[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Monte Carlo modeling for the computation of in-field and out-of-field doses in 3D conformal radiotherapy of breast cancer
N. Rafat-Motavalli , H. Miri-Hakimabad , E. Hoseinian-Azghadi , L. Rafat-Motavalli , M. Dayyani , T. Tuğrul
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran , mirihakim@um.ac.ir
Abstract:   (11 Views)
Background: To generate the Monte Carlo (MC) 3D dose distribution in both in-field and out-of-field regions for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) of breast cancer patients and to compare it with the dose calculations from two available commercial treatment planning systems (TPS). Material and Methods: The Prowess Panther TPS was initially used to create the treatment plan and underwent a simulation process using the MCNPX 2.6.0 Monte Carlo code. Dose maps, profiles, dose volume histograms (DVHs), and mean doses for organs at risk (OARs) were calculated. To evaluate the accuracy of dose calculations, global gamma index analysis was conducted to ensure conformity between MC dose calculations and the two TPSs. Results: For individual beams, comparing Prowess to MC shows that the gamma passing rates (GPR) range from 94.3% to 99.2%, with a GPR of 91.2% for all beams combined. In contrast, when comparing RayStation to MC, the GPRs range from 96.0% to 99.0%, with a total beam GPR of 94.3%. Regarding out-of-field doses, the two TPSs can provide reliable dose calculations only for organs receiving mean doses greater than 500-700 cGy. Conclusion: The MC model was benchmarked for 3DCRT plans, demonstrating that it could provide accurate MC doses in the in-field area. Furthermore, the comparison between MC and TPS doses shows that RayStation performs better in the in-field region. Nonetheless, both TPS-based out-of-field estimates were unreliable, indicating the importance of utilizing MC methods to estimate out-of-field doses.
Keywords: Monte Carlo, breast cancer, radiotherapy.
Full-Text [PDF 1429 kb]   (2 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741