1. 1. Sailer AM, Paulis L, Vergoossen L, et al. (2017) Real-time patient and staff radiation dose monitoring in IR practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 40:421-429. [ DOI:10.1007/s00270-016-1526-8] 2. ICRP (2018) Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures. ICRP publication 139. Ann ICRP., 47(2): 1-118. [ DOI:10.1177/0146645317750356] 3. Mashoufi R and Mashoufi R (2023) Interventional radiology for disease management: A narrative review. Cureus, 15(11): e48603. [ DOI:10.7759/cureus.48603] 4. Talapko J, Talapko D, Katalinić D, et al. (2024) Health effects of ionizing radiation on the human body. Medicina (B Aires), 60(4): 653. [ DOI:10.3390/medicina60040653] 5. Gibb AA, Lazaropoulos MP, Elrod JW (2020) Myofibroblasts and fibrosis: mitochondrial and metabolic control of cellular differentiation. Circ Res, 127(3): 427-447. [ DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316958] 6. Ejaz A, Greenberger JS, Rubin PJ (2019) Understanding the mechanism of radiation induced fibrosis and therapy options. Pharmacol Ther, 204:107399. [ DOI:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107399] 7. Vano E, Sanchez Casanueva R, Fernandez Soto JM, Bartal G (2021) Challenges in occupational dosimetry for interventional radiologists. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 44(6): 866-870. [ DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02725-w] 8. Lee WJ, Bang YJ, Cha ES, Kim YM, Cho SB (2021) Lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among workers at interventional radiology departments. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 94: 139-145. [ DOI:10.1007/s00420-020-01569-8] 9. Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M (2010) Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res, 174(4): 490-495. [ DOI:10.1667/RR2207.1] 10. Machan L. (2018) The eyes have it. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 21(1): 21-25. [ DOI:10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.005] 11. Matuszak N, Piotrowski I, Kruszyna-Mochalska M, Skrobala A, Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz M, Malicki J (2024) Monte Carlo methods to assess biological response to radiation in peripheral organs and in critical organs near the target. Reports Pract Oncol Radiother J Gt Cancer Cent Pozn Polish Soc Radiat Oncol., 29(5): 638-648. [ DOI:10.5603/rpor.103525] 12. Khosravi H, Ghazikhanlu sani K, Jafari S, Nikzad S (2023) Evaluation of the radiation protection capability of a low density and non-Lead composite shield using Monte Carlo model TT. Int J-Radiat Res, 21(4): 833-836. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.21.4.833] 13. Kholghi N, Pouladian M, Shabestani Monfared A (2023) Modification of binomial lateral spreading function for oblique electron beams in pencil beam algorithm based on Monte Carlo simulations TT. Int J Radiat Res, 21(4):789-795. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.21.4.789] 14. Herwiningsih S and Fielding AL (2023) Monte Carlo simulation for verification of lung stereotactic treatment plans delivered with an Elekta beam modulator collimator systems TT. Int J Radiat Res , 21(4):757-764. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.21.4.757] 15. Yeke Dehghan AB, Mostaar A, Azadeh P (2023) Implementation of geant4 application for tomography emission Monte Carlo Code in the calculation of dose distribution in external radiation therapy TT. Int J Radiat Res, 21(4): 663-673. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.21.4.663] 16. León MI, Quispe B, Gutiérrez L, et al. (2024) Eye lens dose estimations in chest computed tomography examinations using Monte Carlo simulations in a Siemens SOMATOM perspective scanner TT. Int J Radiat Res, 22(4): 853-860. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.22.4.853] 17. Qomariyah N, Haryanto F, Waris A, Wirawan R (2025) Investigation of the effects of tissue material on the energy spectrum from Bebig Co-60 High Dose Rate Brachytherapy source based on the Monte Carlo simulation TT. Int J Radiat Res, 23(1): 97-102. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.23.1.97] 18. Talebi AS and Rajabi H (2024) Spread-out of Bragg peak of proton beam using Au nanoparticles: A Monte Carlo simulation study TT. Int J Radiat Res, 22(3): 697-701. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.22.3.697] 19. Zuber SH, Abdul Hadi MFR, Hashikin NAA, et al. (2022) Estimation of linear and mass attenuation coefficients of soy-lignin bonded Rhizophora spp. Particleboard as a potential phantom material using caesium-137 and cobalt-60. Radiat Environ Biophys, 61(3): 435-443. [ DOI:10.1007/s00411-022-00978-2] 20. Zuber SH, Hadi MFRA, Samson DO, et al. (2023) Dosimetric Analysis of Rhizophora-based Phantom Material in Radiation Therapy Applications Using Monte Carlo GATE Simulation. J Med Phys, 48(4): 358-364. [ DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_75_23] 21. Zuber SH, Hadi MFRA, Hashikin NAA, et al. (2025) Dosimetric evaluation of brain radiotherapy using custom-made Rhizophora head phantom-comparison between Monte Carlo GATE and treatment planning system MONACO. Int J Radiat Res, 23(1): 13-20. [ DOI:10.61186/ijrr.23.1.13] 22. Binti Zuber SH, Hadi MFRA, Hashikin NAA, Yusof MFM, Aziz MZA (2024) Rhizophora-based particleboard bonded with soy flour and lignin as potential phantom. BioResources, 19(3): 5467-5482. [ DOI:10.15376/biores.19.3.5467-5482] 23. Di Mario C and Sutaria N (2005) Coronary angiography in the angioplasty era: projections with a meaning. Heart, 91(7): 968-976. [ DOI:10.1136/hrt.2005.063107] 24. Nan W, Zhang L, Li S, et al. (2024) Achieving Ultrahigh Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in Highly Stable Cs3Cu2I5 Perovskite Single Crystals Through Melt Growth. Inorg Chem, 63(50): 23691-23697. [ DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c03588] 25. Wang WH, Wei KC, Huang WC, Yen YY, Mar GY (2021) Radiation reduction and protection for radiosensitive organs (Lens, thyroid, and genital organs) of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention-real-world measurement of radiation dose in a single center. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 8(8). [ DOI:10.3390/jcdd8080099] 26. Wei KC, Bee YS, Wang WH, Huang YT, Lu TH (2016) Incidence of cataract surgery in patients after percutaneous cardiac intervention in Taiwan. JAMA Intern Med, 176(5): 710-711. [ DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0554] 27. Shikhar A, Akhil P, Singh BN, et al. (2014) Relationship of Beam Angulation and Radiation Exposure in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 7(5): 558-566. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.203] 28. Haqqani OP, Agarwal PK, Halin NM, Iafrati MD (2012) Minimizing radiation exposure to the vascular surgeon. J Vasc Surg, 55(3): 799-805. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.055] 29. Leyton F, Nogueira MS, Gubolino LA, Pivetta MR, Ubeda C (2016) Correlation between scatter radiation dose at height of operator's eye and dose to patient for different angiographic projections. Appl Radiat Isot, 117: 100-105. [ DOI:10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.01.013] 30. Roh Y, Kim J, Park H, Kim J, Ryu D, Chun K, Yoon Y (2021) Effect of exposure angulation on the occupational radiation exposure during cardiac angiography: simulation study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(15), 8097. [ DOI:10.3390/ijerph18158097] 31. Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T (2010) Reducing radiation exposure during endovascular procedures. Endovasc Surg E-b Expert Consult Print, with Video, 500: 41. [ DOI:10.1016/B978-1-4160-6208-0.10005-9] 32. Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P (2009) ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP, 39(2): 1-164. [ DOI:10.1016/j.icrp.2009.09.001]
|