:: Volume 21, Issue 2 (4-2023) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2023, 21(2): 227-232 Back to browse issues page
Long-term study of vocal dysfunction and quality of life in patients with non-laryngeal head and neck cancers post chemo-radiation therapy: Results of prospective analysis
P. Fadavi , S. Bagherzadeh , F. Torabinezhad , F. Goli-Ahmadabad , M. Beiki , S. Bijari , S. Sayfollahi , Z. Momeni
Medical Physics Department, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran , sakineh.bagherzadeh@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (735 Views)
Background: Vocal problems caused by Chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) can affect a patient’s quality of life (QOL) for a long time. This study aims to follow up and evaluate the voice of Persian-speaking patients with non-laryngeal head and neck cancer up to eighteen months after treatment. Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted to assess the voice of disease-free patients with various head and neck malignancies treated with CRT. The voice assessment was conducted at four points: before, at the end of treatment, and six and eighteen months after treatment. At the time of the last assessment, there were only 30 patients with an average age of 48.86±14.89 and in the range of (18-75) years. For a comprehensive assessment, acoustic, expert-rater, and subjective evaluation of voice was conducted. The Pearson correlation coefficient for all acoustic parameters, subgroups of the Persian VHI-30 questionnaire, and perceptual measurements were computed. The effect of essential factors on patient QOL associated with the voice in different groups was examined. Results: All acoustic parameters, other than fundamental and habitual frequencies, subjective and perceptual data values increased significantly (P < 0.001) during the treatment and decreased at the last assessment. None of the values have returned to pre-treatment levels. There was a significant relationship between some acoustic parameters, Persian VHI-30 questionnaire values, and G on the GRBAS scale. Chemotherapy and smoking were influential factors in patients' QOL. Conclusions: Vocal problems and reduced voice related QOL in patients treated with CRT may persist for years after treatment.
Keywords: Quality of life, radiation therapy, non-laryngeal cancers, voice evaluation.
Full-Text [PDF 553 kb]   (490 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. 1. Sreenivas A, Sreedharan S, Narayan M, et al. (2021) Effect of vocal rehabilitation after chemoradiation for non-laryngeal head and neck cancers. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 41(2): 131-141. [DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N0977] [PMID] []
2. Mostaghimi H, Ahmadabad FG, Rezaei H (2021) Super-selective intra-arterial platinum-based chemotherapy concurrent with low-dose-rate plaque brachytherapy in the treatment of retinoblastoma: A simulation study. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 17(1): 130-136. [DOI:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_340_19] [PMID]
3. Sagiroglu S and Kurtul N (2020) The effect of supraclavicular radiotherapy on acoustic voice quality index (AVQI), spectral amplitude and perturbation values. Journal of Voice, 34(4): 649. e7-. e13. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.01.003] [PMID]
4. Fung K, Yoo J, Leeper H, Hawkins S, Heeneman H, Doyle PC, et al. (2001) Vocal function following radiation for non‐laryngeal versus laryngeal tumors of the head and neck. The Laryngoscope, 111(11): 1920-4. [DOI:10.1097/00005537-200111000-00009] [PMID]
5. Brockmann M, Drinnan MJ, Storck C, Carding PN (2011) Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task. Journal of voice, 25(1): 44-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.07.002] [PMID]
6. Vaziri G, Almasganj F, Behroozmand R. (2010) Pathological assessment of patients' speech signals using nonlinear dynamical analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 40(1): 54-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.10.011] [PMID]
7. Kraaijenga S, Oskam I, Van Son R, et al. (2016) Assessment of voice, speech, and related quality of life in advanced head and neck cancer patients 10-years+ after chemoradiotherapy. Oral oncology, 55: 24-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.02.001] [PMID]
8. Maertens K and De Jong F (2007) The voice handicap index as a tool for assessment of the biopsychosocial impact of voice problems. B ENT, 3(2): 61-6.
9. Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Vedrody M, et al. (2009) Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index and voice measurements in four groups of patients with dysphonia. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 141(6): 762-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.021] [PMID]
10. Van der Molen L, van Rossum MA, Jacobi I, et al. (2012) Pre-and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception. Journal of Voice, 26(5): 664. e25-. e33. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.016] [PMID]
11. Woisard V, Bodin S, Yardeni E, Puech M (2007) The voice handicap index: correlation between subjecti ve patient response and quantitative assessment of voice. Journal of Voice, 21(5): 623-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.04.005] [PMID]
12. Hamdan A-l, Geara F, Rameh C, et al. (2009) Vocal changes following radiotherapy to the head and neck for non-laryngeal tumors. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 266(9): 1435-9. [DOI:10.1007/s00405-009-0950-7] [PMID]
13. Jalalinajafabadi F, Gadepalli C, Ascott F, et al. (2017) Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurement. European Modelling Symposium, 107-111.
14. Nemr K, Simoes-Zenari M, Cordeiro GF, et al. (2012) GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times. Journal of voice , 26(6): 812. e17-. e22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005] [PMID]
15. Kraaijenga SA, van der Molen L, Jacobi I, et al. (2015) Prospective clinical study on long-term swallowing function and voice quality in advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and preventive swallowing exercises. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272(11): 3521-31. [DOI:10.1007/s00405-014-3379-6] [PMID]
16. Aghajanzadeh M, Ghorbani A, Torabinezhad F, Reza Keyhani M (2012) Comparing two Persian passages in laboratory evaluation of mean and fundamental frequency variations range. Audiology, 21(1): 62-68.
17. Teixeira JP and Fernandes PO (2015) Acoustic analysis of vocal dysphonia. Procedia Computer Science, 64: 466-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.544]
18. Moradi N, Pourshahbaz A, Soltani M, Javadipour S (2013) Cutoff point at voice handicap index used to screen voice disorders among persian speakers. Journal of Voice, 27(1): 130. e1-. e5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.08.007] [PMID]
19. Aghadoost O, Moradi N, Dabirmoghaddam P, et al. (2016) Voice handicap index in Persian speakers with various severities of hearing loss. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 68(5): 211-15. [DOI:10.1159/000455230] [PMID]
20. Bagherzadeh S, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Torabinezhad F, et al. (2022) The effects of (chemo) radiation therapy on the voice and quality of life in patients with non-laryngeal head and neck cancers: a subjective and objective assessment. Int J Radiat Res, 20(2): 397-402. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.20.2.21]
21. Davies‐Husband C, Murphy J, Kelly C, et al. (2018) Extreme long‐term voice outcomes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced non‐laryngeal head and neck cancer: Eight‐year post‐treatment analysis. Clinical Otolaryngology, 43(6): 1494-9. [DOI:10.1111/coa.13204] [PMID]
22. Paleri V, Carding P, Chatterjee S, et al. (2012) Voice outcomes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced nonlaryngeal head and neck cancer: a prospective study. Head & Neck, 34(12): 1747-52. [DOI:10.1002/hed.22003] [PMID]
23. Radhakrishna N, Yamini B, Kadam AS, et al. (2017) Acoustic analysis of voice in nonlaryngeal head and neck cancer patients post chemoradiotherapy. J Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 13(1):113-117. [DOI:10.4103/0973-1482.199386] [PMID]
24. Sanguineti G, Adapala P, Endres EJ, Brack C, Fiorino C, Sormani MP, et al. (2007) Dosimetric predictors of laryngeal edema. Int Journal of Radiat Oncolo Biolo Phys, 68(3): 741-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.010] [PMID]
25. Agarwal JP, Baccher GK, Waghmare CM, Mallick I, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, et al. (2009) Factors affecting the quality of voice in the early glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 90(2): 177-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.016] [PMID]
26. Lechien JR, Khalife M, Huet K, Fourneau A-F, Delvaux V, Piccaluga M, et al. (2018) Impact of chemoradiation after supra-or infrahyoid cancer on aerodynamic, subjective, and objective voice assessments: a multicenter prospective study. Journal of Voice, 32(2): 257. e11-. e19. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.009] [PMID]
27. Dehqan A, Yadegari F, Scherer RC, Dabirmoghadam P. (2017) Correlation of VHI-30 to acoustic measurements across three common voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 31(1): 34-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.016] [PMID]
28. Niebudek-Bogusz E, Woznicka E, Zamyslowska-Szmytke E, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. (2010) Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 62(1-2): 55-60. [DOI:10.1159/000239064] [PMID]
29. Wheeler KM, Collins SP, Sapienza CM (2006) The relationship between VHI scores and specific acoustic measures of mildly disordered voice production. Journal of Voice, 20(2): 308-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.03.006] [PMID]
30. Ziwei Y, Zheng P, Pin D (2014) Multiparameter voice assessment for voice disorder patients: a correlation analysis between objective and subjective parameters. Journal of Voice, 28(6): 770-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.014] [PMID]
31. Fujiki RB and Thibeault SL (2021) Examining relationships between GRBAS ratings and acoustic, aerodynamic and patient-reported voice measures in adults with voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 1-7.

XML     Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 21, Issue 2 (4-2023) Back to browse issues page