[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Keywords
For Authors::
Aims and Scope
Call for Papers
Submission Instructions
For Reviewers::
Referee page
Subscription::
Subscription Form
News & Events::
Journal News
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE
:: Volume 22, Issue 1 (1-2024) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2024, 22(1): 125-130 Back to browse issues page
Application of two-dimensional color ultrasonography technology to evaluate the postoperative repair of massive rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic humeral insertion displacement treatment
S. Wu , Z. Yu , W. Lin , W. Xu , Y. Luo , S. Guan
Department of Orthopedics, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China , yzx830830830@163.com
Abstract:   (508 Views)
Background: To explore the value of two-dimensional color ultrasonography (US) in the evaluation of treatment effect of arthroscopic humeral insertion displacement for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). Materials and Methods: From February 2021 to April 2022, 42 patients diagnosed as MRCTs by shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected and separated into the control group (CG, n=21) and study group (SG, n=21). Patients in the SG received rotator cuff humeral insertion displacement and patients in the CG were treated with traditional suture bridge. The reliability of US imaging was examined and the clinical outcomes in two groups were compared. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional color ultrasonography reached 87.1% and 100% in detecting postoperative repair of MRCTs. Three months after surgery, compared with the CG, the university of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA) scores in the SG were elevated (P<0.05), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the SG were declined (P<0.05). Degrees of external rotation, internal rotation, back extension and forward flexion of shoulder joint in both groups were increased after surgery, and those in the SG were higher relative to the CG (P<0.05). The retear rate of the SG was reduced compared with the CG (P<0.05). SG showed higher patient satisfaction rate compared with the CG (P<0.05). Conclusion: Two-dimensional color ultrasonography is a reliable approach to evaluate the repair of MRCT after arthroscopic rotator cuff internal displacement, which can reduce shoulder pain, improve patient life quality, and is valuable for promotion.
Keywords: Color ultrasonography, arthroscopic surgery, massive rotator cuff tears.
Full-Text [PDF 708 kb]   (307 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. 1. Oh JH, Park MS, Rhee SM (2018) Treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Surg, 10(2): 119-34. [DOI:10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.119]
2. Piórek A and Adamiak Z (2010) Ultrasonography of the canine shoulder joint and its pathological changes. Pol J Vet Sci, 13(1): 193-200.
3. Fonseca Filho JM, Sella GDV, Souza LHL, et al. (2022) Evaluation of the clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears using the modified suture bridge technique. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo), 57(6): 984-91. [DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1746179]
4. Berthold DP, Garvin P, Mancini MR, et al. (2022) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biologically enhanced patch augmentation. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 34(1): 4-12. [DOI:10.1007/s00064-021-00754-3]
5. Di Benedetto P, Mancuso F, Tosolini L, et al. (2021) Treatment options for massive rotator cuff tears: a narrative review. Acta Biomed, 92(S3): e2021026.
6. Wei S, Tang M, Li W, et al. (2022) Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair technique for an avulsion of the talar insertion of the anterior talofibular ligament. J Foot Ankle Surg, 61(4): 689-94. [DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2021.10.031]
7. Do WS, Kim JH, Lim JR, et al. (2022) Pull-out strength of suture anchor and torque of buddy anchor for an osteoporotic humeral head in rotator cuff repair: Parallel versus divergent insertion. Am J Sports Med, 50(10): 2782-6. [DOI:10.1177/03635465221104766]
8. Euler SA, Hengg C, Kolp D, et al. (2014) Lack of fifth anchoring point and violation of the insertion of the rotator cuff during antegrade humeral nailing: pitfalls in straight antegrade humeral nailing. Bone Joint J, 96-b(2): 249-53. [DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.31293]
9. Suluova F, Kanatli U, Ozturk BY, et al. (2014) Humeral head cysts: association with rotator cuff tears and age. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 24(5): 733-9. [DOI:10.1007/s00590-013-1247-5]
10. Fotiadou AN, Vlychou M, Papadopoulos P, et al. (2008) Ultrasonography of symptomatic rotator cuff tears compared with MR imaging and surgery. European Journal of Radiology, 68(1): 174-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.002]
11. Gilat R, Atoun E, Cohen O, et al. (2018) Recurrent rotator cuff tear: is ultrasound imaging reliable? Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 27(7): 1263-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.017]
12. Thamyongkit S, Wanitchanont T, Chulsomlee K, et al. (2022) The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale: translation, reliability and validation of a Thai version of UCLA shoulder scale in rotator cuff tear patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 23(1): 65. [DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05018-0]
13. Sung YT and Wu JS (2018) The visual analogue scale for rating, ranking and paired-comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement. Behav Res Methods, 50(4): 1694-715. [DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8]
14. Huegel J, Williams AA, Soslowsky LJ (2015) Rotator cuff biology and biomechanics: a review of normal and pathological conditions. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 17(1): 476. [DOI:10.1007/s11926-014-0476-x]
15. Greenspoon JA, Petri M, Warth RJ, et al. (2015) Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 24(9): 1493-505. [DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.005]
16. Narvani AA, Imam MA, Godenèche A, et al. (2020) Degenerative rotator cuff tear, repair or not repair? A review of current evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 102(4): 248-55. [DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2019.0173]
17. Keener JD, Patterson BM, Orvets N, et al. (2019) Degenerative rotator cuff tears: refining surgical indications based on natural history data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 27(5): 156-65. [DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00480]
18. Lewis J (2016) Rotator cuff related shoulder pain: Assessment, management and uncertainties. Man Ther, 23: 57-68. [DOI:10.1016/j.math.2016.03.009]
19. Cole BJ and Romeo AA (2001) Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with suture anchors: technique, technology, and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (390): 17-30. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-200109000-00005]
20. Liu T, Zhang MT, Zhou JP, et al. (2022) [Progress on arthroscopic surgery for massive rotator cuff tears]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 35(12): 1177-82.
21. Chianca V, Albano D, Messina C, et al. (2018) Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: from diagnosis to treatment. Acta Biomed, 89(1-s): 186-96.
22. Yamakado K (2021) Two techniques for treating medium-sized supraspinatus tears: The medially based single-row technique and the suture bridge technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 11(2). [DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00004]
23. Wall LB, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, et al. (2012) Diagnostic performance and reliability of ultrasonography for fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 94(12): e83. [DOI:10.2106/JBJS.J.01899]
24. Adler RS (2013) Postoperative rotator cuff. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology, 17(1): 12-9. [DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1333909]
25. Gyftopoulos S, Cardoso MDS, Rodrigues TC, et al. (2022) Postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 219(5): 717-23. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.22.27847]
26. Chen X, Wang Y, Chen J, et al. (2023) Clinical value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the morphologic evaluation of rotator cuff tear: a prospective study. European Radiology, 33(4): 2331-9. [DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09213-4]
27. Lee SC, Williams D, Endo Y (2018) The repaired rotator cuff: MRI and ultrasound evaluation. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 11(1): 92-101. [DOI:10.1007/s12178-018-9463-6]
28. Galasso O, Mantovani M, Muraccini M, et al. (2020) The latissimus dorsi tendon functions as an external rotator after arthroscopic-assisted transfer for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 28(7): 2367-76. [DOI:10.1007/s00167-019-05819-2]
29. Cavalier M, Jullion S, Kany J, et al. (2018) Management of massive rotator cuff tears: Prospective study in 218 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 104(8s): S193-s7. [DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.007]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Wu S, Yu Z, Lin W, Xu W, Luo Y, Guan S. Application of two-dimensional color ultrasonography technology to evaluate the postoperative repair of massive rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic humeral insertion displacement treatment. Int J Radiat Res 2024; 22 (1) :125-130
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-5223-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 1 (1-2024) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660