1. Sabbadini G (2013) A review of pediatric radiology. CDA J 2013, 41(8):575-81. [DOI:10.1080/19424396.2013.12222339]

2. Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Waltimo-Siren J, Laatikainen T, Haukka J, Ekholm M (2016) Application of segmented dental panoramic tomography among children: positive effect of continuing education in radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 45:20160104. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20160104]

3. Benchimol D, Koivisto J, Kadesjö N, Shi XQ (2018) Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 47:20180007. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20180007]

4. Alamri HM, Sadrameli M, Alshalhoob MA, Sadrameli M, Alshehri MA (2012) Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature. Gen Dent, 60(5):390-400.

5. Council of the European :union: (1996) Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation. Official Journal of the European Communities N° L 159, http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9629_en.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2022.

6. Council of the European :union: (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legislation/9743_en.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2022.

7. Espelid I, Mejàre I, Weerheijm K (2003) EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 4:40-8.

8. European Commission (EC) (2004) Radiation protection 136. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology: the safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/doc/136_en.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2022.

9. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2012) Guideline on Prescribing Dental Radiographs for Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Persons with Special Health Care Needs Revised 2009 Reference Manual 37(6): 319-21.

10. International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP (2013) Radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. ICRP Publication 121. Ann ICRP 42(2): 21-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001]

11. European Commission, Radiation Protection 172 (2012) SEDENTEXCT Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence-based Guidelines. European Commission. Available from: http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf. Accessed May 2012.

12. Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Castro C, Jacobs R (2014) Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. Imaging Sci Dent, 44(2):121-8. [DOI:10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.121]

13. Mota de Almeida FJ, Knutsson K, Flygare L (2014) The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 43(4):20130137. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20130137]

14. Tsiklakis K, Mitsea A, Tsichlaki A, Pandis N (2020) A systematic review of relative indications and contra-indications for prescribing panoramic radiographs in dental paediatric patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 21(4):387-406. [DOI:10.1007/s40368-019-00478-w]

15. Hedesiu M, Marcu M, Salmon B, Pauwels R, Oenning AC, Almasan O, et al. (2018) Irradiation provided by dental radiological procedures in a pediatric population. Eur J Radiol, 103:112-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.04.021]

16. Van Acker JWG, Pauwels NS, Cauwels RGEC, Rajasekharan S (2020) Outcomes of different radioprotective precautions in children undergoing dental radiography: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 21(4):463-508. [DOI:10.1007/s40368-020-00544-8]

17. Ozaki Y, Watanabe H, Kurabayashi T (2021) Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 50(7):20210084. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20210084]

18. Mutalik S, Tadinada A, Molina MR, Sinisterra A, Lurie A (2020) Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 130(4):433-446. [DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2020.04.008]

19. Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, Scheske MJ (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 44(1):20140197. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20140197]

20. EzEldeen M, Stratis A, Coucke W, Codari M, Politis C, Jacobs R (2017) As low dose as sufficient quality: optimization of cone-beam computed tomographic scanning protocol for tooth autotransplantation planning and follow-up in children. Journal of Endodontics, 43(2): 210-217. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.022]

21. Choi E and Ford NL (2015) Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 44(6):20150018. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20150018]

22. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol, 32:228-3. [DOI:10.1007/s00247-002-0671-1]

23. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R (2012) SEDENTEXCT project consortium: estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol, 85:153-160. [DOI:10.1259/bjr/19389412]

24. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K (2012) SEDENTEXCT project consortium: effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol, 81:267-271. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028]

25. Lee C, Park B, Lee SS, Kim JE, Han SS, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Choi SC (2019) Efficacy of the Monte Carlo method and dose reduction strategies in paediatric panoramic radiography. Sci Rep, 9(1):9691. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-46157-0]

26. Davis AT, Safi H, Maddison SM (2015) The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 44(2):20140223. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20140223]

27. Paro JN and Zavisić BK (2012) Iodine and thyroid gland with or without nuclear catastrophe. Med Pregl, 65:489-495. [DOI:10.2298/MPNS1212489T]

28. Zamani H, Parach AA, Razavi SH, Shabani M, Ataei G, Zare MH (2021) Estimating the radiation surface dose and measuring the dose area product to provide the diagnostic reference level in panoramic radiography. International Journal of Radiation Research, 19(4): 963-970. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.19.4.24]

29. Jose A, Kumar AS, Govindarajan KN, Manimaran P (2020) Assessment of regional pediatric diagnostic reference levels for panoramic radiography using dose area product. J Med Phys, 45:1826. [DOI:10.4103/jmp.JMP_106_19]

30. Özkan G, Sessiz Ak R, Akkaya N, Öztürk H (2021) Awareness level of dentists and dental students about radiation doses of dental imaging methods. International Journal of Radiation Research, 19(3):729-736. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.19.3.729]

31. Zamani H, Falahati F, Omidi R, Abedi-Firouzjah R, Zare MH, Momeni F (2020) Estimating and comparing the radiation cancer risk from cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in pediatric and adult patients. International Journal of Radiation Research, 18(4): 885-893. [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.18.4.885]