<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Journal of Radiation Research</title>
<title_fa>نشریه پرتو پژوه</title_fa>
<short_title>Int J Radiat Res</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ijrr.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>79</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal79</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-3243</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2345-4229</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/ijrr</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1403</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2025</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>23</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>other</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Meta-analysis of curative effect of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy with primary chemo-radiation in patients with cervical cancer</title>
	<subject_fa>Radiation Biology</subject_fa>
	<subject>Radiation Biology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>تحقيق بديع</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:newspaper&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida-space:50%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:119%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;Background&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-US&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-US&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;The comparative analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH) in cervical cancer (CC) patients undergoing primary chemoradiation has yielded divergent and contentious study conclusions. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science core database, Nature, Science Direct, and others, covering the period from January 2007 to the present. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;Ten relevant articles were identified, encompassing 4,148 CC patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, with 1,949 (47.0%) undergoing MIRH and 2,199 (53.0%) undergoing ORH. Among these patients, 767 experienced recurrence, and 223 succumbed to the disease. The analysis revealed a slightly higher recurrence rate in patients who underwent MIRH versus ORH [OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.02~1.54, Z=2.16, P=0.03], demonstrating statistical significance (P&lt;0.05). However, the mortality rate in MIRH patients was marginally superior to in ORH patients [OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.76 ~ 1.37, Z=0.11, P=0.91] (P&gt;0.05). MIRH was associated with a slightly lower complication rate versus ORH [OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.28 ~ 0.57, Z=5.02, P&lt;0.00001], and a significantly reduced incidence of perioperative blood transfusions [OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.05 ~ 0.58, Z=4.18, P&lt;0.0001]. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#1f497d&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight:bold&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;en-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;language:en-GB&quot;&gt;The findings suggest that ORH is linked to lower recurrence and mortality rates versus minimally invasive surgery, establishing its potential advantage in the treatment of CC.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH), cervical cancer, meta-analysis, primary chemo-radiotherapy.</keyword>
	<start_page>185</start_page>
	<end_page>191</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-1309&amp;slc_lang=other&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>J. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Pan</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460029604</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460029604</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Gynecology, Huzhou Maternity &amp; Child Health Care Hospital, Zhejiang, China </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>H. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Hang</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>7900319475328460029605</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460029605</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Gynecology, Huzhou Maternity &amp; Child Health Care Hospital, Zhejiang, China </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Q. </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Hu</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>likeyou022003@163.com</email>
	<code>7900319475328460029606</code>
	<orcid>7900319475328460029606</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Gynecology, Huzhou Maternity &amp; Child Health Care Hospital, Zhejiang, China </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
