[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 19, Issue 3 (7-2021) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2021, 19(3): 531-541 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for cranio-spinal irradiation: A rando - phantom based dosimetric study
E.O. Goksel, E. Tezcanli, M. Okutan, H. Bilge, Y. Yildiz Yarar
Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Vocational School of Health Services, Radiotherapy Program, Istanbul, Turkey , e.ozangoksel@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1382 Views)
Background: In this study, clinical advantages and the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI) were investigated and compared with field in field (FinF) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. Materials and Methods: The organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volume (PTV) were generated on the RANDO phantom computerized tomography (CT) image series. The dose–volume parameters for PTVs and OARs were compared for three techniques. Furthermore, the dose distribution inside the RANDO phantom was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) for all three techniques. Comparisons were done between measured and calculated doses of field junctions, targets and OARs. Results: FinF failed to obtain an adequate dose distribution for the upper spine (US), while VMAT and IMRT provided good dose coverage for all parts of the PTV. The most homogeneous dose distribution at the field junctions was obtained with the VMAT. Although heart, thyroid, intestine, lung, liver and testicular maximum doses were lower for the VMAT, the mean doses were higher except for the heart and thyroid. The absolute volume receiving prescription dose was significantly lower for the VMAT. The median differences between the TLD measurements and TPS calculations were 0.27% (7.8, -9.7; p=0.394), -0.28% (8.1, -10.7; p=0.322) and -0.33% (8.4, -12; p=0.338) for the FinF, IMRT and VMAT, respectively.  These differences were not found statistically significant for the VMAT technique, as were the other two techniques. Conclusion: We conclude that the VMAT technique is the optimal Linac based CSI treatment in regards to dose coverage, dose homogeneity in field junctions and OAR sparing for higher doses. In addition, the VMAT showed dose distribution accuracy as good as the two other techniques in measurements simulating real clinical situations.
Keywords: Cranio-spinal irradiation, VMAT, TLD, RANDO phantom.
Full-Text [PDF 1743 kb]   (817 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiobiology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Goksel E, Tezcanli E, Okutan M, Bilge H, Yildiz Yarar Y. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for cranio-spinal irradiation: A rando - phantom based dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Res. 2021; 19 (3) :531-541
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-3762-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 19, Issue 3 (7-2021) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4419