based on the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. To evaluate survival differences among women with diverse molecular subtypes, comparisons were drawn between those treated with RT and those untreated, employing Cox proportional hazards modeling, Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, and chi-square analysis. Results: The cohort included 532 female patients, of whom 263 (49.4%) received radiotherapy. Nodal involvement, metastatic status, and chemotherapy use were each significantly correlated with the likelihood of receiving RT (all P &#60; 0.05). Longer survival was exhibited in overall molecular subtypes who received RT(P&#60;0.001). RT significantly improved outcomes in IBC cases of the hormone receptor (HR)-/human epidermal growth factor (HER2)- phenotype (OR, odds ratio = 0.525 [0.334&#8211;0.823], P = 0.005), whereas those with HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+ or HR-/HER2+ subtypes had a comparable prognosis between the RT cohort and non-RT cohort. HR-/HER2- patients with pathologic stage N0-2M0 had longer survival with RT (OR=0.354 [0.178-0.704], P=0.003), whereas those with N3M0 stage (P=0.880) or M1 stage (P=0.443) derived no benefit. Conclusion: Marked improvements in survival following RT were noted for HR&#8722;/HER2&#8722; IBC with pathologic N0&#8211;2M0 staging.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>913</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>919</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>Z.H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, P. R. China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>Y.Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, P. R. China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>He</Family>
				<NameE>Z.Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>He</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, P. R. China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hezhy2253@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Inflammatory breast neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>survival analysis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>retrospective studies</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>SEER program.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Robertson FM, Bondy M, Yang W, Yamauchi H, Wiggins S, Kamrudin S, et al. (2010) Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment. CA Cancer J Clin, 60(6): 351-75.##2.	Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy BT, Broglio K, Meric-Bernstam F, Cristofanilli M, Giordano SH, et al. (2007) Trends for inflammatory breast cancer: is survival improving? Oncologist, 12(8): 904-12.##3.	Abraham HG, Xia Y, Mukherjee B, Merajver SD (2021) Incidence and survival of inflammatory breast cancer between 1973 and 2015 in the SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 185(1): 229-38.##4.	Dawood S, Ueno NT, Valero V, Woodward WA, Buchholz TA, Hortobagyi GN, et al. (2011) Differences in survival among women with stage III inflammatory and noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer appear early: a large population-based study. Cancer, 117(9): 1819-26.##5.	Ibrahim SA, Gadalla R, El-Ghonaimy EA, Samir O, Mohamed HT, Hassan H, et al. (2017) Syndecan-1 is a novel molecular marker for triple negative inflammatory breast cancer and modulates the cancer stem cell phenotype via the IL-6/STAT3, Notch and EGFR signaling pathways. Molecular Cancer, 16(1): 57.##6.	Fouad TM, Kogawa T, Liu DD, Shen Y, Masuda H, El-Zein R, et al. (2015) Overall survival differences between patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 152(2): 407-16.##7.	Mamouch F, Berrada N, Aoullay Z, El Khanoussi B, Errihani H (2018) Inflammatory breast cancer: a literature review. World Journal of Oncology, 9(5-6): 129-35.##8.	Takahashi Y, Sridhar N, Iwase T, Marumoto A, Fukui J, Pradhan A, et al. (2025) Inflammatory breast cancer, best practice in the community setting. Breast Cancer, 11(1): 52.##9.	Moshfegh S, Jadidi M, Hasanzadeh H, Nasr R, Mirmohammadkhani M (2022) Efficacy of Hematoporphyrin mediated photo-sonodynamic therapy on mice breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20(3): 555-61.##10.	Chainitikun S, Saleem S, Lim B, Valero V, Ueno NT (2021) Update on systemic treatment for newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Research, 29: 1-12.##11.	Dawood S, Lei X, Dent R, Gupta S, Sirohi B, Cortes J, et al. (2014) Survival of women with inflammatory breast cancer: a large population-based study. Ann Oncol, 25(6): 1143-51.##12.	Bertucci F, Finetti P, Colpaert C, Mamessier E, Parizel M, Dirix L, et al. (2015) PDL1 expression in inflammatory breast cancer is frequent and predicts for the pathological response to chemotherapy. Oncotarget, 6(15): 13506-19.##13.	Holly Dushkin M and Cristofanilli M (2011) Inflammatory breast cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 9(2): 233-40.##14.	Rueth NM, Lin HY, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman SF, Ueno NT, Shen Y, et al. (2014) Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database. J Clin Oncol, 32(19): 2018-24.##15.	Ma Y, Pan Y, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Fan W (2024) Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients underwent radiotherapy with different genotypes in relation to the risk of recurrence. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22(4): 1043-50.##16.	Arora S, Velichinskii R, Lesh RW, Ali U, Kubiak M, Bansal P, et al. (2019) Existing and emerging biomarkers for immune checkpoint immunotherapy in solid tumors. Adv Ther, 36(10): 2638-78.##17.	Tramacere F, Pisani AR, Maggiulli E, Moschetta M, Sardaro A, Altini C, et al. (2023) Effective management of a patient with secondary male breast cancer after neck radiotherapy for tonsillar lymphoma. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(1): 163-7.##18.	Fouad TM, Barrera AMG, Reuben JM, Lucci A, Woodward WA, Stauder MC, et al. (2017) Inflammatory breast cancer: a proposed conceptual shift in the UICC–AJCC TNM staging system. The Lancet Oncology, 18(4): e228-e32.##19.	Borri F and Granaglia A (2021) Pathology of triple negative breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol, 72: 136-45.##20.	Nicaise B, Loap P, Loirat D, Laki F, Pierga JY, Fourquet A, et al. (2021) Radiotherapy in the management of non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancers: a retrospective observational study. Cancers (Basel), 14(1): 107.##21.	Kwon YS, Lee MG, Kim NY, Nam GS, Nam KS, Jang H, et al. (2024) Overcoming radioresistance of breast cancer cells with MAP4K4 inhibitors. Sci Rep, 14(1): 7410.##22.	Fattahi S, Mullikin TC, Aziz KA, Afzal A, Smith NL, Francis LN, et al. (2022) Proton therapy for the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. Radiother Oncol, 171: 77-83.##23.	Parisi S, Sciacca M, Critelli P, Ferrantelli G, Chillari F, Venuti V, et al. (2024) Lattice radiotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer: report of a first case treated with curative aim. Radiation Oncology Journal, 42(2): 160-5.##24.	Wang X, Zhao L, Song X, Wu X, Krishnamurthy S, Semba T, et al. (2024) Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identify distinctive features of triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol, 8(1): 265.##25.	Zhou J, Tang LY, Zhang XH, Wang JW, Yang LC, Wu SG (2020) Increasing radiosensitivity by the combined inhibition of PARP1 and PI3K in BRCA1-mutated triple negative breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 18(2): 283-93.##26.	Chow R, Hasan S, Choi JI, Fox J, Chhabra AM, Marshall DC, et al. (2023) Effect of treatment interruptions on overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 115(9): 1029-35.##27.	Huang J, Barbera L, Brouwers M, Browman G, Mackillop WJ (2003) Does delay in starting treatment affect the outcomes of radiotherapy? a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(3): 555-63.##28.	Fayanju OM, Ren Y, Greenup RA, Plichta JK, Rosenberger LH, Force J, et al. (2020) Extent of axillary surgery in inflammatory breast cancer: a survival analysis of 3500 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 180(1): 207-17.##29.	Smith AE, Ferraro E, Safonov A, Morales CB, Lahuerta EJA, Li Q, et al. (2021) HER2 + breast cancers evade anti-HER2 therapy via a switch in driver pathway. Nature Communications, 12(1): 6667.##30.	Bahar ME, Kim HJ, Kim DR (2023) Targeting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway for cancer therapy: from mechanism to clinical studies. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8(1): 455.##31.	Garrido-Castro AC, Regan MM, Niman SM, Nakhlis F, Remolano C, Rosenbluth JM, et al. (2023) Clinical outcomes of de novo metastatic HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer. npj Breast Cancer, 9(1): 50.##32.	Ploumen RAW, van Nijnatten TJA, Kooreman LFS, Voogd AC, Keymeulen K, Siesling S, et al. (2025) Surgical treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive invasive breast cancer in the Netherlands: 10-Year trends and the influence an accompanying DCIS component. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 79: 103854.##33.	Liang Y, Liu X, Yun Z, Li K, Li H (2024) Endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy, another favorable option for HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 16: 17588359231220501.##34.	Iwase T, Harano K, Masuda H, Kida K, Hess KR, Wang Y, et al. (2020) Quantitative hormone receptor (HR) expression and gene expression analysis in HR+ inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) vs non-IBC. BMC Cancer, 20(1): 430.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Assessment of outdoor radiation dose and radiological health hazards</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: All generations of living beings have been and will be exposed to ionizing radiation. Until the discovery of radioactivity, man was not aware that ionizing radiation was a part of him and his environment. Humans are mainly exposed to gamma and beta radiation from terrestrial radionuclides, which represent the main source of irradiation of the human body. Materials and Methods: This paper presents the research overview of the dose rates of gamma and beta radiation, measured outdoors in the research locations by the Gamma&#8211;Scout device. The measurements were performed at fifteen locations in the area of Tuzla Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Gamma&#8211;Scout device was mounted outside on the table, at a height of 50 cm above ground in the vicinity of residential buildings in periods of 30 minutes. Results: The results presented include gamma, gamma+beta, and beta dose rate measurements. Based on these results, the annual effective doses originating from gamma and beta radiation were estimated. Results of measurements taken by this method showed that the values of the annual effective dose of gamma and gamma+beta radiation were in the interval of (0.21-0.32) mSv and (0.22-0.33) mSv, respectively. The estimated annual effective dose received by beta radiation was in the interval of (0-0.04) mSv. Conclusion: For all investigated locations, excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) was below the recommended risk value.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>921</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>926</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kasić</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kasić</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Tuzla, Urfeta Vejzagića 4, 75 000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>amela.dedic@untz.ba</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sakić</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sakić</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Tuzla, Urfeta Vejzagića 4, 75 000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kasumović</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kasumović</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Tuzla, Urfeta Vejzagića 4, 75 000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiation exposure</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>gamma radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>beta radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>annual effective dose</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>risk assessment.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Jakobović Z (1991) Ionizirajuće zračenje i čovjek [Ionizing radiation and man]. Školska knjiga, Zagreb. (In Croatian)##Termizi Ramli A, Aliyu AS, Agba EH, Saleh MA (2014) Effective dose from natural background radiation in Keffi and Akwanga towns, central Nigeria. Int J Rad Res, 12(1): 47-52.##Ramachandran TV (2011) Background radiation, people and environment. Iran J Radiat Res, 9(2): 63-76.##United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000)Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report, New York, vol I##Gholami M, Mirzaei S, Jomehzadeh A (2011) Gamma background radiation measurement in Lorestan province, Iran.  Int J Radiat Res, 9(2): 89-93.##Oladele BB, Arogunjo AM, Aladeniyi K (2018) Indoor and outdoor gamma radiation exposure levels in selected residential buildings across Ondo state, Nigeria. Int J Radiat Res, 16(3): 363-370.##Bouzarjomehri F and Ehrampoush MH (2005) Gamma background radiation in Yazd province; A preliminary report. Int J Radiat Res, 3(1): 17-20.##Jurin M (1998) Zračenje: izvor života i vrata smrti. [Radiation: the source of life and death]. Borba Protiv Raka, 29-30(1): 102-109. (In Croatian)##Lokalni ekološki akcioni plan općine Živinice za period od 2016. do 2026. (LEAP) (2016) Živinice [Local environmental action plan of the municipality of Zivinice for period from 2016. until 2026. (LEAP) Živinice]. (In Bosnian)##Kudumović-Dostović F (2017) Sjeveroistočna Bosna, Geografska Monografija [Northeastern Bosnia, Geographical monograph]. OFF-SET, Tuzla. (In Bosnian)##Offical Web Page of Municipality of Banovici.[Internet] 2023. Available from: https://banovici.gov.ba/historija/ Bosnian.##Gamma-Scout Manual (2010). Gamma-Scout GmbH &#38; Co. KG, Schriesheim.##Khalid N, Majid AA, Yahaya R,Yasir MS (2013) Radiological risk assessment of environmental radon. In AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics, 1571: 169-176.##Azhdarpoor A, Hoseini M, Shahsavani S, Shamsedini N, Gharehchahi E (2021) Assessment of excess lifetime cancer risk due to exposure to radon in a middle eastern city in Iran. Radiat Med Prot, 2 (3): 112-116.##Kasić A and Kasumović A (2020) Correlation of the ambient dose equivalent rate and meteorological parameters. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 326 (1): 147-155.##European Commission. (2019). Routine and emergency radioactivity monitoring arrangements Monitoring of radioactivity in drinking water and foodstuffs. Art. 35 Technical Report – HR 19-05, Zagreb.## United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2008). Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Report. United Nations.##Petrušić Z, Jovanović U, Vuletić V, Jovanović I, Mančić D (2012) Validation of portable monitoring system for measurement of natural background gamma radiation. RAD2012 Conference Proceedings, Invited Papers, 129-132.##European Commission (2014). Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Official J., 13, 1-73.##Nuccetelli C, Menghi E, Bochicchio F (2006) A computational study to evaluate indoor gamma dose-rate on the basis of outdoor measurements. Conference: Second European IRPA congress on radiation protection - Radiation protection: from knowledge to action, INIS-FR-6552, Paris.## Kolo MT, Amin YM, Khandaker MU, Abdullah WHB (2017) Radionuclide concentrations and excess lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in tailing enriched soil around Maiganga coal mine, Northeast Nigeria. Int J Radiat Res,15 (1): 71-80.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Dosimetric and biological evaluation of respiratory motion effects on dose distribution in lung cancer SIB-SBRT</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Simultaneous integrated boost-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SIB-SBRT) is an effective technique for lung cancer treatment but is significantly affected by respiratory motion. This study employed a four-dimensional (4D) dose calculation method to evaluate the impact of respiratory motion on dose delivery. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data from 17 lung cancer patients who underwent four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, referred to as the original plans, were designed with dose prescriptions of 6 Gy per fraction for the internal target volume (ITV) and 5 Gy per fraction for the planning target volume (PTV). Control points (CPs) and monitor units (MUs) from the original plans were mapped onto ten respiratory phases of the 4DCT to generate sub-plans. These sub-plans were combined to form a 4D dose plan, followed by evaluation of physical and biological dose effects. Results: Compared to the original plans, respiratory motion reduced V100 by 1.4% for the ITV and 3.5% for the PTV. Additionally, it decreased the tumor control probability (TCP) by 0.1% for the ITV and 4.2% for the PTV. Gamma analysis revealed hot spots at the target periphery and cold spots within the target. Conclusion: Respiratory motion has a greater impact on PTV than ITV in SIB-SBRT. Dose deviations and distribution should be considered to enhance treatment accuracy.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>927</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>934</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fei</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, The 901st Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Pei</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Pei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Technology Development Department, Anhui Wisdom Technology Company Limited, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Q.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ren</Family>
				<NameE>Q.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ren</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Technology Development Department, Anhui Wisdom Technology Company Limited, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Cui</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Cui</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Hefei Cancer Hospital of CAS, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>xlcui@cmpt.ac.cn</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>wanghz@hfcas.ac.cn</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Lung neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>stereotactic body radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>four-dimensional  computed tomography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>respiratory motion.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(3): 209-249. ##2. Timmerman R, Paulus R, Galvin J, Michalski J, Straube W, Bradley J, et al. (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early-stage lung cancer. JAMA, 303(11): 1070-1076. ##3. Bezjak A, Paulus R, Gaspar LE, Timmerman RD, Straube WL, Ryan WF, et al. (2016) Efficacy and toxicity analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0813 trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 96(2): S8.##4. Tandberg DJ, Tong BC, Ackerson BG, Kelsey CR (2018) Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review. Cancer, 124(4): 667-678.##5. Zhang Q, Cai XW, Feng W, Yu W, Fu XL (2022) Dose-escalation by hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost IMRT in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer, 22(1): 96.##6. Hurkmans CW, Cuijpers JP, Lagerwaard FJ, Widder J, van der Heide UA, Schuring D, et al. (2009) Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study. Radiat Oncol, 4(1): 1-14. ##7. Kelada OJ, Decker RH, Nath SK, Johung KL, Zheng MQ, Huang YY, et al. (2018) High single doses of radiation may induce elevated levels of hypoxia in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 102(1): 174-183. ##8. Haque WM, Endres EC, Szeja S, Hatch SS, Joyner MM, Internationals O (2016) Simultaneous integrated boost using conformal radiation therapy for treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer, 3(1): 1-7. ##9. Tanabe Y, Deguchi T, Kiritani M, Hira N, Tomimoto S, Nishikawa H, et al. (2024) Evaluation of statistical prediction model fitting by combining fiducial markers and lung volume for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Res, 22(1): 17-22.##10. Kaviarasu K, Raj NAN, Murthy KK (2021) Dosimetric evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy for different duty cycles of the gated beam delivery. Int J Radiat Res, 19(3): 669-683.##11. Chung H, Jung J, Jeong C, Kwaket J, Park J, Kim JJ, et al. (2018) Evaluation of delivered dose to a moving target by 4D dose reconstruction in gated volumetric modulated arc therapy. PLoS ONE, 13(9): e0202765. ##12. Zeng YL, Chang Y, Zhang S, Han J, Liu HY, Xiao F, et al. (2023) Clinical evaluation of 4D dynamic dose for thoracic tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy with variable parameters. Radiat Med Prot, 4(3): 150-158. ##13.  Kauweloa KI, Gutierrez AN, Bergamo A, Stathakis S, Papanikolaou N, Mavroidis P (2014) Practical aspects and uncertainty analysis of biological effective dose (BED) regarding its three-dimensional calculation in multiphase radiotherapy treatment plans. Med Phys, 41(7): 071707. ##14. Karava K, Ehrbar S, Riesterer O, Roesch J, Glatz S, Klöck S, et al. (2017) Potential dosimetric benefits of adaptive tumor tracking over the internal target volume concept for stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol, 12(1): 175.##15.	Tian Y, Wang ZH, Ge H, Zhang T, Cai J, Kelsey C, et al. (2012) Dosimetric comparison of treatment plans based on free breathing, maximum, and average intensity projection CTs for lung cancer SBRT. Med Phys, 39(5): 2754-2760.##16.	Chan MKH, Kwong DLW, Ng SCY, Tam EKW, Tong ASM. (2012) Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers. Med Phys, 39(9): 5479-5487. ##17. Park J, Xu Q, Xue J, Zhai Y, An L, Chen Y (2014) SU-E-T-119: Dosimetric and Mechanical Characteristics of Elekta Infinity LINAC with Agility MLC. Med Phys, 41(6): 249-249.##18. Patel G, Mandal A, Choudhary S, et al. (2020) Plan evaluation indices: A journey of evolution. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 25(3): 336-344.##19. Ozturk N, Ozbek N, Depboylu B (2022) Dosimetric comparison of IMRT, VMAT and HYBRID treatment methods in radical radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Res, 20(2): 411-416.##20.	Hoffman D, Dragojević I, Hoisak J, Hoopes D, Manger R (2019) Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) dose gradient and PTV volume: a retrospective multi-center analysis. Radiat Oncol, 14(1): 162. ##21. Thaper D, Singh G, Kamal R, Oinam AS, Yadav HP, Kumar R, et al. (2021) Impact of dose heterogeneity in target on TCP and NTCP for various radiobiological models in liver SBRT: different isodose prescription strategy. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 7(1): 015020. ##22. Chang JH, Gehrke C, Prabhakar R, Gill S, Wada M, Joon DL, et al. (2016) RADBIOMOD: A simple program for utilising biological modelling in radiotherapy plan evaluation. Phys Med, 32(1): 248-254. ##23. Gay HA and Niemierko A (2007) A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med, 23(3-4): 115-125.##24. ]Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. (1991) Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 21(1): 109-122. ##25. Chaikh A and Balosso J (2016) The use of radiobiological TCP and NTCP models to validate the dose calculation algorithm and readjust the prescribed dose. Radiother Oncol, 118(1): S24.##26. Li X, Yang Y, Li TF, Fallon K, Heron DE and, Huq MS (2013) Dosimetric effect of respiratory motion on volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based lung SBRT treatment delivered by TrueBeam machine with flattening filter-free beam. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 14(6): 4370.##27. Chang LR, Yu XC, Lu ZW, WU B, Qi B (2015) The influence of respiratory motion on dose distribution of 3D-CRT and IMRT- a simulation study. Int J Radiat Res, 13(1): 39-43.##28.	Palmer AL, Nash D, Kearton JR, Jafari SM, Muscat S (2017) A multicentre 'end to end' dosimetry audit of motion management (4DCT-defined motion envelope) in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol, 125(3): 453-458. ##29.	Thomas A, Yan H, Oldham M, Juang T, Adamovics J, Yin FF (2013) The effect of motion on IMRT-looking at interplay with 3D measurements. J Phys Conf Ser, 444: 012049.##30. Liu G, Hu F, Ding XF, et al. (2019) Simulation of dosimetry impact of 4DCT uncertainty in 4D dose calculation for lung SBRT. Radiat Oncol. 14: 1.##31.	Ohira S, Ueda Y, Hashimoto M, Miyazaki M, Isono M, Kamikaseda H, et al. (2016) VMAT-SBRT planning based on an average intensity projection for lung tumors located in close proximity to the diaphragm: a phantom and clinical validity study. J Radiat Res, 57(1): 91-97. ##32. Ehrbar S, Lang S, Stieb S, Riesterer O, Stark LS, Guckenberger M, et al. (2016) Three-dimensional versus four-dimensional dose calculation for volumetric modulated arc therapy of hypofractionated treatments. Z Med Phys, 26(1): 45-53.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Cyclotron 30 MeV 1.5 mA shielding design for boron neutron capture therapy</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Effective radiation shielding in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) facilities is essential to protect patients, staff, and the environment from secondary radiation. This study aims to determine the optimal thickness of Portland, boron, and barite concretes for shielding the Beam Shaping Assembly (BSA) in BNCT facilities, ensuring compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Indonesia&#8217;s BAPETEN (Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia) safety standards. Materials and Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) to model radiation interactions. The shielding performance of the three concretes was evaluated across five critical areas of the BSA: front, left side, external labyrinth, top, and bottom, utilizing 100,000,000 particles for statistical accuracy. Results: Barite concrete required the least thickness due to its high density and superior photon attenuation, with optimal thicknesses of 0.56 m, 0.4 m, 1.0 m, 0.4 m, and 0.32 m in the respective areas. Boron concrete provided enhanced neutron protection with thicknesses of 0.79 m, 0.35 m, 1.0 m, 0.45 m, and 0.32 m. Portland concrete, while needing greater thickness for gamma shielding, remained cost-effective and accessible with thicknesses of 0.7 m, 0.5 m, 1.0 m, 0.5 m, and 0.37 m. Conclusion: All three concretes met IAEA and BAPETEN safety standards. Barite concrete was most effective for photon attenuation, boron concrete excelled in neutron protection, and Portland concrete offered a practical balance between effectiveness and cost. These findings aid in designing safe and efficient BNCT facilities, especially in resource-limited settings.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>935</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>943</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.R.W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wicaksana</Family>
				<NameE>A.R.W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wicaksana</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2 Grafika Street, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Muharini</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Muharini</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2 Grafika Street, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sardjono</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sardjono</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wijaya</Family>
				<NameE>G.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wijaya</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ismail</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ismail</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>I.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Triatmoko</Family>
				<NameE>I.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Triatmoko</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ulya</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ulya</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>syar015@brin.go.id</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Prasetio</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Prasetio</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nuraeni</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nuraeni</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hidayati</Family>
				<NameE>N.R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hidayati</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fendinugroho</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fendinugroho</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kasesaz</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kasesaz</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization></Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>BNCT</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiation shielding</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Monte Carlo simulation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>PHITS</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>concrete materials.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Frick C, Rumgay H, Vignat J, Ginsburg O, Nolte E, Bray F, et al. (2023) Quantitative estimates of preventable and treatable deaths from 36 cancers worldwide: a population-based study. Lancet Glob Health, 11(11): e1700-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00406-0##2.	Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(3): 209-49. ##3.	Vanita Sharma Stewart H Kerr ZK, Kerr DJ (2011) Challenges of cancer control in developing countries: current status and future perspective. Future Oncology, 7(10): 1213-22. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.11.101##4.	Yao N, Wang J, Cai Y, Yuan J, Wang H, Gong J, et al. (2016) Patterns of cancer screening, incidence and treatment disparities in China: protocol for a population-based study. BMJ Open, 6(8): e012028. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/8/e012028.abstract##5.	Feliciano EJG, Ho FD V, Yee K, Paguio JA, Eala MAB, Robredo JPG, et al. (2023) Cancer disparities in Southeast Asia: intersectionality and a call to action. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 41: 100971.## https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100971##6.	Minas TZ, Kiely M, Ajao A, Ambs S (2021) An overview of cancer health disparities: new approaches and insights and why they matter. Carcinogenesis, 42(1): 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgaa121##7.	Li L, Shan T, Zhang D, Ma F (2024) Nowcasting and forecasting global aging and cancer burden: analysis of data from the GLOBOCAN and Global Burden of Disease Study. Journal of the National Cancer Center, 4(3):223-32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000280##8.	Are C (2023) JSO seminar series: Global inequities in access to cancer care and strategies to address them. J Surg Oncol, 128(6): 929-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27476##9.	Thun MJ, DeLancey JO, Center MM, Jemal A, Ward EM (2010) The global burden of cancer: priorities for prevention. Carcinogenesis, 31(1): 100-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp263##10.	Sha R, Kong X meng, Li X yu, Wang Y bing (2024) Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2021: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Biomark Res, 12(1): 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-024-00631-8##11.	Lertkhachonsuk A aroon, Yip CH, Khuhaprema T, Chen DS, Plummer M, Jee SH, et al. (2013) Cancer prevention in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines from the Asian Oncology Summit 2013. Lancet Oncol, 14(12): e497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70350-4##12.	Onyoh EF, Hsu WF, Chang LC, Lee YC, Wu MS, Chiu HM (2019) The rise of colorectal cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, screening, and management. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 21(8): 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-019-0703-8##13.	Varmus H and Kumar HS (2013) Addressing the growing international challenge of cancer: A multinational perspective. Sci Transl Med, 5(175): 175cm2. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3005899##14.	He H, Li J, Jiang P, Tian S, Wang H, Fan R, et al. (2021) The basis and advances in clinical application of boron neutron capture therapy. Radiation Oncology, 16(1): 216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01939-7##15.	Bortolussi S, Liu YH, Porras I (2021) Boron neutron capture therapy: From nuclear physics to biomedicine. Biology (Basel), 10(5): 370.  https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/5/370##16.	Miyatake SI, Kawabata S, Hiramitsu R, Kuroiwa T, Suzuki M, Kondo N, et al. (2016) Boron neutron capture therapy for malignant brain tumors. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 56(7): 361-71. ##17.	Hatanaka H, Amano K, Kamano Sh, Fankhauser H, Hanamura T, Sano K (1978) Boron-neutron capture therapy in relation to immunotherapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 42(1): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406631##18.	Lan TL, Lin CF, Lee YY, Lin KH, Chang FC, Lin SC, et al. (2023) Advances in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for recurrent intracranial meningioma. Int J Mol Sci, 24(5): 4978. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/5/4978##19.	Barth RF, Gupta N, Kawabata S (2024) Evaluation of sodium borocaptate (BSH) and boronophenylalanine (BPA) as boron delivery agents for neutron capture therapy (NCT) of cancer: an update and a guide for the future clinical evaluation of new boron delivery agents for NCT. Cancer Commun, 44(8): 893-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12582##20.	Skwierawska D, López-Valverde JA, Balcerzyk M, Leal A (2022) Clinical viability of boron neutron capture therapy for personalized radiation treatment. Cancers (Basel), 14(12): 2865. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/12/2865##21.	Seneviratne D, Advani P, Trifiletti DM, Chumsri S, Beltran CJ, Bush AF, et al. (2022) Exploring the biological and physical basis of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) as a promising treatment frontier in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel), 14(12): 3009. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/12/3009##22.	Dymova MA, Taskaev SY, Richter VA, Kuligina EV (2020)Boron neutron capture therapy: Current status and future perspectives. Cancer Commun, 40(9): 406-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12089##23.	Tsoulfanidis N (2010) Measurement and detection of radiation. 3rd ed. CRC Press. ##24.	BAPETEN. Perka Bapeten No 4 Tahun 2013 tentang Proteksi dan Keselamatan Radiasi dalam Pemanfaatan Tenaga Nuklir [Internet]. 2013. https://www.bapeten.go.id/##25.	Oudiz A, Croft J, Fleishman A, Lochardj Lombard J, Webb G (1986) What is ALARA ? IAEA Press.##26.	Priambodo G, Nugroho F, Palupi DS, Zailani R, Sardjono Y (2017) Optimasi perisai radiasi neutron fasilitas ruangan iradiasi untuk boron neutron capture cancer therapy (BNCT) dengan sumber beamport tembus reaktor kartini. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 19(3): 139-46. ##27.	Mu’Alim M and Sardjono Y (2018) Modeling the radiation shielding of boron neutron capture therapy based on 2.4 MeV D-D neutron generator facility. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 20(1): 1-8.##28.	Sato T, Shtotfs YI Atkpetnmhinsls I, Niita K (2018) Features of Particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. J Nucl Sci Technol, 55(6): 684-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890##29.	Nemati MJ, Habibi M, Amrollahi R (2013) Analysis of concrete labyrinth shielding and radiation dose for APF plasma focus neutron source by FLUKA Monte Carlo code. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 295(1): 221-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2196-x##30.	Kashiwagi H, Kawabata S, Yoshimura K, Fukuo Y, Kanemitsu T, Takeuchi K, et al. (2022) Boron neutron capture therapy using dodecaborated albumin conjugates with maleimide is effective in a rat glioma model. Invest New Drugs, 40(2): 255-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-021-01201-7##31.	Oloo SO, Smith KM, Vicente M da GH (2023) Multi-functional boron-delivery agents for boron neutron capture therapy of cancers. Cancers, 15(13): 3277. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/13/3277##32.	McConn RJ, Gesh CJ, Pagh RT, Rucker RA (2011) Radiation portal monitor project compendium of material composition data for radiation transport modeling. PIET-43741-TM-963 PNNL-15870 Rev. 1, Technical report.##33.	Ardana IM and Sardjono Y (2017) Optimization of a neutron beam shaping assembly design for BNCT and its dosimetry simulation based on MCNPX. Jurnal Teknologi Reaktor Nuklir Tri Dasa Mega, 19(3): 121. ##34.	Zhou Y, Chen X, Zhan Y, Sun F, Zhang J, He W (2023) Research on the shielding performance of concrete in a 60Co irradiation environment. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 413: 112575. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549323004247##35.	Awadeen M, Amin M, Bakr RH, Tahwia AM (2024) Mechanical properties, attenuation coefficient, and microstructure of ultra high-performance heavyweight concrete for radiation shielding applications. Journal of Building Engineering, 82: 108395. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710223025780##36.	Barbhuiya S, Das BB, Norman P, Qureshi T (2024) A comprehensive review of radiation shielding concrete: Properties, design, evaluation, and applications. Structural Concrete, 26(2): 1809-1855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400519##37.	Al-Saleh WM, Almutairi HM, Sayyed MI, Elsafi M (2023) Multilayer radiation shielding system with advanced composites containing heavy metal oxide nanoparticles: a free-lead solution. Sci Rep, 13(1): 18429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45621-2##38.	Magni C, Postuma I, Ferrarini M, Protti N, Fatemi S, Gong C, et al. (2020) Design of a BNCT irradiation room based on proton accelerator and beryllium target. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 165: 109314. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804320304644##39.	Lai BL, Huang YS, Lai PC, Chu WH, Sheu RJ (2020) Comparison of different methods for the shielding analysis of an AB-BNCT facility based on the Be(p,xn) reaction with 30-MeV protons. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 166: 109351. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804320304991##40.	Luo Y, Seidl M, Wang X (2023) Design and verification of BNCT beam shaping assembly based on genetic algorithm. In: Liu C, editor. Proceedings of the 23rd Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Volume 2. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore;. p. 306-15. ##41.	Lee PY, Tang X, Geng C, Liu YH (2021) A bi-tapered and air-gapped beam shaping assembly used for AB-BNCT. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 167: 109392. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096980432030539X##42.	Martellucci M, Romanelli G, Valeri S, Cottone D, Andreani C, Senesi R (2021) The neutron cross section of barite-enriched concrete for radioprotection shielding in the range 1 meV–1 keV. The European Physical Journal Plus, 136(2): 259. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01243-z##43.	Sato S, Konno C, Nakashima H, Shionaga R, Nose H, Ito Y, et al. (2018) Shielding performance of newly developed boron-loaded concrete for DT neutrons. J Nucl Sci Technol, 55(4): 410-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1403380##44.	Çelen YY, Evcin A, Akkurt I, Bezir NÇ, Günoğlu K, Kutu N (2019) Evaluation of boron waste and barite against radiation. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(9): 5267-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02333-3##45.	Mansouri E, Mesbahi A, Malekzadeh R, Ghasemi Janghjoo A, Okutan M (2020) A review on neutron shielding performance of nanocomposite materials. International Journal of Radiation Research, 18(4): 611-22. ## ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Integrative analysis of immune gene features and radiotherapy sensitivity in rectal cancer</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To investigate the correlation between immune gene expression patterns and radiotherapy (RT) response, aiming to identify novel biomarkers for personalized rectal cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: Data from rectal cancer patients were clustered into two subgroups based on immune gene expression. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between subgroups were identified by using the limma package, and survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. ClusterProfiler was used to conduct GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses on the DEGs. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were utilized to pinpoint key modules or hub genes through interaction scores. In the TCGA rectal cancer dataset, 165 samples were divided into high (n=39) and low (n=126) immune gene expression groups based on the expression of 1,959 immune-related genes. Results: Between the two groups, 775 DEGs were up-regulated and 35 were down-regulated. Analysis of the GSE35452 dataset revealed 308 up-regulated and 209 down-regulated DEGs between the RT-responsive group (n=24) and the non-responsive group (n=22). PPI analysis showed that PLA2G2A and PLA2G4A exhibited the highest interaction score (value = 0.918). Conclusion: Through gene enrichment and PPI network analysis, potential core targets PLA2G2A and PLA2G4A were identified, providing new biomarkers for personalized treatment in rectal cancer.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>945</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>951</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Gao</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Gao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Zone 1,Ningde Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>H.C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Zone 1,Ningde Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ruan</Family>
				<NameE>Z.J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ruan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Zone 1,Ningde Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai First Hospital Ningde City Hospital, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yang</Family>
				<NameE>T.T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Lin</Family>
				<NameE>K.L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Lin</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>School of Medicine, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chen</Family>
				<NameE>K.J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Zone 1,Ningde Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>chenkejie1@126.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liao</Family>
				<NameE>C.L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Zone 1,Ningde Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>597326974@qq.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Immunotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>PLA2G2A</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>PLA2G4A</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>rectal cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Zhen J, Li J, Liao F, et al. (2024) Development and validation of machine learning models for young-onset colorectal cancer risk stratification. NPJ Precision Oncology, 8: 239.##2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73: 17-48.##3. Lin S, Wei J, Lai H, et al. (2024) Determining the optimal distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients by imaging of large pathological sections: An experimental study. Medicine (Baltimore), 103: e38083.##4. Tian J, Afebu KO, Bickerdike A, et al. (2023) Fundamentals of Bowel Cancer for Biomedical Engineers. Ann Biomed Eng, 51: 679-701.##5. Huang W, Su D, Liao X, et al. (2023) Prognostic costimulatory molecule-related signature risk model correlates with immunotherapy response in colon cancer. Sci Rep, 13: 789.##6. National Health Commission of The People's Republic of China (2020) National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer 2020 in China (English version). Chinese Journal of Cancer Research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 32: 415-445.##7. Zheng Z, Ye D, Wang X, et al. (2022) Effect of partial preservation versus complete preservation of Denonvilliers' fascia on postoperative urogenital function in male patients with low rectal cancer (PREDICTION): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open, 12: e055355.##8. Pallisera-Lloveras A, Planelles-Soler P, Hannaoui N, et al. (2019) Dissection of the inferior mesenteric vein versus of the inferior mesenteric artery for the genitourinary function after laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urology, 19: 75.##9. Zhang L, Hu C, Zhao J, et al. (2024) The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 38: 1912-1921.##10. Zhang Q, Wei J, Chen H (2023) Advances in pelvic imaging parameters predicting surgical difficulty in rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol, 21: 64.##11. Dai D, Liu G, Liu H, et al. (2022) Clinical feasibility of the therapeutic strategies total neoadjuvant therapy and &#34;watch and wait&#34; in the treatment of rectal cancer patients with recurrence after clinical complete response. Frontiers in Surgery, 9: 1006624.##12. Han G, Cui L, Sun C, et al. (2023) Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen in advanced colorectal cancer after deep hyperthermia: a single-center retrospective study. Front Oncol, 13: 1259713.##13. Zhao J, Liu X, Wang W, et al. (2019) Concomitant dose escalation with image-guided tomotherapy in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a single-center study. Cancer Management and Research, 11: 1579-1586.##14. Zhu L, Wang M, Chen N, et al. (2022) Mechanisms of microRNA action in rectal cancer radiotherapy. Chin Med J (Engl), 135: 2017-2025.##15. Mukherjee AG, Wanjari UR, Namachivayam A, et al. (2022) Role of immune cells and receptors in cancer treatment: An immunotherapeutic approach. Vaccines, 10: 1493.##16. Lin S, Chen W, Chen Z, et al. (2022) Efficacy of sintilimab and fruquintinib combination treatment in the management of microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10: 380.##17. Cai C, Zhang X, Sun X, et al. (2024) Node-sparing modified short-course Radiotherapy combined with CAPOX and tislelizumab for locally advanced MSS of middle and low rectal cancer (mRCAT): an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicentre clinical trial. BMC Cancer, 24: 1247.##18. Zhou H, Chen Y, Xiao Y, et al. (2022) Evaluation of the ability of fatty acid metabolism signature to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Frontiers in Immunology, 13: 1050721.##19. Koukourakis IM, Platoni K, Tiniakos D, et al. (2023) Immune response and immune checkpoint molecules in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A review. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45: 4495-4517.##20. Zhao S, Ye Z, Stanton R (2020) Misuse of RPKM or TPM normalization when comparing across samples and sequencing protocols. RNA (New York, NY), 26: 903-909.##21. Wilkerson MD and Hayes DN (2010) ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26: 1572-1573.##22. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 43: e47.##23. Diao C, Xi Y, Xiao T (2018) Identification and analysis of key genes in osteosarcoma using bioinformatics. Oncology Letters, 15: 2789-2794.##24. Ranstam J and Cook JA (2017) Kaplan-Meier curve. The British Journal of Surgery, 104: 442.##25. Huang M, Yang Y, Zhu X, et al. (2021) A prospective phase II study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 17: 513-521.##26. Peng Q, Tao J, Xu Y, et al. (2024) Lipid metabolism-associated genes serve as potential predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in rectal cancer. Transl Oncol, 39: 101828.##27. Zhu W, Pan S, Zhang J, et al. (2024) The role of hyperthermia in the treatment of tumor. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 204: 104541.##28. Lhuillier C, Vanpouille-Box C, Galluzzi L, et al. (2018) Emerging biomarkers for the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockers. Semin Cancer Biol, 52: 125-134.##29. Morris ZS, Wang AZ, Knox SJ (2021) The Radiobiology of Radiopharmaceuticals. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 31: 20-27.##30. Shen X, Zhang Y, Dong Y, et al. (2024) Identification and validation of prognostic models and survival predictions of T cell-inflamed related genes in patients with colorectal cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22: 595-602.##31. Hörner-Rieber J, Klüter S, Debus J, et al. (2020) MR-guided radiotherapy: The Perfect partner for immunotherapy? Front Oncol, 10: 615697.##32. Zheng H, Guo B, Qiu X, et al. (2022) Polymersome-mediated cytosolic delivery of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonist enhances tumor immunotherapy. Bioact Mater, 16: 1-11.##33. Ge W, Yue M, Lin R, et al. (2023) PLA2G2A(+) cancer-associated fibroblasts mediate pancreatic cancer immune escape via impeding antitumor immune response of CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells. Cancer Lett, 558: 216095.##34. Li F, Yang M, Li Y, et al. (2020) An improved clear cell renal cell carcinoma stage prediction model based on gene sets. BMC Bioinformatics, 21: 232.##35. Deng C, Zhong ME, Chen Y, et al. (2023) Proteomic profiling and functional characterization of serum-derived extracellular vesicles in the mucinous and non-mucinous colon adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 149: 9285-9300.##36. Sukhadia SS, Tyagi A, Venkataraman V, et al. (2022) ImaGene: a web-based software platform for tumor radiogenomic evaluation and reporting. Bioinformatics Advances, 2: vbac079.##37. He HL, Lee YE, Shiue YL, et al. (2015) PLA2G2A overexpression is associated with poor therapeutic response and inferior outcome in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Histopathology, 66: 991-1002.##38. Shin JI and Ha SJ (2014) Regulatory T cells-an important target for cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews Clinical Oncology, 11: 307.##39. Song D and Ding Y (2023) A new target of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: regulatory T cells. Frontiers in Immunology, 14: 1330099.##40. Aliru ML, Schoenhals JE, Venkatesulu BP, et al. (2018) Radiation therapy and immunotherapy: what is the optimal timing or sequencing? Immunotherapy, 10: 299-316.##41. Jin W, Zhao J, Yang E, et al. (2022) Neuronal STAT3/HIF-1α/PTRF axis-mediated bioenergetic disturbance exacerbates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via PLA2G4A. Theranostics, 12: 3196-3216.##42. Ayabe T, Hisasue M, Yamada Y, et al. (2022) Characterisation of canine CD34+/CD45 diminished cells by colony-forming unit assay and transcriptome analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9: 936623.##43. Zhan Y, Zheng L, Liu J, et al. (2021) PLA2G4A promotes right-sided colorectal cancer progression by inducing CD39+γδ Treg polarization. JCI Insight, 6(16): e148028.##44. Nakao Y, Nakagawa S, Yamashita YI, et al. (2021) High ARHGEF2 (GEF-H1) expression is associated with poor prognosis via cell cycle regulation in patients with pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 28: 4733-4743.##45. Olsen RS, Andersson RE, Zar N, et al. (2016) Prognostic significance of PLA2G4C gene polymorphism in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Acta Oncologica, 55: 474-479.##46. Menzel N, Fischl W, Hueging K, et al. (2012) MAP-kinase regulated cytosolic phospholipase A2 activity is essential for production of infectious hepatitis C virus particles. PLoS Pathogens, 8: e1002829.##47. Takada N, Sugano H, Shirai Y, et al. (2021) Nafamostat mesilate, a nuclear factor kappa B inhibitor, enhances the antitumor action of radiotherapy on gallbladder cancer cells. PloS One, 16: e0257019.##48. Zhang J, Xu DL, Liu XB, et al. (2016) Darapladib, a lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 inhibitor, reduces Rho kinase activity in atherosclerosis. Yonsei Medical Journal 57, 321-327.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Intravenous dexmedetomidine administration prior to radiotherapy in lung cancer patients: Effects on hemodynamics, stress response, and pulmonary protection</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To assess the clinical benefits of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion administered before radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer, focusing on hemodynamic stability, stress response modulation, and pulmonary protection. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 lung cancer patients scheduled for thoracic radiotherapy (6 MV linear accelerator, Varian Clinac iX, USA; 2 Gy/fraction, 30 fractions, total dose 60 Gy) between April 2022 and January 2024 were divided into the control group (n = 60) and dexmedetomidine group (n = 60). Prior to each radiotherapy session, the control group received intravenous 0.6 &#956;g/kg normal saline, while the study group received 0.6 &#956;g/kg dexmedetomidine. Hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress markers, and stress hormone levels were recorded at baseline (T0), midway (T1), end of session (T2), and 24 hours post-radiotherapy (T3). Pulmonary complications, cognitive impairment, and adverse reactions were documented. Results: The dexmedetomidine group maintained significantly more stable mean arterial pressure, heart rate, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂), and oxidative stress profiles (P &#60; 0.05). Compared to controls, they showed lower arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO₂), malondialdehyde, cortisol, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels. Pulmonary injury occurred in 5.0% vs. 16.7% (P = 0.041), and cognitive impairment in 6.7% vs. 20.0% (P = 0.031). Adverse reaction rates were similar between groups (P &#62; 0.05). Conclusion: Pre-radiotherapy dexmedetomidine stabilizes hemodynamics, attenuates oxidative and neuroendocrine stress responses, and reduces pulmonary and cognitive complications without increasing adverse events, suggesting a valuable role in peri-radiotherapy management of lung cancer patients.
&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>953</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>958</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zheng</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zheng</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of  Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhu</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Anesthesiology, Haimen District Peoples Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sun</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sun</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of  Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>sunjiafengntyy@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Dexmedetomidine</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>lung neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hemodynamics</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>oxidative stress</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cognitive dysfunction.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Aluru JS, Barsouk A (2021) Epidemiology of lung cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn), 25(1): 45-52.##2. Li C, Lei S, Ding L, Xu Y, Wu X, Wang H, et al. (2023) Global burden and trends of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Chin Med J, 136(13): 1583-90.##3. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. (2024) Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 74(3): 229-63.##4. Hirji SA and Swanson SJ (2018) T1a lung carcinoma: the place of segmentectomy in the treatment array. J Thorac Dis, 10(Suppl 10): S1151-s6.##5. Lederman D, Easwar J, Feldman J, Shapiro V (2019) Anesthetic considerations for lung resection: preoperative assessment, intraoperative challenges and postoperative analgesia. Ann Transl Med, 7(15): 356.##6. Ivascu R, Torsin LI, Hostiuc L, Nitipir C, Corneci D, Dutu M (2024) The surgical stress response and anesthesia: a narrative review. J Clin Med, 13(10): 3017.##7. Kaye AD, Chernobylsky DJ, Thakur P, Siddaiah H, Kaye RJ, Eng LK, et al. (2020) Dexmedetomidine in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for postoperative pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 24(5): 21.##8. Bao N and Tang B (2020) Organ-protective effects and the underlying mechanism of dexmedetomidine. Mediators Inflamm, 2020: 6136105.##9. Zhou Y, Dong X, Zhang L (2023) Dexmedetomidine can reduce the level of oxidative stress and serum mir-10a in patients with lung cancer after surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 71(3): 197-205. ##10. Xu Y, Zhou Y, Maloney JD, Shan G (2023) Effects of dexmedetomidine on inflammation and pulmonary function after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis, 15(6): 3397-3408.##11. Kutanis D, Erturk E, Besir A, et al. (2016) Dexmedetomidine acts as an oxidative damage prophylactic in rats exposed to ionizing radiation. J. Clin. Anesthesia , 34, 577-585.##12. Wang K, Wu M, Xu J, Wu C, Zhang B, Wang G, et al. (2019) Effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative stress, inflammation, and immune function: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 123(6): 777-94.##13. Bao N and Tang B (2020) Organ-protective effects and the underlying mechanism of dexmedetomidine. Mediators of Inflammation, 2020: 6136105.##14. Li H, Liu J, Shi H (2021) Effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics and myocardial protection in thoracoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery. Med Sci Monit, 27: e929949.##15. Liu H, Gao M, Zheng Y, Sun C, Lu Q, Shao D (2023) Effects of dexmedetomidine at different dosages on perioperative haemodynamics and postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 24(1): 386.##16. Cekic B, Geze S, Ozkan G, Besir A, Sonmez M, Karahan SC, et al. (2014) The effect of dexmedetomidine on oxidative stress during pneumoperitoneum. Biomed Res Int, 2014: 760323.##17. Chen X, Chen Q, Qin Z, Alam A, Zhao H, West R, et al. (2024) Dexmedetomidine attenuates inflammation in elderly patients following major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Interv Aging, 19: 981-91.##18. Mei B, Yang X, Yang YY, Weng JT, Cao SD, Yang R, et al. (2024) Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion improved postoperative sleep quality and melatonin secretion in patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic lung surgery: A prospective, randomized study. Nat Sci Sleep, 16: 2009-20.##19. Xu CY, An MZ, Hou YR, Zhou QH (2024) Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med, 24(1): 500.##20. Zdravković R, Vicković S, Preveden M, Drobnjak V, Lukić-Šarkanović M, Miljević IB, et al. (2025) Effect of continuous intraoperative dexmedetomidine on interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Medicina (Kaunas), 61(5): 787.##21. Huang SQ, Zhang J, Zhang XX, Liu L, Yu Y, Kang XH, et al. (2017) Can dexmedetomidine improve arterial oxygenation and intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in adults undergoing thoracic surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Chin Med J, 130(14): 1707-14.##22. Kernan S, Rehman S, Meyer T, Bourbeau J, Caron N, Tobias JD (2011) Effects of dexmedetomidine on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery in adults. J Minim Access Surg, 7(4): 227-31.##23. Ye Q, Wang F, Xu H, Wu L, Gao X (2021) Effects of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative hemodynamics, recovery profile and postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol, 21(1): 63.##24. Yu H, Kang H, Fan J, Cao G, Liu B (2022) Influence of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brain Behav, 12(8): e2665.##25. Ding NH, Li JJ, Sun LQ (2013) Molecular mechanisms and treatment of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Current Drug Targets, 14(11): 1347-56.##26. Xie Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Wu Y, Xie H (2020) Effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative inflammation and lung protection in elderly patients undergoing radical resection of lung cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 13(10): 2544-53.##27. Yu H, Kang H, Fan J, Cao G, Liu B (2022) Influence of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brain and Behavior, 12(8): e2665.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>The role of color doppler echocardiography in evaluating ventricular remodeling and cardiotoxicity following radiotherapy in thoracic cancer patients</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Radiotherapy (RT) for thoracic malignancies, such as breast and lung cancer, can induce cardiac injury, leading to ventricular remodeling and heart failure (HF), which negatively impacts long-term health outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of color Doppler echocardiography in detecting early signs of ventricular remodeling and cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing thoracic RT. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 patients with thoracic cancers who underwent RT between June 2022 and December 2024. Patients were divided into high-dose RT (n=49) and standard-dose RT groups (n=31). Serial color Doppler echocardiography was conducted before, immediately after, and at a 6-month follow-up to assess changes in cardiac structure and function. Results: Post-RT, both groups showed an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), with the high-dose group showing significantly greater changes (P&#60;0.05). Eleven patients in the high-dose group showed signs of HF, including increased left ventricular diameters and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) (P&#60;0.05). Color Doppler echocardiography demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting RT-related cardiotoxicity. Conclusion: Color doppler echocardiography is a valuable, non-invasive tool for monitoring ventricular remodeling and detecting early cardiotoxic effects of RT in thoracic cancer patients, enabling timely interventions and improved cardiac outcomes.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>959</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>965</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/9/25
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Peng</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Peng</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xiong</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xiong</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>m13576064516@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>color doppler echocardiography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cardiotoxicity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ventricular remodeling</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>heart failure</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>thoracic cancer.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Finazzi T, Schneiders FL, Senan S (2021) Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies. Eur Respir Rev, 30(160): 200224. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0224-2020.##2.	Mechanic OJ, Gavin M, Grossman SA (2023) Acute myocardial infarction.  StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2025.##3.	Yu YY, Zhao BW, Ma L, Dai XC (2021) Association between out-of-hour admission and short- and long-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med, 8: 752675. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.752675.##4.	Yeke Dehghan AB, Mostaar A, Azadeh P (2023) Implementation of geant4 application for tomography emission Monte Carlo Code in the calculation of dose distribution in external radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(4): 663-673. DOI: 10.61186/ijrr.21.4.663.##5.	Rezende PC, Ribas FF, Serrano CV, Jr., Hueb W (2019) Clinical significance of chronic myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease patients. J Thorac Dis, 11(3): 1005-1015. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.85.##6.	Buja LM (2023) Pathobiology of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: Models, modes, molecular mechanisms, modulation, and clinical applications. Cardiol Rev, 31(5): 252-264. DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000440.##7.	Yang M, Guo F, Yang YJ, Jing ZC, Sun K (2023) Prognostic value of preoperative assessment of left ventricular function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 24(3): 80. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2403080.##8.	Leancă SA, Crișu D, Petriș AO, et al. (2022) Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: from physiopathology to treatment. Life (Basel), 12(8): 1111. DOI: 10.3390/life12081111.##9.	Saheera S and Krishnamurthy P (2020) Cardiovascular changes associated with hypertensive heart disease and aging. Cell Transplant, 29: 963689720920830. DOI: 10.1177/0963689720920830.##10.	Bokhari SFH, Umais M, Faizan Sattar SM, et al. (2025) Novel cardiac biomarkers and multiple-marker approach in the early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of cardiac diseases. World J Cardiol, 17(7): 106561. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.106561.##11.	Demir H, Özdemir S, Işık N, Yaprak G (2023) The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of recurrent / progressive lung lesions after primary treatment. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(4): 727-732. DOI: 10.61186/ijrr.21.4.727.##12.	Akhtar KH, Khan MS, Baron SJ, et al.  (2024) The spectrum of post-myocardial infarction care: From acute ischemia to heart failure. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 82: 15-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.017.##13.	Gaspar A, Azevedo P, Roncon-Albuquerque R, Jr. (2018) Non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation by Doppler echocardiography. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 30(3): 385-393.  DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180055.##14.	Abbas MM, Mahmoud AH, Abdelmonem HA (2022) Modulatory effects of Zn oxide nanoparticles on cardiotoxicity and hematological changes in irradiated rats. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20(4): 851–855. DOI: 10.52547/ijrr.20.4.18.##15.	Ling HJ, Bernard O, Ducros N, Garcia D (2023) Phase unwrapping of color doppler echocardiography using deep learning. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 70(8): 810-820. DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2023.3289621.##16.	Petersen JW, Forder JR, Thomas JD, et al. (2011) Quantification of myocardial segmental function in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease and implications for cardiovascular cell therapy trials: a review from the NHLBI-Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 4(6): 671-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.015.##17.	Dandel M (2022) Role of Echocardiography in the management of patients with advanced (Stage D) heart failure related to nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 23(6): 214. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2306214.##18.	Zahedi M and Shirmohammadi M (2022) The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on left and right ventricular function in post primary PCI patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 79: 104093. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104093.##19.	Mignatti A, Echarte-Morales J, Sturla M, Latib A (2025) State of the art of primary PCI: Present and future. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(2): 653. ##20.	Wang YB, Fu XH, Gu XS, et al. (2014) Thrombolysis followed by early percutaneous coronary intervention via transradial artery approach in patients with ST-segment elevation infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin, 30(4): 284-91. ##21.	Arnautu DA, Andor M, Buz BF, et al. (2022) Left Ventricular Remodeling and heart failure predictors in acute myocardial infarction patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after successful percutaneous intervention in Western Romania. Life (Basel), 12(10): 1636. DOI: 10.3390/life12101636.##22.	Stiermaier T, Eitel I, de Waha S, et al. (2017) Myocardial salvage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction presenting early versus late after symptom onset. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 33(10): 1571-1579. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1143-x.##23.	Ibáñez B, Heusch G, Ovize M, Van de Werf F (2015) Evolving Therapies for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(14): 1454-1471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.032.##24.	Kumar R, Shah JA, Solangi BA, et al. (2022) The burden of short-term major adverse cardiac events and its determinants after emergency percutaneous coronary revascularization: A prospective follow-up study. J Saudi Heart Assoc, 34(2): 100-109. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1302.##25.	Vaidya K, Tucker B, Patel S, Ng MKC (2021) Acute coronary syndromes (ACS)-unravelling biology to identify new therapies-the microcirculation as a frontier for new therapies in ACS. Cells, 10(9): 2188. DOI: 10.3390/cells10092188.##26.	Del Buono MG, Moroni F, Montone RA, Azzalini L, Sanna T, Abbate A (2022) Ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rep, 24(10): 1505-1515. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01766-6.##27.	Gong FF, Campbell DJ, Prior DL (2017) Noninvasive cardiac imaging and the prediction of heart failure progression in preclinical stage A/B subjects. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 10(12): 1504-1519. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.001.##28.	Prana Jagannatha GN, Suastika LOS, Kosasih AM, et al. (2023) Prognostic value of baseline echocardiographic parameters in heart failure with improved vs nonrecovered ejection fraction. CJC Open, 5(12): 859869. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco..08.006.##29.	Sani MU, Davison BA, Cotter G, et al. (2017) Echocardiographic predictors of outcome in acute heart failure patients in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from THESUS-HF. Cardiovasc J Afr, 28(1): 60-67.  DOI: 10.5830/cvja-2016-070.##30.	Kim SR and Park SM (2023) Role of cardiac imaging in management of heart failure. Korean J Intern Med, 38(5): 607-619. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2023.262.##31.	Barton AK, Tzolos E, Bing R, et al. (2023) Emerging molecular imaging targets and tools for myocardial fibrosis detection. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 24(3): 261-275. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac242.##32.	Smiseth OA, Rider O, Cvijic M, Valkovič L, Remme EW, Voigt J-U (2025) Myocardial strain imaging: Theory, current practice, and the future. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 18(3): 340-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.011.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Effect of host anti-tumor immune response following endoscopic mucosal resection combined with photodynamic treatment in patients with early gastrointestinal cancer</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To investigate the host anti-tumor immune response induced by the combination of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with early gastrointestinal cancer (EGIC), and its impact on recurrence and immune modulation. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients diagnosed with EGIC were enrolled and divided into EMR-only (n=60) and EMR+PDT (n=60) groups. Peripheral blood samples were taken before treatment, and on days 7 and 30 post-treatment. Immune markers (CD4+, CD8+ T cells, NK cells) were measured by flow cytometry. Serum cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IFN-&#947;, TNF-&#945;, IL-10) were assessed using ELISA. Recurrence was tracked over 6 months using endoscopic follow-up. Results: At day 30, the EMR+PDT group showed significantly elevated CD8+ T cell counts (P&#60;0.01), IFN-&#947; levels (P&#60;0.01), and NK cell activity (P&#60;0.05) compared to EMR-only. There was a marked decrease in Treg cells and IL-10 in the EMR+PDT group (P&#60;0.05). Recurrence rate was 5% in the PDT group versus 18% in EMR-only (P=0.01). Conclusion: PDT combined with EMR enhances host immune responses against tumor cells via immunogenic cell death, improving clinical outcomes in early gastrointestinal cancers.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>967</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>972</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xia</Family>
				<NameE>B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xia</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastroenterology, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 900TH Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Qiu</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Qiu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastroenterology, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 900TH Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>15980276855@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Photodynamic therapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>endoscopic mucosal resection</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>T cell  response</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>gastrointestinal cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>host immune modulation.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Nishiguchi A, Kurihara Y, Taguchi T (2019) Underwater-adhesive microparticle dressing composed of hydrophobically-modified Alaska pollock gelatin for gastrointestinal tract wound healing. Acta Biomater, 99: 387-96.##2.	Zhang H, Zhao C, Song C, Wu Y, Wei D, Li X (2023) Knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare workers on early gastrointestinal cancer in China. Front Public Health,11: 1191699.##3.	Ben-Aharon I, van Laarhoven HWM, Fontana E, Obermannova R, Nilsson M, Lordick F (2023) Early-onset cancer in the gastrointestinal tract is on the rise-evidence and implications. Cancer Discov, 13(3): 538-51.##4.	Weinberg BA, Murphy CC, Freyer DR, Greathouse KL, Blancato JK, Stoffel EM, et al. (2025) Rethinking the rise of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers: a call to action. JNCI Cancer Spectr, 9(1): pkaf002. ##5.	Yanagida M, Hosoi Y, Kawano T, Otake Y, Yamanaka Y, Baba T, et al. (2024) Noniatrogenic meningitis caused by streptococcus salivarius associated with early esophageal cancer and early gastric cancer. Intern Med, 63(3): 457-60.##6.	Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, et al. (2020) Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. Clin Endosc, 53(2): 142-66.##7.	Du Y, Zhu H, Liu J, Li J, Chang X, Zhou L, et al. (2020) Consensus on eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention and control of gastric cancer in China (2019, Shanghai). J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 35(4): 624-9.##8.	Patil M, Jr., Gharde P, Reddy K, Nayak K (2024) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open procedures in specific general surgical interventions. Cureus, 16(2): e54433.##9.	Feng Q, Yu C, Li R, Ren Q, Xie F, Chen S, et al. (2023) The efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions. J Gastrointest Oncol,14(6): 2671-2.##10.	Shi B, Wang L, Huang S (2021) Effect of high-quality nursing on psychological status and prognosis of patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Am J Transl Res, 13(10): 11974-80.##11.	Shi L, Wang L, Cui Q (2021) The clinical effects of high-quality nursing interventions after a diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bulging lesions with mEUS. Am J Transl Res, 13(8): 9655-62.##12.	Oosterveld-Vlug MG, Custers B, Hofstede J, Donker GA, Rijken PM, Korevaar JC, et al. (2019) What are essential elements of high-quality palliative care at home? An interview study among patients and relatives faced with advanced cancer. BMC Palliat Care, 18(1): 96.##13.	Nishiguchi A, Sasaki F, Maeda H, Kabayama M, Ido A, Taguchi T (2019) Multifunctional hydrophobized microparticles for accelerated wound healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Small,15(35): e1901566.##14.	Yin L (2023) The application value of the clinical nursing pathway for patients with head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 149(12): 9629-34.##15.	Kelly R, Gordon P, Thompson R, Semple C (2023) Availability and use of web-based interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: a scoping review. J Cancer Surviv, 17(5): 1309-26.##16.	Harrington KJ, Affronti ML, Schneider SM, Razzak AR, Smith TJ (2019) Improving Attitudes and perceptions about end-of-life nursing on a hospital-based palliative care unit. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 21(4): 272-9.##17.	Wen FH, Chou WC, Hou MM, Su PJ, Shen WC, Chen JS, et al. (2022) Caregivers' death-preparedness states impact caregiving outcomes and patients' end-of-life care. J Pain Symptom Manage, 63(2): 199-209.##18.	Wang M, Sun Y, Zhang M, Yu R, Fu J (2022) Effects of high-quality nursing care on quality of life, survival, and recurrence in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore), 101(37): e30569.##19.	Alvero AB, Fox A, Madina B, Krady M, Gogoi R, Chehade H, et al.  (2023) Immune modulation of innate and adaptive responses restores immune surveillance and establishes anti-tumor immunological memory. bioRxiv.##20.	Jin P, Sun LL, Li BX, Li M, Tian W (2022) High-quality nursing care on psychological disorder in ovarian cancer during perioperative period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 101(27): e29849.##21.	Zhang L, Zhang X, Cui Z, Zhou L, Qu K, Wang N (2020) Effects of high-quality nursing care on psychological outcomes and quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(35): e21855.##22.	He XL and Cao ZM (2020) Effect of high-quality nursing intervention on the psychological disorder in patients with gastric cancer during perioperative period: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(23): e20381.##23.	Cui Y and Li YX (2020) Effect of high-quality nursing on alleviating depression and anxiety in patients with thyroid cancer during perioperative period: A protocol for systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(45): e23018.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Predicting prostate movement during early-stage radiotherapy treatment</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Predicting the direction and amount of movement of the patient-specific prostate at an early stage of treatment is important for estimating systematic errors and avoiding large dose differences between planning and actual treatment. This study aimed to evaluate a two-plane analysis of prostate movement for multiple-image matching and examine the accuracy of predicting the amount of prostate movement for inter- and intra-fraction setup errors at the early stage of treatment. Materials and Methods: Sixty-five patients who underwent prostate intensity-modulated rotating radiotherapy with fiducial markers were examined for setup errors in bone matching and inter- and intra-marker matching. The two-plane setup errors in the anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were analyzed. Correlation analysis was performed by calculating the relationship between the total average setup error and each average setup error (2‒5 fractions), increasing from the first to the sixth fraction. Results: The inter- and intra-fraction setup errors between the AP and SI directions of prostate movement were moderately correlated (r: 0.63, r =0.58, respectively). The average setup error of &#62;4 fractions was strongly correlated (r &#62;0.7), and the standard deviation of the &#62;3 fraction setup errors was moderately correlated (r &#62;0.4) with total and early setup errors. Conclusions: Prostate movement during radiotherapy was linear in the AP-SI direction. The evaluation of early fraction setup errors may be used to predict prostate movement in individual patients during the treatment period.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>973</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>977</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Kojima</Family>
				<NameE>R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Kojima</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Facilty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Tanaka</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tanaka</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1, Shikata, Kita, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Irie</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Irie</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Facilty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sasaki</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sasaki</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Facilty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Morishita</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Morishita</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Facilty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nakamoto</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nakamoto</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nishioka</Family>
				<NameE>K.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nishioka</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Takahashi</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Takahashi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Tanabe</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Tanabe</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>tanabey@okayama-u.ac.jp</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Prostate cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>two-plane analysis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>prostate movement</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>setup errors</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>adaptive radiation therapy.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Rawla P (2019) Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol, 10(2): 63-89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191.##2. Martin JM, Frantzis J, Eade T, Chung P (2010) Clinician’s guide to prostate IMRT plan assessment and optimization. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 54(6): 569-75. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02217.x.##3. Bauman G, Rumble RB, Chen J, Loblaw A, Warde P (2012) Members of the IMRT Indications Expert Panel. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. Clin Oncol, 24(7): 461-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.05.002.##4. Colvill E, Poulsen PR, Booth JT, O’Brien RT, Ng JA, Keall PJ (2014) DMLC tracking and gating can improve dose coverage for prostate VMAT. Med Phys, 41(9): 091705. doi: 10.1118/1.4892605.##5. Venkatesan K, Raphael CJ, Varghese KM, Gopu P, Sivakumar S, Boban M, et al. (2020). Volume and dosimetric analysis of rectum and bladder for prostate carcinoma patients by using kilo voltage cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Int J Radiat Res, 18(3): 557-569. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.3.557.##6. Mahdavi SR, Gharehbagh EJ, Mofid, B, Jafari A H, Nikoofar AR (2017). Accuracy of the dose delivery in prostate cancer patients-using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Int J Radiat Res, 15(1): 39. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.15.1.39.##7. Tanabe Y and Ishida T (2019) Optimizing multiple acquisition planning CT for prostate cancer IMRT. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 5(3): 035011. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab0dc7.##8. Tanabe Y, Ishida T, Eto H, Sera T, Emoto Y (2019) Evaluation of the correlation between prostatic displacement and rectal deformation using the Dice similarity coefficient of the rectum. Med Dosim, 44(4): e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.12.005.##9. Pathmanathan AU, van As NJ, Kerkmeijer LGW, Christodouleas J, Lawton CAF, Vesprini D, et al. (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiation therapy: a “game changer” for prostate treatment? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 100(2): 361-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.020.##10. Boubaker MB, Haboussi M, Ganghoffer JF, Aletti P (2009) Finite element simulation of interactions between pelvic organs: predictive model of the prostate motion in the context of radiotherapy. J Biomech, 42(12): 1862-8. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.022.##11. Budiharto T, Slagmolen P, Haustermans K, Maes F, Junius S, Verstraete J, et al. (2011) Intrafractional prostate motion during online image guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol, 98(2): 181-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.019.##12. Kiriyama T, Fukui A, Ishikawa H, Doi M, Nishimoto Y, Cyosei K, Kishimoto K, Tanabe Y (2025). Efficacy of hydrogel spacer compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Med Dosim, in press. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2025.01.005.##13. Tanabe Y and Eto H (2022) Evaluation of patient-specific motion management for radiotherapy planning computed tomography using a statistical method. Med Dosim, 47(2): e13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.12.002.##14. Tanabe Y, Ishida T, Eto H, Sera T, Emoto Y, Shimokawa M (2021) Patient-specific radiotherapy quality assurance for estimating actual treatment dose. Med Dosim, 46(1): e5-e10. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2020.08.003.##15. Sasaki H, Morishita T, Irie N, Kojima R, Kiriyama T, Nakamoto A, Nishioka K, Takahashi S, Tanabe, Y. (2024). Evaluation of the trend of set-up errors during the treatment period using set-up margin in prostate radiotherapy. Med Dosim, 49(4). 291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.02.004.##16. Brand VJ, Milder MT, Christianen M E, Hoogeman MS, Incrocci L (2022) Seminal vesicle inter-and intra-fraction motion during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A review. Radiother Oncol, 169: 15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.002.##17. Feng SQ, Brouwer CL, Korevaar EW, Vapiwala N, Kang-Hsin Wang KKH, Deville Jr C, et al. (2023) Dose evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction prostate motion in extremely hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol, 27: 100474. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100474.##18. Sihono DSK, Ehmann M, Heitmann S, von Swietochowski S, Grimm M, Boda-Heggemann J, et al. (2018) Determination of intrafraction prostate motion during external beam radiation therapy with a transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound real-time tracking system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 101(1): 136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.040.##19. Yagihashi T, Inoue K, Nagata H, Yamanaka M, Yamano A, Suzuki S, et al. (2023) Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 24(4): e13881. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13881.##20. Tanabe Y, Ishida T, Eto H, Sera T, Emoto Y (2020) Optimizing planning CT using past CT images for prostate cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Dosim, 45(3): 213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.12.008.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>FGR and MNDA as prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy: 
A bioinformatics analysis of M2 macrophage-derived exosome-related genes</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), a subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, has a poor prognosis in patients undergoing radiotherapy. M2 macrophage polarization and their derived exosomes play key roles in tumor progression, but their impact on LUAD prognosis remains unclear. This study aims to identify M2 macrophage-derived exosome-related genes associated with prognosis in radiotherapy-treated LUAD patients. Materials and Methods: Transcriptomic data from TCGA-LUAD, ExoRBase, ExoCarta, and GEO were analyzed. The CIBERSORT algorithm quantified immune cell infiltration, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Prognostic genes were screened via univariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, and Kaplan&#8211;Meier survival analysis. Gene function was explored using enrichment analysis and immune infiltration correlation. Results: A total of 2,592 DEGs were identified in LUAD, of which 17 were exosome-related and associated with M2 macrophages. Among these, FGR and MNDA emerged as key prognostic markers. High expression levels of both genes were associated with better outcomes: median overall survival of 45.2 months versus 28.7 months in the low-expression group. Improved progression-free interval and disease-specific survival were also observed. Multivariate analysis confirmed FGR and MNDA as independent prognostic indicators. Their high expression correlated with favorable radiotherapy response and enhanced immune infiltration, particularly of CD8⁺ T cells. Conclusion: FGR and MNDA, as M2 macrophage-derived exosome-related genes, are associated with favorable prognosis and enhanced radiotherapy response in LUAD. These biomarkers may offer novel insights into tumor immunity and therapeutic targeting in LUAD patients receiving radiotherapy.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>979</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>986</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Huang</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Huang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Miao</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Miao</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>The Yangtze River Delta Biological Medicine Research and Development Center of Zhejiang Province, Yangtze Delta Region Institution of Tsinghua University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Gu</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Gu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jiaxing Second Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>guyyjiaxing@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Lung neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>exosomes</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>macrophages</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>biomarkers</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>gene expression profiling.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Aluru JS, Barsouk A (2021) Epidemiology of lung cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn), 25(1) :45-52.##2.	Dela Cruz CS, Tanoue LT, Matthay RA (2011) Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin Chest Med, 32(4): 605-44.##3.	Tang FH, Wong HYT, Tsang PSW, Yau M, Tam SY, Law L, et al. (2025) Recent advancements in lung cancer research: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 14(3): 975-90.##4.	He S, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, Yang F, Yan X, et al. (2022) Survival of 7,311 lung cancer patients by pathological stage and histological classification: a multicenter hospital-based study in China. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 11(8): 1591-605.##5.	Peinado-Serrano J and Carnero A (2022) Molecular radiobiology in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic and predictive response factors. Cancers (Basel), 14(9): 2202.##6.	Wang H, Dai X, Liu X, Li C, Shu W (2025) Computed tomography manifestations and clinical features of acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients with cervical lymph node tuberculosis. International Journal of Radiation Research, 23(1): 169-73.##7.	Chen S, Saeed A, Liu Q, Jiang Q, Xu H, Xiao GG, et al. (2023) Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 8(1): 207.##8.	Zuber SH, Abdul Hadi MFR, Hashikin NAA, Samson DO, Ishak NH, Raof NA, et al. (2025) Dosimetric evaluation of brain radiotherapy using custom-made Rhizophora head phantom – comparison between Monte Carlo GATE and treatment planning system MONACO. International Journal of Radiation Research, 23(1): 13-20.##9.	Yang Q, Guo N, Zhou Y, Chen J, Wei Q, Han M (2020) The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor progression and relevant advance in targeted therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B, 10(11): 2156-70.##10. Wang S, Wang J, Chen Z, Luo J, Guo W, Sun L, et al. (2024) Targeting M2-like tumor-associated macrophages is a potential therapeutic approach to overcome antitumor drug resistance. NPJ Precis Oncol, 8(1): 31.##11.	Cao L, Che X, Qiu X, Li Z, Yang B, Wang S, et al. (2019) M2 macrophage infiltration into tumor islets leads to poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res, 11: 6125-38.##12.	Zhang B, Yao G, Zhang Y, Gao J, Yang B, Rao Z, et al. (2011) M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages are associated with poor prognoses resulting from accelerated lymphangiogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 66(11): 1879-86.##13.	Aakel N, Mohammed R, Fathima A, Kerzabi R, Abdallah A, Ibrahim WN (2025) Role of exosome in solid cancer progression and its potential therapeutics in cancer treatment. Cancer Med, 14(9): e70941.##14.	Kumar MA, Baba SK, Sadida HQ, Marzooqi SA, Jerobin J, Altemani FH, et al. (2024) Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 9(1): 27.##15.	Hu X, Li Y, Wang X, Xue X (2025) Role of M2 macrophage-derived exosomes in cancer drug resistance via noncoding RNAs. Discov Oncol, 16(1): 741.##16.	Zhang W, Zhou R, Liu X, You L, Chen C, Ye X, et al. (2023) Key role of exosomes derived from M2 macrophages in maintaining cancer cell stemness (Review). Int J Oncol, 63(5): 126.##17.	Guo W, Li Y, Pang W, Shen H (2020) Exosomes: A potential therapeutic tool targeting communications between tumor cells and macrophages. Mol The, 28(9): 1953-64.##18.	Liu L, Zhang S, Ren Y, Wang R, Zhang Y, Weng S, et al. (2025) Macrophage-derived exosomes in cancer: a double-edged sword with therapeutic potential. J Nanobiotechnology, 23(1): 319.##19.	Li S, Li Y, Chen B, Zhao J, Yu S, Tang Y, et al. (2017) exoRBase: a database of circRNA, lncRNA and mRNA in human blood exosomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1): D106-D12.##20.	Lai H, Li Y, Zhang H, Hu J, Liao J, Su Y, et al. (2022) exoRBase 2.0: an atlas of mRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in extracellular vesicles from human biofluids. Nucleic Acids Res, 50(D1): D118-d28.##21.	Mathivanan S and Simpson RJ (2009) ExoCarta: A compendium of exosomal proteins and RNA. Proteomics, 9(21): 4997-5000.##22.	Mathivanan S, Fahner CJ, Reid GE, Simpson RJ (2012) ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res, 40(Database issue): D1241-4.##23.	Keerthikumar S, Chisanga D, Ariyaratne D, Al Saffar H, Anand S, Zhao K, et al. (2016) ExoCarta: A web-based compendium of exosomal cargo. J Mol Biol, 428(4): 688-92.##24.	Newman AM, Steen CB, Liu CL, Gentles AJ, Chaudhuri AA, Scherer F, et al. (2019) Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry. Nat Biotechnol, 37(7): 773-82.##25.	Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, et al. (2023) The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res, 51(D1): D638-d46.##26.	Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13(11): 2498-504.##27.	Doncheva NT, Assenov Y, Domingues FS, Albrecht M (2012) Topological analysis and interactive visualization of biological networks and protein structures. Nat Protoc, 7(4): 670-85.##28.	Li J, Liu C, Chen Y, Gao C, Wang M, Ma X, et al. (2019) Tumor characterization in breast cancer identifies immune-relevant gene signatures associated with prognosis. Front Genet, 10: 1119.##29.	Cao Q, Li C, Li Y, Kong X, Wang S, Ma J (2025) Tumor microenvironment and drug resistance in lung adenocarcinoma: molecular mechanisms, prognostic implications, and therapeutic strategies. Discov Oncol, 16(1): 238.##30.	Mahalingam M, Hu M, Schointuch M, Szychowski JM, Harper L, Owen J, et al. (2022) Uterine myomas: effect of prior myomectomy on pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 35(25): 8492-7.##31.	Uckun FM and Qazi S (2022) Tyrosine kinases in KMT2A/MLL-rearranged acute leukemias as potential therapeutic targets to overcome cancer drug resistance. Cancer Drug Resist, 5(4): 902-16.##32.	Ma Q, Zheng L, Cheng H, Li X, Liu Z, Gong P (2024) PDCD4-induced oxidative stress through FGR/NF-κB axis in rectal cancer radiotherapy-induced AKI. Int Immunopharmacol, 132: 111779.##33.	Lieu C and Kopetz S (2010) The SRC family of protein tyrosine kinases: a new and promising target for colorectal cancer therapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 9(2): 89-94.##34.	Seo J and Park M (2020) Molecular crosstalk between cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci, 77(14): 2659-80.##35.	Cho DH, Nakamura T, Lipton SA  (2010) Mitochondrial dynamics in cell death and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci, 67(20): 3435-47.##36.	Zhang Z, Peng Y, Peng X, Xiao D, Shi Y, Tao Y (2023) Effects of radiation therapy on tumor microenvironment: an updated review. Chin Med J (Engl), 136(23): 2802-11.##37.	Reuvers TGA, Kanaar R, Nonnekens J (2020) DNA Damage-inducing anticancer therapies: from global to precision damage. Cancers (Basel), 12(8): 2098.##38.	Gupta A, Probst HC, Vuong V, Landshammer A, Muth S, Yagita H, et al. (2012) Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells via dendritic cell activation. J Immunol, 189(2): 558-66.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Experimental insights into high background radiation: reduced cancer risks in a murine model study</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Natural background radiation varies geographically and has potential implications for cancer development. High-level natural radiation areas (HLNRAs), like Ramsar, Iran, offer unique opportunities to study the biological effects of radiation exposure. This study investigates the relationship between high background radiation and tumor progression in a murine model. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two C57BL/6 mice were exposed to varying levels of natural radiation (0.097 &#956;Sv/h to 9.24 &#956;Sv/h) for two months, simulating conditions in Ramsar. Mice were divided into four groups based on radiation intensity. After exposure, 1106 B16-F10 melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously, and tumor growth was monitored for 24 days. Tumor morphology was assessed using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and survival rates were recorded. Statistical analyses included mixed-model and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Tumor volume and growth rates were significantly reduced in groups exposed to the highest radiation levels (100X Bkg). Mice in this group also exhibited the highest survival rates (100%) compared to the control group (55.6%). Tumor reduction and disintegration were observed, especially in female mice, suggesting a potential protective effect of elevated radiation exposure against melanoma progression. Conclusion: Findings challenge the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model by demonstrating that high background radiation may not correlate with increased cancer risk. Instead, elevated radiation levels appear to confer protective effects against tumor growth in this murine model. These results highlight the need to reassess radiation safety standards and explore the complex interplay between radiation and cancer biology.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>987</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>994</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.M.J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mortazavi</Family>
				<NameE>S.M.J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mortazavi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Arshadi</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Arshadi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>B.F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Baha'addini Baigy Zarandi</Family>
				<NameE>B.F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Baha'addini Baigy Zarandi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of, Pharmacology School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Welsh</Family>
				<NameE>J.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Welsh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, United States</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mozdarani</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mozdarani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Haghani</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Haghani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jooyan</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jooyan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Nematollahi</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Nematollahi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fallah</Family>
				<NameE>A.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fallah</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mortazavi</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mortazavi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>MVLS College, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Farshidfar</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Farshidfar</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Azarpira</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Azarpira</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>azarpiran@sums.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Sihver</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Sihver</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Informatics and Engineering Systems, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, TX, USA</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Background radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radioactivity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Melanoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Mice.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Nations U (1993) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR Report.##Radiation UNSCotEoA (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2000 Report, Volume I: Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations.##Bugała E and Fornalski KW (2024) Radiation adaptive response for constant dose-rate irradiation in high background radiation areas. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 63(1): 1-8.##Eslami J, Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi SAR (2019) A glance at the errors of some studies on the health effects of high background natural radiation areas. J Biomed Phys Eng, 9(4): 389-394.##Abbasi S, Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi SAR (2019) Martian residents: Mass media and Ramsar high background radiation areas. J Biomed Phys Eng, 9(4): 483-486.##Bennett B, (Ed.) (1996) Exposure to natural radiation worldwide. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on high levels of natural radiation: radiation doses and health effects, Beijing, China.##Cullen TL (Ed.) (1977) Review of Brazilian investigations in areas of high natural radioactivity. Part I: Radiometric and dosimetric studies. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Areas of High Natural Radioactivity.##Franca E (1977) Review of Brazilian investigations in areas of high natural radioactivity, 2. pt.##Paschoa AS (2000) More than forty years of studies of natural radioactivity in Brazil. Technology, 7(2-3): 193-212.##Wei L and Sugahara T (2000) An introductory overview of the epidemiological study on the population at the high background radiation areas in Yangjiang, China. Journal of Radiation Research, 41(Suppl): S1-S7.##Wei L, Zha Y, Tao Z, et al. (1993) Epidemiological investigation in high background radiation areas of Yangjiang, China.##Sunta C, (Ed.)  (1993) A review of the studies of high background areas of the SW coast of India. Proceedings of the international conference on high levels of natural radiation, Ramsar, IAEA.##Sunta C, David M, Abani M, et al. (1982) Analysis of dosimetry data of high natural radioactivity areas of SW coast of India. Natural Radiation Environment, 1982.##Sohrabi M, (Ed.). (1993) Recent radiological studies of high-level natural radiation areas of Ramsar. Proceedings of the International Conference on High Levels of Natural Radiation.##Mortazavi S and Mozdarani H (2012) Is it time to shed some light on the black box of health policies regarding the inhabitants of the high background radiation areas of Ramsar? International Journal of Radiation Research, 10(3/4): 111.##Mortazavi S and Mozdarani H (2013) Non-linear phenomena in biological findings of the residents of high background radiation areas of Ramsar. International Journal of Radiation Research, 11(1): 3.##Mortazavi S, Niroomand-Rad A, Mozdarani H, et al. (2012) Short-term exposure to high levels of natural external gamma radiation does not induce survival adaptive response. International Journal of Radiation Research, 10(3/4): 165.##ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP, 21: 1.##Ghiassi-Nejad M, Mortazavi S, Cameron J, et al. (2002) Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: preliminary biological studies. Health Physics, 82(1): 87-93.##Mortazavi S, Ghiassi-Nejad M, Karam P, et al. (2006) Cancer incidence in areas with elevated levels of natural radiation. International Journal of Low Radiation, 2(1-2): 20-27.##Mortazavi S, Ghiassi-Nejad M, Rezaiean M, (Eds). (2005) Cancer risk due to exposure to high levels of natural radon in the inhabitants of Ramsar, Iran. International Congress Series, Elsevier.##Mortazavi SMJ and Ikushima T (2006) Open questions regarding implications of radioadaptive response in the estimation of the risks of low-level exposures in nuclear workers. International Journal of Low Radiation, 2: 88-96.##Karam PA, (Ed.)  (2002) The high background radiation area in Ramsar Iran: Geology, NORM, biology, LNT, and possible regulatory fun.##Chen WL, Luan YC, Shieh MC, et al. (2006) Effects of cobalt-60 exposure on health of Taiwan residents suggest new approach needed in radiation protection. Dose Response, 5(1): 63-75.##Lin CM, Chang WP, Doyle P, et al. (2010) Prolonged time to pregnancy in residents exposed to ionising radiation in cobalt-60-contaminated buildings. Occup Environ Med, 67(3): 187-195.##Mortazavi S, Niroomand-Rad A, Roshan-Shomal P, et al. (2014) Does short-term exposure to elevated levels of natural gamma radiation in Ramsar cause oxidative stress? Int J Appl Basic Med Res, 4(2): 72-76.##Davies, Joan M., and Hazel Inskip. Epidemiological studies related to enhanced natural radiation: Possibilities and problems. Science of The Total Environment 45(1985): 509-518.##Daly JM, Reynolds HM, Rowlands BJ, et al. (1980) Tumor growth in experimental animals: nutritional manipulation and chemotherapeutic response in the rat. Annals of Surgery, 191(3): 316.##Redmond H, Schuchter L, Bartlett D, et al. (1992) Anti-neoplastic effects of interleukin-4. Journal of Surgical Research, 52(4): 406-411.##Reilly JJ, Goodgame JT, Jones DC, et al. (1977) DNA synthesis in rat sarcoma and liver: The effect of starvation. Journal of Surgical Research, 22(3): 281-286.##Cohen BL (2002) Cancer risk from low-level radiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 179(5): 1137-1143.##Nambi KSV and Soman S (1987) Environmental radiation and cancer in India. Health Physics, 52(5): 653-657.##Zlobina A, Farkhutdinov I, Carvalho FP, et al. (2022) Impact of environmental radiation on the incidence of cancer and birth defects in regions with high natural radioactivity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14): 8643.##Sanders CL (2017) Radiobiology and radiation hormesis. Springer, 10: 978-3.##David E, Wolfson M, Fraifeld VE (2021) Background radiation impacts human longevity and cancer mortality: reconsidering the linear no-threshold paradigm. Biogerontology, 22(2): 189-195.##David E, Bitan R, Atlas S, et al. (2022) Correlative links between natural radiation and life expectancy in the US population. Biogerontology, 23(4): 425-430.##Fornalski KW, Adamowski Ł, Bugała E, et al. (2022) Biophysical modeling of the ionizing radiation influence on cells using the stochastic (Monte Carlo) and deterministic (analytical) approaches. Dose-Response, 20(4): 15593258221138506.##Nambi Razavi-Toosi, Seyyed Mohammad Taghi, Morteza Bakshi, and Rohullah Yousefi. Assessing cancer mortality in high natural background radiation areas: a systematic review. Journal of Current Oncology and Medical Sciences 3.3(2023): 532-540.##Tang FR and Loganovsky K (2018) Low dose or low dose rate ionizing radiation-induced health effect in the human. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 192: 32-47.##Cohen BL (1995) Test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Physics, 68(2): 157-174.##Deqing C, Luxin W. Chromosome aberration, cancer mortality and hormetic phenomena among inhabitants in areas of high background radiation in China. Journal of Radiation Research. 1991 Dec 1; 32(Suppl-2): 46-53. ##Hart J (2011) Cancer mortality in six lowest versus six highest elevation jurisdictions in the US. Dose-Response, 9(1): dose-response.09-051. ##Hart J (2011) Cancer mortality for a single race in low versus high elevation counties in the US. Dose-Response, 9(3): dose-response. 10-014.##Cameron J (2005) Moderate dose rate ionizing radiation increases longevity. The British Journal of Radiology, 78(925): 11-13.##Dobrzyński L, Fornalski KW, Feinendegen LE (2015) Cancer mortality among people living in areas with various levels of natural background radiation. Dose-Response, 13(3): 1559325815592391.##Hendry JH, Simon SL, Wojcik A, Sohrabi M, Burkart W, Cardis E, et al. (2009) Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks? Journal of Radiological Protection, 29(2A): A29.##Mozdarani H (2012) Biological complexities in radiation carcinogenesis and cancer radiotherapy: Impact of new biological paradigms. Genes, 3, 90-114.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Study of radiation attenuation properties by incorporating a zinc oxide and conjugated hole transport material into polystyrene</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This study aims to understand the impact of material composition on radiation attenuation by integrating polystyrene (PS) composites with a conjugated hole transport material (MADN) and zinc oxide (ZnO). The high atomic number of zinc is expected to enhance photon interactions, making ZnO a promising additive for radiation shielding applications. Materials and Methods: PS composites with varying concentrations of MADN (1.3%&#8211;4.5%, denoted as PM0&#8211;PM5) and ZnO (PMZnO1&#8211;PMZnO5) were prepared. Linear and mass attenuation coefficients were measured at photon energies of 59.5 keV, 661.7 keV, 1173.2 keV, and 1332.5 keV. Furthermore, the half value layer (HVL) and mean free path (MFP) were evaluated to assess the attenuation behavior at these energy levels. Results: The PM0&#8211;PM5 samples exhibited similar mass attenuation coefficients, which is attributed to the predominant presence of carbon and hydrogen atoms. The addition of ZnO significantly increased the mass attenuation coefficient, especially at lower photon energies, owing to the higher atomic number of zinc, which enhances photoelectric absorption and photon interactions. ZnO addition also reduced the HVL, particularly at 59.5 keV, where composites with higher ZnO concentrations exhibited significantly lower HVL values, indicating stronger attenuation. Conclusion: The findings highlight the crucial roles of atomic number and material density in radiation attenuation, with ZnO effectively enhancing photon attenuation in PS composites. This effect is particularly significant at lower photon energies, validating ZnO&#8217;s potential as a useful additive for improved radiation shielding in PS composites.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>995</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1001</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Marashdeh</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Marashdeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>mwmarashdeh@imamu.edu.sa</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Aljaafreh</Family>
				<NameE>M.J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Aljaafreh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Polystyrenes</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>zinc oxide</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>half-value layer (HVL)</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>mean free path (MFP)</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiation attenuation.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Zou Y, Wei Y, Wang G, Meng F, Gao M, Storm G, Zhong Z (2017) Nanopolymersomes with an ultrahigh iodine content for high-performance X-ray computed tomography imaging in vivo. Adv Mater, 29(10): 1603997.##Howard JA and Probert MR (2014) Cutting-edge techniques used for the structural investigation of single crystals. Science, 343(6175): 1098-1102.##Durante M and Cucinotta FA (2011). Physical basis of radiation protection in space travel. Reviews of Modern Physics, 83(4): 1245.##Bakar NFA, Othman SA, Azman NFAN, Jasrin NS (2019) Effect of ionizing radiation towards human health: A review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 268(1): 012005. IOP Publishing.##Almurayshid M, Helo Y, Kacperek A, Griffiths J, Hebden J, Gibson A (2017) Quality assurance in proton beam therapy using a plastic scintillator and a commercially available digital camera. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 18(5): 210-219.##AbuAlRoos NJ, Azman MN, Amin NAB, Zainon R (2020) Tungsten-based material as promising new lead-free gamma radiation shielding material in nuclear medicine. Physica Medica, 78: 48-57.##Khosravi H, Sani KG, Jafari S, Nikzad S (2023) Evaluation of the radiation protection capability of a low density and non-Lead composite shield using Monte Carlo model. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(4): 833-836.##Abdolahzadeh T, Morshedian J, Ahmadi S (2023) Novel polyethylene/tungsten oxide/bismuth trioxide/barium sulfate/graphene oxide nanocomposites for shielding against X-ray radiations. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(1): 79-87.##Al Hassan M, Liu WB, Wang J, Ali MMM, Rawashdeh A (2022) Monte Carlo simulations of gamma-rays shielding with phthalonitrile-tungsten borides composites. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20(3): 621-626.##Lee JB, Byun JI, Yun JY (2020) Mass attenuation coefficients of environmental samples for gamma-ray energies from 46.5 keV to 1408 keV. International Journal of Radiation Research, 18: 201-207.##Vagheian M, Sardari D, Saramad S, Ochbelagh DR (2020). Experimental and theoretical investigation into X-ray shielding properties of thin lead films. International Journal of Radiation Research, 18(2): 263-274.##Alshareef R, Marashdeh MW, Almurayshid M, Alsuhybani M (2023) Study of radiation attenuation properties of HDPE/ZnO at energies between 47.5 and 266 keV. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 165: 104909.##Hussein M, Dannoun A, Aziz EM, Brza SB, Abdulwahid MA, Hussen RT, et al.  (2020) Steps toward the band gap identification in polystyrene based solid polymer nanocomposites integrated with tin titanate nanoparticles. Polymers, 12(10): 2320.##Cinan ZM, Erol B, Baskan T, Mutlu S, Ortaç B, Savaskan Yilmaz S, Yilmaz AH (2022) Radiation shielding tests of crosslinked polystyrene-b-polyethyleneglycol block copolymers blended with nanostructured selenium dioxide and boron nitride particles. Nanomaterials, 12(3): 297.##Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke EA, Abe A, Bloch DR (Eds.) (1999). Polymer handbook (Vol. 89). New York: Wiley.##Al‐Buriahi MS, Eke C, Alomairy S, Yildirim A, Alsaeedy HI, Sriwunkum C (2021) Radiation attenuation properties of some commercial polymers for advanced shielding applications at low energies. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 32(6): 2386-2396.##Körpinar B, Canbaz B, Füsun ÇAM, Hakan AKAT (2021) Gamma radiation shielding and thermal properties of the polystyrene/tungsten (VI) oxide composites. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 14(2): 395-407.##Cinan ZM, Erol B, Baskan T, Mutlu S, Savaskan Yilmaz, S, Yilmaz AH (2021) Gamma irradiation and the radiation shielding characteristics: For the lead oxide doped the crosslinked polystyrene-b-polyethyleneglycol block copolymers and the polystyrene-b-polyethyleneglycol-boron nitride nanocom- posites. Polymers, 13(19): 3246.##Osman AF, El Balaa H, El Samad O, Awad R, Badawi MS (2023) Assessment of X-ray shielding properties of polystyrene incorporated with different nano-sizes of PbO. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 62(2): 235-251.##Azmi R, Nam SY, Sinaga S, Akbar ZA, Lee CL, Yoon SC, et al. (2018) High-performance dopant-free conjugated small molecule-based hole-transport materials for perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy, 44: 191-198.##Xie Z, Park H, Choi S, Park HY, Gokulnath T, Kim H, et al. (2023) Thienothiophene‐assisted property optimization for dopant‐free π‐conjugation polymeric hole transport material achieving over 23% efficiency in perovskite solar cells. Advanced Energy Materials, 13(2): 2202680.##Zhang F, Liu X, Yi C, Bi D, Luo J, Wang S, et al. (2016) Dopant‐free donor (D)–π–D–π–D conjugated hole‐transport materials for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem, 9(18): 2578-2585.##Wang J, Wang S, Li X, Zhu L, Meng Q, Xiao Y, Li D (2014) Novel hole transporting materials with a linear π-conjugated structure for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Chemical Communications, 50(44): 5829-5832.##Shih CC, Chiang YC, Hsieh HC, Lin YC, Chen WC (2019) Multilevel photonic transistor memory devices using conjugated/insulated polymer blend electrets. ACS Applied Materials &#38; Interfaces, 11(45): 42429-42437.##Oyama K, Seike M, Mitamura K, Watase S, Suzuki T, Omura T, et al. (2021) Monodispersed nitrogen-containing carbon capsules fabricated from conjugated polymer-coated particles via light irradiation. Langmuir, 37(15): 4599-4610.##Brabec CJ, Padinger F, Sariciftci NS, Hummelen JC (1999) Photovoltaic properties of conjugated polymer/methanofullerene composites embedded in a polystyrene matrix. Journal of Applied Physics, 85(9): 6866-6872.##Beek WJ, Wienk MM, Janssen RA (2004) Efficient hybrid solar cells from zinc oxide nanoparticles and a conjugated polymer. Advanced Materials, 16(12): 1009-1013.##Beek WJ, Wienk MM, Kemerink M, Yang X, Janssen RA (2005) Hybrid zinc oxide conjugated polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(19): 9505-9516.##Nambiar S and Yeow JT (2012) Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection. ACS Applied Materials &#38; Interfaces, 4(11): 5717-5726.##Alsayed Z, Badawi MS, Awad R, Thabet AA, El-Khatib AM (2019) Study of some γ-ray attenuation parameters for new shielding materials composed of nano ZnO blended with high density polyethylene. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, 34(4): 342-352.##Mirji, R and Lobo B (2017) Computation of the mass attenuation coefficient of polymeric materials at specific gamma photon energies. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 135: 32-44.##Nasehi F and Ismail M (2019) Evaluation of X and gamma-rays attenuation parameters for polyacrylamide and ZnO composites as light shielding materials using MCNP and X-COM simulation. Nucl Med Radiat Ther, 10(404): 2.##Ponnamma D, Cabibihan JJ, Rajan M, Pethaiah SS, Deshmukh K, Gogoi JP, et al. (2019) Synthesis, optimization and applications of ZnO/polymer nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 98: 1210-1240.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Quality of life > 5 years after prostate cancer radiation therapy with a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Perirectal spacers are injected to decrease the dose to the rectum and prevent rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Advantages of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer are a good visibility in computed tomography and improved placement control. The aim of this study was to demonstrate unaffected long-term bowel quality of life (QoL) in comparison to baseline levels, independently from radiotherapy (RT) treatment technique. Materials and Methods: Patients responded to the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire before RT, at the last day of RT, 3 months, &#62;12 months and &#62;60 months after RT (n=27). A significant QoL change was defined as a statistically significant mean change &#62;5 points in comparison to baseline. Results: The largest mean bowel domain changes were found at the end of RT (&#62;10 points in the function and bother subdomains, respectively). Function subdomain changes remained without a significant difference in comparison to baseline at all later points in time (&#60;3 points, respectively). In the bother subdomain, changes remained &#62;5 points and statistically significant (8 and 6 points after &#62;12 and &#62;60 months, repsectively). In contrast to patients after pelvic node RT, the difference after &#62;60 months was &#60;5 points for patients after prostate only RT (12 vs. 4 points with vs. without pelvic node RT). Conclusion: The first QoL analysis after RT with a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer showed unaffected long-term bowel QoL in patients with limitation of the target volume to the prostate.&#160;</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1003</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1007</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Pinkawa</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Pinkawa</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Wege Klinik, Bonn, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>michael.pinkawa@post.rwth-aachen.de</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Haddad</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Haddad</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Wege Klinik, Bonn, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rashid</Family>
				<NameE>A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rashid</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Wege Klinik, Bonn, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Temming</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Temming</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Wege Klinik, Bonn, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hermani</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hermani</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Wege Klinik, Bonn, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Schlenter</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Schlenter</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Prostate cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>brachytherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hydrogel</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>quality of life.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Pinkawa M (2023) Gastrointestinal quality-of-life trajectories after radiotherapy for prostate cancer-which patients suffer from persisting problems? Cancers (Basel), 15: 4295.##2.	Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, Davis M, Walsh EI, Avery KNL, et al. (2022) Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int, 130: 370-80.##3.	Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, et al. (2013) Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 368: 436-45.##4.	Pinkawa M, Schubert C, Escobar-Corral N, Berneking V, Eble MJ (2018) Optimization of prostate cancer radiotherapy using of a spacer gel, volumetric modulated arc therapy and a single biological organ at risk objective. International Journal of Radiation Research, 16: 169-76.##5.	Seymour ZA, Pinkawa M, Daignault-Newton S, Bosch W, Michalski JM, Gay H, et al. (2023) A pooled long-term follow-up after radiotherapy for prostate cancer with and without a rectal hydrogel spacer: impact of hydrogel on decline in sexual quality of life. Front Oncol, 13: 1239104.##6.	Armstrong N, Bahl A, Pinkawa M, Ryder S, Ahmadu C, Ross J, et al. (2021) SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer for reducing radiation toxicity during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A systematic review. Urology, 156: e74-e85.##7.	Pinkawa M, Haddad H, Schlenter M, Hermani H, Ho H, Kovacs A, et al. (2024) Application of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer radiation therapy: A prospective phase 2 study. Pract Radiat Oncol, 14: 57-64.##8.	Hatiboglu G, Pinkawa M, Vallee JP, Hadaschik B, Hohenfellner M (2012) Application technique: placement of a prostate-rectum spacer in men undergoing prostate radiation therapy. BJU Int, 110: E647-52.##9.	Pinkawa M, Berneking V, Schlenter M, Krenkel B, Eble MJ (2017) Quality of life after radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a hydrogel spacer: 5-year results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 99: 374-7.##10.	Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG (2000) Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology, 56: 899-905.##11.	Volz-Sidiropoulou E, Pinkawa M, Fischedick K, Jakse G, Gauggel S, Eble MJ (2008) Factor Analysis of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) in a patient group after primary (external beam radiotherapy and permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy) and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol, 2: 122-9.##12.	Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol, 16: 139-44.##13.	Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, et al. (2024) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2024 update. Part I: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol, 68: 148-163.##14.	Pinkawa M, Hermani H, Bischoff P, Hanitzsch H, Heidrich A, Schafer A, et al. (2022) Focal injection of a radiopaque viscous spacer before focal brachytherapy as re-irradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer. Brachytherapy, 21: 848-52.##15.	Mariados NF, Orio PF, 3rd, Schiffman Z, Van TJ, Engelman A, Nurani R, et al. (2023) Hyaluronic acid spacer for hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol, 9: 511-8.##16.	Song D, Dabkowski M, Costa P, Nurani R, Kos M, Vanneste B, et al. (2024) Prospective, randomized controlled pivotal trial of biodegradable balloon rectal spacer for prostate radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 120: 1410-20.##17.	Kim HJ, Lee JS, Kim WC (2021) Moderate hypofractionated volumetric modulated Arc therapy with daily image guidance for patients with localized prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 19: 243-9.##18.	Ozturk N, Ozbek N, Depboylu B (2022) Dosimetric comparison of IMRT, VMAT and HYBRID treatment methods in radical radiation therapy of prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20: 411-6.##19.	Seymour ZA, Hamstra DA, Daignault-Newton S, Bosch W, Michalski J, Gay HA, et al. (2020) Long-term follow-up after radiotherapy for prostate cancer with and without rectal hydrogel spacer: a pooled prospective evaluation of bowel-associated quality of life. BJU Int, 126: 367-72.##20.	Pinkawa M, Berneking V, Konig L, Frank D, Bretgeld M, Eble MJ (2017) Hydrogel injection reduces rectal toxicity after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol, 193: 22-8.##21.	Ishii K, Yamanaga T, Ogino R, Hosokawa Y, Kishimoto S, Nakahara R, et al. (2018) Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol, 8: e49-e55.##22.	Link C, Honeck P, Lohr F, Bolenz C, Schaefer J, Bohrer M, et al. (2019) Quality of life and decision regret after postoperative radiation therapy to the prostatic bed region with or without elective pelvic nodal radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol, 9: e516-e27.##23.	Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, Payne HA, Woodward E, Pinkawa M (2020) Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open, 3: e208221.##24.	Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, Shah D, Karsh L, Hudes R, et al. (2017) Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: Final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 97: 976-85.##25.	Hadigal SR and Gupta AK (2022) Application of hydrogel spacer SpaceOAR Vue for prostate radiotherapy. Tomography, 8: 2648-61.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Volumetric changes in meningioma after six-month follow-up of single session gamma knife radiosurgery: A single-centre study</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery is a type of radiation therapy that uses a very intense beam of gamma rays that is used in destroying brain tumors like meningiomas without the need to make a surgical interface. The current study aims to assess the impact of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in meningioma treatment by estimating the changes in meningioma volumes after six months of follow-up. Materials and Methods: 43 participants&#39; data was collected at the Saad Al-Watari Gamma Knife Center in Baghdad, Iraq. The data was gathered from June 2022 to December 2022, and each patient followed after 6 months after the gamma knife surgery. Results: The outcomes show a decrease in meningioma volumes of 83.7% of patients. Only 2.3% of the patients recorded no change in meningioma size. Also, 9.3% of the patients recorded an increase in meningioma size. And finally, the tumor completely disappeared in 4.7% of the patients. Conclusion: Gamma knife treatment is a beneficial option for reducing the meningioma volume. The study demonstrated a significant decrease in tumor size for most patients. Furthermore, a small percentage of patients reported no change or an increase in tumor size, indicating that gamma knife treatment may not be equally effective for all individuals. However, it is essential to mention that two patients reported the complete disappearance of their tumors, suggesting a potential for successful tumor eradication with this treatment.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1009</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1015</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>R.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ahmed</Family>
				<NameE>R.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ahmed</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>rasha.sabeeh.ahmed@colmed-alnahrain.edu.iq</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hassen</Family>
				<NameE>Y.M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hassen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hameed</Family>
				<NameE>F.H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hameed</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Abd El-Azeem</Family>
				<NameE>S.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Abd El-Azeem</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physics Department, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.Y.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Mostafa</Family>
				<NameE>M.Y.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Mostafa</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>Mostafa.youness@mu.edu.eg</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Meningioma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>gamma knife</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiosurgery</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Iraq</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>tumor.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. 	Wechsler W and Reifenberger G (1996) Histopathological classification of brain tumors according to the revised WHO classification: Current State and perspectives BT  - brain tumor. In: Nagai M (ed). Springer Japan, Tokyo, pp 3-20.##2. 	Zulch MDKJ (1957) Brain tumors, their biology and pathology. Springer; First Edition (January 1, 1957).##3. 	Mennel H-D (1991) Grading of intracranial tumors following the WHO classification. Neurosurgical Review, 14: 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383256##4. 	Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL, Weiss MH (1996) Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery 84: 20-28. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.1.0020##5. 	Zhu W, Mao Y, Zhou L-F, et al. (2007) Combined subtemporal and retrosigmoid keyhole approach for extensive petroclival  meningioma surgery: report of experience with 7 cases. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery: MIN, 50: 106-110. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-984384##6. 	Nadeem A, Khan A, Habib A, et al. (2024) Intracranial intricacies: Comprehensive analysis of rare skull base meningiomas-A  single-center case series. Clinical Case Reports, 12: e8376.##7. 	Sheikhbahaei S, Sadaghiani MS, Rowe SP, Solnes LB (2021) Neuroendocrine tumor theranostics: An update and emerging applications in  clinical practice. American Journal of Roentgenology, 217: 495-506. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23349##8. 	Richter S, Steenblock C, Fischer A, et al. (2024) Improving susceptibility of neuroendocrine tumors to radionuclide therapies:  personalized approaches towards complementary treatments. Theranostics, 14: 17-32. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.87345##9. 	Mishra S, Kumar AG, Garg K, et al. (2023) Role of stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus hemangiomas - an individual  patient data-based meta-analysis. Neurology India, 71: S21-S30. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.373654##10. 	Speckter H, Bido J, Hernandez G, et al. (2016) SU-F-J-92: Predictive value of diffusion tensor imaging parameters for gamma knife radiosurgery in meningiomas. Medical Physics, 43: 3427-3428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4956000##11. 	Lee JA, Kim SR, Yoon SH, et al. (2022) Evaluation and analysis of radiation exposure to normal tissues during gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Int J Radiat Res, 20: 571-578. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijrr.20.3.8##12. 	Sarihan S, Tunc SG, Irem ZK, Kahraman A (2024) Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: CyberKnife-M6 experience. Int J Radiat Res, 22: 117-124. https://doi.org/10.61186/ijrr.22.1.117##13. 	Lippitz BE, Bartek JJ, Mathiesen T, Förander P (2020) Ten-year follow-up after Gamma Knife radiosurgery of meningioma and review of the  literature. Acta Neurochirurgica, 162: 2183-2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04350-5##14. 	Ganz JC (2014) Stockholm radiosurgery developing 1968-1982. Progress in Brain Research, 215: 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63520-4.00009-0##15. 	Mori Y, Nakazawa H, Hashizume C, et al. (2019) Dosimetric comparison of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy by three different modalities for benign skull base tumors adjacent to functioning optic pathways. Int J Radiat Res, 17: 519-530##16. 	Ibrahim RT, Ahmed RS, Hassan YM (2023) The evaluation of tumor volume and radiological features in patients with meningioma treated by multi-session, single session and hypo fractionation gamma knife radiosurgery. Onkologia i Radioterapia, 17: 231-234.##17. 	Fallows P, Wright G, Bownes P (2019) A standardised method for use of the Leksell GammaPlan Inverse Planning module  for metastases. Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 6: 227-233.##18. 	Schmutzer M, Skrap B, Thorsteinsdottir J, et al. (2023) Meningioma involving the superior sagittal sinus: long-term outcome after robotic  radiosurgery in primary and recurrent situation. Frontiers in Oncology, 13: 1206059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1206059##19. 	Zada G, Pagnini PG, Yu C, et al. (2010) Long-term outcomes and patterns of tumor progression after gamma knife  radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. Neurosurgery, 67: 322-329. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000371974.88873.15##20. 	Maksoud Z, Schmidt MA, Huang Y, et al. (2022) Transient enlargement in meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Cancers, 14: 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14061547##21. 	Ogasawara C, Philbrick BD, Adamson DC (2021) Meningioma: A review of epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and future  directions. Biomedicines, 9(3): 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9030319##22. 	Samanic CM, Teer JK, Thompson ZJ, et al. (2021) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and risk of meningioma. Journal of Neuro-oncology, 155: 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03878-5##23. 	Ullah MS, Khan MA, Masood A, et al. (2024) Brain tumor classification from MRI scans: a framework of hybrid deep learning  model with Bayesian optimization and quantum theory-based marine predator algorithm. Frontiers in Oncology, 14: 1335740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1335740##24. 	Hosseini-Siyanaki MR, Hasanpour Segherlou Z, Liu S, et al. (2023) Recurrent meningioma: When to intervene. BOHR International Journal of Neurology and Neuroscience, 1: 50-58. https://doi.org/10.54646/bijnn.2023.08##25. 	Maiuri F, Corvino S, Corazzelli G, et al. (2024) Time to recurrence of intracranial meningiomas from a monoinstitutional surgical  series. World Neurosurgery, 185: e612-e619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.087##26. 	Bethke L, Murray A, Webb E, et al. (2008) Comprehensive analysis of DNA repair gene variants and risk of meningioma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100: 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn004.##27. 	Niranjan A, Wei Z, Taori S, et al. (2024) 199 Gamma knife radiosurgery to treat neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas: A 35 year experience and paradigm for future treatment. Neurosurgery, 70(Suppl 1): 51-52.##28. 	Kim YJ, Moon K-S, Park SJ, et al. (2024) Gamma knife radiosurgery as primary management for intracranial meningioma  identified as growing on serial imaging. Medicine, 103: e37082. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037082##29. 	Akyoldaş G, Samancı Y, Yılmaz M, et al. (2021) Long-term results of gamma knife radiosurgery for foramen magnum meningiomas. Neurosurgical review, 44: 2667-2673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01446-5##30. 	Starke RM, Przybylowski CJ, Sugoto M, et al. (2015) Gamma knife radiosurgery of large skull base meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery, 122: 363-372. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS14198##31. 	Park S-H, Kano H, Niranjan A, et al. (2015) Gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas arising from the tentorium: a 22-year  experience. Journal of Neuro-oncology, 121: 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1605-0.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on self-efficacy and mental health in lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in improving self-efficacy, quality of life, and mental health outcomes in patients with lung cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 60 patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to receive radiotherapy between January 2024 and February 2025. Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG, n=30), which received MBCT in addition to standard oncological care, or the control group (CG, n=30), which received standard oncological care alone. The MBCT program was delivered over eight weekly sessions during the radiotherapy course. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy (SE), cancer-related fatigue, and levels of depression and anxiety. Assessments were conducted at baseline, one day after completing radiotherapy, and seven days post-treatment. Results: Compared to baseline, patients in the intervention group showed significant improvements in QoL, self-relaxation, positive attitude, decision-making confidence, and overall self-efficacy (P&#60;0.05). These improvements were significantly greater than those observed in the control group at both follow-up points. Furthermore, the intervention group exhibited markedly reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety, and cancer-related fatigue-particularly emotional and cognitive fatigue-seven days post-treatment (P&#60;0.05). Conclusion: MBCT significantly enhances self-efficacy and mental health outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. These findings support the integration of MBCT as a complementary psychosocial intervention in radiotherapy care to improve patients&#8217; psychological resilience and quality of life.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1017</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1022</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/28
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xie</Family>
				<NameE>B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xie</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Zhejiang 1Class 2, Nursing, 21st Batch, Equal Academic Qualification Program, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310002, Zhejiang Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>18058445771@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ma</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ma</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Engineering, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>lung cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>self-efficacy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>mental health</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>quality of life.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Smolarz B, Łukasiewicz H, Samulak D, Piekarska E, Kołaciński R, Romanowicz H (2025) Lung cancer-epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and molecular aspect. Int J Mol Sci, 26(5): 2049.##2. Liu H and Tang T (2022) Pan-cancer genetic analysis of cuproptosis and copper metabolism-related gene set. Front Oncol, 12: 952290.##3. Li AH, Bu S, Wang L, Liang AM, Luo HY (2024) Impact of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cognition and emotion in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 16(1): 79-89.##4. Baskar R, Dai J, Wenlong N, Yeo R, Yeoh KW (2014) Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment. Front Mol Biosci, 1: 24.##5. Seol KH, Bong SH, Kang DH, Kim JW (2021) Factors Associated with the quality of life of patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Psychiatry Investig, 18(1): 80-7.##6. Koul R, Tse R, Karreman E, Dubey A, Tai P (2015) Overall quality of life assessment in the patients undergoing external beam radiation in outpatient radiation oncology department. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res, 9(3): 122-7.##7. Arias F, Arrarás JI, Asín G, Zarandona U, Mora I, Errasti M, et al. (2018) To what extent does radiotherapy improve the quality of life of patients with bone metastasis?: A prospective, single-institutional study. Am J Clin Oncol, 41(2): 163-6.##8. Hofmann SG and Gómez AF (2017) Mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety and depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 40(4): 739-49.##9. Fereidouni Z, Dehghan Abnavi S, Ghanbari Z, Gashmard R, Zarepour F, Khalili Samani N, et al. (2024) The impact of cancer on mental health and the importance of supportive services. Galen Med J, 13:e3327.##10. Looijmans M, van Manen AS, Traa MJ, Kloover JS, Kessels BLJ, de Vries J (2018) Psychosocial consequences of diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer and evaluation of the need for a lung cancer specific instrument using focus group methodology. Support Care Cancer, 26(12): 4177-85.##11. Shivappa P, Bernhardt GV, Gatti P, Radhakrishnan V (2024) Exploring Psychosocial distress in cancer patients and survivors: A quick overview. New Emirates Medical Journal, 5: e02506882320073.##12. Li S, Gao Z, Xu Y, Zhong X, Bai X (2025) Self-efficacy for coping with cancer and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports, 15(1): 7056.##13. Merluzzi TV, Pustejovsky JE, Philip EJ, Sohl SJ, Berendsen M, Salsman JM (2019) Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychooncology, 28(9): 1781-90.##14. Chang YC, Tseng TA, Lin GM, Hu WY, Wang CK, Chang YM (2023) Immediate impact of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) among women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health, 23(1): 331.##15. Sheikhzadeh M, Zanjani Z, Baari A (2021) Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety, depression, and fatigue in cancer patients: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Psychiatry, 16(3): 271-80.##16. Feng L and Yang D (2022) Observation on the Effect of high-quality nursing intervention plus health education in chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and its influence on the physical and mental health of patients. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022: 2459013.##17. Yu J, Huang T, Xu J, Xiao J, Chen Q, Zhang L (2022) Effect of nursing method of psychological intervention combined with health education on lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Healthc Eng, 2022: 2438612.##18. Park S, Sato Y, Takita Y, Tamura N, Ninomiya A, Kosugi T, et al. (2020) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological distress, fear of cancer recurrence, fatigue, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in patients with breast cancer-A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 60(2): 381-9.##19. Johns SA, Tarver WL, Secinti E, Mosher CE, Stutz PV, Carnahan JL, et al. (2021) Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on fatigue in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 160: 103290.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Evaluation of the critical organ doses in high dose rate brachytherapy plans using single-and multi-channel applicators</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: The purpose of our study was to investigate the doses received by critical organs, namely the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon, in the treatment plans using single-channel (SC) or multi-channel (MC) applicators in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatments for vaginal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We established treatment plans for 10 patients received 45Gy (1.8Gy&#215;25fractions) external radiotherapy and then subsequently treated with HDR brachytherapy using MC applicators in the Oncentra Brachytherapy Treatment Planning System (OBTPS). These plans, originally created with MC applicator in the OBTPS, were redefined to simulate an SC applicator, where only the central channel active was kept active. To compare the doses to critical organs, new plans were generated with a prescribed dose of 5Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV). During optimization, it was ensured that 90% of the CTV received the prescribed dose (5Gy), in accordance with Groupe Europ&#233;en de Curieth&#233;rapie and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) criteria. The doses received by critical organs were analyzed for volumes of 0.1, 1, and 2cc in both SC and MC applicator plans. Results: A significant difference was found in rectal doses at 1cc and 2cc (p=0.022 and p=0.022, respectively); bladder doses at 0.1cc 1cc and 2cc (p=0.013 for all); and sigmoid colon dose at 1cc (p=0.012). Conclusion: HDR brachytherapy plans using MC applicators delivered lower doses to critical organs compared to SC applicators. Thus, MC applicators are preferable for better organ sparing in vaginal cancer treatment.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1023</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1027</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/29
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/8
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Suncak</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Suncak</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>The Institute of Health Sciences at Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>lxleyla@hotmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.K.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Akbas</Family>
				<NameE>C.K.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Akbas</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Medical Physics, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>G.U.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Alveroglu</Family>
				<NameE>G.U.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Alveroglu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Medical Physics, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Özkurt</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Özkurt</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>İbiş</Family>
				<NameE>K.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>İbiş</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Küçücük</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Küçücük</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.B.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Becerir</Family>
				<NameE>H.B.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Becerir</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Division of Medical Physics, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Brachytherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>rectum</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>sigmoid colon</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>urinary bladder</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>applicators.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Horowitz NS, Peters WA 3rd, Smith MR, Drescher CW, Atwood M, Mate TP (2002) Adjuvant high dose rate vaginal brachytherapy as treatment of stage I and II endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol, 99(2): 235-240. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01672-6##Pearcey RG and Petereit DG (2000) Post-operative high dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low to intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Radiother Oncol, 56(1): 17-22. doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00171-7##Sabater S, Andres I, Lopez-Honrubia V, Berenguer R, Sevillano M, Jimenez-Jimenez E, Rovirosa A, Arenas M (2017) Vaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer - a technically easy treatment? Cancer Manag Res, 9: 351-362. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S119125##Iftimia I, Cirino ET, Mower HW, McKee AB (2013) Treatment planning methodology for the Miami Multichannel Applicator following the American Brachytherapy Society recently published guidelines: the Lahey Clinic experience. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 14(1): 4098. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4098##Bahadur YA, Constantinescu C, Hassouna AH, Eltaher MM, Ghassal NM, Awad NA. (2015) Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning. J Contemp Brachytherapy, 6(4): 362-370. doi:10.5114/jcb.2014.47816##Demanes DJ, Rege S, Rodriquez RR, Schutz KL, Altieri GA, Wong T (1999) The use and advantages of a multichannel vaginal cylinder in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 44(1): 211-219. doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00453-2##Kim H, Rajagopalan MS, Houser C, Beriwal S (2014) Dosimetric comparison of multichannel with one single-channel vaginal cylinder for vaginal cancer treatments with high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy, 13: 263-267. doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2013.08.009##Shin SM, Duckworth TL, Cooper BT, Curtin JP, Schiff PB, DeWyngaert JK, Lymberis SC (2015) Use of a flexible inflatable multi-channel applicator for vaginal brachytherapy in the management of gynecologic cancer. Front Oncol, 5: 201. doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00201##Zhang Z, He W, Yang L, Li D, Zhong L, Shi X, Tan L, Wen Q, Pang H (2021) Dosimetric comparison between the use of insertion needles and Fletcher applicator in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Res, 19(4): 819-820.##Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. (2006) Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol, 78(1): 67-77. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014##Celik Y, (editor). (2011) Nasıl? Biyoistatistik Bilimsel Araştırma SPSS.##Gebhardt BJ, Vargo JA, Kim H, Houser CJ, Glaser SM, Sukumvanich P, et al. (2018) Image-based multichannel vaginal cylinder brachytherapy for the definitive treatment of gynecologic malignancies in the vagina. Gynecol Oncol, 150(2): 293-299. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.06.011##Feng C, Wen X, Li S, Hua L, Chen S (2024) Comparison of 3D-printed multichannel non–co-planar vaginal applicators and single-channel vaginal applicators for brachytherapy with positive or close surgical margins in cervical cancer. Brachytherapy, 23(4): 641-647.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Dosimetric assessment of photon, proton, and carbon ion beams in a magnetic field; a Monte Carlo simulation study</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: The advent of Magnetic Resonance-guided (MR-guided) radiotherapy, facilitated by MR-guided linear accelerators (MR-LINACs), has significantly enhanced the availability of online adaptive radiotherapy treatments. Research indicates that a static magnetic field influences the amount of radiation absorbed by patients undergoing MR-guided radiotherapy. This study employed Monte Carlo simulations to assess the dose distribution of Photon, Proton, and Carbon ion beams in the absence and presence of magnetic fields. Materials and Methods: All simulations were performed using version 9.1 of the GATE software. The experimental configuration consisted of a water phantom equipped with a one mm-thick air slit oriented parallel to the x-y plane. Energy and dose measurements from both the primary beam and secondary electrons were conducted using DoseActor. Results: The observed magnetic field shifted the Bragg peak for both proton and carbon ion beams, with an increasing displacement correlating to higher primary beam energy levels. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between secondary electron doses and magnetic field intensity; in scenarios involving a 7 Tesla magnetic field, photon doses at the water-air interface increased considerably. Additionally, at the air slit location, doses from photon-induced secondary electrons markedly increased at this interface. Conclusion: The Electron Return Effect (ERE) influences dose distribution at water-air boundaries. Increased initial energies and more robust magnetic fields exacerbate these phenomena, emphasizing the critical importance of rigorous deliberation in the treatment planning process.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1029</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1036</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/29
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/8
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Bagherzadeh</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Bagherzadeh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rajabi</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rajabi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hrajabi@modares.ac.ir</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Comprehensive Magnetic Fields</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Carbon-Ion Therapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Monte Carlo Method</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Proton Therapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Protons.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Ahmad R, Barcellini A, Baumann K, et al. (2024) Particle Beam Radiobiology Status and Challenges: A PTCOG Radiobiology Subcommittee Report. Int J Particle Ther, 13: 100626.##2. Hamad Morad K (2021) Bragg-curve simulation of carbon-ion beams for particle-therapy applications: A study with the GEANT4 toolkit. Nucl Eng Technol, 53(8): 2767-2773.##3. Loeffler J and Durante M (2013) Charged particle therapy-optimization, challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 10: 411-424.##4. Tinganelli W and Durante M (2020) Carbon ion radiobiology. Cancers, 12(10): 3022.##5. Kleynhans J, Sathekge M, Ebenhan T (2021) Obstacles and recommendations for clinical translation of nanoparticle system-based targeted alpha-particle therapy. Materials, 14(17): 4784.##6. Kurz C, Buizza G, Landry G, et al. (2020) Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol, 15: 93.##7. Xia W, Li T, Chen Y, et al. (2020) Magnetic field-induced dose distortions in carbon-ion therapy: a Monte Carlo study. Med Phys, 47: 4415-4425.##8. Nahum A (2021) Interactions of charged particles with matter. In: Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics, CRC Press, pp. Vol1-25.##9. Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ (2005) Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue–air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons. Phys Med Biol, 50(7): 1363.##10. Santos DM, Wachowicz K, Burke B, Fallone BG (2019) Proton beam behavior in a parallel configured MRI-proton therapy hybrid: effects of time-varying gradient magnetic fields. Med Phys, 46(2): 822-838.##11. Fuchs H, Padilla-Cabal F, Oborn BM, Georg D (2023) Commissioning a beam line for MR-guided particle therapy assisted by in silico methods. Med Phys, 50(2): 1019-1028.##12. Pham TT, Tran LT, Hoang NH, et al. (2022) Optimizing proton beam energies in the presence of magnetic fields for MR-guided therapy. Radiother Oncol, 170: 54-61.##13. Karger CP, Glowa C, Peschke P, et al. (2021) The RBE in ion beam radiotherapy: In vivo studies and clinical application. Z Med Phys, 31(2): 105-121.##14. Wang X, Zhou J, Fan L, et al. (2021) Integration of MR guidance in carbon-ion therapy: challenges and opportunities. J Radiat Oncol, 36: 327-335.##15. Loap P, Vischioni B, Bonora M, et al. (2021) Biological rationale and clinical evidence of carbon ion radiation therapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma: a narrative review. Front Oncol, 11: 789079.##16. Muraro S, Battistoni G, Kraan AC (2020) Challenges in Monte Carlo simulations as clinical and research tool in particle therapy: a review. Front Phys, 8: 567800.##17. Mesbahi A, Mohammadi M, Mahdavi SR (2007) Application of Monte Carlo calculations in evaluation of neutron and capture gamma doses for a high-energy photon beam. Int J Radiat Res, 5: 143-148.##18. Durante M and Paganetti H (2016) Nuclear physics in particle therapy: a review. Rep Prog Phys, 79(9): 096702.##19. Haberl, D. (2021). Implementation and verification of Monte Carlo particle transport in electromagnetic fields in GATE, Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien, Austria.##20. Grevillot L, Boersma DJ, Fuchs H, et al. (2020) GATE-RTion: a GATE/Geant4 release for clinical applications in scanned ion beam therapy. Med Phys, 47(8): 3675-3681.##21. Reis CAC (2024) Development of a Monte Carlo framework to simulate 3D-printed plastics in proton therapy beams, Master's thesis, Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal).##22. Makarova A, Gottschalk B, Sauerwein W (2017) Comparison of Geant4 multiple Coulomb scattering models with theory for radiotherapy protons. Phys Med Biol, 62(15): 5959.##23. ICRU Report 78 (2007) Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. J ICRU, 7(2).##24. ICRU Report 89 (2016) Prescribing, recording, and reporting light-ion beam therapy. J ICRU, 14(2).##25. Akbari M and Karimian A (2019) Monte Carlo assessment of beam deflection and depth dose equivalent variation of a carbon-ion beam in a perpendicular magnetic field. Physica Medica, 61: 33-43.##26. Oborn BM, Dowdell S, Metcalfe PE, et al. (2015) Proton beam deflection in MRI fields: implications for MRI-guided proton therapy. Med Phys, 42(5): 2113-2124.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Development and in-vitro evaluation of gallium-68 labelled Staphylococcus aureus -specific aptamer as a potential PET agent for infection imaging</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most common causative pathogen associated with a wide range of infections, from mild to life-threatening conditions such as osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and pneumonia. Early detection and reliable differentiation between infection and sterile inflammation are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. However, most radiopharmaceuticals currently available fail to discriminate between these conditions, underscoring the need for infection-specific imaging agents. Materials and Methods: In this study, a Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled S. aureus-specific aptamer was developed as a potential PET infection imaging probe. Aptamers were selected using the cell- systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) method, and their specificity was verified by fluorescence-based binding assays. Radiolabeling was achieved via DOTA chelation, and radiochemical purity was determined. Additionally, in vitro binding assays were performed with S. aureus, while Escherichia coli (E. coli) served as a control. Results: The aptamer exhibited an affinity constant (Kₐ) of 2260 &#177; 634 CFU/mL and a linear detection range of 250-2&#215;10⁴ CFU/mL, with a limit of detection of 171 CFU/mL for S. aureus. The Ga-68-labeled aptamer demonstrated radiochemical purity greater than 99%. In vitro binding increased linearly with rising S. aureus concentrations (10&#179;-2&#215;10⁴ CFU/mL), while minimal binding to E. coli confirmed its specificity. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that the Ga-68-labeled S. aureus-specific aptamer holds promise as an infection-targeted PET imaging agent. Although currently limited to in vitro evaluation, such aptamer-based radiopharmaceuticals may contribute to improved diagnosis and imaging of infectious diseases.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1037</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1042</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/29
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/8
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Bargh</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Bargh</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ozkul</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ozkul</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Timur</Family>
				<NameE>S.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Timur</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>V.C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ozalp</Family>
				<NameE>V.C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ozalp</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Atılım University, Ankara, Turkiye</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Erdogan</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Erdogan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>serdogan@hacettepe.edu.tr</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Aptamer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>gallium-68</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Staphylococcus aureus</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>PET agent for infection imaging.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>dos Santos AL, Santos DO, de Freitas CC, Alves Ferreira BL, Afonso IF, Rodrigues CR, Castro HC (2007) Staphylococcus aureus: visitando uma cepa de importância hospitalar. J Bras Patol Med Lab, 43 :413-23.##Hatzenbuehler J and Pulling TJ (2011) Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Physician, 84(9): 1027-33.##Navalkissoor S, Nowosinska E, Gnanasegaran G, Buscombe JR (2013) Single-photon emission computed tomography–computed tomography in imaging infection. Nucl Med Commun, 34(4): 283-90.##Patel RD, Patel PM, Patel NM (2011) A review on radiopharmaceuticals and radiochemical method in analysis. Int J Pharm Biol Arch, 2: 1062-7.##Salmanoglu E, Kim S, Thakur ML (2018) Currently available radiopharmaceuticals for imaging infection and the holy grail. Semin Nucl Med, 48(2): 86-99.##Mokoala KM, Ndlovu H, Lawal I, Sathekge MM (2024) PET/CT and SPECT/CT for infection in joints and bones: an overview and future directions. Semin Nucl Med, 54(3): 394-408.##dos Santos SR, Corrêa CR, de Barros AL, Serakides R, Fernandes SO, Cardoso VN, et al. (2015) Identification of Staphylococcus aureus infection by aptamers directly radiolabeled with technetium-99m. Nucl Med Biol, 42(3): 292-8.##Ferreira IM, de Sousa Lacerda CM, dos Santos SR, de Barros ALB, Fernandes SO, Cardoso VN, et al. (2017) Detection of bacterial infection by a technetium-99m-labeled peptidoglycan aptamer. Biomed Pharmacother, 93: 931-8.##Correa CR, Miranda AS, Simionatto CS, Lima WM, Souto AA, Silva RG, et al. (2014) Aptamers directly radiolabeled with technetium-99m as a potential agent capable of identifying carcinoembryonic antigen in tumor cells T84. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 24(8): 1998-2001.##Termaat MF, Raijmakers PG, Scholten HJ, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJ (2005) The accuracy of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(11): 2464-71.##Smith DL, Breeman WA, Sims-Mourtada J (2013) The untapped potential of gallium-68 PET: the next wave of 68Ga agents. Appl Radiat Isot, 76: 14-23.##Vanbrocklin HF. Radiochemistry of PET. In: Schwaiger M, Reske SN, editors. Molecular Imaging: Principles and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. p. 304.##Dursun AD, Borsa BA, Bayramoglu G, Arica MY, Ozalp VC (2022) Surface plasmon resonance aptasensor for Brucelladetection in milk. Talanta, 239: 123074.##Ersoy Omeroglu E, Sudagidan M, Yurt MN, Tasbasi BB, Acar EE, Ozalp VC (2021) Microbial community of soda Lake Van as obtained from direct and enriched water, sediment and fish samples. Sci Rep, 11(1): 18364.##Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res, 37: W202-8.##Farrel Côrtes M, Bes T, Deo BR, Barbosa dos Anjos B, Jimenez Galisteo AJ Jr, Cerdeira Sabino E, et al. (2022) Selection and identification of a DNA aptamer for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii using an in-house cell-SELEX methodology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 12: 818737.##Timur SS (2023) Anticancer potential of novel nanoemulgel formulations in melanoma. FABAD J Pharm Sci, 48(3): 443-58.##Sicco E, Báez J, Margenat J, García F, Ibarra M, Cabral P, et al. (2018) Derivatizations of Sgc8-c aptamer to prepare metallic radiopharmaceuticals as imaging diagnostic agents: Syntheses, isolations, and physicochemical characterizations. Chem Biol Drug Des, 91(3): 747-55.##Tayeri H, Sattarzadeh Khameneh E, Zolghadri S, Kakaei S, Sardari D (2020) Optimized production, quality control and biological assessment of 68Ga-bleomycin as a possible PET imaging agent. Int J Radiat Res, 18(2): 235-41.##Liu X, Zhao Y, Wang X, Wu L, Zhang Y, Lu W, et al. (2025) Preclinical evaluation of 68Ga-labeled SL1 aptamer for c-Met targeted PET imaging. Mol Pharm, 22(3): 1615-23.##Kolm C, Cervenka I, Aschl UJ, Baumann N, Jakwerth S, Krska R, et al. (2020) DNA aptamers against bacterial cells can be efficiently selected by a SELEX process using state-of-the-art qPCR and ultra-deep sequencing. Sci Rep, 10(1): 20917.##Jayasena SD (1999) Aptamers: an emerging class of molecules that rival antibodies in diagnostics. Clin Chem, 45(9): 1628-50.##Thelu HVP, Siriki A, Devanathan P, Kaloor SH, Shajesh V, Reji V (2019) Self-assembly of an aptamer-decorated, DNA-protein hybrid nanogel: a biocompatible nanocarrier for targeted cancer therapy. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2(12): 5227-34.##Foster A and DeRosa MC (2014) Development of a biocompatible layer-by-layer film system using aptamer technology for smart material applications. Polymers (Basel), 6(5): 1631-44.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Does the high dose to the vertebral body in the treatment of esophageal cancer lead to increased hematological toxicity?</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To investigate the effect of radiation dose to thoracic vertebrae (TV) on the development of hematologic toxicity in esophageal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: We identified 28 patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy between 2014-2021.Vertebral volumes receiving 5-50 Gy (TV5-50) and the mean vertebral and thoracic blood pool dose were collected from the dose-volume-histogram. Complete blood cell counts were analyzed and hematologic toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). Results: TV50 was negatively linearly associated with mean lymphocyte nadir by percentage. TV20 was negatively linearly associated with mean platelet nadir by cc. Planning Target Volume (PTV) length was negatively linearly associated with mean hemoglobin nadir. The optimal threshold dose values for avoiding grade &#8805;4 lymphopenia was TV40 of &#60;22.3%, TV50 of &#60;9.09%, mean thoracic blood pool dose of &#60; 16.9 Gy, PTV volume of &#60;652 cc and PTV length of &#60;16.7 cm. The optimal threshold dose values for avoiding grade &#8805;3 leukopenia were TV10 of &#60;47.6%, TV20&#160; of &#60;39.7%, TV30 of&#60; 34.69%,and mean vertebral dose of &#60;17.7Gy. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation between vertebral doses and hematologic parameters. The optimal threshold dose values for avoiding grade &#8805;3 leukopenia were TV10 of &#60;47.6% and mean vertebral dose of &#60;17.7Gy.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1043</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1049</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/29
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/8
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Barlas</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Barlas</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Sivas Numune Hospital, Sivas, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>dr.cerencicibiyik@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.K.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Çatal</Family>
				<NameE>T.K.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Çatal</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Kahramanmaraş Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yıldırım</Family>
				<NameE>H.C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yıldırım</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>E.S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Akovalı</Family>
				<NameE>E.S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Akovalı</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.Ç.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Karaçam</Family>
				<NameE>S.Ç.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Karaçam</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Vocational School of Health Services, Radiotherapy Program, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Ş.A.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Ergen</Family>
				<NameE>Ş.A.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Ergen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>D.Ç.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Öksüz</Family>
				<NameE>D.Ç.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Öksüz</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Esophageal neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>chemoradiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hematologic toxicity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>complete blood cell counts</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>dosimetry parameter.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Crosby T, Hurt CN, Falk S, Gollins S, Mukherjee S, Staffurth J, et al. (2013) Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology, 14(7): 627-37.##Fukuzawa T, Nagao R, Kuroki T, Mikami T, Akiba T, Nakano Y, et al. (2024) Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of esophageal cancer. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 29(4): 426-36.##Conroy T, Galais M-P, Raoul J-L, Bouché O, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Douillard J-Y, et al. (2014) Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 15(3): 305-14.##Hallemeier CL, Moughan J, Haddock MG, Herskovic AM, Minsky BD, Suntharalingam M, et al. (2023) Association of radiotherapy duration with clinical outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated in NRG Oncology trials: a secondary analysis of NRG Oncology randomized clinical trials. JAMA Network Open, 6(4): e238504-e.##Damen PJ, Kroese TE, van Hillegersberg R, Schuit E, Peters M, Verhoeff JJ, et al. (2021) The influence of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia on overall survival in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 111(4): 936-48.##Mell LK, Kochanski JD, Roeske JC, Haslam JJ, Mehta N, Yamada SD, et al. (2006) Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 66(5): 1356-65.##Mell LK, Schomas DA, Salama JK, Devisetty K, Aydogan B, Miller RC, et al. (2008) Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 70(5): 1431-7.##Deek MP, Benenati B, Kim S, Chen T, Ahmed I, Zou W, et al. (2016) Thoracic vertebral body irradiation contributes to acute hematologic toxicity during chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 94(1): 147-54.##Lee J, Lin J-B, Sun F-J, Lu K-W, Lee C-H, Chen Y-J, et al. (2016) Dosimetric predictors of acute haematological toxicity in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The British Journal of Radiology, 89(1066): 20160350.##Zhang A, Deek MP, Kim S, Sayan M, Grann A, Wagman RT, et al. (2019) Vertebral body irradiation during chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer contributes to acute bone marrow toxicity. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 10(3): 513.##Wu AJ, Bosch WR, Chang DT, Hong TS, Jabbour SK, Kleinberg LR, et al. (2015) Expert consensus contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiation therapy in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 92(4): 911-20.##Lee NY, Lu JJ, Yu Y (2013) Target volume delineation and field setup: a practical guide for conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Springer.##Fabian D, Ayan A, DiCostanzo D, Barney CL, Aljabban J, Diaz DA, et al. (2019) Increasing radiation dose to the thoracic marrow is associated with acute hematologic toxicities in patients receiving chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 9: 147.##Inan G, Aral I, Ozturk H, Gani Z, Arslan S, Tezcan Y (2023) The effect of spleen dose-volume parameters on lymphopenia during chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(3): 421-5.##Davuluri R, Jiang W, Fang P, Xu C, Komaki R, Gomez DR, et al. (2017) Lymphocyte nadir and esophageal cancer survival outcomes after chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 99(1): 128-35.##Deek MP, Kim S, Beck R, Yegya-Raman N, Langenfeld J, Malhotra J, et al. (2018) Variations in initiation dates of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for definitive management of inoperable non–small cell lung cancer are associated with decreases in overall survival. Clinical Lung Cancer, 19(4): e381-e90.##Xu C, Jin J-Y, Zhang M, Liu A, Wang J, Mohan R, et al. (2020) The impact of the effective dose to immune cells on lymphopenia and survival of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 146: 180-6.##van Rossum PS, Deng W, Routman DM, Liu AY, Xu C, Shiraishi Y, et al. (2020) Prediction of severe lymphopenia during chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: development and validation of a pretreatment nomogram. Practical Radiation Oncology, 10(1): e16-e26.##Zhou XL, Zhu WG, Zhu ZJ, Wang WW, Deng X, Tao WJ, et al. (2019) Lymphopenia in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: relationship to malnutrition, various disease parameters, and response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The Oncologist, 24(8): e677-e86.##Tseng I, Li F, Ai D, Chen Y, Xu Y, Yu L, et al. (2023) Less irradiation to lymphocyte-related organs reduced the risk of G4 Lymphopenia in Esophageal Cancer: re-analysis of prospective trials. The Oncologist, 28(8): e645-e52.##Wang Q, Qiu Q, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Yang G, Liu C, et al. (2021) Bone marrow dosimetric analysis of lymphopenia in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. Cancer Medicine, 10(17): 5847-58.##Newman N, Sherry A, Anderson J, Osmundson E (2018) Dose-dependent association of vertebral body irradiation and lymphopenia during chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 102(3): e37-e8.##Wang J-j, Shao H, Zhang L, Jing M, Xu W-j, Sun H-w, et al. (2023) Preoperative chemoradiation-induced hematological toxicity and related vertebral dosimetry evaluations in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: data from a phase III clinical trial. Radiation Oncology, 18(1): 100.##Liang Y, Bydder M, Yashar CM, Rose BS, Cornell M, Hoh CK, et al. (2013) Prospective study of functional bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 85(2): 406-14.##Rose BS, Liang Y, Lau SK, Jensen LG, Yashar CM, Hoh CK, et al. (2012) Correlation between radiation dose to 18F-FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 83(4): 1185-91.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Endurance exercise exerts hepatoprotection against electromagnetic radiation via targeting oxidative stress in male rats</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: The effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) on the body are an emerging field of research. The evidence supports the production of oxidative stress (OS) through EMR and the positive role of exercise in reducing liver damage. The evidence supports the production of OS through EMR and the positive role of exercise in reducing liver damage. Materials and Methods: 32 Wistar male rats were randomly divided into four groups: control, EMR, endurance training (ET), and EMR+ET. The ET and EMR+ET groups ran on the treadmill with the maximum speed and duration of 30 m/ min and 35 min, respectively (5 sessions/weeks, during four weeks). The ET and EMR+ ET groups were exposed to a 2.45GHZ Wi-Fi router for four weeks (4 h/day, 7days/weeks). Forty-eight hours after the last training session, the blood and liver tissue of the animals were sampled for histological, biochemical evaluations and measurement of oxidative stress markers. Results: Histopathological findings confirmed the protective role of ET in rats exposed to EMR. The results showed that in the EMR group, the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) and the serum levels of liver enzymes (AST, ALT, and ALP) increased significantly, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes decreased significantly (P&#60;0.05). In the ET and EMR+ET groups, compared to the EMR group, the concentration of MDA and the serum levels of liver enzymes significantly decreased, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes increased significantly (P&#60;0.05). Conclusion: Our findings show that ET can improve the state of OS and liver damage caused by EMR.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1051</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1056</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/30
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/9
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Amiri</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Amiri</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>K.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Rakhshan</Family>
				<NameE>K.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Rakhshan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shabkhiz</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shabkhiz</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>R.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zeighami fard</Family>
				<NameE>R.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zeighami fard</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>N.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Aboutaleb</Family>
				<NameE>N.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Aboutaleb</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Physiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>dr.nabotaleb@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Endurance training</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>electromagnetic radiation</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>oxidative stress</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>transaminases</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>pathology.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Ansal K, Jose DS, Rajan RK (2018) Review on biological effect of electromagnetic radiation. Proc Int Conf Circuits Syst Digit Enterprise Technol (ICCSDET): 1-5.##2.	Dongus S, Jalilian H, Schürmann D, et al. (2022) Health effects of WiFi radiation: a review based on systematic quality evaluation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 52(19): 3547-66.##3.	Batool S, Bibi A, Frezza F, et al. (2019) Benefits and hazards of electromagnetic waves, telecommunication, physical and biomedical: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 23(7): 3121.##4.	Yavas MC, Kilitci A, Çelik E, et al. (2024) Rat brain and testicular tissue effects of radiofrequency radiation exposure: Histopathological, DNA damage of brain and qRT-PCR analysis. Int J Radiat Res, 22(3): 529-36.##5.	Fahmy H and Mohammed F (2021) Hepatic injury induced by radio frequency waves emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices in Wistar rats. Hum Exp Toxicol, 40(1): 136-47.##6.	Tawfik M, Saif-Elnasr M, Elkady A, et al. (2018) Protective role of ferulic acid against the damaging effect induced by electromagnetic waves on rat liver and intestine tissues. Int J Radiat Res, 16(4): 421-30.##7.	Berköz M, Arslan B, Yıldırım M, et al. (2018) 1800 MHz radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation induces oxidative stress in rat liver, kidney and brain tissues. East J Med, 23(2): 71.##8.	Powers SK, Ji LL, Leeuwenburgh C (1999) Exercise training-induced alterations in skeletal muscle antioxidant capacity: a brief review. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 31(7): 987-97.##9.	Jaffar FHF, Osman K, Ismail NH, et al. (2019) Adverse effects of Wi-Fi radiation on male reproductive system: a systematic review. Tohoku J Exp Med, 248(3): 169-79.##10.	Kıvrak EG, Yurt KK, Kaplan AA, et al. (2017) Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure, 5(4): 167-76.##11.	Pizzino G, Irrera N, Cucinotta M, et al. (2017) Oxidative stress: harms and benefits for human health. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2017: 8416763.##12.	Schuermann D and Mevissen M (2021) Manmade electromagnetic fields and oxidative stress—Biological effects and consequences for health. Int J Mol Sci, 22(7): 3772.##13.	Koyu A, Naziroglu M, Ozguner F, et al. (2005) Caffeic acid phenethyl ester modulates 1800 MHz microwave-induced oxidative stress in rat liver. Electromagn Biol Med, 24(2): 135-42.##14.	Moradpour R, Shokri M, Abedian S, et al. (2020). The protective effect of melatonin on liver damage induced by mobile phone radiation in mice model. Int J Radiat Res, 18(1): 133-41.##15.	Pooladi M, Montzeri A, Nazarian N, et al. (2018) Effect of WiFi waves (2.45 GHz) on aminotransaminases (ALP, ALT and AST) in liver of rat. Arch Adv Biosci, 9(2): 13-20.##16.	Anderson E and Durstine JL (2019) Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: A brief review. Sports Med Health Sci, 1(1): 3-10.##17.	Ahmadian M, Dabidi Roshan V, Leicht AS (2018) Age-related effect of aerobic exercise training on antioxidant and oxidative markers in the liver challenged by doxorubicin in rats. Free Radic Res, 52(7): 775-82.##18.	Amiri H, Shabkhiz F, Pournemati P, et al. (2023) Swimming exercise reduces oxidative stress and liver damage indices of male rats exposed to electromagnetic radiation. Life Sci, 317: 121461.##19.	DastAmooz S, Boroujeni ST, Shahbazi M, et al. (2018) Physical activity as an option to reduce adverse effect of EMF exposure during pregnancy. Int J Dev Neurosci, 71: 10-7.##20.	Akbari HA, Gaeini AA, Choobineh S (2020) Moderate exercise training reduced the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted from a cell phone on hematological parameters in male Wistar rats. Sport Sci Health, 16: 267-72.##21.	Akbari H and Gaeini A (2021) Moderate exercise training as an effective strategy to reduce the harmful effects of cell phone radiation on Wistar rat's semen quality. Int J Radiat Res, 19(2): 317-23.##22.	Pilch W, Szygula Z, Tyka AK, et al. (2014) Disturbances in pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance after passive body overheating and after exercise in elevated ambient temperatures in athletes and untrained men. PLoS One, 9(1): e85320.##23.	Wei D, Zhang XL, Wang YZ, et al. (2010) Lipid peroxidation levels, total oxidant status and superoxide dismutase in serum, saliva and gingival crevicular fluid in chronic periodontitis patients before and after periodontal therapy. Aust Dent J, 55(1): 70-8.##24.	Farzanegi P, Abbaszadeh H, Farokhi F, et al. (2020) Attenuated renal and hepatic cells apoptosis following swimming exercise supplemented with garlic extract in old rats. Clin Interv Aging, 15: 1409.##25.	Fathi R, Nasiri K, Akbari A, et al. (2020) Exercise protects against ethanol-induced damage in rat heart and liver through the inhibition of apoptosis and activation of Nrf2/Keap-1/HO-1 pathway. Life Sci, 256: 117958.##26.	Okudan N and Belviranli M (2016) Effects of exercise training on hepatic oxidative stress and antioxidant status in aged rats. Arch Physiol Biochem, 122(4): 180-5.##27.	Hajighasem A, Farzanegi P, Mazaheri Z (2018) Effects of combined therapy with resveratrol, continuous and interval exercises on apoptosis and lipid profile in the liver tissue of rats with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Report of Health Care, 4(4): 21-9.##28.	Sadeghipour HR, Yeganeh G, Zar A, et al. (2020) The effect of 4-week endurance training on serum levels of irisin and betatrophin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Arch Physiol Biochem, 129(3): 575-81.##29.	Varghese R, Majumdar A, Kumar G, et al. (2018) Rats exposed to 2.45 GHz of non-ionizing radiation exhibit behavioral changes with increased brain expression of apoptotic caspase 3. Pathophysiology, 25(1): 19-30.##30.	Mahmoudi R, Mortazavi S, Safari S, et al. (2015) Effects of microwave electromagnetic radiations emitted from common Wi-Fi routers on rats’ sperm count and motility. Int J Radiat Res, 13: 363-8.##31.	Gürler HŞ, Bilgici B, Akar AK, et al. (2014) Increased DNA oxidation (8-OHdG) and protein oxidation (AOPP) by low level electromagnetic field (2.45 GHz) in rat brain and protective effect of garlic. Int J Radiat Biol, 90(10): 892-6.##32.	Adebayo E, Adeeyo A, Ogundiran MA, et al. (2018) Bio-physical effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) on blood parameters, spermatozoa, liver, kidney and heart of albino rats. J King Saud Univ Sci, 31(4): 813-821.##33.	Ismaiil LA, Joumaa WH, Moustafa ME (2019) The impact of exposure of diabetic rats to 900 MHz electromagnetic radiation emitted from mobile phone antenna on hepatic oxidative stress. Electromagn Biol Med, 38(4): 287-96.##34.	Jaffar FHF, Osman K, Hui CK, et al. (2024) Effect of Wi-Fi exposure and edible bird nest supplementation on the testicular oxidative stress status and sperm quality in male Sprague-Dawley rat pups. Int J Radiat Res, 22(2): 329-38.##35.	Ragy MM (2015) Effect of exposure and withdrawal of 900-MHz-electromagnetic waves on brain, kidney and liver oxidative stress and some biochemical parameters in male rats. Electromagn Biol Med, 34(4): 279-84.##36.	Hejazi K, Ghahremani Moghaddam M, Darzabi T (2019) Effects of an 8-week aerobic exercise program on some indicators of oxidative stress in elderly women. Iran J Ageing, 13(4): 506-17.##37.	Ghiasi R, Naderi R, Mozaffar A, et al. (2019) The effect of swimming training on oxidative stress, SIRT1 gene expression, and histopathology of hepatic tissue in type 2 diabetic rats. Biologia Futura, 70(3): 167-74.##38.	Ozmen O and Kavrik O (2020) Ameliorative effects of vitamin C against hepatic pathology related to Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz electromagnetic radiation) in rats. Int J Radiat Res, 18(3): 405-12.##39.	Hasan I and Islam MR (2020) Biochemical and histopathological effects of mobile phone radiation on the liver of Swiss albino mice. Eur J Anat, 24(4): 257-61.##40.	Pashayi P, Abbassi Daloii A, Barari AR, et al. (2019) The effect of endurance training and l-carnitine supplementation on gene expression of hepatic enzymes (AST, ALT, ALP) in Wistar male rats toxicated by boldenone. J Adv Biomed Sci, 9(4): 1710-8.##41.	Mohammad P, Esfandiar KZ, Abbas S, et al. (2019) Effects of moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training on serum levels of resistin, chemerin and liver enzymes in streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced type-2 diabetic rats. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 18: 379-87.##42.	Koohestani Sini Z, Afzalpour ME, Mohammadnia Ahmadi M, et al. (2020) The effect of aerobic continuous training on myonectin, insulin resistance and liver enzymes in rats with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Appl Sport Sci,  8 (S2).## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Radiologic value of computerized tomography angiography (CTA) for assessment of carotid artery Tortuosity Index and its impact on stroke recovery</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: This study investigated the relationship between extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) and extracranial carotid artery (ECA) tortuosity and clinical prognosis in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke (AIS). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 201 patients with anterior circulation AIS who underwent head and neck CT angiography (CTA) between January&#8211;December 2023.CTA was performed using a Discovery CT750 HD scanner (GE Medical Systems), with scanning extending from the aortic arch to the skull vertex. Iopromide contrast agent (37g iodine/100ml) was administered intravenously. Images were reconstructed at 0.63-mm slice thickness using multiplanar reformation (MPR) and 3D volume rendering (VR). Results: Tortuosity Index (TI) of EICA and ECA were independent predictors of poor 90-day prognosis (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] &#8805;3) in multivariate regression (Model I: EICA OR=1.038, P=0.007.ECA OR=1.052, P=0.015). ROC analysis showed ECA-TI&#8805;12.5 predicted poor prognosis with higher specificity (AUC=0.623,sensitivity 55.6%,specificity 68.3%) than EICA-TI &#8805;14.5 (AUC=0.601,sensitivity 61.9%,specificity60.7%). Conclusions: Increased EICA/ECA tortuosity independently correlates with poor AIS outcomes, with ECA-TI being a superior prognostic indicator.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1057</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1063</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/30
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/9
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Neurology, Jingxian Hospital, Xuancheng, Anhui 242500, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Cui</Family>
				<NameE>W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Cui</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Neurology, Shahe Hospital Changping District, Beijing 102206, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>ssamsca2001@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Carotid arteries</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>stroke  prognosis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>intracranial arteriosclerosis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>x-ray computed</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>risk factors.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Kim ST, Brinjikji W, Lehman VT, Carr CM, Luetmer PH, Rydberg CH (2018) Association between carotid artery tortuosity and carotid dissection: a case-control study. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences, 62(4): 413-417.##Krzyzewski RM, Klis KM, Kwinta BM, et al. (2022) Subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured internal carotid artery aneurysm: Association with arterial tortuosity. World Neurosurgery, 166: e84-e92.##Chen KP, Wang JJ, Wang LJ, et al. (2017) Study of correlation between carotid artery tortuosity and atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 55(8): 608-612.##Georgakarakos E and Fiska A (2022) Dolichoarteriopathy of common carotid artery: an unusual entity. Aorta (Stamford),10(6): 308-309.##Kim BJ, Kim SM, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Suh DC, Kim JS (2015) Vascular tortuosity may be related to intracranial artery atherosclerosis. International Journal of Stroke, 10(7): 1081-1086.##Chen Z, Fan T, Zhao X, Hu T, Qi H, Li D (2022) Simplified classification of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity: a predictor of procedural complexity and clinical outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy. Neurological Research, 44(10): 918-926.##Abhilash HN, Yanagita Y, Pai R, et al. (2024) Effect of vascular geometry on haemodynamic changes in a carotid artery bifurcation using numerical simulation. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 237: 108153.##St LM, Park BD, Dahn M, Bozeman P (2012) Cerebral intolerance during flow arrested carotid angioplasty. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 46(1): 85-88.##Alvarez B, Matas M, Ribo M, Maeso J, Yugueros X, Alvarez-Sabin J (2012) Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal is a safe technique for high-risk patients older than 70 years. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 55(4): 978-984.##Kessel DO, Robertson I, Taylor EJ, Patel JV (2003) Renal stenting from the radial artery: a novel approach. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 26(2): 146-149.##Mari JM, Khoo M, Riga C, Coppola G, Bicknell C, Caro CG (2012) Index proposal and basic estimator study for quantification of oscillation of the secondary flow pattern in tortuous vessels. Ultrasonics, 52(2): 294-305.##Satow T, Nakazawa K, Ohta T, Hashimoto N (2005) Techniques for passing the PercuSurge Guardwire system through severe and tortuous stenotic lesions. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 45(2): 116-122.##Chiam PT and Roubin GS (2008) Carotid sheath rescue with a distal filter retrieval catheter. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 71(7): 987-990.##Shilkina NP, Butusova SV, Driazhenkova IV (2014) System of microcirculation, markers of vascular wall damage and systematicity of the process in rheumatic diseases. Angiol Sosud Khir, 20(1): 27-34.##Perrino M, Voulaz E, Balin S, et al. (2024) Autoimmunity in thymic epithelial tumors: a not yet clarified pathologic paradigm associated with several unmet clinical needs. Frontiers in Immunology, 15: 1288045.##Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. (2019) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke, 50(12): e344-e418.##Ren Z, Easley TO, Pineda FD, Guo X, Barber RF, Karczmar GS (2023) Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Enhancement-Constrained Acceleration (ECA) reconstruction-based high temporal resolution breast DCE-MRI. PLoS One, 18(6): e0286123.##Miozzo R, Eaton W, Bienvenu OJ, Samuels J, Nestadt G (2023) Psychiatric comorbidity in the Baltimore ECA follow-up study: the matrix approach. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 58(1): 141-151.##Wu D and Liu Y (2021) FM Combined with NIHSS score contributes to early ais diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic AIS. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis-Hemostasis, 27: 1319785663.##Tamada H, Kiryu-Seo S, Sawada S, Kiyama H (2021) Axonal injury alters the extracellular glial environment of the axon initial segment and allows substantial mitochondrial influx into axon initial segment. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 529(16): 3621-3632.##Yang J, Yu F, Liu H, An H, Xiong R, Huang D (2016) A Retrospective Study of thrombolysis with 0.6 mg/kg Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) in Mild Stroke. Scientific Reports, 6: 31344.##Han Y, Li G, Tang Y, et al. (2021) Effect of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis on the prognosis of patients with minor ischemic stroke. Neurological Research, 43(8): 653-658.##Duan H, Mo D, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li L (2019) Carotid-vertebral artery bypass with saphenous vein graft for symptomatic vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Neurosurgical Focus, 46(2): E8.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Astragaloside IV enhances Paclitaxel chemosensitivity in breast cancer cells via regulating Nrf-2 signaling</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Chemotherapy resistance has become a problem for the treatment of breast cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate whether astragaloside IV (AS-IV) has synergistic effects to enhance Paclitaxel (PTX) chemosensitivity in breast cancer cells. Materials and Methods: CCK-8 assays were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the cell to AS-IV and PTX. The flow cytometric analysis of Annexin-V-fluoresceine isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) staining was carried out to evaluate cell apoptosis. The western blotting assay was used to measure the apoptosis-related proteins and Nrf-2 levels. ROS levels were measured using Dichlorofluorescein (DCF) assay. Results: AS-IV enhances PTX chemosensitivity in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells by enhancing the inhibitory effect of cell viability and promotion effect on cell apoptosis of PTX. The synergistic effects of AS-IV to PTX could decrease the Nrf-2 expression and increase the ROS levels. Nrf-2 signaling was related to ROS generation. Conclusion: AS-IV may enhance PTX chemosensitivity in breast cancer via regulating Nrf-2 signaling. AS-IV might be used as a potential adjuvant drug to increase PTX sensitivity in breast cancer cells.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1065</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1070</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/1
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/11
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>T.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Runwei</Family>
				<NameE>T.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Runwei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>General Surgery Department, Liqun Hospital, Putuo District, Shanghai, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chaoran</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chaoran</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Breast Surgery/Medical Department, Baoshan District Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yinghui</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yinghui</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Breast Surgery Department, Jiading Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>postop.tsin@foxmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Astragaloside IV</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>breast cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>chemosensitivity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>reactive  oxygen species.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin, 73(1): 17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763##2.	Ding Y, Chen X, Zhang Q, Liu Q (2020) Historical trends in breast cancer among women in China from age-period-cohort modeling of the 1990-2015 breast cancer mortality data. BMC Public Health, 20(1): 1280. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09375-0.##3.	Fisusi FA and Akala EO (2019) Drug combinations in breast cancer therapy. Pharm Nanotechnol, 7(1): 3-23. doi: 10.2174/2211738507666190122111224##4.	Koual M, Tomkiewicz C, Cano-Sancho G, Antignac JP, Bats AS, Coumoul X (2020) Environmental chemicals, breast cancer progression and drug resistance. Environ Health,19(1): 117. doi:10.1186/s12940-020-00670-2.##5.	Weaver BA (2014) How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell, 25(18): 2677-2681. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0916##6.	Kumar A, Hoskins PJ, Tinker AV (2015) Dose-dense paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 27(1): 40-47. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2014.10.001.##7.	Ali Hassan A, Ibrahim NY, Jassen MAR (2019) Concurrent Paclitaxel and Radiotherapy for Node Positive Breast Cancer. Gulf J Oncolog, 1(29): 14-21.##8.	Abu Samaan TM, Samec M, Liskova A, Kubatka P, Büsselberg D (2019) Paclitaxel’s mechanistic and clinical effects on breast cancer. Biomolecules, 9(12): 789. doi:10.3390/biom9120789##9.	Cui H, Arnst K, Miller DD, Li W (2020) Recent advances in elucidating paclitaxel resistance mechanisms in non-small cell lung cancer and strategies to overcome drug resistance. Curr Med Chem, 27(39): 6573-6595. doi:10.2174/ 0929867326666191016113631.##10.	Němcová-Fürstová V, Kopperová D, Balušíková K, et al. (2016) Characterization of acquired paclitaxel resistance of breast cancer cells and involvement of ABC transporters. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 310: 215-228. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2016.09.020.##11.	Li L, Hou X, Xu R, Liu C, Tu M (2017) Research review on the pharmacological effects of astragaloside IV. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 31(1): 17-36. doi:10.1111/fcp.12232.##12.	Zhang J, Wu C, Gao L, Du G, Qin X (2020) Astragaloside IV derived from Astragalus membranaceus: A research review on the pharmacological effects. Adv Pharmacol, 87: 89-112. doi:10.1016/bs.apha.2019.08.002.##13.	Zhang L, Zhou J, Qin X, Huang H, Nie C (2019) Astragaloside IV inhibits the invasion and metastasis of SiHa cervical cancer cells via the TGF-β1-mediated PI3K and MAPK pathways. Oncol Rep, 41(5): 2975-2986.##14.	Xu F, Cui WQ, Wei Y, et al. (2018) Astragaloside IV inhibits lung cancer progression and metastasis by modulating macrophage polarization through AMPK signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 37(1): 207. doi:10.1186/s13046-018-0878-0.##15.	Zheng Y, Dai Y, Liu W, et al. (2019) Astragaloside IV enhances taxol chemosensitivity of breast cancer via caveolin-1-targeting oxidant damage. J Cell Physiol, 234(4): 4277-4290. doi:10.1002/jcp.27196##16.	Basak P, Sadhukhan P, Sarkar P, Sil PC (2017) Perspectives of the Nrf-2 signaling pathway in cancer progression and therapy. Toxicol Rep, 4: 306-318. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.06.002.##17.	Khurana N and Sikka SC (2018) Targeting crosstalk between Nrf-2, NF-κB and androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel),10(10): 352. doi:10.3390/cancers10100352##18.	Testai L, Martelli A, Flori L, Cicero AFG, Colletti A (2021) Coenzyme Q10: Clinical applications beyond cardiovascular diseases. Nutrients, 13(5): 1697. doi:10.3390/nu13051697.##19.	Su CY, Chang YC, Yang CJ, Huang MS, Hsiao M (2016) The opposite prognostic effect of NDUFS1 and NDUFS8 in lung cancer reflects the oncojanus role of mitochondrial complex I. Sci Rep, 6: 31357. doi:10.1038/srep31357.##20.	Yang W, Shen Y, Wei J, Liu F (2015) MicroRNA-153/Nrf-2/GPx1 pathway regulates radiosensitivity and stemness of glioma stem cells via reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget, 6(26): 22006-22027. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4292.##21.	Son SS, Kang JS, Lee EY (2020) Paclitaxel ameliorates palmitate-induced injury in mouse podocytes. Med Sci Monit Basic Res, 26: e928265. doi:10.12659/MSMBR.928265.##22.	Moloney JN and Cotter TG (2018) ROS signaling in the biology of cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 80:50-64. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.05.023.##23.	Yang L, Shi P, Zhao G, et al. (2020) Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 5(1): 8. doi:10.1038/s41392-020-0110-5.##24.	Zhu Y, Su Y, Zhang J, et al. (2021) Astragaloside IV alleviates liver injury in type 2 diabetes due to promotion of AMPK/mTOR‑mediated autophagy. Mol Med Rep, 23(6): 437. doi:10.3892/mmr.2021.12076.##25.	Liu F, Ran F, He H, Chen L (2020) Astragaloside IV exerts anti-tumor effect on murine colorectal cancer by re-educating tumor-associated macrophage. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 68(6): 33. doi:10.1007/s00005-020-00598-y.##26.	Wang X, Gao S, Song L, Liu M, Sun Z, Liu J (2021) Astragaloside IV antagonizes M2 phenotype macrophage polarization-evoked ovarian cancer cell malignant progression by suppressing the HMGB1-TLR4 axis. Mol Immunol, 130: 113-121. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2020.11.014.##27.	He Y, Zhang Q, Chen H, et al. (2021) Astragaloside IV enhanced carboplatin sensitivity in prostate cancer by suppressing AKT/NF-κB signaling pathway. Biochem Cell Biol, 99(2): 214-222. doi:10.1139/bcb-2020-0026.##28.	DeNicola GM, Karreth FA, Humpton TJ, et al. (2011) Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature, 475(7354): 106-109. doi:10.1038/nature10189.##29.	 Gao P, Du X, Liu L, Xu H, Liu M, Guan X, Zhang C (2021)Astragaloside IV Alleviates tacrolimus-induced chronic nephrotoxicity via p62-Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Front Pharmacol, 11: 2020. ##30.	Qu X, Gao H, Zhai J, et al. (2020) Astragaloside IV enhances cisplatin chemosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing MRP2. Eur J Pharm Sci, 148: 105325. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105325.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Neuroprotective role of remote ischemic post-conditioning in radiotherapy-induced cognitive decline: Modulating hippocampal phospho-tau and autophagy via Nrf2-ARE pathway</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Cranial radiotherapy (RT), while critical for treating brain tumors, often leads to delayed cognitive dysfunction due to neuronal damage and Tau protein accumulation. Remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIPC) has emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate RT-induced neurotoxicity. This study explores the neuroprotective role of RIPC in modulating hippocampal autophagy and phospho-Tau (P-Tau) expression through the Nrf2-antioxidant response element (ARE) signaling pathway following cranial irradiation. Materials and Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to focal cranial RT to induce radiation-associated hippocampal injury. A subgroup received RIPC through intermittent limb ischemia. Behavioral evaluations, including Morris water maze, elevated plus maze, and novel object recognition tests, were conducted at weeks 4 and 8 post-irradiation. Hippocampal expression levels of Nrf2, HO-1, SOD2, Tau, and P-Tau were assessed via qPCR and ELISA. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were employed to localize and quantify neuronal changes and autophagy markers. Results: Rats receiving RIPC demonstrated significant improvements in memory and spatial learning compared to non-conditioned controls. RIPC upregulated hippocampal Nrf2, HO-1, and SOD2, while decreasing Tau and P-Tau accumulation. Additionally, increased neuronal autophagy and reduced oxidative stress were observed, correlating with better cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: RIPC exerts neuroprotective effects in a RT-induced brain injury model by activating the Nrf2-ARE pathway, promoting autophagy, and reducing Tau pathology. These findings support the therapeutic potential of RIPC as an adjunct to RT for preserving cognitive function in cancer patients.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1071</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1077</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/4
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/14
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yang</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Qingdao Huanghai University, Qingdao, Shandong, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Qi</Family>
				<NameE>W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Qi</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>School of Nursing, Qingdao Binhai University, Qingdao, Shandong, China; Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, 610500, China; Philippine Women's University, 1743 Taft Avenue, Malate, Manila 1004</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>793219993@qq.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>F.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhou</Family>
				<NameE>F.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>S.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Li</Family>
				<NameE>S.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Li</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zong</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zong</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yang</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Hu</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Hu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Pathology, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cognitive  dysfunction</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ischemic preconditioning</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>hippocampus</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Tau proteins</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>autophagy.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Gondi V, Meyer J, Shih HA (2021) Advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv, 3(Suppl 5): v26-v34.##2.	Mantovani C, Gastino A, Cerrato M, Badellino S, Ricardi U, Levis M (2021) Modern radiation therapy for the management of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: current approaches and future directions. Front Oncol, 11: 772789.##3.	Shamsesfandabadi P, Patel A, Liang Y, Shepard MJ, Wegner RE (2024) Radiation-induced cognitive decline: challenges and solutions. Cancer Manag Res, 16: 1043-52.##4.	Cramer CK, Cummings TL, Andrews RN, Strowd R, Rapp SR, Shaw EG, et al. (2019) Treatment of radiation-induced cognitive decline in adult brain tumor patients. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 20(5): 42.##5.	Vysakh R, Ganapathi Raman R, Muhammed SO, Puzhakkkal N (2023) Fixed field technique for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy: A feasibility study using Elekta system. International Journal of Radiation Research, 21(1): 105-9.##6.	Raj JAT, Shah J, Ghanekar S, John G, Goda JS, Chatterjee A (2025) Pharmacological and therapeutic innovation to mitigate radiation-induced cognitive decline (RICD) in brain tumor patients. Cancer Lett, 620: 217700.##7.	Haldbo-Classen L, Amidi A, Wu LM, Lukacova S, Oettingen Gv, Gottrup H, et al. (2019) Long-term cognitive dysfunction after radiation therapy for primary brain tumors. Acta Oncologica, 58(5): 745-52.##8.	Guo D, Liu Z, Zhou J, Ke C, Li D (2024) Significance of programmed cell death pathways in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci, 25(18): 9947.##9.	Cui J, Zhao S, Li Y, Zhang D, Wang B, Xie J, et al. (2021) Regulated cell death: discovery, features and implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Communication and Signaling, 19: 1-29.##10.	Sharma C and Kim SR (2021) Linking oxidative stress and proteinopathy in Alzheimer's disease. Antioxidants (Basel), 10(8): 1231.##11.	Iqbal K, Liu F, Gong CX, Grundke-Iqbal I (2010) Tau in Alzheimer disease and related tauopathies. Curr Alzheimer Res, 7(8): 656-64.##12.	Ngo V and Duennwald ML (2022) Nrf2 and oxidative stress: a general overview of mechanisms and implications in human disease. Antioxidants (Basel), 11(12): 2345.##13.	Ulasov AV, Rosenkranz AA, Georgiev GP, Sobolev AS (2022) Nrf2/Keap1/ARE signaling: Towards specific regulation. Life Sci, 291: 120111.##14.	Zhou D, Ding J, Ya J, Pan L, Wang Y, Ji X, et al. (2018) Remote ischemic conditioning: a promising therapeutic intervention for multi-organ protection. Aging (Albany NY), 10(8): 1825-55.##15.	Lv J, Guan W, You Q, Deng L, Zhu Y, Guo K, et al. (2020) RIPC provides neuroprotection against ischemic stroke by suppressing apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway. Sci Rep, 10(1): 5361.##16.	Liu ZJ, Chen C, Li XR, Ran YY, Xu T, Zhang Y, et al. (2016) Remote ischemic preconditioning-mediated neuroprotection against stroke is associated with significant alterations in peripheral immune responses. CNS Neurosci Ther, 22(1): 43-52.##17.	Rajeev V, Chai YL, Poh L, Selvaraji S, Fann DY, Jo DG, et al. (2023) Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion: a critical feature in unravelling the etiology of vascular cognitive impairment. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 11(1): 93.##18.	Rajeev V, Fann DY, Dinh QN, Kim HA, De Silva TM, Lai MKP, et al. (2022) Pathophysiology of blood brain barrier dysfunction during chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in vascular cognitive impairment. Theranostics, 12(4): 1639-58.##19.	Kazda T and Polachova K (2023) Financial toxicity of radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases: Will it get worse or better? Neurooncol Pract, 10(4) :318-9.##20.	Frank A, Bonney M, Bonney S, Weitzel L, Koeppen M, Eckle T (2012) Myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury: from basic science to clinical bedside. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 16(3): 123-32.##21.	Wang W, Tai S, Tao J, Yang L, Cheng X, Zhou J (2024) Innovative hydrogel-based therapies for ischemia-reperfusion injury: bridging the gap between pathophysiology and treatment. Materials Today Bio, 29: 101295.##22.	Tülü S, Mulino M, Pinggera D, Luger M, Würtinger P, Grams A, et al. (2015) Remote ischemic preconditioning in the prevention of ischemic brain damage during intracranial aneurysm treatment (RIPAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16: 594.##23.	Martín-Tovar EA, Badillo-Alvarado AH, Cocom-Poot LE, Gaxiola-Sosa JL (2024) Dosimetric evaluation of a hybrid treatment planning for whole-brain radiation with hippocampal sparing. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22(2): 321-8.##24.	Farina M, Vieira LE, Buttari B, Profumo E, Saso L (2021) The Nrf2 pathway in ischemic stroke: a review. Molecules, 26(16): 5001.## 25. Johnson DA and Johnson JA (2015) Nrf2--a therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Free Radic Biol Med, 88(Pt B): 253-67.##26.	Guo F, Liu X, Cai H, Le W (2018) Autophagy in neurodegenerative diseases: pathogenesis and therapy. Brain Pathol, 28(1): 3-13.##27.	Xolalpa-Cueva L, García-Carlos CA, Villaseñor-Zepeda R, Orta-Salazar E, Díaz-Cintra S, Peña-Ortega F, et al. (2022) Hyperphosphorylated Tau relates to improved cognitive performance and reduced hippocampal excitability in the young rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. J Alzheimers Dis, 87(2): 529-43.##28.	Majd S, Power JH, Koblar SA, Grantham HJ (2016) Early glycogen synthase kinase-3β and protein phosphatase 2A independent tau dephosphorylation during global brain ischaemia and reperfusion following cardiac arrest and the role of the adenosine monophosphate kinase pathway. Eur J Neurosci, 44(3): 1987-97.##29.	Park Y, Kc N, Paneque A, Cole PD (2024) Tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain as brain protein biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid and blood for diagnosis of neurobiological diseases. Int J Mol Sci, 25(12): 6295.##30.	Farjam R, Pramanik P, Aryal MP, Srinivasan A, Chapman CH, Tsien CI, et al. (2015) A radiation-induced hippocampal vascular injury surrogate marker predicts late neurocognitive dysfunction. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys, 93(4): 908-15.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Significant decrease in the radiation low-dose delivered to normal tissue in a novel cervical cancer VMAT plan using             sub-arc collimator angle optimization</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Traditionally, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans have depended on a predefined gantry range and a fixed collimator angle. Herein, we develop a novel sub-arc collimator angle optimization (SACAO) method for VMAT in cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with cervical cancer were retrieved in the retrospective planning study. Two plans for traditional optimization were generated using dual arcs with two static collimator angles of 0˚ and 45˚ (named VMAT_0 and VMAT_45, respectively). A new plan was also developed using SACAO (named VMAT_SACAO). The dynamic gantry range segmentation of the full arc was calculated according to the continuity of the best conformity index (CI). The dose-volumetric parameters, average x-jaw size, and total monitor units (MUs) were compared. Results: The HI (uniformity index) and CI (conformity index) were improved in VMAT_SACAO compared to VMAT_0 and VMAT_45. The average x-jaw size of VMAT_SACAO was lower than VMAT_0 and VMAT_45 (18.7 &#177; 0.9 cm2, 20.7 &#177; 1.1 cm2, and 20.2 &#177; 1.0 cm2), as well as the total MUs (402 &#177; 19.0, 450 &#177; 18.8, and 432 &#177; 18.5). The average low-dose delivered to normal tissue was lowest in VMAT_SACAO compared to VMAT_0 and VMAT_45 (15.8 &#177; 0.4 Gy, 18.6 &#177; 0.3 Gy, and 17.0 &#177; 0.4 Gy). Conclusion: Compared to the two VMAT plans, the VMAT_SACAO improved the HI and CI, decreased the low-dose delivered to normal tissue, the V50, V45, and V15 of the small bowel, and the total MUs when applied in treating cervical cancer patients.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1079</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1084</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/5
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/15
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chen</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xu</Family>
				<NameE>W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Shen</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Shen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>C.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Xie</Family>
				<NameE>C.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Xie</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhou</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhou</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>D.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Jiang</Family>
				<NameE>D.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Jiang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhong</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhong</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>doctorzyh73@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>liuhui69_wh@hotmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yu</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Street, Wuhan, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>haijunyu@whu.edu.cn</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cervical cancer</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>volumetric modulated arc therapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>collimator angle optimization</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>normal tissue protection.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Otto K (2008) Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Medical Physics, 35(1): 310-317.##2. Bedford JL (2009) Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy. Medical Physics, 36(11): 5128-5138.##3. Rao M, Yang W, Chen F, Sheng K, Ye J, Mehta V, et al. (2010) Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. Medical Physics, 37(3): 1350-1359.##4. Quan EM, Li X, Li Y, Wang X, Kudchadker RJ, Johnson JL, et al. (2012) A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 83(4): 1169-1178.##5. Ostheimer C, Hübsch P, Janich M, Gerlach R, Vordermark D (2016) Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in total scalp irradiation: a single institutional experience. Radiation Oncology Journal, 34(4): 313-321.##6. Liu X, Huang E, Wang Y, He Y, Luo H, Zhong M, et al. (2017) Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, VMAT, fixed-field IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for stage I-II nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma. Radiation Oncology, 12(1): 1-9.##7. Ohira S, Sagawa T, Ueda Y, Inui S, Masaoka A, Akino Y, et al. (2020) Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases. Medical Dosimetry, 45(1): 85-91.##8. Battinelli C, Fredriksson A, Eriksson K (2021) Technical Note: Collimator angle optimization for multiple brain metastases in dynamic conformal arc treatment planning. Medical Physics, 48(9): 5414-5422.##9. Ahn BS, Park SY, Park JM, Choi CH, Chun M, Kim JI (2017) Dosimetric effects of sectional adjustments of collimator angles on volumetric modulated arc therapy for irregularly-shaped targets. PloS one, 12(4): e0174924. ##10.	Kim JI, Ahn BS, Choi CH, Park JM, Park SY (2018) Optimal collimator rotation based on the outline of multiple brain targets in VMAT. Radiation Oncology, 13(1): 88.##11. Sandrini ES, da Silva AX, da Silva CM (2018) Evaluation of collimator rotation for volumetric modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using flattening filter free. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 141: 257-260.##12. Sun W, Chen K, Li Y, Xia W, Dong L, Shi Y, et al. (2021) Optimization of collimator angles in dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampus and inner ear sparing. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 19035. ##13. Tsurumaki F, Nakajima Y, Ito K, Kito S, Kikumura R, Murofushi KN, et al. (2024) Optimal combination of collimator angles for dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Medical Dosimetry, S0958-3947(24): 00045-1.##14. Treutwein M, Hipp M, Koelbl O, Dobler B (2012) Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer. Radiation Oncology, 7: 108.##15. Knill C, Loughery B, Sandhu R (2023) Dosimetric effects of dynamic jaw tracking and collimator angle optimization in non-coplanar cranial arc radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry, 48(3): 176-180.##16. Zhang P, Happersett L, Yang Y, Yamada Y, Mageras G, Hunt M (2010) Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 77(2): 591-599.##17. Rasmus B, van Amerongen JHM, Craft D (2019) Improving VMAT delivery efficiency by optimizing the dynamic collimator trajectory. Medical Physics 46(9): 3877-3882.##18. MacDonald RL, Syme A, Little B, Ward L, Thomas CG (2020) Toward the combined optimization of dynamic axes (CODA) for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery using fixed couch trajectories. Medical Physics, 47(2): 307-316.##19. Murtaza G, Toftegaard J, Khan EU, Poulsen PR (2017) Volumetric modulated arc therapy with dynamic collimator rotation for improved multileaf collimator tracking of the prostate. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 122(1): 109-115.##20. Wang Y, Chen L, Zhu F, Guo W, Zhang D, Sun W (2018) A study of minimum segment width parameter on VMAT plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical cancer using Monaco TPS. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 19(5): 609-615.##21. Hussein M, South CP, Barry MA, Adams EJ, Jordan TJ, Stewart AJ, et al. (2016) Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 120(3): 473-479.##22. Shen J, Dai Z, Yu J, Yuan Q, Kang K, Chen C, et al. (2022) Sub-arc collimator angle optimization based on the conformity index heatmap for VMAT planning of multiple brain metastases SRS treatments. Frontiers in Oncology, 12: 987971.##23. Huang SX, Yang SH, Zeng B, Li XH (2024) Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y.##24. Feng WG, Ma W, Li SP, Guo YX, Du W, Cai HY (2023) Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasal tumor: a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Res, 21(3): 561-569.##25. Ozturk N, Ozbek N, Depboylu B (2022) Dosimetric comparison of IMRT, VMAT and HYBRID treatment methods in radical radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Res, 20(2): 411-416.##26. Bijina TK, Ganesh KM, Subbulakshmi B, Pichandi A (2020) Dosimetric comparison of single and double collimator stereotactic body radiotherapy plans using Cyber Knife for carcinoma prostate. Int J Radiat Res, 18(2): 209-217.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>The role of electrocardiography in monitoring cardiac function in patients undergoing tumor radiotherapy: A systematic literature review</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Radiotherapy, an essential treatment for numerous malignancies, can lead to radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD), including pericarditis, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular dysfunction, or arrhythmias. Early cardiac monitoring is crucial for timely interventions. Electrocardiography (ECG), a widely available, non-invasive diagnostic tool, provides real-time insights into cardiac electrical activity. However, its utility in detecting and managing RIHD remains underexplored. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on studies published in English up to 2025 in order to evaluate the role of ECG in monitoring cardiac function in patients undergoing radiotherapy, its diagnostic potential, limitations, and emerging advancements. Results: ECG can detect early signs of RIHD, including ST-segment changes, QT interval prolongation, T-wave abnormalities, and conduction disturbances. While ECG is useful for baseline assessment and ongoing surveillance, its specificity for RIHD-related structural and functional changes is limited. Clinical guidelines recommend ECG as part of routine cardio-oncology care, particularly for high-risk patients. Advancements in wearable devices, such as smartwatches that can measure ECG and artificial intelligence-driven ECG interpretation, may improve early detection, enabling real-time monitoring and improving patient outcomes. Conclusions: ECG allows for early detection and monitoring of RIHD in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Integrating ECG with multimodal imaging and biomarkers can enhance diagnostic accuracy. Future research should focus on refining ECG-based risk stratification models, improving detection algorithms, and optimizing clinical guidelines for cardio-oncology surveillance. Emerging technologies, including AI and remote monitoring, can advance the utility of ECG.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1085</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1090</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/6
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/16
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Q.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wei</Family>
				<NameE>Q.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Electrocardiogram room, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo City, Shandong Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Electrocardiogram room, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo City, Shandong Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>406262711@qq.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Electrocardiography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>cardiotoxicity</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>heart diseases</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>arrhythmias.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. 	Uehara M, Bekki N, Shiga T (2024) Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer: current insights from a cardio-oncologist. J Radiat Res, 65: 575-590.##2. 	Bedi R, Ahmad A, Horbal P, et al. (2023) Radiation-associated arrhythmias: Putative pathophysiological mechanisms, prevalence, screening and management strategies. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev, 12: e24.##3. 	Mitchell JD, Cehic DA, Morgia M, et al. (2021) Cardiovascular manifestations from therapeutic radiation: a multidisciplinary expert consensus statement from the International Cardio-Oncology Society. JACC CardioOncol, 3: 360.##4. 	Hsieh K, Hotca AE, Runnels J, et al. (2024) The effects of radiation therapy on the heart: implications for management. Chin Clin Oncol, 13: 10-10.##5. 	Lu LS, Wu YW, Chang JTC, et al. (2022) Risk management for radiation-induced cardiovascular disease (RICVD): The 2022 Consensus Statement of the Taiwan Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (TASTRO) and Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC). Acta Cardiol Sin, 38: 1.##6. 	Tao Y, Lu J, Deng W, et al. (2023) Correlation of mean heart dose and cardiac biomarkers with electrocardiographic changes in patients receiving thoracic radiation therapy. Radiat Res, 199: 336-345.##7. 	Goldschlager N (2014) ECG atlas of advanced electrocardiogram interpretation. J Electrocardiol, 47: 272.##8. 	Mesitskaya DF, Fashafsha ZZA, Poltavskaya MG, et al. (2024) A single-lead ECG based cardiotoxicity detection in patients on polychemotherapy. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 50: 101336.##9. 	Toma RV, Anca Z, Trifǎnescu OG, et al. (2023) Early echocardiography and ECG changes following radiotherapy in patients with Stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab-based therapy. Med Sci Monit, 29: e941754-1.##10. Armenian SH, Lacchetti C, Barac A, et al. (2017) Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol, 35: 893-911.##11. Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, et al. (2013) Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 26: 1013-1032.##12. 	Aznar M, Korreman SS, Pedersen AN, et al. (2011) Evaluation of dose to cardiac structures during breast irradiation. British Journal of Radiology, 84: 743-746.##13. Gujral DM, Lloyd G, Bhattacharyya S (2016) Radiation-induced valvular heart disease. Heart, 102: 269-276.##14. Masek KP and Levis JT (2013) ECG diagnosis: acute pericarditis. Perm J, 17: e146.##15. Finsterer J, Stöllberger C, Köcher K, et al. (1997) ECG abnormalities in myopathies, coronary heart disease and controls. Herz, 22: 277-282.##16. Pohl J, Mincu RI, Mrotzek SM, et al. (2021) ECG scoring for the evaluation of therapy-naïve cancer patients to predict cardiotoxicity. Cancers (Basel), 13: 1197.##17. Bazyka DA, Lytvynenko OO, Demianov VO (2022) Radiation-induced damage to the cardiovascular system after radiation therapy in women with breast cancer. Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol, 27: 60-83.##18. Ping Z, Peng Y, Lang H, et al. (2020) Oxidative stress in radiation-induced cardiotoxicity. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2020: 3579143.##19. Akbari H, Gaeini A, Kordi M, et al. (2025) Cardiac oxidative stress induced by cell phone electromagnetic radiation and the cardioprotective effect of aerobic exercise in rats. Int J Radiat Res, 23 (1): 45-52##20. Koutroumpakis E, Deswal A, Yusuf SW, et al. (2022) Radiation-induced cardiovascular disease: mechanisms, prevention, and treatment. Curr Oncol Rep, 24: 543-553.##21. Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Dent S, et al. (2016) Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management. CA Cancer J Clin, 66: 309-325.##22.Slezak J, Kura B, Babal P, et al. (2017) Potential markers and metabolic processes involved in the mechanism of radiation-induced heart injury. Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 95: 1190-1203.##23. Schultz-Hector S (1992) Radiation-induced heart disease: review of experimental data on dose response and pathogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol, 61: 149-160.##24.Livingston K, Schlaak RA, Puckett LL, et al. (2020) The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in radiation-induced heart disease: from bench to bedside. Front Cardiovasc Med, 7: 2020.##25.Wang KX, Ye C, Yang X, et al. (2023) New insights into the understanding of mechanisms of radiation-induced heart disease. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 24: 12-29.##26.van der Poll T and Parker RI (2020) Platelet activation and endothelial cell dysfunction. Crit Care Clin, 36: 233-253.##27. Zhang KY, He XY, Zhou Y, et al. (2015) Atorvastatin ameliorates radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis in rats. Radiat Res, 184: 611-620.##28. Kovács MG, Kovács ZZA, Varga Z, et al. (2021) Investigation of the antihypertrophic and antifibrotic effects of losartan in a rat model of radiation-induced heart disease. Int J Mol Sci, 22(23): 12963.##29. Wang B, Wang H, Zhang M, et al. (2020) Radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis: Mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. J Cell Mol Med, 24: 7717-7729.##30. Wang B, Wang H, Zhang M, et al. (2020) Radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis: Mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. J Cell Mol Med, 24: 7717-7729.##31. Imazio M and Cooper LT (2013) Management of myopericarditis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 11: 193-201.##32. von Kemp BA and Cosyns B (2023) Radiation-induced pericardial disease: mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep, 25: 1113-1121.##33. Wang H, Wei J, Zheng Q, et al. (2019) Radiation-induced heart disease: a review of classification, mechanism and prevention. Int J Biol Sci, 15: 2128-2138.##34. Zhuang XF, Yang YM, Sun XL, et al. (2017) Late onset radiation-induced constrictive pericarditis and cardiomyopathy after radiotherapy. Medicine (United States), 96(5): e5932.##35. Lee PJ and Mallik R (2005) Cardiovascular effects of radiation therapy: practical approach to radiation therapy-induced heart disease. Cardiol Rev, 13: 80-86.##36. Ellahham S, Khalouf A, Elkhazendar M, et al. (2022) An overview of radiation-induced heart disease. Radiat Oncol J, 40: 89-102.##37. Šteiner I (2020) Pathology of radiation induced heart disease. Reports of Practical Oncology &#38; Radiotherapy, 25: 178-181.##38. Pan L, Lei D, Wang W, et al. (2020) Heart dose linked with cardiac events and overall survival in lung cancer radiotherapy: A meta-analysis. Medicine, 99: e21964.##39. Tang J, Xu X, Chen M, et al. (2025) Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of early breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Int J Radiat Res, 23(1): 163-168##40. Cheng RK, Lee MS, Seki A, et al. (2013) Radiation coronary arteritis refractory to surgical and percutaneous revascularization culminating in orthotopic heart transplantation. Cardiovascular Pathology, 22: 303-308.##41. Veinot JP and Edwards WD (1996) Pathology of radiation-induced heart disease: A surgical and autopsy study of 27 cases. Hum Pathol, 27: 766-773.##42. Brosius FC, Waller BF, Roberts WC (1981) Radiation heart disease: Analysis of 16 young (aged 15 to 33 years) necropsy patients who received over 3,500 rads to the heart. Am J Med, 70: 519-530.##43. Belzile-Dugas E and Eisenberg MJ (2021) Radiation-induced cardiovascular disease: Review of an underrecognized pathology. J Am Heart Assoc, 10: 21686.##44. Aleman BMP, Van Den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, et al. (2007) Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood, 109: 1878-1886.##45. Chen MF, Chen WC, Lai CH, et al. (2010) Predictive factors of radiation-induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 10: 508.##46. van den Bogaard VAB, Spoor DS, van der Schaaf A, et al. (2021) The importance of radiation dose to the atherosclerotic plaque in the left anterior descending coronary artery for radiation-induced cardiac toxicity of breast cancer patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 110: 1350-1359.##47. Hayashi Y, Iijima H, Isohashi F, et al. (2019) The heart’s exposure to radiation increases the risk of cardiac toxicity after chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer, 19: 195.##48. Witting MD, Hu KM, Westreich AA, et al. (2020) Evaluation of Spodick’s Sign and Other Electrocardiographic Findings as Indicators of STEMI and Pericarditis. J Emerg Med, 58: 562-569.##49. Maeba H (2012) Isoelectric reference for pericarditis: TP may be better than PR. Cardiology, 123: 39-40.##50. Imazio M, Spodick DH, Brucato A, et al. (2010) Diagnostic issues in the clinical management of pericarditis. Int J Clin Pract, 64: 1384-1392.##51. Tao Y, Lu J, Deng W, et al. (2023) Correlation of mean heart dose and cardiac biomarkers with electrocardiographic changes in patients receiving thoracic radiation therapy. Radiat Res, 199: 336-345.##52. Ellahham S, Khalouf A, Elkhazendar M, et al. (2022) An overview of radiation-induced heart disease. Radiat Oncol J, 40: 89-102.##53. Dai H, Zhang Q, Much AA, et al. (2020) Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, mortality, and risk factors for atrial fibrillation, 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes, 7: 574.##54. Wang K, Pearlstein KA, Patchett ND, et al. (2017) Heart dosimetric analysis of three types of cardiac toxicity in patients treated on dose-escalation trials for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol, 125: 293.##55. Reshko LB, Kalman NS, Hugo GD, et al. (2018) Cardiac radiation dose distribution, cardiac events and mortality in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). J Thorac Dis, 10: 2346-2356.##56. Adams MJ, Lipsitz SR, Colan SD, et al. (2004) Cardiovascular status in long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease treated with chest radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 22: 3139-3148.##57. Fradley MG, Lefebvre B, Carver J, et al. (2021) How to manage patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing radiation therapy. JACC Cardio Oncol, 3: 447.##58. Record remote cardiac monitoring following lung radiotherapy - Health Research Authority. Available at: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/application-summaries/research-summaries/record-remote-cardiac-monitoring-following-lung-radiotherapy/ [Accessed 22 March 2025].##59. Pohl J, Mincu RI, Mrotzek SM, et al. (2021) ECG scoring for the evaluation of therapy-naïve cancer patients to predict cardiotoxicity. Cancers (Basel), 13: 1197.##60. Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Armenian S, et al. (2022) Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) consensus statement. Eur Heart J, 43: 280-299.##61. Reichlin T, Abächerli R, Twerenbold R, et al. (2016) Advanced ECG in 2016: is there more than just a tracing? Swiss Med Wkly, 146: w14303.##62. Bouzid Z, Al-Zaiti SS, Bond R, et al. (2022), Remote and wearable ECG devices with diagnostic abilities in adults: a state-of-the-science scoping review. Heart Rhythm, 19: 1192.##63. Symanski BJ and Marriott HJL (1995) Ventricular tachycardia, diagnosis and misdiagnosis: A case report. Heart &#38; Lung, 24: 121-123.##64. Khan AR, Waqar S, Arif A, et al. (2022) Brugada syndrome misdiagnosed as acute myocardial infarction: A Case Report. Cureus, 14(7): e26998.##65. Boos CJ, Khan MY, Thorne S (2008) An unusual case of misdiagnosed ventricular tachycardia. Emerg Med J, 25: 173-174.##66. Pérez-Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Daminello-Raimundo R, et al. (2017) Main artifacts in electrocardiography. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol, 23: e12494.##67. Nandana J, Gopalakrishnan A, Sukumaran S (2025) Beyond arrhythmias in the ECG: Is there any correlation between QT interval and stroke subtype and severity? Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 133: 111045.##68. Willcox ME, Compton SJ, Bardy GH (2021) Continuous ECG monitoring versus mobile telemetry: A comparison of arrhythmia diagnostics in human- versus algorithmic-dependent systems. Heart Rhythm O2, 2: 543.##69. Wang W, Feng D, Song Q, et al. (2024) The role of multimodal medical imaging in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of myocarditis. Int J Radiat Res, 22(2): 243-250.##70. Lu LS, Wu YW, Chang JTC, et al. (2022) Risk management for radiation-induced cardiovascular disease (RICVD): The 2022 Consensus Statement of the Taiwan Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (TASTRO) and Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC). Acta Cardiol Sin, 38: 1.##71. Practical Integration of the ASCO Guidelines for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers - American College of Cardiology. Available at: https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2018/12/04/08/26/practical-integration-of-the-asco-guidelines [Accessed 22 March 2025].##72. Lyon AR, López-Fernánde T, Couch LS, et al. (2022) 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J, 43: 4229-4361.##73. Leszek P, Klotzka A, Bartuś S, et al. (2023) A practical approach to the 2022 ESC cardio-oncology guidelines: Comments by a team of experts – cardiologists and oncologists. Polish Heart Journal, 81: 1047-1063.##74. Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D, et al. (2016) 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines:  The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 37: 2768-2801.##75. Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Armenian S, et al. (2022) Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) consensus statement. Eur Heart J, 43: 280-299.##76. Spînu S, Cismaru G, Boarescu PM, et al. (2021) ECG markers of cardiovascular toxicity in adult and pediatric cancer treatment. Dis Markers, 2021: 6653971.##77. Ross EG and Hess PL (2025), Realizing the promise of artificial intelligence-enabled cardio-oncology care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 18(1): e011581.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Disease Burden of Gynecological Tumors and radiotherapy effectiveness: A Systematic Review based on Epidemiological Insights</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Gynecological cancers-including cervical, ovarian, endometrial, vulvar, vaginal, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasms-pose significant global health challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment, yet access remains limited in under-resourced regions, contributing to poor outcomes. This systematic review investigates the epidemiology and disease burden of gynecological cancers, focusing on incidence trends, risk factors, geographical variation, histopathological subtypes, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). It also evaluates the effectiveness of radiotherapy and the potential of personalized approaches guided by molecular profiling. Materials and Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published between 2000 and 2023. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Cervical cancer showed the highest incidence, with increasing trends in some regions. High TMB was associated with aggressive histological subtypes and poorer survival, highlighting its value as a predictive biomarker. Radiotherapy significantly improved outcomes, especially when integrated into personalized treatment plans based on molecular characteristics. Conclusion: The global burden of gynecological cancers is rising, with substantial disparities in diagnosis and treatment access, especially in LMICs. Radiotherapy remains vital, but outcomes may be further improved through TMB-guided personalization. Expanding radiotherapy infrastructure and integrating molecular diagnostics are crucial for addressing global inequities and enhancing treatment efficacy.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1091</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1099</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>X.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>X.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology and Hematology, People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, 614000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Liu</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Liu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology and Hematology, People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, 614000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fu</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Oncology and Hematology, People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, 614000, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>13388266807@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Gynecologic neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>tumor mutational burden</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>precision medicine</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>uterine cervical neoplasms.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Kataki AC, Tiwari P, Thilagavthi R, Krishnatreya M. Epidemiology of gynaecological cancers.  Fundamentals in Gynaecologic Malignancy: Springer; 2023. p. 1–8.##2.	Kyrgiou M, Bowden S, Denny L, Fagotti A, Abu-Rustum NR, Ramirez PT, et al. (2024) Innovation in gynaecological cancer: highlighting global disparities. The Lancet Oncology, 25(4): 425-30.##3.	Nanda S (2020) Evaluation and management of high-risk pregnancies: Emerging Research and Opportunities.1st edition, Medical Info Science Reference.##4.	Zadeh SAH (2018) Histopathological spectrum of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the uterine cervix: Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India).##5.	Bah Camara H (2018) Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and co-infection with sexually transmitted pathogens in reproductive age women in urban Gambia: University of Westminster.##6.	Duhoranenayo D (2022) Clinical staging versus pelvic MRI staging before and after chemoradiation among patients with cervical cancer in Rwanda: patients seen at RMH and KFH: University of Rwanda.##7.	Sankaranarayanan R and Ferlay J (2006) Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem. Best Pract Res Clinl Obstet  Gynaecol, 20(2): 207-25.##8.	Iyoke CA and Ugwu GO (2013) Burden of gynaecological cancers in developing countries. World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(1): 1-7.##9.	Castellano T, ElHabr AK, Washington C, Ting J, Zhang YJ, Musa F, et al. (2024) Health disparities in cervical cancer: Estimating geographic variations of disease burden and association with key socioeconomic and demographic factors in the US. Plos one, 19(7): e0307282.##10.	Ginsburg O, Bray F, Coleman MP, Vanderpuye V, Eniu A, Kotha SR, et al. (2017) The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health. The Lancet, 389(10071): 847-60.##11.	Chan CK, Aimagambetova G, Ukybassova T, Kongrtay K, Azizan A (2019) Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer: epidemiology, screening, and vaccination-review of current perspectives. Journal of Oncology, 2019(1): 3257939.##12.	Sankaranarayanan R (2014) Screening for cancer in low-and middle-income countries. Annals of Global Health, 80(5): 412-7.##13.	Black E and Richmond R (2018) Prevention of cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: the advantages and challenges of HPV vaccination. Vaccines, 6(3): 61.##14.	Temkin SM, Rimel B, Bruegl AS, Gunderson CC, Beavis AL, Doll KM (2018) A contemporary framework of health equity applied to gynecologic cancer care: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review. Gynecologic Oncology, 149(1): 70-7.##15.	dos Santos Silva I. Cancer epidemiology: principles and methods: IARC; 1999.##16.	Schottenfeld D and Fraumeni Jr JF. Cancer epidemiology and prevention: Oxford University Press; 2006.##17.	Fabian A, Krug D, Alkatout I (2020) Radiotherapy and Its intersections with surgery in the management of localized gynecological malignancies: A comprehensive overview for clinicians. J Clin Med, 10(1): 93.##18.	Samiei M (2013) Challenges of making radiotherapy accessible in developing countries. Cancer Control, 2013: 83-96.##19.	Gebretsadik A, Bogale N, Dulla D (2022) Descriptive epidemiology of gynaecological cancers in southern Ethiopia: retrospective cross-sectional review. BMJ open, 12(12): e062633.##20.	Hailu HE, Mondul AM, Rozek LS, Geleta T (2020) Descriptive epidemiology of breast and gynecological cancers among patients attending Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Ethiopia. PloS one, 15(3): e0230625.##21.	Bernard J, Abreu P, Alexis L, Joseph E, Suprien V, Auguste J, et al. 2019239 Gynecological cancers in haiti: epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic challenges. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 29(Suppl 3): A102.3-A103##22.	Abdullahi H and Ayogu M (2020) Pattern and relative frequencies of gynecological malignancies at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Abuja. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(1): 177-81.##23.	Wang M, Fan W, Ye M, Tian C, Zhao L, Wang J, et al. (2018) Molecular profiles and tumor mutational burden analysis in Chinese patients with gynecologic cancers. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 8990.##24.	Zhao Y, Qiu P, Yan L, Li S, Yang Z, Zhang H, et al. (2022) Epidemiological trends of female breast and gynecologic cancers in adolescents and young adults in China from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Frontiers in Oncology, 12: 1003710.##25.	Schildkraut JM, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Bondy M, Cote ML, et al. (2014) A multi-center population-based case–control study of ovarian cancer in African-American women: the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES). BMC cancer, 14: 1-13.##26.	You W, Dainty LA, Rose GS, Krivak T, McHale MT, Olsen CH, et al. (2005) Gynecologic malignancies in women aged less than 25 years. Obstetrics &#38; Gynecology, 105(6): 1405-9.##27.	Münstedt K, Wagner M, Kullmer U, Hackethal A, Franke FE (2008) Influence of body mass index on prognosis in gynecological malignancies. Cancer Causes &#38; Control, 19: 909-16.##28.	Zhu B, Gu H, Mao Z, Beeraka NM, Zhao X, Anand MP, et al. (2024) Global burden of gynaecological cancers in 2022 and projections to 2050. J Glob Health, 14: 04155.##29.	Wen X, Yin B, Lin L, Liu L, Weng S, Xu H, et al. (2024) The T cell-mediated tumor killing patterns revealed tumor heterogeneous and proposed treatment recommendation in ovary cancer. Discov Oncol, 15(1): 753.##30.	Khanna D, Sharma P, Budukh A, Vishwakarma R, Sharma AN, Bagal S, et al. (2024) Rural-urban disparity in cancer burden and care: findings from an Indian cancer registry. BMC Cancer, 24(1): 308.##31.	Patel D, Tayade S, Tidke VP, Toshniwal S, Tilva H (2023) Radiotherapy versus chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cureus, 15(9): e44726.##32.	Ao M, Ding T, Tang D, Xi M (2020) Efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant therapies for high-risk endometrial cancer in stage I-III: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit, 26: e925595.##33.	Kuhn TM, Dhanani S, Ahmad S (2023) An overview of endometrial cancer with novel therapeutic strategies. Curr Oncol, 30(9): 7904-19.##34.	Ramashia PN, Nkosi PB, Mbonane TP (2025) Improving access to radiotherapy: exploring structural quality indicators for radiotherapy in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 22(4), 544.##35.	Haileselassie W, Mulugeta T, Tigeneh W, Kaba M, Labisso WL (2019) The situation of cancer treatment in Ethiopia: Challenges and opportunities. J Cancer Prev, 24(1): 33-42.##36.	Bhatia R, Lichter KE, Gurram L, MacDuffie E, Lombe D, Sarria GR, et al. (2022) The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Can, 32(3): 421-8.##37.	Koka K, Verma A, Dwarakanath BS, Papineni RVL (2022) Technological advancements in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT): An indispensable tool for cancer treatment. Cancer Manag Res, 14: 1421-9.##38.	Grisham RN, Slomovitz BM, Andrews N, Banerjee S, Brown J, Carey MS, et al. (2023) Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science. Int J Gynecol Can, 33(9): 1331-44.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Enhancing radiotherapy for gastric cancer: A systematic review on the role of predictive models in clinical decision-making</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Predictive models have become essential tools in modern oncology, significantly advancing gastric cancer management&#8212;one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide. This systematic review investigates the application of predictive models derived from public databases, emphasizing their role in improving radiotherapy outcomes. Various modeling techniques are explored, including statistical methods like logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, machine learning approaches such as random forests and support vector machines, and deep learning models like convolutional and recurrent neural networks. These models contribute to early detection, prognosis estimation, treatment response prediction, and tumor classification. Notably, in the context of radiotherapy, predictive models enhance tumor delineation, assist in selecting optimal radiation doses, and forecast individual treatment responses, reducing toxicity and improving precision. Other key clinical applications include molecular subtyping, biomarker discovery, and image-based diagnostics, especially through endoscopic and histopathological image analysis. These applications support the development of personalized treatment regimens and improve long-term patient outcomes. Despite their promise, several challenges remain, including inconsistent or imbalanced data, limited interpretability of complex algorithms, and concerns regarding clinical trust and AI transparency. Addressing these issues requires the development of high-quality standardized databases, stronger data-sharing frameworks, the adoption of federated learning methods, and the integration of explainable AI models into clinical workflows. This review concludes that predictive models, when properly validated and implemented, hold substantial potential to transform gastric cancer radiotherapy by enabling more tailored, data-driven treatment strategies, ultimately improving survival rates and quality of life for patients.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1101</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1114</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/72026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Sh.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chen</Family>
				<NameE>Sh.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Sh.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wei</Family>
				<NameE>Sh.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wei</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>L.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Chen</Family>
				<NameE>L.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Chen</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Gastric Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Zh.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Lin</Family>
				<NameE>Zh.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Lin</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Urological Oncology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>hxsf803@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Stomach neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>predictive value of tests</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>machine learning</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>clinical decision-making.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Tan N, Wu H, Cao M, Yang F, Yan X, He S, et al. (2024) Global, regional, and national burden of early-onset gastric cancer. Cancer Biol Med, 21(8): 667-78.##2.	rawla p and barsouk a (2019) epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. prz gastroenterol, 14(1): 26-38.##3.	Kang K, Bagaoisan Ma, Zhang Y (2024) Unveiling the younger face of gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Cureus, 16(6): e62826.##4.	Yu JI (2023) Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in gastric cancer. j Gastric Cancer, 23(1): 194-206.##5.	Chen HHW and Kuo MT (2017) improving radiotherapy in cancer treatment: Promises and challenges. Oncotarget, 8(37): 62742-58.##6.	Lei C, Sun W, Wang K, Weng R, Kan X, li R (2025) Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of early gastric cancer: present practice and future prospects. Ann Med, 57(1): 2461679.##7.	Eloranta S and Boman M (2022) Predictive models for clinical decision making: deep dives in practical machine learning. J Intern Med, 292(2): 278-95.##8.	Li S and Zhou B (2022) A review of radiomics and genomics applications in cancers: the way towards precision medicine. Radiat Oncol, 17(1): 217.##9.	Isaksson LJ, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Marvaso G, Alterio D, Volpe S, et al. (2020) Machine learning-based models for prediction of toxicity outcomes in radiotherapy. Front Oncol, 10: 790.##10.	Mcgrail KM, Teng J, Bentley C, O'doherty KC, Burgess MM (2024) Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement. Int j Popul Data Sci, 9(1): 2372.##11.	Brito DMS, Lima OG, Mesquita FP, Da Silva EL, De Moraes MEA, Burbano RMR, et al. (2023) A shortcut from genome to drug: the employment of bioinformatic tools to find new targets for gastric cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics, 15(9): 2303.##12.	Zhang Z, Shao X, Wu H, Su X, Wang G, Zhu L, et al. (2023) Prognostic impact of aberrantly expressed protein-coding gene associated with gastric cancer's regulatory t cells, based on online databases. Altern Ther Health Med, 29(3): 160-5.##13.	Ramesh P, Nisar M, Neha, Ammankallu S, Babu S, Nandakumar R, et al. (2024) Delineating protein biomarkers for gastric cancers: a catalogue of mass spectrometry-based markers and assessment of their suitability for targeted proteomics applications. J Proteomics, 306: 105262.##14.	Conroy MC, Lacey B, Bešević J, Omiyale W, Feng Q, Effingham M, et al. (2023) UK biobank: a globally important resource for cancer research. Br J Cancer, 128(4): 519-27.##15.	Almeda AF, Grimes SM, lee H, Greer S, Shin G, Mcnamara M, et al. (2022) The gastric cancer registry: a genomic translational resource for multidisciplinary research in gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 31(9): 1693-700.##16.	Martin AN, Chan NW, Cheung DC, Fong ZV (2024) A guide to large data sets for population-based cancer research: strengths, limitations, and pitfalls. Cancer, 130(22): 3802-14.##17.	Hicks-Courant K, Ko EM, Matsuo K, Melamed A, Nasioudis D, Rauh-Hain JA, et al. (2024) Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 34(10): 1619-29.##18.	Karamoozian A, Baneshi MR, Bahrampour A (2021) Short-term and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench, 14(2): 115-22.##19.	Jin Q, Cao J, Wang G, He N (2025) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can effectively avoid unnecessary extended resection for gastric cancer with clinical evidence of duodenum or pancreas head involvement. J Cancer, 16(4): 1181–8.##20.	Allen CJ, Pointer DT, Jr., Blumenthaler AN, Mehta Rj, Hoffe SE, Minsky BD, et al. (2021) Chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus chemoradiation as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg, 274(4): 544–8.##21.	Sabbagh S, Jabbal IS, Iska S, Mohanna M, Itani M, Dominguez B, et al. (2023) Survival analysis comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy for locoregional gastric cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(16-suppl): e16097–e.##22.	Darang E, Pezeshkian- Z, Mirhoseini SZ, Ghovvati S (2023) Bioinformatics and pathway enrichment analysis identified hub genes and potential biomarker for gastric cancer prognosis. Front Oncol, 13: 1187521.##23.	Shamsi S, Larizadeh MH, Bahador M, Nouri M (2024) A five-year survival analysis of patients with gastric cancer in kerman province. Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies, 11(4): 607-615##24.	Park B, Kim CH, Jun JK, Suh M, Choi KS, Choi IJ, et al. (2024) A machine learning risk prediction model for gastric cancer with shapley additive explanations. Cancer Res Treat, 57(3): 821-829.##25.	Zhou H, Gu Q, Bao R, Qiu L, Zhang Y, Wang F, et al. (2024) Machine learning based models for predicting presentation delay risk among gastric cancer patients. Front Oncol, 14: 1503047.##26.	Xu L and Guo C (2024) Imbalanced survival prediction for gastric cancer patients based on improved xgboost with cost sensitive and focal loss. Expert Systems, 41(11): e13666.##27.	Mao S and Liu J (2025) Mulitdeepsurv: survival analysis of gastric cancer based on deep learning multimodal fusion models. Biomed Opt Express, 16(1): 126-41.##28.	Maheswari R, Allah IM, Mukesh B, Britto SS, Editors. Discerning and leveraging gastric cancer using deep analytics algorithms. 2024 International Conference on Signal Processing and Advance Research in Computing (SPARC); 2024 12–13 sept. 2024.##29.	Bhardwaj P, Kim S, Koul A, Kumar Y, Changela A, Shafi J, et al. (2024) Advanced cnn models in gastric cancer diagnosis: enhancing endoscopic image analysis with deep transfer learning. Front Oncol, 14: 1431912.##30. Wu Z, Wang T, Lan J, Wang J, Chen G, Tong T, et al. (2025) Deep learning-based prediction of her2 status and trastuzumab treatment efficacy of gastric adenocarcinoma based on morphological features. j Transl Med, 23(1): 13.##31.	Thota M, Mahajan S, Boppana SH, Boppana SL, Komati SSK, Mintz D (2025) Predicting mortality in upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using long short-term memory neural networks. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(4_Suppl): 340-340##32.	Li S, Deng YQ, Zhu ZL, Hua HL, Tao ZZ (2021) A comprehensive review on radiomics and deep learning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma imaging. Diagnostics (Basel), 11(9): 1523.##33.	Sasagawa S, Honma Y, Peng X, Maejima K, Nagaoka K, Kobayashi Y, et al. (2025) Predicting chemotherapy responsiveness in gastric cancer through machine learning analysis of genome, immune, and neutrophil signatures. Gastric Cancer, 28(2): 228–44.##34.	Rubini D, Gagliardi F, Menditti VS, D'ambrosio L, Gallo P, D'onofrio I, et al. (2024) Genetic profiling in radiotherapy: a comprehensive review. Front Oncol, 14: 1337815.##35.	Yu S, Jiang H, Xia J, Gu J, Chen M, Wang Y, et al. (2025) Construction of machine learning-based models for screening the high-risk patients with gastric precancerous lesions. Chin Med, 20(1): 7.##36.	Eweje f, Li Z, Gopaulchan M, Attaranzadeh A, Kloker L, Jiang Y, et al. (2024) Use of artificial intelligence–based digital pathology to predict outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer. j Clin Oncol, 42 (Suppl 16; Abstr 4013).##37.	Bai Z, Wang H, Han J, An J, Yang Z, Mo X (2024) Multiomics integration and machine learning reveal prognostic programmed cell death signatures in gastric cancer. Sci Rep, 14(1): 31060.##38.	Zubair M, Owais M, Mahmood T, Iqbal S, Usman SM, Hussain I (2024) Enhanced gastric cancer classification and quantification interpretable framework using digital histopathology images. Sci Rep, 14(1): 22533.##39.	Huang L, Feng B, Yang Z, Feng ST, Liu Y, Xue H, et al. (2025) A transfer learning radiomics nomogram to predict the postoperative recurrence of advanced gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 40(4): 844-54.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Application value of transvaginal ultrasonography combined with abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gynecological acute abdomen</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: To explore the value of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) combined with abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) in gynecological acute abdomen diagnosis. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients with gynecological acute abdomen admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were enrolled in this study. Patients were separated into observation group (OG, n=50) and control group (CG, n=50). The OG underwent routine abdominal ultrasound examination. On the basis of the OG, the CG received transvaginal ultrasound examination. The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed by pathological examination after ultrasound examination. The detection rate of diseases (acute pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, rupture of ovarian cyst, and torsion of the pedicle of ovarian cyst) as well as the coincidence rate of ultrasonic diagnosis with pathological examination were assessed in the two groups. Results: OG showed significantly higher disease detection rate relative to CG (P&#60;0.01). The total coincidence rate of diagnosis of gynecological acute abdomen in the OG was 96.00%, which was also higher than that of 74.00% in the CG (P&#60;0.01). Conclusion: Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with abdominal ultrasonography can improve the overall diagnostic coincidence rate of gynecological acute abdomen.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1115</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1118</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/72026/01/72026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Ultrasound, Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>m18331591022@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Acute abdomen</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ultrasonography</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>diagnosis.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Zachariah SK, Fenn M, Jacob K, et al. (2019) Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy: current perspectives. International Journal of Women's Health, 11: 119-34.##2.	Arora D, Bhattacharyya TK, Kathpalia SK, et al. (2005) Acute Abdomen in Gynaecological Practice. Medical Journal, Armed Forces India, 61(1): 66-70.##3.	Fecteau G, Desrochers A, Francoz D, et al. (2018) Diagnostic Approach to the Acute Abdomen. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 34(1): 19-33.##4.	Navez B and Navez J (2014) Laparoscopy in the acute abdomen. Best Practice &#38; Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 28(1): 3-17.##5.	Eiberg JP, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, et al. (2008) Ultrasound of the acute abdomen performed by surgeons in training. Minerva Chir, 63(1): 17-22.##6.	Xu Y, Qian J, Wang F, et al. (2024) Study on diagnostic value of ultrasound combined with mammography in breast cancer with different clinical and pathological features. International Journal of Radiation Research, 22(1): 49-54.##7.	Wu J, Cui SH, Li HZ, et al. (2016) Ultrasound diagnosis in gynecological acute abdomen. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 30(1): 211-7.##8.	Bokemeyer A, Ochs K, Fuhrmann V (2020) Acute abdomen: Diagnostic management. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 145(21): 1544-51.##9.	Kong M, Paramesparan K, Keshvala C, et al. (2020) Acute abdomen or life-threatening heterotopic pregnancy with tubal rupture: where does imaging play a role? BMJ Case Rep, 13(12).##10.	Bondi M, Miller R, Zbar A, et al. (2012) Improving the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis by the combined transabdominal and transvaginal approach. The American Surgeon, 78(1): 98-103.##11.	Ritchie J, Birsner ML, Zighelboim I, et al. (2023) Common obstetrics and gynecologic topics in critical care: A narrative review. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 13(1): 38-43.##12.	Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Daneshi M, et al. (2018) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention. Abdom Radiol (NY), 43(4): 960-76.##13.	Minten L, Messiaen P, Van der Hilst J. (2022) Acute abdominal pain: a challenging diagnosis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg, 85(4): 646-7.##14.	Cartwright SL, Knudson MP. (2015) Diagnostic imaging of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician, 91(7): 452-9.##15.	Dunphy L, Wood F, Hallchurch J, et al. (2022) Ruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy presenting with an acute abdomen. BMJ Case Rep, 15(12).##16.	Malvadkar SM, Malvadkar MS, Domkundwar SV, et al. (2016) Spontaneous rupture of pyometra causing peritonitis in elderly female diagnosed on dynamic transvaginal ultrasound. Case Rep Radiol, 2016: 1738521.##17.	Frasca DJ, Jarrio CE, Perdue J (2023) Evaluation of acute pelvic pain in women. Am Fam Physician, 108(2): 175-80.##18.	Frijlingh M, Juffermans L, de Leeuw R, et al. (2022) How to use power Doppler ultrasound in transvaginal assessment of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 60(2): 277-83.##19.	Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D (2018) Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 51: 16-24.##20.	Yang H, Wang R, Zhao L, et al. (2021) Diagnosis and analysis of transabdominal and intracavitary ultrasound in gynecological acute abdomen. Comput Math Methods Med, 2021: 9508838.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Ultrasound measurement of sheath nerve diameter for guided drug therapy for severe craniocerebral injury</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Severe traumatic brain injured (STBI) is a leading reason for death and long-term disabilities, and improved real-time management of intracranial pressure (ICP) is necessary. This study evaluated the efficacy of drug therapy with ultrasound-guided in patients with STBI by measuring optic nerves sheath diameters (ONSD). Materials and Methods: This retrospective case-control study involved 263 patients with STBI who were treated between March 2019 and June 2021. Patients were categorized in an ultrasound group (n=125), which received ONSD-guided therapy, and a regular group (n=138), which received conventional treatment. Neurogenic and inflammatory markers, clinical scales, and functional recovery metrics were assessed. Results: The ultrasound group showed remarkably improved early-treatment outcomes, such as decreased abnormal breathing (27.20% vs. 40.58%, P=0.022) and lower ICP (54.40% &#60; 350 mmHg vs. 40.58%, P=0.025). This group also showed increased neurogenic factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF) and nerve growth factors (NGF)) and notable decreases in inflammatory indicators like tumor necrosis factor &#945; (TNF-&#945;) (P&#60;0.05). Post-treatment neurological scores were better in the ultrasound group (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS): 18.32 vs. 18.96 (P=0.018); Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 11.19 vs. 10.54 (P=0.007)). Functional assessments (Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Modified Barthel Indexs (MBI)) and quality of life (Simplified Form of Health Questionnaire-36 (SF-36)) indices also favored the ultrasound group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ONSD measurement enhances real-time ICP management in drug therapy for patients with STBI. The measurement has positive effects on neurogenic and inflammatory profiles, functional recoveries, and quality of life.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1119</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1123</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Y.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Fan</Family>
				<NameE>Y.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Fan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shaoxing Second Hospital</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>FanYaoq998@hotmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>J.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Niu</Family>
				<NameE>J.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Niu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College, Zhejiang University</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Q.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Lu</Family>
				<NameE>Q.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Lu</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shaoxing Second Hospital</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Severe traumatic brain injury</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>ultrasound measurement</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>optic nerve sheath diameter</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>neurogenic  markers</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>functional recovery.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1.	Visser K, Koggel M, Blaauw J, et al. (2022) Blood-based biomarkers of inflammation in mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 132: 154-168.##2.	Das AS, Vicenty-Padilla JC, Chua MMJ, et al. (2022) Cerebrovascular injuries in traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 223: 107479.##3.	Graham NS and Sharp DJ (2023) Dementia after traumatic brain injury. BMJ, 383: 2065.##4.	Olsen CM and Corrigan JD (2022) Does Traumatic brain injury cause risky substance use or substance use disorder? Biol Psychiatry, 91(5): 421-437.##5.	Muehlschlegel S, Rajajee V, Wartenberg KE, et al. (2024) Guidelines for neuroprognostication in critically Ill adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care, 40(2): 448-476.##6.	Patel RH, Foltz EA, Witkowski A, et al. (2023) Analysis of artificial intelligence-based approaches applied to non-invasive imaging for early detection of melanoma: A systematic review. Cancers, 15(19): 4694.##7.	Soroushmehr R, Rajajee K, Williamson C, et al. (2019) Automated optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using super-pixel analysis. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE, 2019: 2793-2796.##8.	Sener K, Cakır A, Altug E, et al. (2023) Is optic nerve sheath diameter diagnostic in methanol intoxication? Alcohol (Fayettev, NY), 113: 27-31.##9.	Cho J (2021) Ocular Ultrasound abnormalities and optic nerve sheath diameter in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 51(6): 1295-1314.##10.	Stevens RRF, Gommer ED, Aries MJH, et al. (2021) Optic nerve sheath diameter assessment by neurosonology: A review of methodologic discrepancies. J Neuroimaging, 31(5): 814-825.##11.	Sadaka F, Patel D, Lakshmanan R (2012) The FOUR score predicts outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care, 16(1): 95-101.##12.	Amano S, Umeji A, Takebayashi T, et al. (2020) Clinimetric properties of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the assessment of arm motor function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 27(4): 290-295.##13.	Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review. J Physiother, 59(2): 93-99.##14.	Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 42(8): 703-709.##15.	Wu Q, Chen Y, Zhou Y, et al. (2023) Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of short-form 36 health survey (SF-36) in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Medicine, 102(24): e33979.##16.	Schepici G, Silvestro S, Bramanti P, et al. (2020) Traumatic brain injury and stem cells: an overview of clinical trials, the current treatments and future therapeutic approaches. Medicina (Kaunas), 56(3): 137.##17.	Li R, Zhang P, Lu J, et al. (2023) Case report: Ultrasound-guided median nerve electrical stimulation on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb after stroke. Front Neurol, 14: 1244192.##18.	Kerscher SR, Zipfel J, Haas-Lude K, et al. (2024) Ultrasound-guided initial diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pediatr Radiology, 54(6): 1001-1011.##19.	Lioi F, Ramm-Pettersen J, Fratini A, et al. (2024) Ultrasonographic assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter as a screening tool for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg, 192: e42-e48.##20.	Liu L, Ni Xx, Zhang Lw, et al. (2021) Effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and plasma cytokine levels after uniportal VATS: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Anesth, 35: 3-9.## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in malignant biliary obstruction</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Background: Our investigation employed a retrospective methodological approach, examining a sample of 45 participants (55.6% male, 44.4% female). The average age was 64 years. All participants presented clinical manifestations suggestive of malignant biliary obstruction. Initial diagnoses were established through advanced imaging techniques, specifically endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The study design involved a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the entire cohort to ascertain the diagnostic precision of FDG-PET imaging protocol in this specific clinical context. We also conducted a comparative analysis between the imaging results and the definitive findings from surgical interventions and pathological examinations. To quantitatively assess the diagnostic efficacy of FDG-PET scans, we employed ROC curve analysis as our primary statistical instrument. Results: Imaging studies through FDG-PET scans yielded a sensitivity value at 86.1% with a relatively lower specificity level standing at around 66.7%. These diagnostic parameters underscore the FDG-PET modality&#39;s particular strength in precise lesion localization. The imaging technique exhibited marked efficacy in delineating areas of concern, proving especially valuable in guiding targeted diagnostic sampling procedures. Conclusion: Despite exhibiting only moderate specificity, integrating FDG-PET imaging into surgical planning protocols afforded significant alterations in patient treatment plans. The modality&#8217;s value manifests in two critical domains: detection and localization of malignant biliary obstructions and informing the subsequent management approach. It represents a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in the clinical context.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1125</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1129</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Koç</Family>
				<NameE>Z.P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Koç</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Nuclear Medicine Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>zehrapinarkoc@gmail.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>P.P.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Özcan</Family>
				<NameE>P.P.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Özcan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Nuclear Medicine Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>E.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Reyhan</Family>
				<NameE>E.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Reyhan</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Surgical Oncology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>M.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Yaldız</Family>
				<NameE>M.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Yaldız</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Pathology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>E.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Üçbilek</Family>
				<NameE>E.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Üçbilek</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Gastroenterology Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Biliary stasis</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>18F-FDG</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>positron emission tomography.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, et al. (2012) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut, 61(12): 1657-1669.##Schulick RD (2008) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: detection of cancer in strictures. J Gastrointest Surg, 12(3): 420-2.##Wang SB, Wu HB, Wang QS, et al. (2015) 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignant from benign origins of obstructive jaundice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 14(5): 516-22.##De Gaetano AM, Rufini V, Castaldi P, et al. (2012) Clinical applications of (18)F-FDG PET in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors. Abdom Imaging, 37(6): 983-1003. ##Martins PN, Sheiner P, Facciuto M (2012) Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder cancer and causing obstructive cholestasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 11(5): 549-52. ##Delbeke D and Pinson CW (2004) Pancreatic tumors: role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 11(1): 4-10.##Mertz HR, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D (2000) EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc, 52(3): 367-71.##Delbeke D, Chapman WC, Pinson CW, Martin WH, Beauchamp DR, Leach S (1999) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging with positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has a significant impact on diagnosis and management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med, 40:1784-92.##Franke C, Klapdor R, Meyerhoff K, Schauman M (1999) 18-F Positron emission tomography of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit in the follow-up of pancreatic carcinoma. Anticancer Res, 19(4A): 2437- 42.##Rajekar H (2017) Synchronous gall bladder and bile duct cancer: A short series of seven cases and a brief review of literature. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 7(2): 115-20. ##Nagasaki Y, Yamane H, Ochi N, Honda Y, Takigawa N (2016) High uptake of FDG along a biliary stent. Clin Nucl Med, 41(11): 890-1. ##Patel D and Lu Y (2015) FDG-PET/CT manifestation of tumor seeding along percutaneous biliary drainage catheter tract. Clin Nucl Med, 40(10): 830-1. ##O'Neill RS, Duong T, Dionela W, Rogge C, Brungs D (2020) Pancreatitis and biliary obstruction secondary to duodenal metastasis from rapidly progressing lung adenocarcinoma treated with common bile duct stenting. Case Rep Oncol, 13(2): 962-7. ##Wakabayashi H, Akamoto S, Yachida S, et al. (2005) Significance of fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the diagnosis of malignancies in patients with biliary stricture. Eur J Surg Oncol, 31(10): 1175-9. ##Dubaniewicz A and Dubaniewicz A (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma--bile ducts cancer. Wiad Lek, 56(1-2): 57-60.##Fujiwara Y, Ioka T, Matsui H, et al. (2021) A case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the elderly patient with curative resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 48(13): 2085-7.##Lan L, Zhang S, Xu T, et al. (2022) Prospective comparison of 68Ga-FAPI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging in biliary tract cancers. Radiology, 304(3): 648-57. ## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>


	<ARTICLE> 
		<TitleF>Primary retroperitoneal Ewing's sarcoma in a young woman: A case report</TitleF>
		<TitleE></TitleE>
		<TitleLang_ID>2</TitleLang_ID>
		<ABSTRACTS>
			<ABSTRACT>
			<Language_ID>2</Language_ID>
			<CONTENT>Ewing&#39;s sarcoma (EWS) is a rare malignant tumour that is more likely to occur in children and young people, especially in people of European ancestry, with an annual incidence rate of one in a million, and the incidence of extra-skeletal EWS is even lower, among which retroperitoneal EWS is advanced once detected because of the deep location of the lesion and other characteristics, which makes treatment difficult. The following case report describes an EWS in the retroperitoneal region in a young healthy female patient. A 28-year-old young female patient with a negative family history underwent gynaecologic ultrasound examination for difficulty in defaecation and lower abdominal pain, which revealed a solid cystic mass behind the cervix, tenderness of the mass, and compression of the vagina and rectum. Therefore, surgery was recommended. A retroperitoneal tumour was found during intraoperative exploration, and laparoscopic surgery was changed to open surgery. Postoperative pathology suggested EWS. After postoperative radiation therapy and close follow-up, tumour recurrence occurred six months after surgery, and bone metastasis occurred one year after surgery. Retroperitoneal EWS is a rare and poorly documented disease. Radical surgery remains the first-line treatment of this disease.</CONTENT>
			</ABSTRACT>
		</ABSTRACTS>

		<PAGES>
			<PAGE>
			<FPAGE>1131</FPAGE>
			<TPAGE>1135</TPAGE>
			</PAGE>
		</PAGES>

		<RECEIVE_DATE>
			2025/10/252025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/182025/11/192025/11/192025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/162025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/282025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/292025/12/302025/12/302026/01/12026/01/42026/01/52026/01/62026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/72026/01/7
		</RECEIVE_DATE>

		<RECEIVE_DATE_FA>
			1404/10/17
		</RECEIVE_DATE_FA>

		<ACCEPT_DATE>
			2025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/182025/10/18
		</ACCEPT_DATE>

		<ACCEPT_DATE_FA>
			1404/7/26
		</ACCEPT_DATE_FA>

		<AUTHORS>
			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>Z.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Zhang</Family>
				<NameE>Z.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Zhang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department II of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University,School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>W.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>W.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department II of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University,School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email></Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>

			<AUTHOR>
				<Name>H.</Name>
				<MidName></MidName>
				<Family>Wang</Family>
				<NameE>H.</NameE>
				<MidNameE></MidNameE>
				<FamilyE>Wang</FamilyE>
				<Organizations>
				<Organization>Department II of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University,School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China</Organization>
				</Organizations>
				<Countries>
				<Country></Country>
				</Countries>
				<EMAILS>
				<Email>wanghui201@163.com</Email>
				</EMAILS>
			</AUTHOR>
		</AUTHORS>


		<KEYWORDS>
			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>Ewing sarcoma</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>retroperitoneal space</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>primary neoplasms</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>radiotherapy</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>

			<KEYWORD>
				<KeyText>case report.</KeyText>
			</KEYWORD>
		</KEYWORDS>

		<REFRENCES>
			<REFRENCE>
				<REF>1. Nedham FN, Nagaraj V, Darwish A, Al-Abbasi TA (2022) Retroperitoneal blue cell round tumor (Ewing sarcoma in a 35 years old male)- case report. Int J Surg Case Reports, 94: 107045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107045##2. Javalgi AP, Karigoudar MH, Palur K (2016) Blue cell tumor at unusual site: retroperitoneal Ewing’s sarcoma. J Clin Diag Res,,JCDR, 10(4): ED19-ED20. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/18302.7618##3. AlRashed R, AlHarbi H, Abdulfattah F, Alhasan I, Alsannaa F (2022) A case report of retroperitoneal Ewing sarcoma requiring adrenalectomy. Int J Surg Case Reports, 95, 106966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106966##4. Chen S, Li Y, Zhao H, Yang X (2022) The giant retroperitoneal extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma: A case report. Asian Journal of Surgery, 45(2): 804–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.12.009##5. Reis F, Macedo E, França Junior MC, Amstalden EI, Appenzeller S (2017) Retroperitoneal Ewing's sarcoma/embryonal tumor: a rare differential diagnosis of back pain. Radiologia Brasileira, 50(6): 409-410. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0236##6. Kong L, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Kong Z (2024) Primary retroperitoneal Ewing's sarcoma in a young woman. Asian J Surg, 47(2): 1281-1282. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.11.067##7. Wu SY, Hsu CK, Yue CT, Tsai YC (2023) Large retroperitoneal extra-skeletal Ewing's sarcoma with renal pedicle invasion: a case report. BMC Urology, 23(1): 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01272-z##8. Riggi N, Suvà ML, Stamenkovic I (2021) Ewing's sarcoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(2): 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2028910##9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Bone Cancer (Version 2.2023). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bone.pdf.##10. Van Mater D and Wagner L (2019) Management of recurrent Ewing sarcoma: challenges and approaches.  OncoTargets and therapy, 12: 2279–2288. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S170585##11. Wang Y, Wang C, Xia M, Tian Z, Zhou J, Berger JM, Zhang XH, Xiao H (2024) Engineering small-molecule and protein drugs for targeting bone tumors. Molecular Therapy, 32(5): 1219-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.03.001## ##</REF>
			</REFRENCE>
		</REFRENCES>

	</ARTICLE>

</ARTICLES>

</JOURNAL>
</XML>
