[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 20, Issue 3 (7-2022) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2022, 20(3): 531-535 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of lumbar spine metastasis plans involving different stereotactic radiotherapy devices
N. Isık, E. Algül, G. Yaprak, A. Özen
Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Klinigi, Istanbul, Turkey , nacisik@hotmail.com
Abstract:   (715 Views)
Background: We compare plans involving two different stereotactic radiotherapy devices: Cyberknife (CK) and Helical Tomotherapy (HTT) and their results on the lumbarvertebra targets. Materials and Methods: Ten simulation tomographs of the first lumbar vertebra were selected from among the tomographies of patients who had previously undergone SBRT for any reason. In each planning tomography, two separate clinical target volumes (CTV) were drawn at the first lumbar vertebra, we used 2%, 95% and 98% doses of the target volume (D2, D95, D98) in the plan evaluation. The 2% dose of the planning target volume (PTV) was used for comparison with the hot spot; the 95% dose coverage of CTV was used for the target coverage comparison, and the 98% dose of the target volume was used for the dose volume histogram "shoulder" metric definitionTheHomogeneity Index (HI), new Conformity Index (nCI) and Gradient Index (GI) were evaluated for each planning system and target. Results: In both groups, CTV1 and CTV2, when compared with D95, the coverage for HTT was found statistically significantly higher. D98 was found to be statistically significantly higher with HTT. In both targets, the CKplans were found to have a higher hot area (D2), and inhomogeneous plans were obtained when compared to HTT. The NCI results were similar, and GI was higher with HTT. Conclusion: In lumbar vertebra stereotactic radiotherapy, more inhomogeneous plans were obtained with Cyberknife than with the Helical Tomotherapy device. A better gradient index was achieved with Cyberknife, while better coverage was achieved on the HTT plan.
Keywords: Vertebra metastasis, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cyberknife, helical tomotherapy (HTT).
Full-Text [PDF 1639 kb]   (423 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Isık N, Algül E, Yaprak G, Özen A. Comparison of lumbar spine metastasis plans involving different stereotactic radiotherapy devices. Int J Radiat Res 2022; 20 (3) :531-535
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4321-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 3 (7-2022) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4549