The application of automated volume scanner in bone age assessment

Shi, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Ni, Z.; Du, J.; Wang, Q.

doi:10.52547/ijrr.20.4.6

[Home ] [Archive]

International Journal of Radiation Research

Main Menu

Home

IJRR Information

For Authors

For Reviewers

Subscription

News & Events

Web Mail

Search in website

Receive site information

ISSN

Hard Copy 2322-3243

Online 2345-4229

Online Submission

Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.

Volume 20, Issue 4 (10-2022) Int J Radiat Res 2022, 20(4): 767-772 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.52547/ijrr.20.4.6

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Shi J, Chen Y, Yang L, Ni Z, Du J, Wang Q. The application of automated volume scanner in bone age assessment. Int J Radiat Res 2022; 20 (4) :767-772
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4462-en.html

The application of automated volume scanner in bone age assessment

J. Shi

, Y. Chen

, L. Yang

, Z. Ni

, J. Du

, Q. Wang

Department of Imaging Diagnosis Center, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, P.R. China , duizhi0360603636@163.com

Abstract: (1522 Views)

Background: Radiograph of hand and wrist has been widely used in children's bone age assessment (BAA). However, ionizing radiation may be harmful for children in the future. Therefore, alternative methods have been attempted for the evaluation of children's bone age. Here, we reported an automated volume scanner (AVS) in assessing the biological age of children in comparison with X-ray radiograph as the gold standard. Material and Methods: Total 22 children (13 male and 9 female) with short stature or precocious puberty were enrolled into this study. Their chronological age ranged from 4 to 14 years old. The children's left hand-wrist was scanned with the AVS by putting them into a water sink containing tape water. Coronal images of the left hand-wrist were reconstructed and compared with X-ray images. Results: The number of patients whose hand-wrist bones (except for the first metacarpal sesamoid bone and the secondary ossification center of the first metacarpal bone) identified by AVS image was not significantly different from that by X-ray image. In addition, the total number of observed bones in each patient were not significantly different between the two methods. The concordance rate (percentage of patients whose hand-wrist bone presented in both AVS image and X-ray image) was high and the inter-observer variance of BA was small. Conclusions: The AVS method was highly correlated with the standard radiograph for children's bone age assessment with small inter-observer variability. This novel AVS method could be an alternative method in clinical practice for bone age assessment with higher safety and reliability.

Keywords: radioactive automated volume scanner, bone age assessment, chronological age.

Full-Text [PDF 1778 kb] (825 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology

References

1. 1. Greulich WW and Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [DOI:10.1097/00000441-195909000-00030]

2. Tanner JM and Whitehouse RH (1975) A note on the bone age at which patients with true isolated growth hormone deficiency enter puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 41: 788-90. [DOI:10.1210/jcem-41-4-788] [PMID]

3. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshal WA, Healy MJ, Goldstein H (1975) Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Prediction of Adult's Height (TW2 Method). London: London Academic Press.

4. Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method).3rd ed. London: WB Saunders; 2001.

5. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology, 248: 254-63. [DOI:10.1148/radiol.2481071451] [PMID]

6. Kaufman FR and Sy JP (1999) Regular monitoring of bone age is useful in children treated with growth hormone. Pediatrics, 104: 1039-42. [DOI:10.1542/peds.104.S5.1039] [PMID]

7. Fahmy JL, Kaminsky CK, Kaufman F, Nelson MD Jr, Parisi MT (2000) The radiological approach to precocious puberty. Br J Radiol, 73: 560-7. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.73.869.10884758] [PMID]

8. Heppe DH, Taal HR, Ernst GD, Van Den Akker EL, Lequin MM, Hokken-Koelega AC, et al. (2012) Bone age assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children: an alternative for X-ray? Br J Radiol, 85: 114-20. [DOI:10.1259/bjr/23858213] [PMID] []

9. De González BA and Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet, 363: 345-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0 [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16374-5] [PMID]

10. Hall EJ and Brenner DJ (2008) Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol, 81: 362-78. [DOI:10.1259/bjr/01948454] [PMID]

11. Hall EJ (2009) Radiation biology for pediatric radiologists. Pediatr Radiol, 39(1): S57-64. [DOI:10.1007/s00247-008-1027-2] [PMID]

12. Bilgili Y, Hizel S, Kara SA, Sanli C, Erdal HH, Altinok D (2003) Accuracy of skeletal age assessment in children from birth to 6 years of age with the ultrasonographic version of the Greulich-Pyle atlas. J Ultrasound Med, 22: 683-90. [DOI:10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.683] [PMID]

13. Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Sacco MC, Emberti-Gialloreti L, Fraracci L (1998) Skeletal age assessment in children and young adults: comparison between a newly developed sonographic method and conventional methods. Skeletal Radiol, 27: 271-7. [DOI:10.1007/s002560050380] [PMID]

14. Daneff M, Casalis C, Bruno CH, Bruno DA (2015) Bone age assessment with conventional ultrasonography in healthy infants from 1 to 24 months of age. Pediatr Radiol, 45: 1007-15. [DOI:10.1007/s00247-014-3253-0] [PMID]

15. Martin DD, Wit JM, Hochberg Z, Sävendahl L, van Rijn RR, Fricke O, et al. (2011) The use of bone age in clinical practice - part 1. Horm Res Paediatr, 76: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329374 [DOI:10.1159/000329372]

16. Ostojic SM (2013) Prediction of adult height by Tanner-Whitehouse method in young Caucasian male athletes. QJM, 106: 341-5. [DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcs230] [PMID]

17. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Olze A (2006) Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part I. General considerations. Forensic Sci Int, 159(1): S61-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.017] [PMID]

18. Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) Studies in use of the Greulich-Pyle skeletal age method to assess criminal liability. Leg Med (Tokyo), 10: 190-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2008.01.003] [PMID]

19. Malina RM (2011) Skeletal age and age verification in youth sport. Sports Med, 41: 925-47. [DOI:10.2165/11590300-000000000-00000] [PMID]

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4722