[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

Volume 9, Issue 1 (6-2011)                   Int J Radiat Res 2011, 9(1): 29-36 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jabbari N, Nedaie H, Zeinali A. Evaluation of the electron energy fluence and angular distributions from a clinical accelerator. A BEAMnrc Monte Carlo study. Int J Radiat Res 2011; 9 (1) :29-36
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-729-en.html
, njabbarimp@gmail.com
Abstract:   (13396 Views)
Background: Understanding of the incident electron energy and angular distributions from clinical electron accelerators (linacs) is important for dosimetry and treatment planning. The most important goals of this study were to evaluate the energy fluence and angular distributions of electron beams from a Neptun 10PC linac using the Monte Carlo (MC) code. Materials and Methods: The linac electron beams (6, 8, and 10 MeV) were modeled, using the BEAMnrc MC system based on the Electron- Gamma-Shower (EGSnrc) code. Central axis depthdose curves and dose profiles of the electron beams were measured experimentally, and calculated with the MC for three field sizes. In order to benchmarking the simulated models, the calculated and measured dose distributions were compared with Kolmogorov– Smirnov (KS) statistical test. Results: The KS test indicated that the calculated percent depth dose (PDD) and dose profile values for the three electron beam energies well agree with measured data (within 2% everywhere). The results also showed good agreement (discrepancies smaller than 1%) between the simulated electron energy parameters and those calculated from energy-range relationships using equations for the reference field size. Conclusion: The results showed that there was no significant difference between energy fluence curves of each electron beam energy at different field sizes. In addition, the results of the calculated angular distributions showed that the direction of the electron emerged from the treatment head and trimmer applicators were in forward direction. Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2011 9(1): 29-36
Full-Text [PDF 258 kb]   (5277 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4722