1. 1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M (2021) SEER Cancer Statistics Review. National Cancer Institute, posted to the SEER website. Cited 2021 Apr 19. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr. 2. gco.iarc.fr [internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Posted to The Global Cancer Observatory Website. 2020 [cited 2021 March 11]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home 3. Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F, Ghaziani MF, Ghafari A, Khezerloo D, et al. (2020) A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med, 51: 57. [ DOI:10.1186/s43055-020-00175-5] 4. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Carlsson GA (1999) Breast dosimetry. Appl Radiat Isot, 50(1): 185-203. [ DOI:10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-5] 5. Osteras BH, Skaane P, Gullien R, Martinsen ACT (2018) Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: Effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality. Phys Med Biol, 63(3): 035006. [ DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aaa614] [ PMID] 6. Yaffe MJ and Mainprize JG (2010) Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology, 258(1): 98-105. [ DOI:10.1148/radiol.10100655] [ PMID] 7. Nosratieh A, Hernandez A, Shen SZ, Yaffe MJ, Seibert JA, Boone JM (2015) Mean glandular dose coefficients (DgN) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems. Phys Med Biol, 60(18): 7179-90. [ DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7179] [ PMID] [ ] 8. Delis H, Spyrou G, Panayiotakis G, Tzanakos G (2005) a Monte Carlo simulation program for dose related studies in mammography. Eur J Radiol, 54(3): 371-6. [ DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.014] [ PMID] 9. Nigapruke K, Puwanich P, Phaisangittisakul N, Youngdee W (2010) Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors. J Radiat Res, 51(4): 441-8. [ DOI:10.1269/jrr.10008] [ PMID] 10. Kave Z, Deevband MR, Ghorbanee M (2018) Effect of heterogeneous breast tissue on average glandular dose in mammography using simulation. Q J Sch Med Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, 42(1): 34-9. 11. Suleiman ME, Brennan PC, McEntee MF (2017) Mean glandular dose in digital mammography: a dose calculation method comparison. J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 4(1): 013502. [ DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.013502] [ PMID] [ ] 12. Boone JM (1999) Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams. Radiology, 213: 23-37. [ DOI:10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923] [ PMID] 13. Stanton L, Villafana T, Day JL, Lightfoot DA (1984) Dosage evaluation in mammography. Radiology, 150(2): 577-84. [ DOI:10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691119] [ PMID] 14. Alvar AA, Deevband MR, Ashtiyani M (2017) Neutron spectrum unfolding using radial basis function neural networks. Appl Radiat Isot, 129: 35-41. [ DOI:10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.048] [ PMID] 15. Massera RT and Tomal A (2021) Breast glandularity and mean glandular dose assessment using a deep learning framework: Virtual patients study. Phys Medica, 83: 264-77. [ DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.007] [ PMID] 16. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ (2000) Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol, 45(11): 3225-40. [ DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308] [ PMID] 17. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH, De Jesús O (2014) Neural Network Design; 2nd Edition, eBook, Frisco, Texas. 18. Yee PV and Haykin SS (2001) Regularized radial basis function networks: theory and applications. John Wiley. 19. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation second edition. Pearson Education. 20. Hartman EJ, Keeler JD, Kowalski JM (1990) Layered neural networks with Gaussian hidden units as universal approximations. Neural Comput MIT Press, 2(2): 210-5. [ DOI:10.1162/neco.1990.2.2.210] 21. Buhmann MD (2003) Radial basis functions theory and implementations. Cambridge University Press. [ DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511543241] [ ] 22. Bayram S, Ocal Me, Laptali Oral E, Atis Cd (2016) Comparison of multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) for construction cost estimation: The case of Turkey. J Civ Eng Manag. Taylor & Francis, 22(4): 480-490. [ DOI:10.3846/13923730.2014.897988] 23. Avriel M (2003) Nonlinear programming: analysis and methods. Dover Publications. 24. Mohammadi A, Faghihi R, Mehdizadeh S, Hadad K (2005) Total absorbed dose of critical organs in mammography, assessment and comparison of Monte-Carlo method and TLD. Biomed Tech, 50(1): 393-4. 25. Čceke D, Kunosic S, Kopric M, Lincender L (2009) Using neural network algorithms in prediction of mean glandular dose based on the measurable parameters in mammography. Acta Inform Medic, 17(4): 194-7.
|