[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 12, Issue 4 (10-2014) ::
Int J Radiat Res 2014, 12(4): 369-372 Back to browse issues page
Rectal wall dose estimation in intracavitary brachytherapy: A preliminary comparison of an in-house rectal wire versus ICRU 38 recommendations
M.A. Mosleh-Shirazi, S. Norouzi, M. Ansari, N. Ahmadloo, S.M.J. Mortazavi, S. Karbasi, A. Mosalaei
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , saeedeh_now@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6174 Views)

Background: In intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological cancers, various techniques are used to locate the anterior rectal wall nearest to the sources but there is no consensus on the best method to do so. This study aimed to compare a technique used routinely in some centers that employs a wire marker to locate the position of the maximum rectal dose point, versus the method recommended by the ICRU Report 38. Materials and Methods: In a preliminary prospective study on 34 intracavitary insertions for patients with cervical or endometrial cancer, treated at our center based on the Manchester system, the dose distributions were obtained from a treatment planning system following the input of scanned orthogonal anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. For each case, an in-house marked wire was inserted in the rectal lumen and the doses were calculated on several points along the wire seen on the radiographs, to obtain the maximum dose. For the same insertions, the ICRU method was also applied by considering the rectal wall hot spot as a point 0.5 cm posterior to the posterior vaginal wall (visualized on the radiographs by vaginal packing material containing contrast medium). Results: Averaged over all insertions, mean rectal wall hot spot dose calculated using the positional information obtained by the wire technique was lower by 28.6% than that given by the ICRU method (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our initial results add evidence to the suggestion that the wire technique underestimates the rectal wall hot spot dose significantly compared to the ICRU method.

Keywords: Rectal wall dose, gynecological brachytherapy, cervical and endometrial cancer, rectal wire, ICRU 38
Full-Text [PDF 755 kb]   (1813 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Short Report | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mosleh-Shirazi M, Norouzi S, Ansari M, Ahmadloo N, Mortazavi S, Karbasi S et al . Rectal wall dose estimation in intracavitary brachytherapy: A preliminary comparison of an in-house rectal wire versus ICRU 38 recommendations. Int J Radiat Res. 2014; 12 (4) :369-372
URL: http://ijrr.com/article-1-1357-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 4 (10-2014) Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4414