[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 15, Number 2 (4-2017) ::
IJRR 2017, 15(2): 157-165 Back to browse issues page
Dosimetric accuracy of the Acuros XB and Anisotropic analytical algorithm near interface of the different density media for the small fields of a 6- MV flattening-filter-free beam
S.W. Kang, Dr. J.B. Chung , J.W. Lee, M.J. Kim, Y.L. Kim, J.S. Kim, K.Y. Eom, I.A. Kim, Dr. T.S. Suh
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bungdang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea , jbchung1213@gmail.com
Abstract:   (144 Views)

Background: This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of dose calculation near the air-phantom interface of a heterogeneous phantom for Acuros XB (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) algorithm of a           6-MV flattening-filter-free beam, compared with film measurements. Materials and Methods: A phantom included air gap was specially manufactured for this study. In order to evaluate the dose near air gap-phantom interface, Eclipse treatment planning system equipped both AXB and AAA was used for the dose calculations. Measurements in this region were performed with radiochromic film. The central-axis dose (CAD) and off-axis dose (OAD) between calculations and measurements were analyzed for various field sizes and air gaps. The root-mean-square-error (RMSE) was used to evaluate the difference between the calculated and measured OAD. In order to quantify agreement between the calculated and measured dose distributions, the gamma analysis was performed with the 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Results: For all fields traveling through 1 and 3 cm air gap, the maximum difference in the calculated CAD was -5.3% for AXB and 214.8% for AAA, compared to the measured CAD. For the RMSE between the calculated and measured OAD, the calculated OAD using AXB showed interval in the RMSE (from 4.4 to 12.7) while using AAA indicated broad (from 7.7 to 101.0). In addition, the gamma passing rates showed that AXB was higher agreement than AAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that AXB was more accurate in heterogeneous media near air-phantom interface than AAA when comparing the measured data.

Keywords: Acuros XB, anisotropic analytical algorithm, heterogeneous media, FFF, interface.
Full-Text [PDF 1380 kb]   (98 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Reviews and Perspectives | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or email:

Write the security code in the box >



DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.15.2.157


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kang S, Chung J, Lee J, Kim M, Kim Y, Kim J, et al . Dosimetric accuracy of the Acuros XB and Anisotropic analytical algorithm near interface of the different density media for the small fields of a 6- MV flattening-filter-free beam . IJRR. 2017; 15 (2) :157-165
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-1960-en.html
Volume 15, Number 2 (4-2017) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 809 queries by yektaweb 3443