1. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. (2018) Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med, 379(20): 1895-1904. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1806395]

2. Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, et al. (2018) Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med, 379(20): 1905-1914. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1804923]

3. Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, et al. (2020) Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol, 6(7): 1019-1027. [DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694]

4. Obermair A, Asher R, Pareja R, et al. (2020) Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 222(3): 249.e1-249.e10. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036]

5. Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, et al. (2020) SUCCOR study Group. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(9): 1269-1277.

6. Frumovitz M, Obermair A, Coleman RL, et al. (2020) Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol, 21(6):851-860. [DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4]

7. van Workum F, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, et al. (2021) ICAN collaborative research group. Intrathoracic vs cervical anastomosis after totally or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg, 156(7): 601-610.

8. Tavakoli F, Khatami SS, Momeni F, et al. (2021) Cervical cancer diagnosis: Insights into biochemical biomarkers and imaging techniques. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, 24(5): 605-623. [DOI:10.2174/1386207323666200901101955]

9. Nica A, Kim SR, Gien LT, et al. (2020) Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Int J Gynecol Cancer, 30(12): 1864-1870. [DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001816]

10. Kim SI, Park DC, Lee SJ, et al. (2021) Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement. Int J Med Sci, 18(10): 2204-2208. [DOI:10.7150/ijms.55026]

11. Li LY, Wen LY, Park SH, et al. (2021) Impact of the learning curve on the survival of abdominal or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Cancer Res Treat, 53(1): 243-251. [DOI:10.4143/crt.2020.063]

12. Wang Y, Wang A, Zhan J, et al. (2021) Curative effect of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection on early-stage cervical cancer. J BUON, 26(3): 684-690.

13. Ratiu D, Luncescu C, Morgenstern B, et al. (2019) Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer. Anticancer Res, 39(5): 2661-2664. [DOI:10.21873/anticanres.13390]

14. Dhanaworavibul K, Leetanaporn K, Wattanapaisal P, et al. (2023) Association between resting heart rate and oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who have undergone radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Oncol Res Treat, 46(5): 192-200. [DOI:10.1159/000529969]

15. Miller H, Matsuo K, Roman LD, et al. (2021) Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery. Radiat Oncol, 16(1): 123. Erratum in: Radiat Oncol, 16(1): 162. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-021-01843-0]

16. Baessler K, Windemut S, Chiantera V, et al. (2021) Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Clin Transl Oncol, 23(11): 2335-2343. [DOI:10.1007/s12094-021-02632-7]

17. Gan YX, Du QH, Li J, et al. (2021) Adjuvant radiotherapy after minimally invasive surgery in patients with stage IA1-IIA1 cervical cancer. Front Oncol, 11: 690777. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.690777]

18. Di Donato V, Bogani G, Casarin J, Ghezzi F, Malzoni M, Falcone F, et al. (2023) Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis. Gynecol Oncol, 174: 49-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.030]

19. Uppal S, Gehrig PA, Peng K, et al. (2020) Recurrence rates in patients with cervical cancer treated with abdominal versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional retrospective review study. J Clin Oncol, 38(10): 1030-1040. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.19.03012]

20. Chua PT, Lee CL, Huang KG (2020) 100%5-Year Survival Rate in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer is an Achievable Task. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 9(2): 53. [DOI:10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_23_20]

21. Courcier H, Azaïs H, Belghiti J, et al. (2021) Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Rediscovering the Schautheim robot-assisted procedure. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 50(2): 101980. [DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101980]

22. Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, et al. (2012) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol, 23(4): 903-11. [DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdr360]

23. Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. (2014) Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21(5): 857-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.018]

24. Ditto A, Martinelli F, Bogani G, et al. (2015) Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations. Eur J Surg Oncol, 41(1): 34-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.058]

25. Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, et al. (2017) Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol, 28(6): e82. [DOI:10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82]

26. Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, et al. (2019) No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer, 116: 169-177. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.016]

27. Wallin E, FlöterRådestad A, Falconer H (2017) Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome. Acta ObstetGynecol Scand, 96(5): 536-542. [DOI:10.1111/aogs.13112]

28. Cusimano MC, Baxter NN, Gien LT, et al. (2019) Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221(6): 619.e1-619.e24. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.009]

29. Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, et al. (2020) SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 30(9): 1269-1277. [DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506]

30. Salvo G, Ramirez PT, Leitao M, et al. (2019) International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 29(3): 635-638. [DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000273]

31. Levine MD, Brown J, Crane EK, et al. (2018) Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 28(4): 824-828. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021]

32. Gallotta V, Giudice MT, Conte C, et al. (2018) Minimally invasive salvage lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer patients: A single institution series. Eur J Surg Oncol, 44(10): 1568-1572. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.006]

33. Jensen PT, Schnack TH, Frøding LP, et al. (2020) Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study. Eur J Cancer, 128: 47-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.020]

34. Kim M, Kong TW, Kim S, et al. (2019) Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement. J Gynecol Oncol, 30(5): e104. [DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.032]

35. Nasioudis D, Albright BB, Haggerty AF, et al. (2021) Survival following minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with cervical carcinoma and tumor size ≤2 cm. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 224(3): 317-318. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.044]

36. Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, et al. (2020) Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol, 6(7): 1019-1027. [DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694]

37. Wang Y, Li B, Ren F, et al. (2020) Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol, 10: 1236. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.01236]