[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.



:: Volume 2, Issue 2 (9-2004) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2004, 2(2): 63-68 Back to browse issues page
Staff and patient absorbed doses due to diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures
F. Tabeie , I. Neshandar Asli , S.M. Aghamiri , K. Arbabi
, tabeie_far@sbmu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (18310 Views)

Background: Annual patient effective dose equivalent can be considered as a quantitative physical parameter describing the activities performed in each nuclear medicine department. Annual staff dose equivalent could be also considered as a parameter describing the amount of radiation risk for performing the activities. We calculated the staff to patient dose equivalent ratio to be used as a physical parameter for quantification of ALARA law in nuclear medicine departments.

Materials and Methods: As a part of nationwide study, this paper reports the staff and patient absorbed dose equivalents from diagnostic nuclear medicine examinations performed in four nuclear medicine departments during 1999-2002. The type and frequency of examinations in each department were determined directly from hospital medical reports. Staff absorbed dose equivalents were calculated from regular personal dosimeter reports.

Results: The total number of examinations increased by 16.7% during these years. Annual
patient collective dose equivalent ( EDE ) increased about 13.0% and the mean effective dose equivalent per exam was 3.61±0.07 mSv. Annual total staff absorbed dose equivalent (total of 24 radiation workers) in four departments increased from 40.45 mSv to 47.81 mSv during four years that indicates an increase of about 20.6%. The average of annual ratios of staff to patient effective dose equivalents in four departments were 1.83×10-3, 1.04×10-3, 3.28×10-3 and 3.24×10-3, respectively, within a range of 0.9×10-3 – 4.17×10-3 . The mean value of ratios in four years was about 2.24×10-3 ± 1.09×10-3 that indicates the staff dose of about two 1000th of
patient dose.

Conclusion: The mean value of ratios in four years was about 1.89×10-3 ± 0.95×10-3 indicating the staff dose of about one 1000th of the patient dose. The staff to patient absorbed dose equivalent ratio could be used as a quantitative parameter for describing ALARA law in radiation protection and risk-benefit assessments. Iran . J. Radiat. Res., 2004 2 (2): 63-68

Keywords: staff and patient effective dose equivalent, Diagnostic nuclear medicine
Full-Text [PDF 256 kb]   (2700 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

F. Tabeie, I. Neshandar Asli, S.M. Aghamiri, K. Arbabi. Staff and patient absorbed doses due to diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures . Int J Radiat Res 2004; 2 (2) :63-68
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-58-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 2 (9-2004) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4624