<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1393</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2014</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>12</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>An investigation into the potential applicability of gel dosimeters for dosimetry in boron neutron capture therapy</title>
	<subject_fa>Radiation Biology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiation Biology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; The aim of this work was to establish how well gel dosimeters performed, as substitutes for brain tissue compared with standard phantom materials such as water, polymethyl-methacrylate (or PMMA), A150 plastic and TE- liquid phantom material for dosimetry of neutron beams in boron neutron capture therapy. &lt;strong&gt; Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Thermal neutron fluence, photon dose and epithermal neutron dose distributions were computed for the epithermal neutron beam of the optimized linac based BNCT. &lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Amongst all investigated phantom materials, TE-liquid was shown to be a better substitute for brain tissue than other phantom materials. The differences between TE- liquid and brain at the depth of 6.1 cm for thermal neutron fluence, gamma dose and epithermal neutron dose distributions was calculated 2.80%, 2.40% and -13.87% , respectively. In comparison with the other gel dosimeters, LMD2 provided a better simulation of radiation transport in the brain. It&amp;#39;s results differed from the real brain, at the depth of 6.1 cm, for thermal neutron fluence, gamma dose and epithermal neutron dose distributions, by -1.27%, 4.20% and 21.05% respectively. &lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Even though, in gamma dose distribution the LMD2 has large deviation from brain tissue distribution, the deviation is approximately independent of depth, so the results can be multiplied by a constant coefficient to be more consistent with reality. Even though, TE- liquid showed satisfactory results for brain tissue substitution in BNCT, but some properties of gel dosimeters such as three dimensionality, make LMD2 a potentially good dosimeter for dosimetric verification in BNCT.&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Gel dosimetry, BNCT, phantom, MCNP, dose distribution</keyword>
	<start_page>139</start_page>
	<end_page>149</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-499&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>S.M.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abtahi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>sm_abtahi@sbu.ac.ir</email>
	<code>790031947532846007595</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846007595</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>University of Shahid Beheshti, Radiation Medicine Department, P. O. Box 19839- 63113, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>S.M.R.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Aghamiri</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>790031947532846007596</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846007596</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>University of Shahid Beheshti, Radiation Medicine Department, P. O. Box 19839- 63113, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>H</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Khalafi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>790031947532846007597</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846007597</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>F.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Rahmani</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>790031947532846007598</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846007598</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>University of Shahid Beheshti, Radiation Medicine Department, P. O. Box 19839- 63113, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
