[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 18, Issue 3 (7-2020) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2020, 18(3): 487-494 Back to browse issues page
Dosimetric comparison of conventional and field-in-field techniques in early-stage breast cancer radiotherapy
S.M. Hosseini , M. Momennezhad , SH. Naseri
Abstract:   (2583 Views)
Background: Breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy is the accepted treatment in early-stage breast cancer. Due to breast irregularities, it is difficult to achieve homogenous dose distribution with conventional techniques. Currently, it is possible to use varied breast irradiation techniques such as field-in-field (FIF) that is claimed to produce more homogenous distribution of doses within the target volumes while sparing the organs at risk, leading to a better treatment outcome. The present study aimed to compare the conventional and the FIF techniques dosimetrically. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with early-stage breast cancer underwent computed tomography. Two different treatment plans were created for each patient: the wedge-based (conventional) plan and the FIF plan. Dosimetric parameters and monitor units were compared with paired sample t-test. Results: FIF technique obtained significantly lower dose homogeneity index, lower maximum doses and higher median doses in PTV (P<0.05). Similarly, the conformity index, and mean doses were higher in the FIF technique but the differences were not significant (P>0.05). In ipsilateral lungs, FIF significantly reduced the maximum and mean doses (P<0.05), and showed a tendency to reduce V20 (P>0.05). In patients with left-sided breast cancer, minimum and maximum doses and V40 of heart were significantly decreased in FIF plans (P<0.05). Doses to the contralateral lungs did not differ significantly. Conclusion: These results along with significantly less monitor units required for therapy in FIF suggest that this technique may be more advantageous during breast irradiation.
 
Keywords: field-in-field, 3D conformal radiotherapy, wedge, breast irradiation, OAR dose.
Full-Text [PDF 1640 kb]   (732 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Medical Physics
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseini S, Momennezhad M, Naseri S. Dosimetric comparison of conventional and field-in-field techniques in early-stage breast cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Res 2020; 18 (3) :487-494
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-3047-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 3 (7-2020) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645