1. Debois M, Oyen R, Maes F, et al. (1999) Thecontribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 45: 857-65. [DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00288-6]

2. Edmund JM and Nyholm T (2017) A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy. Radiation Oncology, 12(28): 1-15. [DOI:10.1186/s13014-016-0747-y]

3. Largent A, Barateau A, Nunes J, et al. (2019) Pseudo-CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy treatment planning: comparison among patch-based, atlas-based, and bulk density methods. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 103(2): 479-490. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.002]

4. Paganelli C, Kipritidis J, Lee D, et al. (2018) Image-based retrospective 4D MRI in external beam radiotherapy: A comparative study with a digital phantom. Medical Physics, 45(7): 3161-3172. [DOI:10.1002/mp.12965]

5. Farjam R, Tyagi N, Veeraraghavan H, et al. (2017) Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy. Medical Physics, 44(7): 3706-3717. [DOI:10.1002/mp.12303]

6. Demol B, Boydev C, Korhonen J, et al. (2016) Dosimetric characterization of MRI-only treatment planning for brain tumors in atlas-based pseudo-CT images generated from standard T1-weighted MR images. Medical Physics, 43(12): 6557. [DOI:10.1118/1.4967480]

7. Brou Boni K, Klein J, Vanquin L, et al. (2020) MR to CT synthesis with multicenter data in the pelvic area using a conditional generative adversarial network. Phys Med Biol, 65(7): 075002. [DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ab7633]

8. Jiang DZ, Dai ZT, Bao ZR et al. (2019) CT value organ and homogeneous assigned methods-based radiation treatment planning of pelvic cavity tumors. International Journal of Radiation Research, 17(4): 667-674.

9. Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V, et al. (2008) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 49(11): 1875-1883. [DOI:10.2967/jnumed.107.049353]

10. Han X (2017) MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Medical Physics, 44(4): 1408-1419. [DOI:10.1002/mp.12155]

11. Nie D, Trullo R, Lian J, et al. (2017) Medical image synthesis with context-aware generative adversarial networks. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention; MICCAI. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 10435: 417-425. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_48]

12. Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA (2017) Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks, pp: 2242-2251. [DOI:10.1109/ICCV.2017.244]

13. Wolterink JM, Dinkla AM, Savenije MHF, et al. (2017) Deep MR to CT synthesis using unpaired data. Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging, p. 14-23. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-68127-6_2]

14. Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang Y, et al. (2019) Evaluation of a deep learning-based pelvic synthetic CT generation technique for MRI-based prostate proton treatment planning. Phys Med Biol, 64(20): 205022. [DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ab41af]

15. Peng Y, Chen S, Qin A, et al. (2020) Magnetic resonance-based synthetic computed tomography images generated using generative adversarial networks for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 150: 217-224. [DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.049]

16. Oulbacha R and Kadoury S (2020) MRI to C-arm spine registration through Pseudo-3D CycleGANs with differentiable histograms. Medical Physics, 47(12): 6319-6333. [DOI:10.1002/mp.14534]

17. Korsholm ME, Waring LW, Edmund JM (2014). A criterion for the reliable use of MRI-only radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol, 9: 16. [DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-9-16]

18. Hsu SH, Han Z, Leeman JE, et al. (2022) Synthetic CT generation for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Front Oncol, 12: 969463. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.969463]

19. Kang SK, An HJ, Jin H, et al. (2021) Synthetic CT generation from weakly paired MR images using cycle-consistent GAN for MR-guided radiotherapy. Biomed Eng Lett, 11(3): 263-271. [DOI:10.1007/s13534-021-00195-8]

20. Arabi H, Dowling JA, Burgos N, et al. (2018) Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI-guided radiation planning in the pelvic region. Med Phys, 45(11): 5218-5233. [DOI:10.1002/mp.13187]

21. Gholamiankhah F, Mostafapour S, Arabi H (2022) Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation from MR images: comparison of generative adversarial and residual neural networks. International Journal of Radiation Research, 20(1): 121-130 [DOI:10.52547/ijrr.20.1.19]

22. Henke LE, Contreras JA, Green OL, et al. (2018) Magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT): a 4.5-year clinical experience. Clin Oncol, 30(11): 720-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.010]

23. Koivula L, Wee L, Korhonen J (2016). Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images. Med Phys, 43(8): 4634. [DOI:10.1118/1.4958677]

24. Maspero M, van den Berg CAT, Landry G, et al. (2017). Feasibility of MR-only proton dose calculations for prostate cancer radiotherapy using a commercial pseudo-CT generation method. Phys Med Biol, 62(24): 9159-9176. [DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aa9677]

25. Hegazy MAA, Cho MH, Cho MH, et al. (2019) U-net based metal segmentation on projection domain for metal artifact reduction in dental CT. Biomed Eng Lett, 9(3): 375-385. [DOI:10.1007/s13534-019-00110-2]

26. Comelli A, Dahiya N, Stefano A, et al. (2020) Deep learning approach for the segmentation of aneurysmal ascending aorta. Biomed Eng Lett, 11(1): 15-24.

27. Bourbonne V, Jaouen V, Hognon C, et al. (2021) Dosimetric validation of a GAN-based pseudo-CT generation for MRI-only stereotactic brain radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel), 13(5): 1082. [DOI:10.3390/cancers13051082]

28. Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, et al. (2025) A comprehensive comparative study of generative adversarial network architectures for synthetic computed tomography generation in the abdomen. Med Phys, 52(8): e18038. [DOI:10.1002/mp.18038]

29. Thwaites D (2013). Accuracy required and achievable in radiotherapy dosimetry: have modern technology and techniques changed our views? Journal of Physics Conference, 444: 012006. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/011001]

30. Wyatt JJ, Pearson RA, Walker CP, et al. (2021). Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol, 17: 71-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.005]