[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
IJRR Information::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
News & Events::
Web Mail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN
Hard Copy 2322-3243
Online 2345-4229
..
Online Submission
Now you can send your articles to IJRR office using the article submission system.
..

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
New radiobiological comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate plans of seven and five fields
N. Dahdouh , Z. Chaoui , S. Khoudri
Laboratory of Optoelectronics and Devices, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, UFAS1, Algeria , zchaoui@univ-setif.dz
Abstract:   (40 Views)
Background: Based on recently published studies carried out in various institutions, the dosimetric evaluation was conducted to compare 5 and 7-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. So far, dosimetric indexes have been used as the main parameters. The present study is new, it uses more sophisticated tools of evaluation based on radiobiologic indices as recommended. Materials and Methods: A comparative study of five and seven fields IMRT plans of sixteen randomly chosen prostate cancer cases has been evaluated radiobiologically. The modified Poisson model of Marsden allows us to calculate the tumor control probability (TCP) of the treated planning target volume (PTV60); The Lyman–Kutcher–Burman (LKB) model is used to calculate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the organs at risk (rectal wall, bladder wall and femoral heads). We have elaborated an in-house program RADBIOFOR to calculate TCP and NTCP and use the dose volume histograms (DVH) from the treatment planning system (TPS) as input information. Results: A significant statistical difference was observed for the bladder (P-value=0.045). The statistical analysis for the rectum did not show a difference (P-value= 0.234). Meanwhile, 88% of the cases exhibited slightly lower toxicities with the 7-field compared to the 5-field. Conclusion: The present study recommends using a 7-field IMRT plan since it has proved to predict lower toxicities in the bladder and the rectum wall even though the 5-field predicts minor improvements in the local control in the tumor compared to the 7-field.
Keywords: Prostate cancer, IMRT, fractionation, TCP, NTCP.
Full-Text [PDF 975 kb]   (12 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: Radiation Biology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
International Journal of Radiation Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714