[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 18, Issue 4 (10-2020) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2020, 18(4): 641-646 Back to browse issues page
CT-Value (?HU and CT-Value ratioin) differential diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma from focal nodular hyperplasia
X.H. Ge , J.F. Zhang
Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China , 570396920@qq.com
Abstract:   (4568 Views)
Background: The objective was to explore the value of the CT value difference (?HU) and CT value ratio (CVR) between the hepatic arterial (AP), portal (PP), and delayed phases (DP) to differentiate the small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SHCC, ≤ 3 cm) from the small Focal nodular hyperplasia (SFNH, ≤ 3 cm). Materials and Methods: All the lesions were confirmed by clinically and/or pathologically and all the patients underwent triple-phase enhanced CT scans. The lesions’ CT values (LCV) and the surrounding normal liver parenchyma (NCV) of the enhancement phases were measured separately, the ?HU and CVR were calculated. Results: The median age and the male/female ratios of the SHCC and SFNH have statistically significant, and the size haven’t statistically significant. The ?HU and CVR of the AP, PP, and DP of the SHCCs and SFNHs were statistically significant, respectively. The area under curve of ?HU and CVR of AP, PP and DP were increased gradually. When the ?HU and CVR of the AP, PP and DP were 105.800HU vs. 1.516, -12.600HU vs. 0.949, -19.750 HU vs. 0.951, obtained the maximum You-den indexes. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 80.6 % and 90.1 % vs. 88.90% and 72.1%, 100% and 81.1% vs. 100% and 81.1%, 94.4 % and 96.4% vs. 94.4 % and 96.4%, respectively. Conclusion: The SHCC was highly suggested when ?HU and CVR are no greater than 105.800HU and 1.516, -12.600HU and 0.949, -19.750 HU and 0.951 of the AP, PP, and DP in the middle-aged and elderly male patients, especially in the DP.
Keywords: Computerized Tomography-value, Liver cancer, hepatocytes, Liver, focal nodular hyperplasia.
Full-Text [PDF 1851 kb]   (2198 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Medical Physics
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ge X, Zhang J. CT-Value (?HU and CT-Value ratioin) differential diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma from focal nodular hyperplasia. Int J Radiat Res 2020; 18 (4) :641-646
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-3272-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 18, Issue 4 (10-2020) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741