[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.



:: Volume 20, Issue 4 (10-2022) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2022, 20(4): 747-751 Back to browse issues page
Radiation dose optimization for computed tomography of the head in pediatric population – An experimental phantom study
Priyanka , R. Kadavigere , S. Sukumar
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India , rajarad@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1051 Views)
Background: There is an increase in pediatric Computed Tomography (CT) imaging with advancement in technology but CT radiation dose produces significant adverse effects. The objective of this experimental phantom study is to develop an age-based low-dose pediatric CT head protocol. Materials and Methods: Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) pediatric head mimicking phantom scanning was performed on a CT scanner using various combinations of tube voltage (kV) and product of tube current and exposure time (mAs) setting. Images were reconstructed by iterative reconstruction iDose4 level 1-5.  Quantitative assessment of image quality (IQ) was done by calculating Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), and Image Noise (IN). Radiation dose indices (RDI) were measured by recording Volumetric CT Dose Index (CTDIv) and Dose length product (DLP). Figure of Merit (FOM) was calculated to study overall effects between IQ and RDI. IQ and RDI obtained using different exposure settings were compared. Result: Optimized age-based low-dose protocols were developed based on IQ analysis and RDI. For pediatric CT head, with age less than one year kV and mAs of 80 and 150 and for one–five years age kV and mAs of 100 and 200 with iDose4 level-3 was found to be optimum low dose protocol. Conclusion: The experimental phantom study concluded that with use of low kVp and mAs, radiation dose was reduced to 62% for less than 1-year age group and 51% for 1-5 year age group and also with use of iterative reconstruction technique iDose4 level-3 diagnostic image quality was maintained.
Keywords: Computed tomography, pediatric population, radiation dose, dose optimization, CT image quality.
Full-Text [PDF 1743 kb]   (556 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
1. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, et al. (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr, 167(8): 700-707. [DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311] [PMID] []
2. Thukral BB (2015) Problems and preferences in pediatric imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 25(4): 359-364. [DOI:10.4103/0971-3026.169466] [PMID] []
3. Almohiy H (2014) Paediatric computed tomography radiation dose: A review of the global dilemma. World J Radiol, 6(1): 1-6. [DOI:10.4329/wjr.v6.i1.1] [PMID] []
4. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176(2): 289-296. [DOI:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289] [PMID]
5. Brenner DJ and Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med, 357(22): 2277-2284. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra072149] [PMID]
6. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res, 168(1): 1-64. [DOI:10.1667/RR0763.1] [PMID]
7. Sodhi KS, Krishna S, Saxena AK, Sinha A, Khandelwal N, Lee EY (2015) Clinical application of 'Justification' and 'Optimization' principle of ALARA in pediatric CT imaging: How many children can be protected from unnecessary radiation? Eur J Radiol, 84(9): 1752-1757. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.030] [PMID]
8. Recommended citation ICRP, (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 37(2-4): 1-332.
9. Radiological protection and safety in medicine (1996) A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP, 26(2): 1-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2]
10. Patino M, Fuentes JM, Hayano K, Kambadakone AR, Uyeda JW, Sahani DV (2015) A quantitative comparison of noise reduction across five commercials (hybrid and model-based) iterative reconstruction techniques: an anthropomorphic phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 204(2): W176-83. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.14.12519] [PMID]
11. Love A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stalhammar F, Bjorkman-Burtscher IM, Soderberg M (2013) Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol, 86(1031): 20130388. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.20130388] [PMID] []
12. Baskan O, Erol C, Ozbek H, Paksoy Y (2015) Effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality in adult head CT with noise-suppressing reconstruction system with a 256 slice MDCT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 16(3): 5360. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5360] [PMID] []
13. Chang KP, Hsu TK, Lin WT, Hsu WL (2017) Optimization of dose and image quality in adult and pediatric computed tomography scans. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 140: 260-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.02.006]
14. Kordolaimi SD, Saradeas I, Ploussi A, Pantos I, Argentos S, Efstathopoulos EP (2014) Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 203(4): W434-W439. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.13.11973] [PMID]
15. Seo N, Chung YE, An C, Choi JY, Park MS, Kim MJ (2018) Feasibility of radiation dose reduction with iterative reconstruction in abdominopelvic CT for patients with inappropriate arm positioning. PLoS One, 13(12): e0209754. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209754] [PMID] []
16. Bodelle B, Wichmann JL, Scholtz JE, Lehnert T, Vogl TJ, Luboldt W, Schulz B (2015) Iterative Reconstruction Leads to Increased Subjective and Objective Image Quality in Cranial CT in patients with Stroke. Am J Roentgenol, 205(3): 618-622. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.15.14389] [PMID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Priyanka, Kadavigere R, Sukumar S. Radiation dose optimization for computed tomography of the head in pediatric population – An experimental phantom study. Int J Radiat Res 2022; 20 (4) :747-751
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4459-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 4 (10-2022) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657