<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1400</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2021</year>
	<month>7</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>19</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with the two-compartment exchange model in glioma</title>
	<subject_fa>Radiobiology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiobiology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Background: Since different grades of gliomas have different treatment programs, prognosis, and survival rates, it&amp;rsquo;s important to differentiate them effectively. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) with the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) have showed great potential for identifying the brain tumors. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with glioma underwent IVIM and DCE imaging at 3.0T. Quantitative parameters (mean, median, 10&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;, 25&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;, 75&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and 90&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentiles) from IVIM (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), D, D*, f, and their product fD*) and DCE (v&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt;, v&lt;sub&gt;e&lt;/sub&gt;, PS, and F&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt;) were analyzed. The independent Student&amp;rsquo;s t-test and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to assess whether these parameters could distinguish low- from high-grade glioma. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Delong test were performed to determine and compare the diagnostic efficiency of IVIM and DCE parameters in differentiating low- and high-grade gliomas, respectively. Results: Various histogram statistics of IVIM and DCE parameters could differentiate different grades of glioma. v&lt;sub&gt;e&lt;/sub&gt; and v&lt;sub&gt;p&lt;/sub&gt; generally yielded higher area under the curve (AUC) values than IVIM parameters, and the differences in AUC values of v&lt;sub&gt;e&lt;/sub&gt;_mean and IVIM parameters had a statistical significance. Although DCE had higher AUC values than IVIM, they didn&amp;rsquo;t reach statistical significance. Conclusions: v&lt;sub&gt;e&lt;/sub&gt; was the best parameter in differential diagnosis of gliomas. IVIM had the similar diagnosis performance with DCE, and both IVIM and DCE-MRI parameters can be used for preoperative grading of gliomas.&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Apparent diffusion coefficient, Dynamic contrast-enhanced, Glioma, Intravoxel incoherent motion, D value.</keyword>
	<start_page>505</start_page>
	<end_page>514</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2188-23&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>F. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Xing</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460020218</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020218</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, P. R. China</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>G. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Wu</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>wuguangy2002@163.com</email>
	<code>7900319475328460020219</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460020219</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Radiology Department, Shenzhen University General Hospital and Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen, 5180554, P. R. China</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
