<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1395</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2016</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>14</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Dosimetric comparison between XR-RV3 and EBT2 radiochromic film in megavoltage photon beams</title>
	<subject_fa>Radiation Biology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiation Biology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>گزارش کوتاه</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Short Report </content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Radiochromic film is used for radiation dose measurement, XR-RV3 is used in fluoroscopy and EBT2 film in radiation therapy. The aim was to determine if the dosimetric properties of these two films are comparable in megavolt photon beams. &lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Comparison measurements included: calibration curves, heterogeneous phantom dose profiles, and nasopharynx dose distribution measurement. &lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Both film types required 24 hours to stabilize. Their heterogeneous phantom dose profiles were similar, and their dose distributions for a nasopharynx treatment were within 3%/3mm.&lt;strong&gt; Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Dose distributions between both films showed good correlation and XR-RV3 film can be used in radiotherapy for quality control checks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>XR-RV3, EBT2, Calibration curves, heterogeneous</keyword>
	<start_page>149</start_page>
	<end_page>152</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-612&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>I.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Setilo</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>itumelengs@gmail.com</email>
	<code>790031947532846008076</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846008076</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>University of the Free State</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>F.C.P.</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>du Plessis</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>790031947532846008077</code>
	<orcid>790031947532846008077</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>University of the Free State</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
