[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Keywords
For Authors::
Aims and Scope
Call for Papers
Submission Instructions
For Reviewers::
Referee page
Subscription::
Subscription Form
News & Events::
Journal News
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE
:: Volume 21, Issue 3 (6-2023) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2023, 21(3): 553-560 Back to browse issues page
Effect of collimator scatter factors on dose calculation of different breast cancer cases in radiotherapy
M.A. Eid , H.S. Mohammed , A.M. Abdelaal , S. Taha
Radiotherapy Department, Nasser Institute, Cairo, Egypt , mohamedahmed@gstd.sci.cu.edu.eg
Abstract:   (835 Views)
Background: The present study aims to estimate the effect of collimator, phantom and Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) scatters on dose calculation in different breast cancer cases using acrylic, brass build-up caps and acrylic mini-phantom in the measurements. Materials and Methods: Collimator scatter factors (Sc), phantom scatter factors (Sp) and MLC transmission factors for different field sizes ranging from 1 × 1 cm2 to 40 × 40 cm2  for energies 6 MV and 15 MV  were measured using acrylic mini-phantom (PTW and local mini-phantom), acrylic build up cap and brass build up cap where the farmer ionization chamber was used as detector in this study and semiflex detector was used but only with small field sizes from 1 × 1 cm2  to 4 × 4 cm2 and scatter effect on the dose calculation in different breast cancer cases was evaluated. Results: The results in this study show that there is no significant difference between MLC transmission factors using acrylic mini-phantom and brass build-up cap with energy 6 MV where the transmission factor value is 0.007 and 0.0071 with acrylic mini-phantom and brass build- up cap, respectively.  Also it is clear that brass build-up cap gives the highest collimator scatter factors results where collimator scatter factors start at value 0.963 at field size 4 × 4 cm2 then increase gradually to end at point value 1.049 at field size 40 × 40 cm2. In breast cancer cases, there is sharp increase in organ at risk doses with brass build-up cap. Conclusion: From this study it is evident that almost there is large variation between the acrylic build-up cap, acrylic mini-phantom and brass build-up cap where brass build-up achieve higher results in most measurements.
Keywords: Collimator scatter factor, mini-phantom, build-up cap, brass, MLC transmission.
Full-Text [PDF 1027 kb]   (497 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
References
1. Podgorsak EB (2005) Radiation oncology physics. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 123-271.
2. Bjärngard B (1980) Thermoluminescence dosimetry in the μGy range, by P. Spanne. Medical Physics, 7: 267-267. [DOI:10.1118/1.594807]
3. Jursinic PA (2006) Measurement of head scatter factors of linear accelerators with columnar miniphantoms. Medical physics, 33(6-1): 1720-1728.‌ [DOI:10.1118/1.2201148] [PMID]
4. McKerracher C and Thwaites DI (2007) Head scatter actors for small MV photon fields. Part II: the effects of source size and detector. Radio ther Oncol, 85: 286-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.006] [PMID]
5. Jursinic PA (2006) Measurement of head scatter factors of linear accelerators with columnar miniphantoms. Med linear accelerators with columnar miniphantoms. Med Phys, 33: 1720-28. [DOI:10.1118/1.2201148] [PMID]
6. Jursinic PA (2006) Measurement of head scatter factors of linear accelerators with columnar miniphantoms. Med linear accelerators with columnar miniphantoms. Med Phys, 33: 1720-28. [DOI:10.1118/1.2201148] [PMID]
7. Hauri P, Hälg RA, Besserer J, Schneider U (2016) A general model for stray dose calculation of static and intensity-modulated photon radiation. Medical Physics, 1955-1968. [DOI:10.1118/1.4944421] [PMID]
8. Khan FM, Gibbons JP, Roback DM (1996) Collimator (head) scatter at extended distances in linear accelerator generated photon beams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 35: 605-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(96)80025-3] [PMID]
9. Zhu TC, Ahnesjö A, Lam KL, et al. (2009) Report of AAPM therapy physics committee task group 74: in-air output ratio, Sc, for megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys, 36(11): 5261-91. [DOI:10.1118/1.3227367] [PMID]
10. Spicka J, Herron D, Orton C (1988) Separating output factor into collimator factor and phantom scatter factor for megavoltage photon calculations. Medical Dosimetry, 13(1): 23-24. [DOI:10.1016/S0958-3947(98)90107-8]
11. Khan FM, Sewchand W, Lee J, Williamson JF (1980) Revision of tissue‐maximum ratio and scatter‐maximum ratio concepts for cobalt 60 and higher energy X‐ray beams. Medical physics, 7(3): 230-237. [DOI:10.1118/1.594648] [PMID]
12. Jursinic PA and Thomadsen BR (1999) Measurements of head‐scatter factors with cylindrical build‐up caps and columnar miniphantoms. Medical physics, 26(4): 512-517. [DOI:10.1118/1.598550] [PMID]
13. Weber L, Nilsson P, Ahnesjö A (1997) Build-up cap materials for measurement of photon head-scatter factors. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 42(10), 1875. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/42/10/002] [PMID]
14. Fogliata A, et al. (2018) "Collimator scatter factor: Monte Carlo and in-air measurements approaches. Radiation Oncology, 13(1): 126. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-018-1070-6] [PMID] []
15. Yang Y, Xing L, Li JG, et al. (2003) Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT. Medical physics, 30(11): 2937-2947.‌ [DOI:10.1118/1.1617391] [PMID]
16. Alongi F, Clerici E, Pentimalli S, et al. (2012) Initial experience of hypofractionated radiation retreatment with true beam and flattening filter free beam in selected case reports of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 17(5): 262-268.‌ [DOI:10.1016/j.rpor.2012.07.012] [PMID] []
17. Klein EE, Harms WB, Low DA, et al. (1995) Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol Phys, 33(5): 1195-1208.‌ [DOI:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00198-0] [PMID]
18. Birgani Tahmasebi MJ, Chegeni N, Behrooz MA, et al. (2017) An analytical method to calculate phantom scatter factor for photon beam accelerators. Electronic Physician, 9(1): 3523. [DOI:10.19082/3523] [PMID] []
19. ‌Fogliata A, Stravato A, Reggiori G, et al. (2018) Collimator scatter factor: Monte Carlo and in-air measurements approaches. Radiation Oncology, 13(1): 1-10.‌ [DOI:10.1186/s13014-018-1070-6] [PMID] []
20. Li J and Zhu TC (2006) Measurement of in-air output ratios using different miniphantom materials. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 51(15): 3819. [DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/51/15/015] [PMID]
21. Olofsso J, Nyholm T, Georg, D, et al. (2006). Evaluation of uncertainty predictions and dose output for model‐based dose calculations for megavoltage photon beams. Medical physics, 33(7-1), 2548-2556. [DOI:10.1118/1.2207316] [PMID]
22. Iftikhar A (2012) Measurements of output factors using different ionization chambers and build-up caps. Int J Radiat Res, 10(2): 95-98.
23. Berris T, Mazonakis M, Stratakis J, et al. (2013) Calculation of organ doses from breast cancer radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14(1): 133146. [DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4029] [PMID] []
24. Zurl B, Stranzl H, Winkler P, Kapp KS (2013) Quantification of contralateral breast dose and risk estimate of radiation-induced contralateral breast cancer among young women using tangential fields and different modes of breathing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 85(2), 500-505. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.016] [PMID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Eid M, Mohammed H, Abdelaal A, Taha S. Effect of collimator scatter factors on dose calculation of different breast cancer cases in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Res 2023; 21 (3) :553-560
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-4913-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 21, Issue 3 (6-2023) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652