[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Lavdas

E. Lavdas, M. Papaioannou, A. Tsikrika, E. Pappas, G.k. Sakkas, V. Roka, S. Kostopoulos, Ph.d., P. Mavroidis,
Volume 19, Issue 3 (7-2021)
Abstract

Background: The existence of air in hollow organs in the thoracic cavity constitutes a life-threatening situation most of the times. However, sometimes in thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) there are artifacts from different sources that could mimic air densities, disorientating the diagnosis. Materials and Methods: 100 patients (46 females and 54 males, mean age: 60 years, range: 20-90 years), who had been routinely scanned in the area of thorax using three different imaging protocols (follow up, aorta, pulmonary vessels) were retrospectively studied. In 67 cases, contrast agent was used during the examination. Every case was studied by two specialists. Results: Artifacts in pulmonary veins were observed in 38 of the cases. Of these artifacts 27 stemmed from contrast agent, calcifications in the vessels, metallic implants, movement of the patient, malfunction of a detector due to the size of field of view (FOV) or due to the existence of contrast agent on the examination table of the CT scanner. In 11 cases, small amounts of air had been inserted into blood circulation during contrast injection. Conclusions: This study characterized and classified many artifacts related to thorax CT in order to separate them from other serious thoracic pathologies (e.g. aortic dissection, ulcer of veins or arteries). The knowledge and identification of the different types of artifacts is very important in order to avoid the risk of misdiagnosis.

M. Papaioannou, A. Tsikrika, V. Roka, P. Lavda, N. Pantazis, G.k. Sakkas, E. Dardiotis, A. Bakas, P. Mavroidis, Ph.d., E. Lavdas,
Volume 23, Issue 1 (1-2025)
Abstract

Background: Comparison of three different sagittal sequences with fat suppression in the lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluating several image characteristics and changing the phase direction. Materials and Methods: Forty-five subjects (20 males, 25 females, mean age 50 years old) participated in this retrospective study in an MRI machine of 1.5 Tesla (GE Signa Hdx). We compared three fat-saturated sequences {T2 Weighted (T2W) Fast Spin Echo (FSE) Fat Saturation (FS) with phase direction superior-inferior (S/I), T2W Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) with phase direction superior-inferior (S/I) and T2W STIR with phase direction (A/P)}. A qualitative analysis was performed, while two experienced radiologists evaluated the images. The statistical analysis was determined by Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test. Results: The T2W FSE FS was superior in almost all studied parameters {total image quality, presence of artifacts, artifacts in 4th lumbar vertebra (L4) - 1st Sacral vertebra (S1), depiction of lesions on vertebral bodies, depiction of lesions on L4-S1 region, sharpness} in comparison with T2W STIR sequences with statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The STIR sequences exceeded the T2W FSE FS in the fat saturation effectiveness with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Conclusion: The T2 Weighted (T2W) Fast Spin Echo (FSE) Fat Saturation (FS) was superior in the depiction of pathology and normal anatomy, eliminating many artifacts in comparison with T2 Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequences, especially in the L4 vertebra– S1 vertebra anatomic region, between three under-study sequences. Choosing the appropriate sagittal fat-saturated sequence in each clinical question is useful to avoid misdiagnosis due to technical artifacts. 


Page 1 from 1     

International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714