[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 10, Issue 3 And 4 (12-2012) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2012, 10(3 And 4): 157-164 Back to browse issues page
The comparison of absorbed dose measurements for water and artificial body fluid
T. Cakir , A. Gur , A. Arasoglu
, tcakir2003@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (8499 Views)
Background: Advances in radiation dosimetry concepts and the development of primary measurement standards based on absorbed dose to water over the last decades offer the possibility to calibrate ionisation chambers directly in terms of absorbed dose to water. The aim of this study is the investigation on utility of artificial body fluid (ABF) instead of water by comparing dosimetric measurements for radiotherapy between water and ABF which is more close to human tissue. Materials and Methods: The measurements were done using 60Co gamma source with a radiation field sizes of 5×5, 10×10, 15×15, 20×20 and 25×25 cm2 at PTW Freiburg MP3 water phantom front surface. The comparisons of the dose measurements were obtained by using IAEA TRS-398 dosimetry protocols and Mephysto mc2 dose analyzer program. Percent depth dose (PDD), dose profiles and penumbras are compared for water and ABF. Results: When the results of the PDD for water and ABF were compared, the maximum difference was observed in big field sizes. The difference in penumbras was found 2.3 mm averagely for depth of maximum dose (dmax). In addition same differences were observed between water and ABF when the dose profiles were compared. It is found that PDD values taken for water are good agreed with PDD values published in British Journal of Radiology (BJR) Supplement 25. Conclusion: Since the ABF is more equivalent to human tissue than water, it is suggested that advanced dosimetric studies should be performed with ABF instead of water. Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(3‐4): 157‐164
Keywords: Radiation dosimetry, absorbed dose measurement, artificial body fluid.
Full-Text [PDF 497 kb]   (4720 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Cakir T, Gur A, Arasoglu A. The comparison of absorbed dose measurements for water and artificial body fluid. Int J Radiat Res 2012; 10 (3 and 4) :157-164
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-983-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 3 And 4 (12-2012) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660