[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.



:: Volume 21, Issue 1 (1-2023) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2023, 21(1): 79-87 Back to browse issues page
Novel polyethylene/tungsten oxide/bismuth trioxide/barium sulfate/graphene oxide nanocomposites for shielding against X-ray radiations
T. Abdolahzadeh , J. Morshedian , S. Ahmadi
Department of Polymer Processing, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute (IPPI), P.O. Box 14975/112, Tehran, Iran , J.Morshedian@ippi.ac.ir
Abstract:   (677 Views)
Background: High-energy beams, such as gamma rays and X-rays, have many applications in nuclear power plants, healthcare, aerospace, and medicine. Therefore, appropriate radiation protection of living bodies in nuclear science and industries is essential to shield humans against the aforementioned radiation. Utilizing shielding materials is a practical method to protect individuals from harmful radiation. Materials and Methods: High-density polyethylene (HDPE)-based nanocomposites were prepared to perform as a shield against X-ray radiation by using various weight fractions of the tungsten oxide, barium sulfate, and bismuth trioxide (10, 15, 20, and 25% wt). Samples’ shielding properties were experimentally studied with an X-ray tube at 50, 60, 80, and 120 kVp. Results: The recorded results showed that with increasing the number of nanoparticles, the transmission factor and HVL values were decreased and the linear attenuation coefficient was increased significantly. SEM, EDX analysis, and TEM evaluated the morphological properties of the fabricated samples. Results revealed that the particle size of the used nanoparticles was in the 25-50 nm range. Thermal study of the prepared nanocomposites including ΔHm, crystalline percentage (Xc), melting point (Tm) as well as the thermal stability of the nanocomposites were determined by using DSC, and TGA, respectively. Conclusion: Samples including 20% ​​and 25% wt of Bismuth trioxide, and Tungsten trioxide loaded on graphene oxide reached 12% and 10% transmission factor values, respectively.
Keywords: Linear attenuation, nanocomposite, polyethylene, shielding, tungsten.
Full-Text [PDF 1749 kb]   (867 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
1. 1. Singh AK, Singh RK, Sharma B, Ajay Kumar Tyagi AK (2017) Characterization and biocompatibility studies of lead Free X-ray shielding polymer composite for healthcare application. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 138: 9-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.04.016]
2. Lyra M and Charalambattou P (2011) Radiation protection of staff in 111In radionuclide therapy- is the lead apron shielding effective? Rad Prot Dosi, 147: 272-276. [DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncr330] [PMID]
3. Aral N, Nergis FB, Candan C (2015) An alternative X-ray shielding material based on coated textiles. Textile Research Journal, 86. [DOI:10.1177/0040517515590409]
4. Maghrabi HA, Vijayan A, Mohaddes F, Deb P, Wang L (2016) Evaluation of X-ray radiation shielding performance of barium Sulphate-coated fabrics. Fibers and Polymers, 17: 2047-2054. [DOI:10.1007/s12221-016-5850-z]
5. Song Y, Phule AD, Wang D, Ma L, Zhang ZX (2021) Lightweight self-cleaning trans-polyisoprene/multiwalled carbon nanotubes open-cell composite material: Its electromagnetic shielding performance. Express Polym Letters, 15: 865-877. [DOI:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.69]
6. Xiao H, Zeng K, Hu J H, Yang G (2021) Multiple cooperative systems obtained by powder metallurgy-like processing method: Adenine containing phthalonitrile/graphene/Fe3O4 high-performance composites with ultra-high EMI shielding. Express Polym Letters, 15: 791-807. [DOI:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.63]
7. Adams J, Hathaway D, Grugel R, Watts J, Parnell T, Gregory J (2005) Revolutionary concepts of radiation shielding for human exploration of space. Book 211-218.
8. Nambiar S and Yeow JTW (2012) Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 4: 5717-5726. [DOI:10.1021/am300783d] [PMID]
9. Mahmoud ME, El-Khatib AM, Badawi MS, Rashed AR, El-Sharkawy RM, Thabet AA (2017) Fabrication, characterization and gamma rays shielding properties of nano and micro lead oxide-dispersed-high density polyethylene composites. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 145: 160-173. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.10.017]
10. Belgin EE and Aycik GA (2015) Preparation and radiation attenuation performances of metal oxide filled polyethylene based composites for ionizing electromagnetic radiation shielding applications. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 306: 107-117. [DOI:10.1007/s10967-015-4052-2]
11. Kaloshkin SD, Tcherdyntsev VV, Gorshenkov MV, Gulbin VN, Kuznetsov SA (2012) Radiation-protective polymer-matrix nanostructured composites. J Alloys Compd, 536S: S522- S526. [DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.01.061]
12. Laurenzi S, de Zanet G, Santonicola MG (2020) Numerical investigation of radiation shielding properties of polyethylenebased nanocomposite materials in different space environments. Acta Astronautica, 170: 530-538. [DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.02.027]
13. Afshar M, Morshedian J, Ahmadi S (2019) Radiation attenuation capability and fow characteristics of HDPE composite loaded with W, MoS2, and B4C. Polym Compos, 40: 149-158. [DOI:10.1002/pc.24620]
14. Abdolahzadeh T, Morshedian J, Ahmadi S (2022) Preparation and characterization of nano WO3/Bi2O3/GO and BaSO4/GO dispersed HDPE composites for X-ray shielding application. Polyolefins Journal, 3009: 1201.
15. Akkurt I, Akyıldırım H, Mavi B, Kilincarslan S, Basyigit C (2010) Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete includes barite in different rate. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 37: 910-914. [DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2010.04.001]
16. Harish V and Harish NNH (2012) Lead oxides filled isophthalic resin polymer composite for gamma radiation shielding applications. Ind J Pure App, Phys, 50: 847-850.
17. Hashemi S A, Mousavi S M, Faghihi R, Arjmand M, Sina S, Amani AM (2018) Lead oxide-decorated graphene oxide/epoxy composite towards X-Ray radiation shielding. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 146: 77-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.01.008]
18. Hanifpour A, Bahri-Laleh N, Nekoomanesh-Haghighi M, Karimi M (2017) Synthesis and characterization of poly1-hexene/silica nanocomposites. Polym Test, 61: 27-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.002]
19. Abdolahzadeh T, Morshedian J, Ahmadi S, Ay M R, Mohammadi O (2021) Introducing a novel Polyvinylchloride/Tungsten composites for shielding against gamma and X- ray radiations. Iran J Nuc Med, 29: 58-64.
20. Bagheri K and Razavi SM (2018) Thermal Resistance, Tensile Properties, and Gamma Radiation Shielding Performance of Unsaturated Polyester/Nanoclay/PbO Composites. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 146: 5-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.12.024]
21. Baksi BG, Sen BH, Eyuboglu TF (2008) Differences in aluminum equivalent values of, endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography. J Endod, 34: 1101-1104. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.004] [PMID]
22. Mota EG, Rockenbach MIB, da Costa NP, Rigo A, Coelho CRR (2008) Radiopacity of impression materials using an indirect digital system. Rev Odonto Ciência, 23: 333-337.
23. Obaid SS, Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP (2018) Determination of gamma ray shielding parameters of rocks and concrete. Rad Phys Chem, 144: 356-360. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.09.022]
24. Mheemeed AK, Hasan HI, Al-Jomaily FM (2017) Gamma-ray absorption using rubber-lead mixtures as radiation protection shields. J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 29: 653-659. [DOI:10.1007/s10967-011-1556-2]
25. Chen S, Bourham M, Rabiei A (2015) Attenuation efficiency of X-ray and comparison to gamma ray and neutrons in composite metal foams. Radiat Phys Chem, 117: 12-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.07.003]
26. Sertchook H, Elimelech H, Makarov C, Khalfin R, Cohen Y, Shuster M, Babonneau F, Avnir D (2007) Composite particles of polyethylene@ silica. J Am Chem Soc, 129: 98. [DOI:10.1021/ja0653167] [PMID]
27. Dehghani-Sanijand AA and Blackburn RS (2008) IR study on hydrogen bonding in epoxy resin-silica nanocomposites. Prog Nat Sci, 18: 801-805. [DOI:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.01.024]
28. Moseenkov SI, Kuznetsov VL, Kolesov BA, Zavorin AV, Serkova AN, Zolotarev NA (2021) Design of effective surface contacts on polymer composites modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Expres Polym Lett, 15: 826-838. [DOI:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.66]
29. Hanifpour A, Bahri-Laleh N, Nekoomanesh-Haghighi M (2020) Methacrylate functionalized POSS as an efficient adhesion promoter in olefin-based adhesives. Polym Eng Sci, 60: 2991-3000. [DOI:10.1002/pen.25528]
30. Mahmoud ME, El-Khatib AM, Badawi MS, Rashed AR, El-Sharkawy RM, Abouzeid A (2018) Thabet recycled high-density polyethylene plastics added with lead oxide nanoparticles as sustainable radiation shielding materials. J Clean Produc, 176: 276-287. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.100]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abdolahzadeh T, Morshedian J, Ahmadi S. Novel polyethylene/tungsten oxide/bismuth trioxide/barium sulfate/graphene oxide nanocomposites for shielding against X-ray radiations. Int J Radiat Res 2023; 21 (1) :79-87
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4573-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 21, Issue 1 (1-2023) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652