[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 24, Issue 2 (4-2026) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2026, 24(2): 509-514 Back to browse issues page
Optimizing bolus application in postmastectomy radiotherapy: A dosimetric study on the impact of frequency and reoptimization
Z. Shan , F. Zhou
Department of Radiotherapy, Luohu People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China , fszl2025@163.com
Abstract:   (376 Views)
Background: This study assessed the dosimetric implications of a reduced-frequency bolus regimen combined with treatment plan reoptimization in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), with the goal of optimizing target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose sparing. Materials and Methods: Eighteen post-mastectomy patients scheduled for radiotherapy were enrolled. CT simulation was performed without bolus. A baseline plan (Plan(all)) was created using a virtual bolus to meet clinical objectives. Two derivative plans were generated from Plan(all): Plan (nobolus)- direct bolus removal without re-optimization and Plan(nobolus-new)- re-optimized after bolus removal to enhance target coverage. Three hybrid 25-fraction plans were generated by combining fractions of Plan(all) and Plan (nobolus): Plan(20bolus) (20 fractions Plan(all)+5 fractions Plan(nobolus)), Plan(18bolus)(18+7), and Plan(13bolus)(13+12). Similarly, three additional hybrid plans were constructed by combining Plan(all) with Plan(nobolus-new): Plan(20bolus-new), Plan(18bolus-new) and Plan(13bolus-new). Dosimetric parameters were compared across all plans. Results: Compared with Plan(nobolus), Plan(nobolus-new) offered improved target coverage, reduced high-dose volumes within the target, and enhanced dose homogeneity, albeit at the expense of elevated doses to the lungs, heart, and skin. Notably, Plan(13bolus-new) achieved comparable skin dose (body2mm/D10cc: 50.19±1.33 Gy vs 50.19±0.46 Gy, P>0.05) and high-dose target volume (PTV/D2%: 52.95±0.25 Gy vs 52.99±0.20 Gy, P>0.05) relative to the Plan(20bolus), while yielding statistically superior target coverage (PTV/V95%p: 96.59±1.86% vs 97.36 ±1.53%, P<0.05). Conclusion: A reduction in bolus application frequency compromises target coverage yet attenuates skin dose. A strategy combining reduced bolus frequency with plan reoptimization represents a feasible approach to minimize bolus use while preserving both target coverage and skin dose parameters.
Keywords: Post-radical mastectomy radiotherapy, bolus, plan design, plan dosimetry.
Full-Text [PDF 774 kb]   (100 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. 1. Whelan TJ, Julian J, Wright J, et al. (2000) Does locore- gional radiation therapy improve survival in breast cancer? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol, 18: 1220-1229. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.6.1220]
2. Dahn HM, Boersma LJ, Ruysscher DD, et al. (2021) The use of bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 18: 103391. [DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103391]
3. McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, et al. (2014) Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomized trials. Lancet, 383: 2127-2135. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8]
4. Bilge H, Cakir A, Okutan M, et al. (2009) Surface dose measurements with GafChromic EBT film for 6 and 18MV photon beams. Phys Med, 25(2): 101-104. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.05.001]
5. Inal A and Us SB. (2024) The effect of MATLAB-based metal artifact reduction software on radiotherapy dose distribution. Int J Radiat Res. 2024(2): 22. [DOI:10.61186/ijrr.22.2.367]
6. Mayadev J, Einck J, Elson S, et al. (2015) Practice patterns in the delivery of radiation therapy after mastectomy among the University of California Athena Breast Health Network. Clin Breast Cancer, 15: 43-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2014.07.005]
7. Nichol A, Dylan Narinesingh MD, Srinivas Raman MAS, et al. (2021) The effect of bolus on local control for patients treated with mastectomy and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 110(5):1360-1369. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.019]
8. Manger R, Paxton A, Cervi OL (2016) Dosimetric assessment of brass mesh bolus for postmastectomy photon radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 17(6): 6221. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6221]
9. Won Y and Kim S (2025) Usefulness of cast-type bolus produced by 3D printing for photon beam treatment of primary cutaneous lymphoma: A phantom experiment. Int J Radiat Res, 2025, 23(1): 69-75. [DOI:10.61186/ijrr.23.1.69]
10. Andic F, Ors Y, Rima D (2009) Evaluation of skin dose associated with different frequencies of bolus applications in post-mastectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Exp Clin Canc Res, 28(1): 41-41. [DOI:10.1186/1756-9966-28-41]
11. Jiang T, Tian J, Lei P, et al. (2024) The impact of bolus on clinical outcomes for post-mastectomy breast cancer patients treated with IMRT: data from China. Radiat Oncol, 19(1): 64. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02456-z]
12. Tieu MT, Graham P, Browne L, et al. (2011) The effect of adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy bolus technique on local recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys, 81: 165-e171. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.002]
13. ICRU 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Press; 1993.
14. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, et al. (2010) Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): An introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol, 76: S3-S9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040]
15. Lv R, Yang G, Huang Y, et al. (2021) Dosimetric effects of supine immobilization devices on the skin in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer, 21(1): 384. [DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08119-6]
16. Andic F, Ors Y, Davutoglu R, et al. (2009) Evaluation of skin dose associated with different frequencies of bolus applications in post- mastectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 28: 41. [DOI:10.1186/1756-9966-28-41]
17. Hosseini FS, Baghani HR, Robatjazi M, et al. (2023) Performance evaluation of buildup bolus during external radiotherapy of mastectomy patients: treatment planning and film dosimetry. Med Biol Eng Comput, 61(2): 435-444. [DOI:10.1007/s11517-022-02721-x]
18. Vyas V, Palmer L, Mudge R, et al. (2013) On bolus for megavoltage photon and electron radiation therapy. Medical Dosimetry, 38(3): 268-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.007]
19. Chung SY, Chang JS, Shin KH et al. (2021) Impact of radiation dose on complications among women with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A multi-institutional validation study, ScienceDirect. The Breast, 2021: 7-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2021.01.003]
20. Alexandra G, Michael R, Che Hsuan D, et al. (2023) The transition in practice to reduce bolus use in post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A dosimetric study of skin and subcutaneous tissue. Medical dosimetry, 48(2): 113-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2023.01.006]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shan Z, Zhou F. Optimizing bolus application in postmastectomy radiotherapy: A dosimetric study on the impact of frequency and reoptimization. Int J Radiat Res 2026; 24 (2) :509-514
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-7052-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 24, Issue 2 (4-2026) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741