[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: Volume 21, Issue 1 (1-2023) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2023, 21(1): 105-109 Back to browse issues page
Fixed field technique for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy: A feasibility study using Elekta system
R. Vysakh , R. Ganapathi Raman , S.O. Muhammed , N. Puzhakkkal
Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumaracoil- 629 180, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India , vysakhraveendran92@gmail.com
Abstract:   (845 Views)
Background: Treatment planning for Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (ha-WBRT) is demanding and time-consuming due to the position of the Hippocampus and low dose tolerances. This study evaluates the feasibility of fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy (fVMAT) for ha-WBRT using the Elekta Agility™ collimator system and Monaco treatment planning system. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients treated for WBRT were subjected to fVMAT and conventional VMAT (cVMAT) planning with similar optimisation criteria. Jaws were restricted above and below the Hippocampus for the fVMAT plans with isocenter positioned at the brain's center, dividing the brain target into two. In contrast, Jaws were not restricted for cVMAT plans. Plans were compared in terms of dose constraints, dose conformity, and dose homogeneity. Plan complexity was compared in terms of modulation degree (MD), and delivery efficiency was checked by performing patient-specific quality assurance. Results: Both plans met the RTOG-0933 dose requirements. The fVMAT plans showed statistically significant improved target coverage (D98%, V30Gy), target homogeneity, and conformity. There was no statistically significant change in hippocampus doses between the two plans. The fVMAT plans showed lesser plan complexity with average MD of 3.34±0.5 compared to cVMAT plans (average MD of 4.21±0.4, p=0.00011). The increased plan complexity was reflected in the delivery efficiency as cVMAT showed higher average gamma failure for patient3.84%(p=0.0004) and a target volume 7.13% (p=0.0359) structures. Conclusions: According to the obtained results, the Elekta Agility™ collimator system and Monaco treatment planning system can generate better ha-WBRT plans using the fVMAT technique.
Keywords: Treatment planning, VMAT, whole brain radiotherapy, hippocampus sparing.
Full-Text [PDF 803 kb]   (520 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. Aupérin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, Le Péchoux C, Gregor A, (1999) Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(7): 476-84. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199908123410703] [PMID]
2. Kong W, Jarvis CR, Sutton DS, Ding K, Mackillop WJ (2012) The use of palliative whole brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Clinical Oncology, 24(10):e149-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2012.08.004] [PMID]
3. Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, Akabane A, Higuchi Y, et al. (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. The Lancet Oncology, 15(4): 387-95. [DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0]
4. Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, et al. (2004) Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. The Lancet, 363(9422): 1665-72. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8]
5. Aoyama H, Tago M, Shirato H (2015) Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: secondary analysis of the JROSG 99-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncology, 1(4): 457-64. [DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1145]
6. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, Caine C, Corn B, Kanner A, Rowley H, et al. (2014) Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(34): 3810. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909] [PMID] []
7. Sood S, Pokhrel D, McClinton C, Lominska C, et al. (2017) Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for whole brain radiotherapy: not only for hippocampal sparing, but also for reduction of dose to organs at risk. Medical Dosimetry, 42(4): 375-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2017.07.005] [PMID]
8. Jiang A, Sun W, Zhao F, Wu Z, Shang D, et al. (2019) Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with Hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases. Radiation Oncology, 14(1): 1-8. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7] [PMID] []
9. Jiang A, Sun W, Zhao F, Wu Z, Shang D, et al. (2019) Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with Hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases. Radiation Oncology, 14(1): 1-8. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7] [PMID] []
10. Lee K, Lenards N, Holson J (2016) Whole-brain hippocampal sparing radiation therapy: volume-modulated arc therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy case study. Medical Dosimetry, 41(1): 15-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2015.06.003] [PMID]
11. Chen J, Chen X, Huang M, Dai J (2014) A fixed-jaw method to protect critical organs during intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry, 39(4): 325-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.006] [PMID]
12. Lai Y, Chen Y, Wu S, Shi L, Fu L, Ha H, Lin Q (2016) Modified volumetric modulated arc therapy in left sided breast cancer after radical mastectomy with flattening filter free versus flattened beams. Medicine, 95(14). [DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000003295] [PMID] []
13. Huang B, Fang Z, Huang Y, Lin P, Chen Z (2014) A dosimetric analysis of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy with jaw width restriction vs 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer. The British Journal of Radiology, 87(1039): 20140183. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.20140183] [PMID] []
14. Shen J, Bender E, Yaparpalvi R, Kuo HC, Basavatia A, et al. (2015) An efficient volumetric arc therapy treatment planning approach for hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT). Medical Dosimetry, 40(3): 205-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2014.11.007] [PMID]
15. Yuen AH, Wu PM, Li AK, Mak PC (2020) Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy: planning comparison with Dual-arc and Split-arc partial-field techniques. Radiation Oncology, 15(1): 1-0. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-020-01488-5] [PMID] []
16. Narayanasamy G, Saenz D, Cruz W, Ha CS, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S (2016) Commissioning an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 17(1): 179-91. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5799] [PMID] []
17. Prescribing IC (2010) Recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU report, 83(10): 27-40. [DOI:10.1093/jicru_ndq008]
18. Paddick I (2000) A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Journal of Neurosurgery. 93(3): 219-22. [DOI:10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement_3.0219]
19. Chiavassa S, Bessieres I, Edouard M, Mathot M, Moignier A (2019) Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications. The British Journal of Radiology, 92(1102): 20190270. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.20190270] [PMID] []
20. Song W, Lu H, Liu J, Zhao D, Ma J, Zhang B, Yu D, Sun X, Li J (2019) Fixed‐jaw technique to improve IMRT plan quality for the treatment of cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 20(10): 24-32. [DOI:10.1002/acm2.12704] [PMID] []
21. Rossi M, Boman E, Skyttä T, Kapanen M (2016) A novel arc geometry setting for pelvic radiotherapy with extensive nodal involvement. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 17(4): 73-85. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6028] [PMID] []
22. Chiavassa S, Bessieres I, Edouard M, Mathot M, Moignier A (2019) Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications. The British Journal of Radiology, 92(1102): 20190270. [DOI:10.1259/bjr.20190270] [PMID] []
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vysakh R, Ganapathi Raman R, Muhammed S, Puzhakkkal N. Fixed field technique for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy: A feasibility study using Elekta system. Int J Radiat Res 2023; 21 (1) :105-109
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4580-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 21, Issue 1 (1-2023) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4624