[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Assessment of the impact of minimum segment width on volumetric modulated Arc therapy planning for head and neck cancer
L. Malar , J. Nagesh , S.S. Nair , C. Shambhavi , S. Lewis , A. Singh , K. Sharan , Y.M. Harshini
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India , jjyothi.nagesh@manipal.edu
Abstract:   (17 Views)
Background: The purpose is to identify the standard minimum segment width [MSW] in terms of planning outcomes of Volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT] in patients with Head and Neck Carcinoma [HNC]. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using planning computed tomography scans from 15 patients diagnosed with head and neck carcinoma. Four separate VMAT plans, utilizing MSW of 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2.0 cm, were created in the Monaco Treatment Planning system [TPS]version 5.11.03. Target volume and critical structures were optimized with the same criteria. The comparison focused on Conformity Index [CI], Homogeneity Index [HI], target volume coverage, dose to Organs at risk [OARs], and total Monitor units (MUs). Data analysis was performed using Jamovi software. At p<0.05, statistical significance was established. Results: MSW of 1.0 cm plans showed significantly enhanced planning target volume [PTV] coverage [p=0.021], fewer monitor units [p=0.03], and an optimal combination of Conformity [CI = 0.816±0.214] and Homogeneity [HI = 1.065±0.017]. Furthermore, the spinal cord received a substantially lower maximum dose in plans created with 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm MSWs compared to those with wider segment widths [p=0.017]. Conclusions: Among the configurations tested, the 1.0 cm MSW offered the most favorable balance between precise target coverage, organ-at-risk sparing, and overall treatment delivery efficiency for head and neck cancer using VMAT planning.
Keywords: Head and Neck Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Planning, VMAT, Organ Sparing, Segment Width.
Full-Text [PDF 859 kb]   (6 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.17 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741